Forum posts made by elitfromnorth

For my Dealing with Death series it would have to be "I laughed my ass off!". I didn't try for them to be sexy, I just wanted to write something funny. For my other stories "I came" is good enough. Anything else is pretty much just saying the same but the same words. It's very easy to write something general that most people can related to; making your story good is a lot more difficult.

People support Hamas, that's a known fact. Hamas has it as their main political agenda to destroy Israel(at least that we hear of. The fact that they re-build schools, mosques and remove local corruption is something we don't hear about of course. So why do they support Hamas if Hamas leads to violence? Because you have religious Jewish fanatics building settlements on Palestinian land. Gaza is suffering from a blockade that won't even let in emergency food and fuel. People in Gaza has limited supply of drinking water. How difficult do you think it is for Hamas to recruit people when all they have to say is "Look around at what Israel has brought us" and the young men will see starvation, poverty and the child graves after the Israeli bombs.

To hear that Palestineans "Can't help themselves from commiting terrorism" really sends shivers down my spine. If I had said that "Jews can't helpt themselves from stealing and grabbing as much money as they can" I'd been outed as a racist and a Nazi/KKK member. You might as well have thrown in "sandniggers" in the mix, because your statement is no better than that.

Can't be arsed to drag in an article link, but you can check any news website you want for sources. But Palestinia has been upgraded to being a "non-member observer state" in the UN, meaning practically nothing other than pretty much most of the world that voted for it, like France and Spain to mention a few European heavyweights, while the US and Canada not surprisingly voted against it. One of the things this allows Palestinia to do is bring Israel to court over the settlements on the West Bank to mention one thing. Israel and the US has said that this will halt the peace process, while others say that it shows Israel that great parts of the world accepts Palestinia as a nation.

Personally I think this is something that can speed on the peace process. Had Israel supported this it would have shown a goodwill and a desire to wanting to solve things peacefully towards the Palestinian people. Right now the Palestinian people feel nothing but oppressed, and are more likely to endorse the violent ideas of Hamas, than more diplomatic ways of Abbas and his party.

Secondly I think it's ironic that both the US, Israel AND Hamas don't want this. Hamas want Israel to keep oppressing people, simply because that's the only way they'll get support. If Abbas and his followers can show people that diplomacy is the way to go, then Hamas will lose support and end up being nothing more than a loose terrorist group with only a few fanatics supporting them, not the majority of the people. That is Hamas' strength; that they have so much support.

He's spent about a month, off and on, trying to fix all the problems caused with this OS "upgrade". We should send Apple an invoice

Or we could hire a bunch of tech guys to fix the problem and make crapple pay the bill :D Unless that's what invoice means

I guess that explains the head ache you usually have when having a cold. Also all those havint STD's that definetely didn't cheat on their partner and got it from a toilet seat. The new thing will be "The two dicked ghost gave it to me while I slept!"

Evolution right in front of our eyes. Or reincarnation perhaps?



Ressurection Lush style.

It all depends on when you meet her. There was done some research on women and who they thought would be considered good fathers for any children they have. Now this is being one of the parents of the most important person(s) that will ever be in your life. Researches showed women a bunch of pictures of different guys and found a(at least to me) quite interesting result: While ovulating women considered the ones that looked properly like a bad boy as who they thought would be the best father. While not ovulating they chose the more well groomed not so Alpha male looking kind of person as who was probably the best father.

Of course this research goes ONLY for appearance and the connection with who they want to father their children, but regardless it proves an interesting point; women are attracted to different types of men(to a degree of course, not that she's gonna want a bodybuilder one day and turns into a chubbychaser the next week) depending on where they are in the cycle. This shows that not only regular biology but also hormone levels decides what's attractive and what's not. I'd say that that's why teenage girls are more likely to pick the bad boy in the class; hormones. Add a little sociolgy that the bad boy suddenly get hyped up a lot because he's not walking the straight line and you got yourself a circle where social law dictates that this is the kind of guy you want. Since this is indoctrinated in youth it is something that stays with many women through the years until they get older, hence why bad boys are attractive to girls in their 20's and 30's.

That's not to say that us men don't get imprinted with the same ideal woman from a young age; nice body and big boobs is something we all drooled for and many still do. It was "decided" that this or that girl was attractive, that became the norm of what was attractive and it stays with us. Personally I can't say that I've broken out of that thought completely, but I'd like to think that I've matured a bit and realised that an ideal partner is someone that has a personality that will fit with mine, not a sexy booty.

Soviet Union itself named as Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
China too named itself as Peoples Republic of China and Communist Party, the only party in China, which incidently also rules China declares itself
Socialist.


Right. From now on I'm going to start describing myself as the smartest man on the planet. From now on the rest of you and your little brains are inferior to mine!

See what I did there?

Wish only that was Socialism.
It also kills indiviual initiative and drive.
It allows to transfer one's responsibility to the collective whole.
It may be strange for you but Moscowites during Soviet Union could not have access to BBC or for that matter any other broadcasting, radio or tv.
Maybe you will laugh but almost the whole country used to have just 2 or three options of shoes as the socialist hierachcy used to decide upon the designs and fashions their men & women should wear.
There was no banking system as prevalent in non socialist countries.
They had just one system of schooling which was revised say after decade.
They spent heavily on atomic wepons and armaments.
They directed all other socialist countries to follow them in all matters and those (China) disagreed got their wrath.
It was thus a totalitarian system.

You're talking about wrongfully communism, not socialism. The government controlling everything and deciding how many different pairs of shoes you can have has nothing to do with socialism. Bringing up totalitarian countries in a discussion is pointless as the points you bring up against socialism simply aren't true.

Norway is quite socialist or at least social democratic. Even with several steps to the left we'd still have a privatised banking system and industry. Sure, the state holds stocks in many businesses, but that doesn't mean they dictate every move. Plenty of private schools, even if the government set up a general education plan.

Definitely see your Dr. There are alternative medications. Ask Dr. about Lamictal. Been around for years...Works like a champ. It may hinder cumming but you will be able to get hard a a diamond again.....

I've been on Lamictal for years, but not for depression. But lamictal hasn't killed my libido at all or my ability to cum. Might be why I take a bit longer than usual to cum, but that all depends on how turned on I am.

What's the reward? If there's no reward then it's no fun unless it's the type of "let's see who can go the longest without taking initiative for sex" and you spend all day trying to turn each other on. Winner gets to tie the other person down and have their way with him/her. Now that is a fun bet, although I doubt I'd last long. Maybe a day before I hand her the cuffs/scarf

Why would anyone want to lie about being a virgin? Usually people hide the fact that they're a virgin. Unless they've made it a choice that they're not gonna shag until they get married then usually it's more connected with shame and pity than a pat on the shoulder and "good on you for keeping your legs closed!" One thing is if the person is very young, but I wouldn't doubt it if a person in their 20's admitted that they were a virgin.

I once dated a guy who called it "Tunnel of Love", not really original. I also knew a guy who called it "The Passage to Bangkok"! Not sure why really, maybe he was a Rush fan, LOL!

I prefer to call it a pussy. Sounds so cute and cuddly that you want to touch, pet and kiss it until it purrs!! HAHA

*Is now very curious how Nikki's lady bits sounds like when it purrs*

So to what extent do you guys keep control of your pubes? All off? Trimming it a bit?

Trimming - How often, how long do you let it be and how often do you do it?

Shaving - How often, and what equipment do you use? Just a regular razor or do you pick something else? Foam and all that crap too? Regular shaving foam for your face or other types?

Waxing - How often, do it yourself or letting your lover do it? Or do you go to a pro and get it done there?

Personally lately I've sticked to trimming it a bit, just to get the worst off. Have tried waxing once, and I can't really say it hurt that much. Was a bit sore for a day, but I didn't lay on the table and screamed or anything.

Now share!

If women do it on their men feel free to share your experiences. I've heard it can be quite fun and almost sensual to shave each other.

I always try to give them a little attention - at least with my hand. I heard once that if you treat them like breasts it works well . Haven't had any complaints ;) I always ask new partners what they like and will add to the basics if that's what he wants.

I think this would be really depending on how sensitive the balls are and how rough you want your boobs to be played with. Some of the things I've read here and seen on movies I would never let anyone do to my balls. I'm twitching just from the thought.

But please give my balls some attention. And if manscaping is a necessity to get the attention there I'll gladly do it.

No, I'm pretty sure I would laugh if he were standing in front of me in my knickers. NO way I would let him fuck me with them on. Unfortunately now that vision is going to be stuck in my head for a long time....

You know you love the idea of being fucked with the feeling of your silk panties slamming against your skin and then be handed them back, all stretched and with a nicely placed sweatstain on the arse

For me, I think it would probably disappear into the big vastness that is my big arse and then they'd be so stretched she could use it as a sail for her boat. Not to mention I'd feel like my entire masculinity was ripped to shreads along with the fabric and her giggling wouldn't help on my confidence.

so... why is it when the guys ask about cock size, and one of the girls says something other then "oh, it's not about the size, it's about what he does with it, cock size doesn't matter to me" like when she says "small cocks are shit", she gets jumped on and yet, it's ok (and trust me, i do think it's ok) to discuss tight pussies vs wide pussies and be all "yeah, why would anyone want to fuck a loose vagina?"

just me thinking out loud...

Have yet to see someone in here say "a wide pussy is shit" with the following exclemation marks as was put in the thread you refer to. It's not about inequality, it's about the phrasing.

Child endangerment? Since when was getting a massive boner considered endangerment?

Fair enough, the parents might not be the brightest if they ordered a stripper to the party, and usually the strippers draw the line(especially if they're professionals and not stripper and massage therapist) with the lapdance. And considering they're only 16 the kid recieving it was probably too shellshocked to do anything while he was getting an ass grinded against him.

As far as the alcohol servings go that's fine with me. Over here we run strict rules on that stuff, so I don't see a problem with checking if people brought alcohol and gave it to minors.

But the rest? Please...

Marco Rubio

"GQ: How old do you think the Earth is?

Marco Rubio: I'm not a scientist, man .



This sentence immediately made me think of Leo from that 70's show

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mblgqwCN1r1ri3jldo1_500.gif

Leo 2016!!!

Is it possible for the US to change it's constitution in any way? Remove outdated things or add things that should be added simply because times have changed? In other words, is it theoretically possible to remove or change the second amendment in a way that will no longer give every person with a clean criminal record to own a gun without the purpose of sport or hunting?

Tight pussy is better, but not so tight that it hurts for either of them.

I admire Switzerland as a country that has minded it's own affairs throughout modern history and has prospered peacefully while it's neighbor's on it's borders waged numerous conflicts. There is a lesson to be learned there.

Why was Switzerland neutral? Because they could. The geography makes it a hellish place to invade and you don't want to go there without a complete neccessity to enter. It's not so much smart politics, but it's more being lucky with the borders. Until recent times bringing in supplies as you wage the war would happen by land or sea, not air, which in return makes Switzerland a really risky place to bring in supplies. Easier to go around than through.

As far as the US I don't know if quick isolationism is the way to go. You'll end up leaving a power vacum that has to be filled. The world will always need one big boss, as it always has. Question is just who. At the moment I can only see China as the possible candidate, since Russia is struggling too much to become a super power. Despite what you wish to believe, a strong military power brings on a greater diplomatic and economic influence. Would you really want China to become the new super power, dictating world politics and the economy? Because that's basically what the US has done. The US has made a move and the rest of the world have responded accordingly.

The US's problem is they go in where they're not really needed. Afghanistan can be excused, since the government there housed Al-Qaida. Iraq really can't, since they didn't find the WMD's. Two long lasting wars and no dead Osama bin Laden(until recently) and no WMD's makes it seem like the US are more invading to promote their own interest than being "liberators". Just have a look at Gitmo and Abu Ghraib and you have two media nightmares that just shows the US as an aggressive power with no respect for the people of the country they invade. Add a few dead children from US bombs and you got yourself a really shite image even amongst your allies. The important part isn't what really happened, it's what people believe happened. If they believe a US bomb dropped on an appartment building then that's how they'll act and view America.

Add the anger towards Israel and the US always having Israel's back, then I'm sure even I as a white man could rile up a couple of hundred people to burn a couple of American flags in Saudi Arabia or Yemen or anywhere in the Arab world.

What should the US do to get more "likes"? Not go anywhere military without broad support from the rest of the world, no matter how strong desire inside the country is. It will only lead to more problems.

An acceptable militia working outside the control of any branch of the government or parliment breaks with one of the main principles of being considered a state; that the government and authorities have complete violence monopoly, meaning they are the only ones that can use force no matter what the situation. The belief that it is a necessity for people to be able to round up in a militia in case the government becomes too totalitarian means that you have no faith what so ever in the democracy that exists in the US today. And don't give me any of the "Better to be safe than sorry" crap.

If they made tires out of pussies then Goodyear and Firestone would go out of business...LOL.....Kidding ladies.......

Put four pussies on your car and you'll have a strong grip on even the wettest surfaces. Interesting in the police report if you throw that kind of tire on someone's head. Death by pussy.

Ok, I'll stop now, but still curious if there are anyone with experience in this.

Being political uncorrect and having a stance on an issue that's not supported as an acceptable idea by the vast majority is not always something you should tell others. Even if you live in a country where you can't be punished legally for your views and opinions, there are still other ways society not only can, but WILL punish you.

Find something to keep you busy. School, work or a hobby. Whatever it is, as long as it keeps you busy and it takes your mind off him. Socialise with other people where you won't meet him and in places where you don't have many memories from. For instance, if it was a certain restaurant or somewhere you two used to go then avoid that place as much as you can. Things like that will help push it away.

Find ways to wear you out. After my break up a friend of me told me to run. Run as fast as you can, as long as you can, run until you feel the taste of blood in your mouth. It might sound extreme, but burning energy and wearing yourself out in a physical way will help put things off.

Those are the long term means. Short term would of course to do the good old get drunk and sleep around a bit, but that depends on if you're the kind of person that get drunk. In any case, if friends ask you to go out with them then do it. The last thing you should do is sit home alone and think about him. Socialise with others.

And lastly; stay the fuck away from him. If he suddenly calls you and goes "Why haven't I heard from you lately?" then you have every right in the world to tell him that he stabbed you in the back and he can go to his girlfriend.

Like Dancing Doll said:

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/25168929.jpg

You're so firmly placed in the friendzone you'd need a bomb to get you out of it. I know where you're coming from, I've been in the same situation myself a couple of times, although luckily with the girl I really fell head over heels for never really did take much interest in me, not even when she was drunk. You need to move on. It's gonna be hard, and it's gonna take a while, but my advice is to move on as best you can. Or at the very least try.

What you shouldn't do is force the issue of her breaking up with him. One thing is drunken rambling that happens once or twice, but if you start bringing up when sober how crap he is, odds are she's gonna go on the defensive and just push you away. It's what most people do, so nothing unique about that.

You've chased her long enough. If she really wants you at this point you need to make her chase you. Start dating other girls, maybe even ask her for tips on how to pick up other girls, if she has any nice single friends etc. She is using you for her own interest, not necessarily yours. Odds are it will never be the two of you, especially not until she matures and realises what kind of man she wants for a long term solution.

They're just finding back to their roots. Remember, the US was founded by pilgrims that wanted a place outside British law where they could freely persecute heretics and others and not risk punishment from more reasonable authorities.

Also, it would be interesting to see how much these states would be able to cope on their own. Especially since some of them are isolated. Not to mention the toll that would be put on goods that they produced and the costs to ship it outside the US(for some of the states). I say let them sit and scream. There will be others screaming in 4 years when you guys elect a Republican.

I sometimes give. There are some people I don't give to, like the Romanians, simply because they make my ears bleed with the accordion they play all the time. It's terrible to listen to.

We used to have a law against begging, but after it got lifted we had a stream of Romanians that come here to the cities simply to beg or sell some crappy goods. Very often it's Gypsies that get blamed as the "perpetrators". I doubt I'll ever give money to them, simply because the only reason they're here is because they can get more money begging here than at home. That doesn't give me any sympathy for them at all. If they can afford the trip up her then surely that's enough to get them by back at home. So no, I rarely give. I'd rather give it to a non profit orginasation, like the Salvation Army that I know will use the money to help people.

And when people talk about how they're lazy and don't wanna work, I doubt they consider the fact that they have no home or place to freshen up and look presentable and don't have the clothes for it either, so basically the only job they can have is somewhere where they won't meet customers.

As a foreigner I think this is rather weird and seems close to indoctrination of fealthy in small kids. Just because the kids don't say it, doesn't mean they'll end up like traitors, and just because they do, doesn't mean they won't end up like one. It seems pointless and is frightingly close to saying "USA über alles".

On a second note, I find it humoristic and ironic that something that I would guess is hailed especially by conservatives was originally written by socialist