Forum posts made by elitfromnorth

Hmmm, it's difficult. Maybe a kiss first and then piss? Sort of like the Mafia "Kiss of Death", with a little twist, so it's the "Kiss of Piss"?

So the European Football Championship is rolling. So have they splitted the rights between three different channels. Which is a pain because two of the channels have more crappy commercials than there are cunty people in the home stand at white heart lane. And not to mention that the commentators are more shitty than a bag of dogpoo. The obvious statements they make are wrong. How the fuck can you be wrong at something that's obvious? It's like saying that decaf coffee contains more caffeine than a caffeine tablet. I could do a better job than these ignorant cunts.

And then they have analasys that really doesn't do anything. It's 4 minutes of jibber jabber before they squeeze in another 5 minutes of cunty commercials. This is why I prefer the national channel. At least they aren't ignorant and annoying cunts.

Actually that is not quite truth. What you are saying is fact for ancient Greece, specifically for Aten's polis, where everyone (at that time only adult men, with permanent residence in Atens) got a vote on all issues- decisions were made on the spot (square, in the middle of the city-polis), and they closed the case and moved to next issue. Ancient Greece is beginning of democracy we know today .
In modern democracy and in the countries organized as republic, we have someone who is representing us, difference is that in democratic system minority cannot overrule majority, which is the case for republic system.

Didn't have time to search online for sources, but here is one

http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm
http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html

Sorry, but that's wrong. The Greek democracy meant that everyone eligeble to vote voted on every matter that the state had to make decisions on. In the modern day we have representative democracy; we elect a few people based on who gets the majority of the votes gets to take part in the decision making. Your average man on the street doesn't approve laws and budgets, but they choose who get to make those decision. The oldest form of the modern democracy you'll find starting up in around 800 AD in Scandinavia(maybe even before, but there's a lack of written sources on this). There every village agreed on a few members to represent the village in the "ting", which was pretty much the modern parliment or city council. The oldest continous democracy can be found on Iceland, where they have their parliment right next to the place where the original Ting was placed over a thousand years ago.

In what situation do you think average joe had a better chance to voice his opinion; 8000 people gathered at the same place all trying to speak at once(and thus the person with the loudest voice or most supporters gets to hold the floor) or the village meet and debate before sending their representatives off to the Ting?

Here endeth the lesson.

Fun fact; There are several Norwegians who move to Costa Del Sol(The Sunshine Coast) in Spain, either to retire or just because they want a warmer climate. A couple of years ago the party leader of the Norwegian party that's furthest to the right in politics here(that's worth mentioning) made a speech where he said something along these lines:
"Immigrants in Norway should learn Norwegian to handle the job market better. Likewise people in Spain where there are large concentrations of Norwegians should learn Norwegian to communicate with the Norwegians there better."

This is the type of double standard that you'd often find with these people. They're the same people that will go somewhere as tourists and then bitch and complain when every local person isn't fluent in English. It's fucking ridicilous and hypocritical. They don't want a well integrated society. They want what's the most convinient for them.

I'm a smoker. I've tried quitting once, lasted about a month or so before crumbling. Have a hope to try again sometime soon, simply because it's way too bloody expensive. But most of it is taxes here, probably more tax than you have in Canada. So once I've payed for my bag of tobacco I'd like to be able to sit outside and enjoy my smoke. People bitch about me not taking care of myself and that I will eventually cost the health care system a lot of money. I'm not denying that, but it's rather ludicrous that the same people who makes these claims are the ones spending more time chewing down burgers and chocolate than dragging their fat ass out of the couch and just taking a walk. Later today I'm gonna head to my uncle and do some good old farm labour that's pretty much a full body work out. I'm gonna be doing this for several hours, a type of work that would tire out most health freaks.

I'll admit that I'm a health risk to myself and maybe nearby children if I blow the smoke straight at their face when outside, but I'm no bigger risk to a kid in a city park than the cars running on petrol and diesel all around, spewing out Nox gasses and all the other crap. I don't think I'm that big of a risk as everyone make it out to be. Why? Because the biggest health risk to people today isn't the smoking, but the lack of activity. The number of smokers that will intentionally blow the smoke in other people's faces is so small that it's not really mentionable.

And if we're talking about making it difficult for other people to breathe indoors, then why are no one reacting to people who shower themselves with perfume/cologne? There are several people with asthma who reacts and can have troubles breathing if the person next to them uses perfume and so forth excessively, but who here will walk up to the smellycat and go "Hey, your excessive use of perfume are causing other people trouble." Of course we wouldn't, because that's rude. But it's not rude to walk up to a smoker and go "that's unhealthy you know". Smokers have become the group that it's pretty much accepted and legal to bully.

Oh I'd tease her good. Real good. And after that... well, let's just say I hope the neighbours are gone

Did a quick search and couldn't find it, so I'm posting a new one. What's the one thing your partner can't be without. I'm not thinking sexual, I'm thinking relaitonship wise, as in the man/woman you marry and grow old with. It can be anything, either it's personality or looks. Humour, cute smile, smelly toes, a nose without boogers etc. What's the one thing you can't be without in a relationship, if you were to pick just one thing. And feel free to explain why if you want.

It pretty much invites for a kiss, doesn't it?

Sadly it very often comes down to the individual headmaster. I understand why in many cases a headmaster would want to sweep it under the carpet, because if he/she did anything about it then you're causing a shitstorm. Today it would be parents of the bully going to the media and telling how the school was accusing their cute little kid who never hurt a fly of something as horrible as bullying. They'd refuse to believe that their little brat is on a level of cuntiness that is hard to understand. You also have to problem of who to believe. It's usually just down to he said she said and 99% of the times classmates won't say anything, because they don't wanna be a snitch, thus lose respect amongst the other kids. It's hard, really hard from a teacher's point of view if they want to do something about it but there are no witnesses. Then the teachers have to ask themselves "Is this student capable of being such a massive cunt?"(and yes, kids that systematically bully other kids and make their life a living hell deserve to be called nothing less than cunts).

But that said, what I mentioned above is no excuse for not dealing with it. Some headmaster's got the balls to go through with it and weather the storm, others don't and decide to ignore the problem or not even admit that there is a problem. It's not uncommon in society. You see it at the workplace not only with bullying but also sexual harassment. And very often it is hard to spot it. Teachers have 28 kids in their class, can't be everywhere at once and when it happens to and from school they're not able to see it. Not to mention texts, facebook, msn and all that. Also like I mentioned earlier, how far does the school's jurisdiction go?

We need to respect property rights as absolute.

Absolute? As in once you've bought it's yours and no one can take it away from you even if it's for the greater good? What about placement of schools, roads, officebuildings and other things that will help the city/area prosper? What if I live in a neighbourhood with run down ugly ass houses that are just fuck ugly and pollute and basically just a cyste on the local community. Should the city not be allowed to take that area and turn it into much needed appartment buildings and so forth? What about expanding cities? Should a grumpy landowner halt construction because that particular area is something he doesn't want to sell? That would be devastating in my area, because the need for new houses and appartments are skyrocketing. Yes, it is sad to see some areas disappear, but guess what; unless we start implementing closed borders and copying China's one kid policy then cities will grow, more houses will be needed and land is required to build the housing and stores and workplaces that keeps a community going.

Hmmm, maybe "I told you guys I wasn't feeling well!!!", although Mazza's is a good one. Good thing my comp is fingerprint protected. They'd have to really want to know what I had here if they took the laptop to my dead body...

One major problem at least now that texts and internet has become part of the bullying is how far the school is legally capable of going. It's not uncommon that all of the bullying happens away from school. So what can the school do? Their hands are very often tied as long as the political authorities says that any bullying that happens between two people going to the same school can also be dealt with by the school in form of detention, suspension, new school etc.

Over here pupils are protected by the work enviroment law, that says that it is illegal to bully your fellow pupils and the school have to give a safe working environment for their pupils. Whenever the bullying happens on the school they have no problem doing it(as long as they're aware of it, which can be difficult especially with girls). But what when the bullying is outside of school. Yes, the pupil is afraid of going to school and all that, but very often the school gets hammered down with "It's outside of school. You can't do anything. It's up to the parents." And we all know how resolute parents can be with their children...

Schools needs to be given absolute power to handle whatever students do to each other, even outside school. Then they would have no excuse not to deal with it. Add that they should lower the bar for expelling pupils and sending them off to other schools. It could work as a deterrent if the bully is pulled into the principal's office and told "Last chance. Do it again and you're off to another school. Behave or lose all your friends and start over." Maybe even report threats and physical violence to the police and that the police are actually willing to deal with it.

Nope I don't think its superior, I asked if it was just. I work 50-70 hours a week, at two jobs to get by. That will change yes, but for now its what I have to do. My question was is it just that I have to work that hard, so that my hard earned money goes to supporting criminals?

That's the difference between you and the person in serving a life sentence. It can change, and in many cases it will. But the person serving his life sentence have no chance of change. That life will become a routine. The system will tell him what he can and can't do, when to eat, when to sleep, when to excercise. There are several people that have served long prison sentences that struggle to live a normal life. Not because they can't get a job and all that, but because they have been institutionalised. They're used to having someone tell them when to do this and that that the freedom of choice makes them insane.

And then you have those that are put in solitary. Imagine spending 23 hours of the day in a small cell, one hour of air every day, and the only human contact you have with the outside world is with the guards who probably doesn't like you because you've been doing bad stuff. I think that's a punishment much much worse than death. Death is quick and easy. Being locked in isn't.

I'm against the death penalty, simply because it's not a penalty, it's revenge. You don't punish someone by killing them, you satisfy your own need for revenge and bloodthirst. And no, death penalty doesn't work as a deterrant. If it did, countries with death penalty wouldn't have a such a high crime rate as they do. Look at the US. The country in the West with the highest guncrime rate. That also include murders. How can you say it works as a deterrent when every day there are people commiting crimes that's worthy of the death penalty?

And insane that you pay both sides of the fight? That all depends on what kind of system you want. If you want the system where every person has a right to a fair trial, then that also includes appeals and so forth. If you want the justice system to work in a way that you pay for your own lawyer, then you're gonna end up with poor people having no chance of winning a case while the rich are more likely to get off completely or at least they'll be capable of prolonging the execution or reducing the sentence. How is that "Just"? You can say that "Oh then they shouldn't have commited the crime", but what about all the innocent people that are put on trial? How is it just for them that they have done nothing wrong, yet they are put on trial and they can't have someone representing them because they don't have the money for it.

Watching it live at the stadium it's what you make it out to be. If you've decided already that you can't be bothered to be a bit interested in it then it's gonna be boring as hell no matter what you do, whether it's football, sissy rugby(american football) or tennis.

Fun things to do at a football match if the game isn't all that exciting

1. Listen to the insults. The chants and songs at footballmatches is where I've learned some of my best insults, and also I learned how to insult people in a more singing matter.
2. Get out some aggression. Usually you can start giving the referee abuse when he makes a decision you don't totally agree with(i.e. it's against your team/whatever team you're sitting amongst). Standing up and screaming "The referee's a wanker" or any similar abuse is totally accepted. Try to charge all your hatred for one person(like an ex) into the chant.
3. Get drunk. Although most stadiums doesn't allow alcohol into the stands, they usually sell it inside. Go in, get drunk.

I'm sure you guys can come up with other things to do as well.

But other than that, football is a fucking awesome sport, especially at the stadiums. My advice if you're going to see one is get tickets with the away supporters. They're usually the hard core of the supporters and are more lively than the big bunch of home supporters(a few exceptions apply) But whatever you do, don't go to a football match in Norway.

Barack/Michelle. He can order all kinds of stuff under the name of some of his Secret Service agents, so he can get into some really kinky shit. If Mitt does the same press will be over him.

Siesta

Norway

And I'm following all of you. We could have a slumberparty on twitter now

I'm your first follower. :)

Since you're my first follower I won't give you abuse there well, not too much anyway

You could probably argue against I.G. Farben and the companies that used slave labour, but it would be retarded to boycot VW and Fanta just because they were made during Hitler's reign. VW stands for Volks Wagen, or People Wagon in English. It wasn't meant to be a transport for Jews to the concentrationcamps. Besides, the workers, administration and management in all these companies have been swapped out since WWII. Are you gonna keep going on the good old "Sins of our fathers" road and not seperate the past from the present? If so, then you should start doing some research in the Concentrationcamps the US had set up for the Japanese during WWII. Have a boycot on the companies that supplied the timber and construction work for those camps.

Or maybe you as an Aussie should check out the companies that did all the shitty stuff that happened to the Aboriginals? If we're gonna keep holding the past against the people who had pretty much nothing to do with it then we're gonna end up with a resentful fucked up world. If nothing else then you should at least stop purchasing stuff that has "Made in China" on them.

Got myself a cute little twatter account. elitfromnorth. Imaginative, ain't it. Dunno what I'm gonna use it as. Could work as a helpdesk as well. Hit me up.

Maybe I did not have the right person on the other end to make if feel enjoyable, although, she definitely know what she was doing. But it sure did not get me off and it just did not feel real to me.

Having the right person on the other end is essential. It doesn't have to be someone you love or care deeply about, but you just need to connect with the person. The good old cliche about chemistry. She can be awesome at cyber and it's all "meh", and she can be mediocre at cyber and it will feel awesome, simply because you two click together. It's a gamble, but I know that if I was to be discouraged by my first then I'd never touch cybersex again =P

Cybersex can be great if you're in position where you don't feel like browsing through porn but just want a more interactive story. If the person you cyber with is crap at it, then it's gonna be more pleasurable to have a large wooden pole shoved up your urethra. But, if you're lucky enough to find someone that you're good and you connect with then it can be quite a turn on. Of course it's not the same as going on cam or just using the microphone, but if you're say in a long distance relationship and you wanna add a little extra to the rather meager sex life you have when all you can do is "just" put on a show.

I also find it's a way to figure out new turn ons. Maybe the person I'm cybering with has a few neat tricks that I haven't thought about that I'd like to have done with me and so forth. If both people are good at it then it can be really hot, but like with anything in sex; it's not for everyone.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/025/393/633502042425783160-what-has-been-seen.jpg

This is true, and given that they derive from the same original faith, it makes sense that a lot of the antiquated hate stuff is the same or similar. The difference is that Christians, except for small cult pockets, aren't doing these things anymore, especially not while running entire nations. Yes, I understand the narrative about powerful people doing what powerful people do, and using religion to hold everyone down, but if all the ruthless, barbaric actions they take are done in the professed name of Islam, then it seems we're going to great pains to extricate religion from culture, when the perpetrators themselves, as well as their willing followers, see them as one in the same.

So what about the witch burnings, crusades and all the shit that Christians have done up throughout history. Is that down to Christianity and the Bible, or is it the people behind it that have used the religion as an excuse to commit te deeds that are to be blamed? Remember that the Qu'uran isn't the only holy scripture you'll find in Islam. There are different directions that hold other scriptures just as holy and valid, while there are other directions that says it's all and only the Qu'uran that is the true book.

Personally for me the difference between culture and religion is largely that "culture" is something that people do or have in common despite beliefs. E.g. arranged marriages becomes a cultural thing because it's not exclusive to Islam, but you'll find it in any many other religions as well. Same way believing in the ressurection of Jesus becomes a Christian thing, because once you believe that Jesus rose from the dead you're Christian. I dunno if you would agree or disagree with that, Nudiepants, but that's my take on it.

All the bad things that Muslims are beaten up for isn't exclusive to their religion. Honour killings, missionaries, violences, opression of women and all that can be found on a large scale in other religions as well. If you read through the Old Testament then it's not exactly a pleasant reading from a female point of view, so if we're gonna interpret that then all the sandwich and kitchen jokes will be a reality. That's a cultural thing, so yes, it is fully possible to remove the religious aspect from a Muslim and view it as a completely cultural thing.

Time to throw in a torch into the think thank.

Many of the far righters have been looking at the increase of immigration from mainly Muslim countries with worry. Their idea is that we will in the end have a full scale war between Christians and Muslims and that Europe will be the battlefield. This theory is shared by amongst others Breivik, the man who commited the 22nd of July attacks/massacre.

There is a more moderate view, saying that there will be a clash between Christianity and Islam, but it will be a more cultural and political one, not a full scale war that some believe.

Shout out your views, my friends.

Shaved or maybe a strip to "guide the way", but that's because I like kissing around and not just the pussy itself. If I wanna kiss hair I'll kiss her on the head.

and have little ribbons, like The Below the Belt Award and Most Drunken Rant award and Most Likely to Alienate the Girls award. :)

We need an announcer. Someone to shout out who's fighting.

"In the red corner, having over 2 years of lush drama under his belt, ready to dance around. It's the mean lean Puss in Boots. Give it up for Magical FEEEEELIX!

And in the blue corner, also with plenty of experience from both the chatrooms and the forums. It's the woman behind the desk, with her heels in your face. Personalassistaaaaaaant!"

Something along those lines.

we need to have a Lush Fight Club or something.

Have an own forum section for it where they attack each other with emotes and different smileys. The level of seriousness would be the same as it is now. We could give points and abilities to the different smileys. And have commentators

This thread is destructive for me for several reasons.

1) I'm losing faith in humanity, quickly. And it's obvious that Social Darwinism is no longer in function, since it's the idiots who breed...
2) I keep getting reminded that people dumber than me are getting laid, while I'm not getting any. Disappointing.


But if you're capable of reading what everyone else in here has said, go buy a fucking pregnancy test. You're 19. If you can sneak away from your mother long enough to have sex with your boyfriend(unless you're into stuff that's not allowed to discuss on this site other than in the verified stories), you can sneak away from your mother to go buy a bloody piss stick.

And if the saying is true, that intelligence skips a generation, I hope you are pregnant and that you have the kid. Fuck, have more, because you're gonna have a bunch of brainiacs....