Forum posts made by elitfromnorth

One thing is what kind of response did you give him as he was going down on you? Were you just laying there and not moving while he was doing it? It depends on how he experienced it as well. You say you love giving head, then I'm guessing it's because you can see he's getting turned on. Is that obvious when he gives oral to you?
But you simply have to ask him. We can throw in a bunch of different theories that at work he accidentaly drank some oil that fucked up his taste buds and that now he's simply disgusted by the taste of pussy, so it could be all him. But maybe if you did what have already been suggested, that you TALK TO HIM, you'll find out...

Pass

As in "Puff Puff Pass"?

To me the Irish bomb stepped on an important piece; the situation. I don't want to be a guy that takes a girls virginity in a back alley and then never see her again. For all we know, it might end in pain and discomfort and it will all be a really bad memory instead of what should be if not a pleasurable then at least a half decent memory. As a long term partner it's different, because then you have the chance to explore, evolve and experience on the way from newbies to becoming a sex godess :D

It's a very difficult question to answer, especially given the circumstances. And to me it does raise a couple of questions. Was she in a bad spot when all this happened, like prostitution/porn being the only way to actually get by? To me that is something I could live with, knowing that we humans are survivalist and we're willing to do a lot to get through, even giving up our bodies.

I'm not gonna lie and say I'm judgemental free(even if I try to be). If this is something that's brought up on the first date then of course it will colour my vision of her and it's more prone to be in the back of my head and put my guard up. If it's after a few months and we actually have a good connection I'm probably more capable of getting past it, but this is given that she at some point comes clean and tells me. I know I would have flipped out if we'd been in a relationship for so long that it's really serious and I some day find out on my own by browsing porn or hearing it from someone that you should check redtube and you'll see your girlfriend. I am a firm believer in that trust is a necessity to make a relationship work, and if there is none there can be no relationship, so keeping stuff like that from me makes me wonder what else she keeps from me and does she really trust me at all. To me that would be the biggest issue. After all, if she doesn't trust me 100% then she can't be the one...

I was sure this post was from someone else I 'remember', but then saw a differrent name on it.. You GO girl! I'd been missing these types of questions.

I think the answer to the question might be something I mentioned a couple of days ago....


" Introducing the new Lego Space Shuttle Jumbo Size Butt plug complete with accessories..for your viewing pleasure.. This little mother will not only hurt like a bitch if you stand on it, but is guaranteed to BLOW your mind! and other things :-"



http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Lego-Space-Shuttle.jpg

HOT TAMALE!

Now I want one of those. Might add them to my nativity set and re enact the ascending to Heaven by Jesus, although in a so much more awesome way!

turning down your husband/partner for sex, what is the meaning of it?

Afraid it means that your precious bits aren't as precious as you thought.....

Come on, how could you not see a reply like that show up from someone in here?

I want to start taxing all elected and appointed politicians by their inefficiency. Shit, they'd all be bankrupt in weeks!

Isn't that why people want to get elected? So they can be inefficiant and slackers and still get payed?

I don't think there is a direct correlation between number of cars on the road and deterioration of the roads, here is why. Cars are lighter,,, road are made of better materials.



No direct correlation? So you think that the only thing that wears down the roads is the weather and time? That cars have nothing at all to do with it? Because if there is no direct correlation then that means that you could drive a trillion cars over one piece of road and if it was in vacum it would be as good as new! Can you not see the flaw in your argument here?

Liberalism and Socialism are both mental disorders. First they tell us during the 1970's that we have hit PEAK OIL production, now we have more know reserves in the USA then ever. Newsweek warned of the coming ICE AGE, now we have global warming. Really, does it ever get old being so wrong so often about so much. In the USA we have food stamps, first started to keep the bottom feeders too stupid and lazy from starving, now we have 47.1 million Americans on foodstamps. This is an all time high.

Are you saying that the founding principles of the US is indeed a mental disorder?

Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles , but generally they support ideas such as free and fair elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.

Apart from the free trade, then at least the rest of these things are essential in the American Philosphy, no?

And Socialism that have bread to amongst others Social Democracy is now the governing political view in Germany(which is the only country in the EU that actually generates a + budget) as well as Norway(by many indexes rated as the best country in the world to live in, based on education, health, democracy and many other things). I guess a political platform where the result isn't that you're being run down in the gutter must clearly be a mental disorder...

The thing about pitbulls is that they are much more easily trained to becoming a killer dog than any other type of breed. They are highly capable of learning, and you don't need much skill to teach them how to kill on command. Some animals, like the German Shepard, can be considered vicious, but that's just because they're very protective of their owner and their owner's property. Unlike the pitbull it will only attack if it considers itself or it's owner(s) to be threatened, while a pitbull can be trained to be a virtual attack dog.

Of course, with a proper trainer then you can make a chiuahua an attack dog, it just takes a hell of a lot more time and skill to train it. That's why they're making certain types of dogs illegal. Basically giving someone a pitbull is like giving them a gun. All they need to know is how to push in a clip, take the safety off and pull the trigger.

Maybe they're dogs carrying AK47's.

My vote is on illegal immigrant dogs. They're working as seeing eye dogs and are also guilty of tax fraud and being payed in bacon under the table.

Depends on what type of tattoo and where. If you get one that says "Get it here" and an arrow pointing to your pussy then it's trashy. Some of the tats above are a bit more tasty. What you also should consider is WHERE you put it. You might want to put it somewhere that can easily be concealed considering job interviews. Some might send you away just because of the tatoo, so consider that before you permanetly mark yourself.

Might want to add some more info on this, because as of this moment you're giving fuck all info other than they're killing dogs...

I got a little excited when I saw Nicola Post in here. Was hoping she was going to suggest a "Matriarch I'd like to fuck" category.

That's a good idea for our next Lush competition. "Thanking Nic for a great site"

How about putting tax on the petrol? Then you take those that actually spend a lot of fuel, and those spending a lot of fuel will also be the ones driving a lot. It will also be an initiative to get people to drive more environmental friendly cars. You pretty much get a win win situation. Sure, you'll piss off people that drive around in their 60's and 70's models, but those are show off cars. They're loud, they pollute and they are pretty much just old penis enhancers.

I'm going to indulge you and your rants with torpedoing your argument about why you should have CCP at schools and public places. That it will act as a deterrent is based on that you actually deal with REASONABLE people. Typical if you or me or someone else had the objective of killing as many people as possible then we'd target soft spots. It's logical. Problem is; most of these people ARE NOT REASONABLE! The fact that they usually take their own lives or go on until there is no way back other than them being killed means that they aren't acting rational. Actions that will cause your own death and it does not gain someone you're willing to die to protect or a greater community are defying our very basic instict of survival. Sure, we might not fear death per se or anything like that, but how many times have you seen rational human beings go do things that have a 100% death risk?

A second thing is that very often the target of choice is due to personal reasons. Columbine incident; the two gunmen went to school there. If I'm not mistaken this was the fact in the latest incident or at least there was a strong connection(correct me if I'm wrong). They go on a rampaging revenge suicide mission to make a statement, a last fuck you to the school they went to. There's nothing rational behind it. Taking innocent lives without any gain at all(unlike in a bank robbery) isn't rational at all. You can't set up things that will deter rational people from doing this and thinking it will work. At best you will have lowered the death ratio, something that an assault rifle gun ban does as well.

And I'm not an expert on your constitution, but does it say ANYWHERE that you have the right to own specifically the weapons that they now want to ban? They're not taking away your hunting rifle, are they? Or don't you consider that an "arm" because it can't really be used for other things than competition and/or hunting?

As recently as that, how time flies...

The original purpose of the 2nd amendment was to stop the North from banning slavery by baring states from maintaining the armed slave patrols that were necessary to chase runaway slaves and put down the slave uprisings that happened quite frequently.

It was about maintaining slavery from start to finish.

My apologies. Of course I meant centuries. I put the blame on being a non-native English speaker. But you see my point.

Another problem the US has is it's view on the constitution and how it's unchangeable, despite the fact that it was written over two decades ago. Times change and laws get outdated. As was pointed out somewhere in one of the many threads about this Thomas Jefferson said that laws are only valid for a generation. If Norway was to have the same relationship to our constitution then we'd still be excluding Jews from our country. There needs to be a willingness to see that times have changed, thus the necessity for laws that were made to make sure that a young and newly established nation is not the same types that a well established democracy and military power needs.

I read it as " You just had sex, now a man who has bathed in pine sol wants to give you another sex, do you accept"

I don't know. Pine Sol smells pretty strong. How fresh is he? Is he substituting pine sol for real showers?

I'm more worried about the whole "give you another sex" part. You gonna agree to a sex change operation just straight after sex? "Hmmm, now that I've just had a dick in me, I wonder how it is to have a dick inside a pussy?"

From what I read of it, he says that the controls in the helicopter to be similar to the ones in the Apache. You know, push L stick to the left to guide the 30 mm cannon type of thing. Can't say where he says "Oh, killing the Taliban is pretty much the same as when I played CoD." Storm in a water glass.

As for Prince Phillip you just have to laugh. He once asked the mum of a man who had just swam the channel "Are there any more nutters in your family?"

Can we have a category called SWAWCWDTMADTMDTWUGUCMTMOHDWTOTBAAHTKGDWSCSOCDWHAOASLPGTILF ?

" She was a wild child who drank too much and did too many drugs then woke up, got under control, married the man of her dreams who turned out to be an asshole, had 3 kids, got divorced, went sex crazy, sort of calmed down, works her ass off and still looks pretty good that Id like to Fuck"

NO! That would be excluding those who:
Wasn't a wild child
Didn't do drugs
Married a woman
Had no kids, less than 3 or more than 3
Still married or widowed.
As medium sex cravings
Still fucking nuts
Lazy bum woman
Looks only semi good or looks bad
You'd only fuck after half a bottle of tequila

Remember, lush is a no discriminatory site

Illusion. Paying for others to take a vacation makes my chest hurt.

And exactly where and how does this happen?

What do Golda Meir(Israel), Indira Gandhi(India) and Margaret Thatcther(Great Britain) have in common?
They were all heads of state and led their countries into war (with Egypt, Pakistan and Argentina respectfully)

The trouble with politicians is that they are politicians first...

So you think Maggie Thatcher should just have sat back and watched Argentina invade a part of Britain where a vast majority of the population want to stay under British rule?

This is the typical outsider looking in, but it seems that the US is a society where you shouldn't need to use common sense in order to get by. When you can sue the microwave company because it didn't say "Don't dry your cat in the microwave"(maybe that one is just an urban myth, but no smoke without fire) then you get a feeling that on the statue of liberty where it says "Give us your sick, your poor and your hungry" they forgot to put on "and those who can't fucking think for themselves".

As for the McDonalds lawsuit I saw a documentary that the old lady won because the temperature of the coffee was 90 degrees celsius, while the Maccy guidelines says it should be 70. For those of you that don't do centigrade, water freezes at 0 and boils at 100.

And if the money comes from the congress? Because that's what happened here. If you read the article you'll see how pro gun people managed to choke money from the congress to research on gun violence. Does that mean that all government funded research is worth nothing and that because of that we can't trust any research done in the US? Because that's how you come off.

And where are all the pro gun people in this? Surely they'd be interested in this research too. After all, they're so damn sure that there is no corrolation between the amount of guns in homes and the level of violence that thourogh research on this would confirm their theories. Not to mention; why won't they distance themselves from the actions of the NRA and Pro Gunners. Does that mean you condone the action of threatening researcher's families as long as you get to keep your guns?

Came across this interesting little piece

http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/16/16532333-obama-plan-eases-freeze-on-cdc-gun-violence-research

It tells a bit about gun research done and partly also why there haven't been any broad studies into the whole range of gun ownership and violence. The two main points that I think are crucial in this article are these two things.

1) Research showed that homes with guns had three times greater risks of homocide and five times the risks of suicide. In other words, yes, you might feel a bit safer from intruders, but you're still more likely to have a homocide occur in your house thanks to the 9mm under your bed.

Of course, I don't think this study is at all conclusive on whether or nut guns create more suicides or anything like that, BUT the results from this study really do cry out for more research to be done on the matter.

2) The NRA and their buddie's way of censoring research that might not go their way. One thing is if they go out and say that this research might not be good or actually use civilised methods, but using their channels to choke funding, slander the scientists that wanted to do the research and in some cases even threatening their families. I hear the extremists call out that by gun control will be a first step towards a dictatorish government, but the way I see it you already have several organisations causing a communist/nazi like censorship of anything they don't agree with and might hurt their cause.

Grog hit woman over head.... Grog drag back to cave....Grog real man....

reliable, I can rely on them to vote themself a raise as our country is in economic distress.
consistent, Consistantly grid locked never making any useful changes
truthful, Their politicians, if there lips move their lieing. The one you trust is just the better liar.
calm, Have you ever watched a session of congress.

Now Grog go teach Phoenix about sarcasm and irony. Grog realise this might be tough. Grog relentless. Grog make big effort for tribe....

I don't consider it derogatory at all, but then again, I don't fit into that category.

Matriarch ILF :-"

As for the term MILF I don't really see a problem with it. I hear countless women talking about how they're afraid of losing their figure after giving birth and being unattractive and all that. Surely being told that yes, your stomach blew out like a baloon and you squeezed a kid out of your vag and you may still have stretchmarks or whatever, but I still wanna fuck you, is a compliment? How many women have complained about being called a MILF?

As for Silverback, I think it's fucking awesome as a term. If it wasn't for the fact that I'm 26 I'd ask to be called a Silverback, simply because it would be one of the more inventive nicknames I've had during my time

They're delaying Hillary so they know she's done with menopause. Imagine a PMSing angry woman with a nuke button. I say let men rule. We have shown through history that we're reliable, consistent, truthful and calm....

Ludicrous. As long as they had a written contract it doesn't matter if it was written on paper made from safran or a napkin from the local pub. As long as it's a written agreement where both parties sign it's valid. That goes for oral agreements as well. If there are witnesses that can say that "Yes, these two were sane and agreed on this" it's valid. It is a typical situation where ideology plays in.

As for the economic part; I dunno how child welfare works in Kansas. Over here it's as long as you have a kid you get some money no matter your financial situation. And what's wrong with using Craigslist? Who knows how much the clinics charge for you getting a kid. Some spend thousands of bucks to get it done, and that's just too big of an expense in short time. It really shouldn't matter in what way they got the kid. They both agreed that he shouldn't have any responsibility on the matter. End of.

Although what always makes me shake my head when it comes to the US; jump across the border and have it done in a shady motel in a different state and it's perfectly ok, while do it in your home it becomes a problem. THAT is what is most ludicrous in this case.