If she is up for it, why not?

I would have to agree with you, I have nothing against male authors and I have read a few great stories from some, but quite a few male authored stories tend to be quick and to the point; whereas more female authors tend to elaborate and be more specific about their stories, leading to better immersion. Although I have read plenty of stories from female authors that are short and to the point as well, not that there is anything wrong with that, but I do find the longer and more detailed stories to be a better read.

I suggest you read some of Jaymal's stories. He is a male author and has written some of the most erotic stories I have ever read.

I am a big fan of pure coconut butter. My wife and I both prefer it over all the others we have tried. It's the only one she will use to help me play with her asshole.

My experience with lube is limited but I'm going to have to go with coconut butter too. You can cook with it, it's great for your hair, and fun as well!

This Korean war would be fought with F/A-18, nuclear missiles, and aircraft carriers. I doubt that troops would be used. If Mr. Kim overruns the DMZ, his reign will end with bombs (conventional) on his capital. If Mr. Kim decides to use nuclear weapons, his country will end in ruin. Highwayman is right, the Chinese will not do anything, unless Mr. Kim directly threatens China.

China will follow what we tell them. We owe them too much money. That is the funny thing about borrowing money from a country. China owns too many treasuries, if we are disabled and not able to pay them interest, China will suffer. In addition, China relies on the US for jobs and money. China exports their products to the US; they have to have a viable market to make money. US suffers, China suffers.

Actually I do not believe your statement about a war with North Korea being fought with F/A-18, Nuclear Armaments, and Aircraft carries to be correct. The reason for this because of NK own nuclear arms. Crude though they may be, nuclear technology is still desired for the legitimacy it give to nations that posses it (reference Iran), and it's (obvious) destructive/lethal capabilities.

The army even had a military wargame about the fall of NK:

can't post link, google " Business Insider The US Army Is Planning For A Failed Nuclear State In North Korea" and you should see it if interested.


The article basically goes on to explain that we would be rushing into NK to do our best to secure said nuclear armaments before they fell into the hands of someone opposing US interests.

The Article also mentions the problem, that because of it's almost unique isolationism from the rest of the world, we don't have the intel on the terrain and other obstacles to initiate another shockingly fast rush to Baghdad type scenario. This leaves the estimated 90,000 troops referred to in the article (take all these estimations as conservative, as "most plans don't survive the first shot"), having to cover unfamiliar terrain with little intel and unknown obstacles in the way.

What the article doesn't mention at all is our invading China's sphere of influence. China is increasingly adopting a similar policy as the US in trying to extend it's influence throughout the Asia-Pacific. I do not expect China to just wave us in and say "hey do whatever you want, we're cool with it". They are now a superpower, and have a reputation to maintain that would surely suffer if they allowed US just waltzed into their backyard and mess with their neighbor whom they have previously supported.

And though it would be nice for US foreign interests if they just gave because they are the #1 holder of US debt, their economy is hardly dependent upon the US paying back all it owes. China's economy is well funded by their inclination to steal patent technology, adapt it, and re-sell said technology for a more competitive price. And though that is no corner stone to hold up their economy in the case of US default, their business with Europe and the rest of the world, leaves them less dependent upon US debt than many realize.


Though hopefully this is all theoretical. NK is like many Asiatic countries in that age is a large contributing factor in power and credibility. Being only 28 years old and recently ascended to his "throne", it is more than likely that Kim Jong Un's chest beating and seemingly infantile and nonsensical theatrics are nothing more than his way of retaining the support of his military cohorts. He needs some way to impress upon them that he is not just some young child too naive to hold his position, or else risk losing the military's support and thus his reign. So he yells and screams, making a lot of noise, but hopefully it shouldn't amount to much.

And for the sake of US domestic interests, I sincerely hope NK does not fall (at least as predicted above) because the US can simply not afford another nation building effort almost solely backed by the US government and its taxpayers.

And @Tranquil: I find it unlikely that if missiles were sent in New Zealand's direction, that the US would just stand by. If not for the philanthropic reasons that would be preached by politicians and news outlet (however justified), then for the simple fact that the US would not allow NK to attain a "new found level of respect/legitimacy" without serious repercussions and retaliation for its hostile actions. A perceived strong/capable North Korea would hinder US interests in the region and the administrations globalist policies as a whole.

Ronda Rousey is a fun fighter to watch (that and she is damn sexy). And it's good that she is the poster child for WMMA because of the growth she inspires, allowing other women who wish to fight to have the opportunity.

As for Fallon Fox, I'm just reiterating what many of already mentioned; she grew as a man and thus has innate advantages that come with growing up with that level of testosterone.

So no, Fox shouldn't be fighting other women (though I feel for her because then she won't have anyone to fight thus potentially losing her passion).

I've never met a guy in real life that I find attractive, but if I'm being honest, the thought doesn't completely turn me off either if thinking about someone who is extremely attractive... so a 1? Maybe?

Romantically = 0

It's unfortunate that you have had experiences that have you asking such a question, but we are human just like you. We run the full gambit of personalities and experiences, and I would hardly judge all women by the actions of a few.

I would have to choose Crossfit because of its variety. Plus the mental challenges and never ending room for improvement make it extremely satisfying (and the community is fun and supportive as well).

im surprised that both guys and girls, for the most part, all said that want to cuddle.

Just because we enjoy cooking all our food in bacon grease, driving cars that are as far from the color green as you can get, and wrestling grizzly bears in our spare time; doesn't mean we can't enjoy the sensual moments as well from time to time ; )

I'm not on here to troll for "date/pics/online action", and if you're that broadly dismissive I most likely won't relate intellectually anyways. So it's kind of like a profile filter ; )

Though that might not be so typical... so I can somewhat understand why some women might be tired of constantly being messaged over some picture on their profile (though I do agree that people who are most likely to message random women aren't going to be so deterred by that posted statement).