Forum posts made by elitfromnorth

Guess what blizz! your level of customer support has reached another low. God knows how much money I've spent on your games, and sure they have been entertaining, but considering how much money I've stuck in your account you treat me with such retardation that I'm beginning to wonder if it's a bunch of monkeys that are sitting there and typing out the replies. I bet people working at McDonald's have more intellect than your monkeys. "You have a problem? Let me tell you to try something you've already tried before and that you told me that you had tried before, however I'm going to ignore all of it and just tell you to try the same thing again because I'm a massively cunty idiot."

Certain things are not mutuall exclusive in this. I'm quite sure that somewhere between 20-60%(that's 1-3% of all) fit in either obese/overweight, african american etc classes. I'm quite sure that there are several bi black women and lesbians too. Probably a few obese women that are too busy with their careers and/or are out of the dating game due to bad experiences. So I doubt there's just one woman left for you. Your interpretation of the statisics is quite ludicrous.

The one from LELO was great:

Dear Nicola,

In less than 1 minute the world’s first and only luxury DIY sex toy can be put together, and it’s sure to take the meaning of do-it-yourself pleasure to a whole new level!

Coinciding with LELO’s 10th anniversary, the brand’s new Pleasure Object, GӒSM, is the world’s first IKEA-style vibrator that is recharged by manual hand-crank technology. 100% eco-friendly, fully-waterproof, and ultra-powerful with 10 speeds, the GӒSM personal massager can be assembled by customer’s in the privacy and comfort of their own home.

And just as Swedish brand IKEA revolutionized the furniture industry with its innovative DIY products, LELO has tapped into its Swedish roots and applied the same creativity and expertise to create its very own DIY Pleasure Object.

Here a few of the many reasons why GӒSM will revolutionize the industry:

- 100% eco-friendly
Crafted from 100% recycled materials, its frame is made of durable compressed wood pulp, and a silky-smooth sheathe made entirely of re-purposed rubber.

- Manual hand-crank rechargeable battery
The long-lasting battery integrates manual, rotation, hand-crank technology (Allen key included) for 100% environmental-friendly recharging

- Revolutionary presentation for lower costs
GӒSM’s DIY assembly makes possible LELO’s new flat-pack boxes – traditionally use for self-assemble furniture – passing the packaging and shipping costs saved directly to consumers.

- Easy-to-assemble
GӒSM can be put together in as little as 1 minute, according to consumer testing respondents who claimed they are “not very good” at completing puzzles.


GӒSM is only available through April 1st, so if you would like more information please feel free to get in touch. Hope all is well, and I look forward to hearing back from you soon.

I'm enjoying the irony that you'll end up with a sex toy that lacks a few screws to be complete and functional....

I would ban dirty martini for a day because he haven't given me a martini yet. Yes, I have a low threshold for these things.

Also, himla gao spaok fyr denna maunen!

I read that one county were only going to do this against people who had the funds to pay for their stay.

On one side it's not all that bad of an idea. Let the Lindsay Lohans and other rich people who can afford it pay for their prison sentence so that the tax payers don't have to pay for it. If it was for everyone then those without means would end up with lots of debt and all that follows. E.g. serving a five year sentence for something like burglary would end up costing you 91 K given that it's 50 bucks a day. Problem is that only the richest will hav ethe money for this, and sadly many of the rich don't get caught. Apart from the 10 day type prison sentences very few will afford to pay, simply because they won't have any form of income. They could take possession of the property, but what's the point of a 10 year prison sentence if they're gonna be homeless afterwards? Then you'll have repeat offenders because they can't get a job and have to do crimes to survive. To some degree it's counter productive.

Although my main question is if it's actually legal. It's a double punishment that is added outside of court. Just waiting for some filthy rich guy to bring this practice to court.

Perverts

Are we talking you have to pay 50 bucks a day after you've gotten your 10 year sentence or is this if they've thrown you in for the night because you're way too drunk and they're letting you sleep it off in a cell?

I would like to remind everyone that you still have to abide by the rules. Mentioning underage in this thread, whether it was you who were underage or someone else involved, like you were watching them or could have been spotted by them is NOT ALLOWED! Please refrain from making such comments or you may very well find yourself on the recieving end of a formal warning.

http://www.guineapigcages.com/forum/attachments/kitchen/36351d1352046046-issue-i-have-been-meaning-address-kelso-burn.jpg

these public sex offenders registries are in my view ridicilous, but maybe that's because I have a different view on prison than many others. To me prison is all about rehabilitation and also that when you have done your time, you're done. Sure, you shouldn't be allowed to work in certain professions depending on your crime, i.e. people arrested for child molesting shouldn't be allowed to work with children, but they way they tend to get hounded down and harassed by people is typical vigilante thing that modern society can do without. This goes especially since there are rape convictions that are dubious at best, i.e. the girl was drunk and tagged along, but guy still gets convicted because she regrets it and spins a story.

You shouldn't have to register. I think it's ludicrious. If you have a job where there's no risk of being a repeat offender, then let the person live their life in peace.

Fucking with Iceland is a bad idea. Iceland is a member of NATO and in the event of an attack they'll just call paragraph 5 and suddenly you have all of NATO bombing the shit out of North Korea as well as South Korea joining in. No matter who North Korea attacks, South Korea will join in, because it's in their own interest to strike an aggressive North down. Even if China attacks you might risk an invasion from the South. They're geniuinly afraid a fuse will blow in Kim Il's head and even if their nukes are unrealiable, a nuclear attack on SK soil will be devestating.

Umm, yeah.

read more..LOL. It snows in Greece too. Now back to the actual topic, and not climates.

I really hope this isn't a map that shows where there's jungle, because if it is, then there's jungle where I live, and I can guarantee you that there is no jungle here... AT ALL. Not even remotely. North Korea in terrain and climate is more similar to Afghanistan than Vietnam.

If that's the case, why is it that the only weapons used to carry out the deadliest mass killing of civilians ever undertaken on American soil were box cutters? And the only weapons used in the second and third deadliest we're homemade bombs?

Because those aren't crimes of opportunity or planned events with easily obtainable materials. Why are there so few bombing incidents? Because it's difficult to get it right if you want a large death toll and you have to do a lot of heavy planning if you're gonna go thorugh with a hijacking of a plane or building a large bomb. Usually the shooting sprees are grabbing a gun they have in the closet or pop down to the local shop and buy it like it's a carton of milk and then go out shooting.

Also, you dragging in acts of terrorism in this debate shows that you struggle to come up with reasonable arguments for your view.

I want an Abrams tank! When the fuck's the next gun show coming to town?

Screw the Abrams tank. Get a British Challenger II or a Leopard II. The British Challenger II had a better kill to death ratio against other tanks in Iraq than the Abrams and the Leopard II simply because the Germans make it. No offence to American quality, but Germans are far superior when it comes to producing reliable mechanical equipment.

Actually, the problem I had with the podcast was on my computer, which I was using to access my college's Wi-Fi, and I couldn't find anyone to talk to about it. I realize this is their network, but it is my system. I think part of the concern is the fact that some of these computers and networks are ours as taxpayers. (Public libraries, public universities, etc.) I can understand if a privately-funded entity wants to block their computers from accessing certain sites; that is their decision.?

First, the system thing; some network admins shut you down is because you might be having programs that are affiliated with malware or any other kind of non-happy programs. Basically, they do that to protect the rest of the computers that are part of the network. Or maybe you had a torrent client running and they shut you down because of that.

Which leads me to the second part; do you really think it's ok that your and other people's tax money are spent on people browsing for porn and downloading programs/music/movies etc.

Why should they not put these softwares in? It's not YOUR computer, you're just allowed to borrow it. It's not your network and so forth, and usually the universities either set the blocked sites on their own list(I can acess Lush on my Uni network) or you can get certain sites removed. It's not your computer so it's not your god given right to choose what sites you should go to. Sorry, but you're not getting any sympathy from me on this one. If the programs are shite then sure, let them be changed, but I don't think you have the right to complain about them making sure you don't spend your time at school surfing for porn.

I would say it's the Sunk Costs Fallacy. People have already spend years investing so much into their religion. If it's not true, that's all wasted, and people would rather keep pumping resources in, hoping it'll be true, then admit it's false, cut their losses, and start a new, more produce, life.

See what you did there? This is very typical from atheists that they raise above people with faith, speak of themselves as the enlightened ones and better people. In my experience the tension when it comes to people of different faith it's usually instigated by atheists. Like Clum said, I've had no problems with religious discussions with people who share my faith nor people who have different faith from me. It's more the atheists that act condencending and do what they can to subtly insulting the one with faith. They usually prove to be just as tolerant as the radical ones yelling that unbelievers will burn in hell. I like calling them "atheistic jihadist"

We could be doing DNA tests and have it going all like on Maury! Some slut comes in testing her 11th man for paternity and Gav goes "You're NOT the father!" and then everybody starts going "DAMN! SHe's a slut!" then she posts a lot of before she leaves the chatroom and whoever is the "host" has to start blackboxing her and copypasting all of the blackboxes into the chatroom. Then we put it on youtube!

Have they been married yet? Nic, you should make a couple of people be "Lush Priests" and we can legally cyber-marry people. Then you can hand out another badge. "Lush-Married". Then people open up private rooms like "The Church", "The maternity room" and also "Divorce court".

The reasons for obesity can be a shitload of different ones, as Trinket noted above. A certain type of medication may suddenly cause you to start eating a whole lot more, believe me I've been there. And saying that it all can be solved by diet and excercise is bullocks. If you've been fat for a long time then your body has suddenly decided to change it's standard settings of weight and bodyfat to being obese. That means that if you try to work it off through the whole diet and excercise thing it's a good chance it won't work. End result is that they either need the surgery or they need one of those "Biggest Loser" type of excercise regimes, and how many can afford that?

What's equally disturbing is that in many cases, especially for families, you'll find that the less healthy groceries are cheaper than the more healthy ones. In the current economic climate where many people have to tighten the belt a bit, the less healthy one suddenly becomes a choice of necessity, not what they want.

So next time you chew your carrot and decide to judge anyone that you think isn't as worthy as you, smack yourself in the face for me and try to understand that the world isn't black and white. That it isn't as easy as you'd like it to be and that just because obesity is DIRECTLY caused by medical conditions in 10% of the cases, doesn't mean that 90% of the world's obese people are that way just because they love fast food.

On the Buddhist course I was on this weekend, we made a Harlem Shake video...

Buddhists doing the Harlem shake? LINK!!!!!!!

Points if you manage to guess which airline they're talking about.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/HPyl2tOaKxM

Perhaps?

http://cdn.webshopapp.com/f/zzm2al/funshirts-bazinga.jpg

Nothing makes me cum harder than a woman shouting this just as she cums. Mind shattering orgasms.

Watch and listen to Epic sax guy.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/kxopViU98Xo

I think that in these cases you have to be square and say that it's up to biology. If your biology says male, then you have to use the men's bathroom. The reason I think so is to actually protect transgenders. If you say "Ok, so he wears girl's clothes, then we'll let him use the girl's bathroom and locker room for PE". Before you know it you have some fucked up boys that show up in girls clothes and say "I just grew the confidence to show who I really am". You could end up with the case that transgenders gets suspected as nothing but pervs who wants to get free acess to the ladies' rooms.

It's a difficult case, but I think it's really sad that a 6 yo have been put in the middle of this. Coy should be living in ignorant bliss and just be told to use the gender neutral bathrooms. When he gets older and all the girls in the class goes "Sure, she can change with us." then let Coy change with the girls.

We have a winner!! Would get my vote if I was a Yank.

Do it like Easter and change the date. Simple as that.

Also, you better mix in national cunnilingus day as well, otherwise the feminists will rip your guts out. And you really should have national cunnilingus day first, otherwise all the women will go "Typical men, always coming first"...

WE DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS, WE NEED TO INFORCE THE ONE THAT ARE ALREADY PASS AND ARE ON THE BOOK. tHE MORE LAWS PASS THE LESS LIBERITY AND CONTRO; WE HAVE ..THIS GOVERMENT WAS FULL CONTRO; OF OUR LIVES.. WHAT WE EAT, HOW WE LIVE.. WHAT WE DRIVE.. ETC...HOISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF.. NEW IN MY LIFE SEEN A PRESIDENT WITH HIS OWN SEAL.. tHE LAST LEADER WHO HAD HIS OWN SYMBOL WAS BACK IN 1930s....GERMANY.

Actually every monarch that takes the throne needs to have their own seal, so I'm guessing that the next leader to make his own seal will be King Willem-Alexander of Netherlands. Your lack of proper spelling, your belief that caps lock is cruise control for cool and your insinuation that Hitler and Obama are the same type invalidates pretty much everything you say in this forum from now on. You managed to brand yourself as the village idiot with that post...

One thing that is needed is that we stop building ridicilously long electric cables that go across seas and instead gun for pipelines that can transport gas. Right now they're planning on building two more cables from Norway to Germany. Sure, the energy from Norway is about 90% water and some wind and solar power, so it's one of the cleanest in the world, but the cable causes huge damage to the life on the sea floor as well as a shitload of it gets lost in transit. Start building powerplants that run on gas with proper CO2 filtering. Force the oil companies to push the CO2 they can't purify down into the wells where they drill for oil and gas. It allows them to pick up maybe a percantage or two more, which in return gives them billions. Win win situation.

Our biggest problem isn't people moaning about them having to recycle and use more public transport. Give people the chance to recycle from their homes, by putting out different bins for plastic, glass and metal, paper and so on and build proper bus routes and trains. Then people will use it. Our biggest problems is politicians not wanting to squeee the balls of the big companies that pollute.

@ WellMadeMale. You have a good point. Gun owners should take care that their tools of death never be stolen. Nobody here can argue against that. Which is why most gun owners buy safes and locks. It is why I fight so hard for gun rights. Everyday thugs and cons aren't the only threat against stolen guns. Also I agree to a point. If the same gun owner keeps gettin' jacked. He might need some jail time. However passing a blanket law for any person that has their guns stolen is pushing it too far. Kinda like saying anybody that drowns in a flood was trying to kill themselves.

I think that depends on how they were stored. Over here the police will fuck you up(take away your guns and you won't ever get to own one again) if they find out that your guns weren't stored properly. This comes down to responsibility. When you have a gun you also have the responsibility that it will be kept in a safe place. Saying that it's in your bedroom drawet and that you've told your kid never to touch it is not a safe place nor is it responsible. Gun lockers, big or small, that are bolted into the floor/ground or the wall and under lock and key should be a minimum requirement. If you come home one day and find your gun locker broken into, then no one can blame you, but if you leave a gun in your dresser and your 5 rifles are in a glass cabinet without any alarm, then you don't deserve to own a gun. Why? Because you're not accepting the responsibility!

Nature has always had a way to straighten itself out when it's been fucked over somehow. If you have a huge amount of prey then you'll get a huge amount of predators taking out the weak, and when there are no weak ones left and the amount of prey goes down, the weak predators will be the first to die. But the balance of nature is very delicate. There can't be any denial that we as humans have fucked up one thing after another in nature, either by cutting down trees, chemical spills and so forth. Right now there's an old German sub laying in the fjord in Norway with shitloads of quicksilver in it. If all that leaks out then the life in the fjord is pretty much fucked.

Trees take up CO2 while animals release it. Considering that there are more sources of CO2 and less trees than say 100 years ago, then you'd be an idiot to think that this won't affect the environment and the climate in one way or another. Comparing satelitte photos which shows the ice North of Norway has proven that the ice has melted and there's more open sea there now than it was 50 years ago, causing a different weather pattern with colder and more rainy summers, which again fucks up the crops. This summer many of the potato fields here had turned into mud piles that reminded me of pictures and footage of the trenches in WWI. Yes, that's how bad it was.

You can argue that this would have happened anyway. Maybe, maybe we haven't affected the nature that much that it would eventually have happened, BUT there should be no doubt that we have helped speed things up. Since we speed things up, the changes will happen much sooner, and before we know it we might end up with another ice age on our hands. Not a big one where half the northern hemisphere turns to ice, but like the one that was back in the 1500's or whenever it was. Food was so scarce that you had a death penalty for stealing a potato. What will the result be? A huge rise in food cost, meaning poor people have to starve, which again will cause riots and in some cases even wars. The death tolls because of it will be in the millions. What we need is to slow down the CO2 release, find the bacteria that stops the cows from farting(yes, they are actually doing that) until we have the technology that can produce more food. We're already on the brink of what we can sustain as far as food goes, and if we have less food... well...