Question is; do you think a porn version of this could become a big thing?



It was only a matter of time before porn was introduced. I'm not that much of a gamer, but I suppose I'd buy it if I had the money to spare.

"Darkness is an odd thing to see. Sometimes, darkness can be scary but not this kind. This was self induced. The sun shone from above onto my neck and head, a spectacular feeling. It just couldn't overpower the feeling of nerves, sexual excitement that I felt. I felt, as I can only put it, like a slut. I'd never felt this way before and i'm not too sure I like it. We shall see. Sure I had done this before but not like this!"

Sometimes, darkness can be scary, but not this kind of self induced darkness. There was the spectacular feeling of the sun shining on my neck and head from above, but it couldn't overpower the feeling of sexual excitement, the nervousness, that I felt. I felt like a slut. It was a feeling I'd never had before, and I wasn't sure that I liked it. I had done this before, but never like this. I'd just have to wait and see.



"Meet me in the Sherwood forest, on the floor, blindfolded. I'll take up your offer." Was a message I received but an hour ago.

How about: An hour ago I received a message, "Meet me in the Sherwood forest, on the floor, blindfolded. I'll take up your offer."

How is that different than fingerprinting? If using a fingerprint database is not considered a random search, why would a DNA database be? As for collecting DNA from those who are not yet convicted, again, if it's ok to do so for fingerprints, why not DNA? Each is a unique signature which identifies you.

As long as the DNA never gets into the hands of American corporations who somehow have the right to patent human DNA, I'm ok with the police collecting it at the same time as finger prints.

That being said, unless you are on a tv series, DNA evidence solves a very limited amount of crimes. Prosecutors are continually frustrated by juries who expect that every case will have some DNA evidence to make it a slam dunk. But it just doesn't happen that way in real life. It works for rape, and maybe some assaults. But not really for much else.

It being OK to use fingerprints of person's is your opinion, and, I suppose most of society and the courts. It isn't my opinion.

I really don't see the big deal.

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." U. S. Constitution.

Taking a DNA test on arrest, according to the dissent, is a violation of the constitutional protection against self incrimination, and taking someone's DNA on arrest seems to me to be ignoring due process. You can't have your house searched without a warrant, and your body is at least as important as your house. If there is sufficient cause to take a person's DNA the arresting officers should be able to get a court order.

When a crime is committed, the police aren't allowed to just search houses at random. They can't just round up people and force them to testify against themselves. Requiring sufficient cause for a warrant is important because it stops the government from just randomly seizing people and searching them or their property.

Precedents are important in court cases. The important thing probably isn't the DNA test, it's the precedent this case will set.

illusion of time
a woman in the tree top
listens to the bird

"A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti." Hannibal Lecter.

The first time I saw that movie it made my skin crawl. He looked so evil and malevolent when he said it.
http://upload.lushstories.com/1349085326-hannibal .gif

According to that source, none. But I don't see how that proves anything substantial. So they all got through: big deal. It was the process of scrutiny that is the main issue now. 90 or so groups targeted, versus 3. Even if it was a 2 to 1 ratio, it would be damning and embarrassing. The current situation is just blatant.

With that in mind, outcome is somewhat immaterial. Aside from that If they've met the requirements, then there shouldn't be an issue with the approval. And if they didn't, then there shouldn't be an issue with the rejection. Then again, it is the IRS...so....

What about the 225 applications that were singled out that weren't from conservative political organizations? Do only liberal and conservative groups count? Ninety groups were conservative, two hundred twenty five were not. Not just conservative groups were asked to justify their tax exempt status.

The IRS reviews every 501(c )(4) application. The narrative of the partisan political IRS conspiracy against conservative groups is false. It is something that never happened. The IRS needed a way to manage the huge number of applications it was getting from political organizations after the Citizens United decision.

This is just more subterfuge to keep our minds off the fact that corporations and special interests are buying the American political system. The fact that corporations are considered people and can freely use their money to influence politics is the real scandal. Like Jeffery Toobin said: " " ... the scandal isn't what's illegal - it's what's legal. It's what society chooses not to punish that tells us most about the prevailing ethical standards of the time."

While groups like Karl Rove's and the Koch brothers continue to manipulate public opinion, pour money into right wing causes, and use their wealth to empower themselves and keep the rest of us from making any impact by flooding the airwaves with right wing propaganda that keeps the public uninformed to the point that they will vote against their own interests, the media distracts us with petty crime.

Just another false flag operation.

Ah..well, if their own spokesperson says so, then it must be true. I don't know anything about Evolve America, or any of the 90-odd conservative/libertarian groups that were targed, for that matter. I do agree that anyone that doesn't meet the parameters for a desired tax status shoudn't be approved for it, but the IRS is a grease fire when it comes to credibility either way. A 90-3 ratio of political scrutiny will never look balanced and apolitical, even if 1 of those 3 got their status denied.

I was responding to a previous post that said no liberal groups were targeted. "No," means none. Zero. Liberal groups were targeted. Which conservative group was denied funding?

Secondly, if your position is based on the fact that the Tea Party is a political org. Then please let me know how you feel that no liberal organizations were targeted? Or do you believe that no liberal organization antwhere gets that exemption?



It's a false assumption that no liberal or progressive groups were targeted. Democratic groups received the same letter as the conservative groups.

“It is also important to understand that the group of centralized cases included organizations of all political views,” the IRS said in its statement.

Emerge America, a progressive group had it's tax exempt status denied. Which of the Republican groups have said that their requests were denied?

her eyes on green wave
vultures waiting for the rust
blue feathers, hidden

On Valentine's Day he brought me two dozen roses, one for each year of my life, a bottle of Cabernet, the same 2001 Beringer that he had brought when I fixed him dinner the first time, a box of hand made chocolates that he had driven to Gatlinburg to buy from from the candy store where we had brought chocolates on our first weekend away together, and a beautiful leather paddle with a pink...

Added 13 Feb 2013 | Category Love Stories | Votes 15 | Avg Score 4.87 | Views 1,585 | 12 Comments

p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; } Neal Cannon always seemed to be looking at me lustfully. He never said anything that might be construed as remotely sexual, but his look always made me feel like he was thinking about dragging me off somewhere and ravishing me. I'd seen that look in other men's eyes on many occasions, and it always meant that I was either going to fuck or fight off their...

Added 12 Sep 2012 | Category Reluctance | Votes 14 | Avg Score 4.86 | Views 5,953 | 5 Comments

 I heard the door closing as Neal led out of the living room and toward the stairway that led to the bedroom. When we got to the stairs, he let go of my hand and told me to go up first. I walked ahead of him, holding onto the rail. It was very well polished and I wondered how it would feel to slide down it naked. “ You have a beautiful ass,” Neal said. “ Thank you,” I said. “You wife...

Added 13 Sep 2012 | Category Reluctance | Votes 10 | Avg Score 4.8 | Views 7,023 | 3 Comments

Alone on the tiny dance floor, Kristen Fowler's hips swayed slowly in rhythm to the slow blues the band was playing. Her long tanned legs and flowing blond hair moved like wind and water. The guitar solo sent chills into her soul, reminding her of Jimmy, the way his fingers would dance on the fretboard and on her skin. Jimmy played better lead than this guy, but there was no denying that the...

Added 08 Feb 2012 | Category Quickie Sex | Votes 15 | Avg Score 4.6 | Views 3,336 | 8 Comments

Sterling smacked my ass, spun me around and pushed me against the wall. “I'm going to fuck you standing up,” he said. “Right here and now.” “You're getting married to my sister,” I said. “So I'm going to have to say no.” “I'm going to fuck you,” he said. “Sooner or later.” His lips moved toward mine and I found myself puckering up to meet them. He tasted of whiskey and apples with...

Added 24 Nov 2011 | Category Taboo | Votes 56 | Avg Score 4.73 | Views 14,522 | 17 Comments

I was bent over Andre Beasley's desk, my panties hanging on one ankle, my slacks off, holding onto the edge and moaning with pleasure as Bernie Graham's stiff throbbing cock drove deeply in and out of me. We were working late for the third time that week, and with the weekend coming up and no excuse to get away from our spouses we were making the most of Friday afternoon. Getting that...

Added 15 Aug 2011 | Category Anal | Votes 17 | Avg Score 4.76 | Views 11,721 | 7 Comments

My parents have a library. I was a very lucky girl growing up, not because of the collection of classics that they had in leather bound editions, or even the enormous number of new books that they seemed to add constantly from visits to the book store or from various book clubs that they belonged to. I liked a lot of those, but my favorite books in their collection weren't actually on the...

Added 28 Jul 2011 | Category Straight Sex | Votes 10 | Avg Score 4.8 | Views 4,486 | 7 Comments

A girl has to set some rules for herself. One of my rules is to never go to his place the first time. I used to have a rule that I never put out on a first date, but after violating it for the umpteenth time I decided to drop that one. I feel much safer in my own apartment though. Not that nothing could go wrong there, of course, but my neighbors are pretty nosy so I think they'd probably...

Added 03 Jul 2011 | Category Straight Sex | Votes 21 | Avg Score 4.95 | Views 5,755 | 13 Comments