Forum posts made by elitfromnorth

Topic Selective Breed Legislation
Posted 28 Jan 2013 17:11

The thing about pitbulls is that they are much more easily trained to becoming a killer dog than any other type of breed. They are highly capable of learning, and you don't need much skill to teach them how to kill on command. Some animals, like the German Shepard, can be considered vicious, but that's just because they're very protective of their owner and their owner's property. Unlike the pitbull it will only attack if it considers itself or it's owner(s) to be threatened, while a pitbull can be trained to be a virtual attack dog.

Of course, with a proper trainer then you can make a chiuahua an attack dog, it just takes a hell of a lot more time and skill to train it. That's why they're making certain types of dogs illegal. Basically giving someone a pitbull is like giving them a gun. All they need to know is how to push in a clip, take the safety off and pull the trigger.

Topic Selective Breed Legislation
Posted 28 Jan 2013 09:39



Maybe they're dogs carrying AK47's.

My vote is on illegal immigrant dogs. They're working as seeing eye dogs and are also guilty of tax fraud and being payed in bacon under the table.

Topic Women with tattoos
Posted 28 Jan 2013 07:41

Depends on what type of tattoo and where. If you get one that says "Get it here" and an arrow pointing to your pussy then it's trashy. Some of the tats above are a bit more tasty. What you also should consider is WHERE you put it. You might want to put it somewhere that can easily be concealed considering job interviews. Some might send you away just because of the tatoo, so consider that before you permanetly mark yourself.

Topic Selective Breed Legislation
Posted 28 Jan 2013 07:16

Might want to add some more info on this, because as of this moment you're giving fuck all info other than they're killing dogs...

Topic Can we dispense with the labels "MILF" and "Cougar"?
Posted 28 Jan 2013 07:14



I got a little excited when I saw Nicola Post in here. Was hoping she was going to suggest a "Matriarch I'd like to fuck" category.

That's a good idea for our next Lush competition. "Thanking Nic for a great site" evil4

Topic American drivers may be taxed by the mile?
Posted 27 Jan 2013 16:37

How about putting tax on the petrol? Then you take those that actually spend a lot of fuel, and those spending a lot of fuel will also be the ones driving a lot. It will also be an initiative to get people to drive more environmental friendly cars. You pretty much get a win win situation. Sure, you'll piss off people that drive around in their 60's and 70's models, but those are show off cars. They're loud, they pollute and they are pretty much just old penis enhancers.

Topic Stop the gun bans! Rant Three
Posted 26 Jan 2013 08:21

I'm going to indulge you and your rants with torpedoing your argument about why you should have CCP at schools and public places. That it will act as a deterrent is based on that you actually deal with REASONABLE people. Typical if you or me or someone else had the objective of killing as many people as possible then we'd target soft spots. It's logical. Problem is; most of these people ARE NOT REASONABLE! The fact that they usually take their own lives or go on until there is no way back other than them being killed means that they aren't acting rational. Actions that will cause your own death and it does not gain someone you're willing to die to protect or a greater community are defying our very basic instict of survival. Sure, we might not fear death per se or anything like that, but how many times have you seen rational human beings go do things that have a 100% death risk?

A second thing is that very often the target of choice is due to personal reasons. Columbine incident; the two gunmen went to school there. If I'm not mistaken this was the fact in the latest incident or at least there was a strong connection(correct me if I'm wrong). They go on a rampaging revenge suicide mission to make a statement, a last fuck you to the school they went to. There's nothing rational behind it. Taking innocent lives without any gain at all(unlike in a bank robbery) isn't rational at all. You can't set up things that will deter rational people from doing this and thinking it will work. At best you will have lowered the death ratio, something that an assault rifle gun ban does as well.

And I'm not an expert on your constitution, but does it say ANYWHERE that you have the right to own specifically the weapons that they now want to ban? They're not taking away your hunting rifle, are they? Or don't you consider that an "arm" because it can't really be used for other things than competition and/or hunting?

Topic These US gun control / law debates are pointless, here's my opinion why
Posted 25 Jan 2013 17:27



As recently as that, how time flies...

The original purpose of the 2nd amendment was to stop the North from banning slavery by baring states from maintaining the armed slave patrols that were necessary to chase runaway slaves and put down the slave uprisings that happened quite frequently.

It was about maintaining slavery from start to finish.

My apologies. Of course I meant centuries. I put the blame on being a non-native English speaker. But you see my point.

Topic These US gun control / law debates are pointless, here's my opinion why
Posted 25 Jan 2013 05:31

Another problem the US has is it's view on the constitution and how it's unchangeable, despite the fact that it was written over two decades ago. Times change and laws get outdated. As was pointed out somewhere in one of the many threads about this Thomas Jefferson said that laws are only valid for a generation. If Norway was to have the same relationship to our constitution then we'd still be excluding Jews from our country. There needs to be a willingness to see that times have changed, thus the necessity for laws that were made to make sure that a young and newly established nation is not the same types that a well established democracy and military power needs.

Topic after sex one fresh man wish to give u another, will u accept?
Posted 22 Jan 2013 09:15



I read it as " You just had sex, now a man who has bathed in pine sol wants to give you another sex, do you accept"

I don't know. Pine Sol smells pretty strong. How fresh is he? Is he substituting pine sol for real showers?

I'm more worried about the whole "give you another sex" part. You gonna agree to a sex change operation just straight after sex? "Hmmm, now that I've just had a dick in me, I wonder how it is to have a dick inside a pussy?"

Topic Prince Harry likens killing the Taliban to playing the Xbox
Posted 21 Jan 2013 19:08

From what I read of it, he says that the controls in the helicopter to be similar to the ones in the Apache. You know, push L stick to the left to guide the 30 mm cannon type of thing. Can't say where he says "Oh, killing the Taliban is pretty much the same as when I played CoD." Storm in a water glass.

As for Prince Phillip you just have to laugh. He once asked the mum of a man who had just swam the channel "Are there any more nutters in your family?"

Topic Can we dispense with the labels "MILF" and "Cougar"?
Posted 21 Jan 2013 19:00

Can we have a category called SWAWCWDTMADTMDTWUGUCMTMOHDWTOTBAAHTKGDWSCSOCDWHAOASLPGTILF ?

" She was a wild child who drank too much and did too many drugs then woke up, got under control, married the man of her dreams who turned out to be an asshole, had 3 kids, got divorced, went sex crazy, sort of calmed down, works her ass off and still looks pretty good that Id like to Fuck"

NO! That would be excluding those who:
Wasn't a wild child
Didn't do drugs
Married a woman
Had no kids, less than 3 or more than 3
Still married or widowed.
As medium sex cravings
Still fucking nuts
Lazy bum woman
Looks only semi good or looks bad
You'd only fuck after half a bottle of tequila

Remember, lush is a no discriminatory site evil4

Topic Socialism an illusion or the real solution?
Posted 20 Jan 2013 17:19

Illusion. Paying for others to take a vacation makes my chest hurt.

And exactly where and how does this happen?

Topic Why no woman US president yet?
Posted 20 Jan 2013 17:11

What do Golda Meir(Israel), Indira Gandhi(India) and Margaret Thatcther(Great Britain) have in common?
They were all heads of state and led their countries into war (with Egypt, Pakistan and Argentina respectfully)

The trouble with politicians is that they are politicians first...

So you think Maggie Thatcher should just have sat back and watched Argentina invade a part of Britain where a vast majority of the population want to stay under British rule?

Topic Suing Again?
Posted 20 Jan 2013 17:05

This is the typical outsider looking in, but it seems that the US is a society where you shouldn't need to use common sense in order to get by. When you can sue the microwave company because it didn't say "Don't dry your cat in the microwave"(maybe that one is just an urban myth, but no smoke without fire) then you get a feeling that on the statue of liberty where it says "Give us your sick, your poor and your hungry" they forgot to put on "and those who can't fucking think for themselves".

As for the McDonalds lawsuit I saw a documentary that the old lady won because the temperature of the coffee was 90 degrees celsius, while the Maccy guidelines says it should be 70. For those of you that don't do centigrade, water freezes at 0 and boils at 100.

Topic NRA; Dictatorship and censorship
Posted 18 Jan 2013 18:29

And if the money comes from the congress? Because that's what happened here. If you read the article you'll see how pro gun people managed to choke money from the congress to research on gun violence. Does that mean that all government funded research is worth nothing and that because of that we can't trust any research done in the US? Because that's how you come off.

And where are all the pro gun people in this? Surely they'd be interested in this research too. After all, they're so damn sure that there is no corrolation between the amount of guns in homes and the level of violence that thourogh research on this would confirm their theories. Not to mention; why won't they distance themselves from the actions of the NRA and Pro Gunners. Does that mean you condone the action of threatening researcher's families as long as you get to keep your guns?

Topic NRA; Dictatorship and censorship
Posted 17 Jan 2013 18:39

Came across this interesting little piece

http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/16/16532333-obama-plan-eases-freeze-on-cdc-gun-violence-research

It tells a bit about gun research done and partly also why there haven't been any broad studies into the whole range of gun ownership and violence. The two main points that I think are crucial in this article are these two things.

1) Research showed that homes with guns had three times greater risks of homocide and five times the risks of suicide. In other words, yes, you might feel a bit safer from intruders, but you're still more likely to have a homocide occur in your house thanks to the 9mm under your bed.

Of course, I don't think this study is at all conclusive on whether or nut guns create more suicides or anything like that, BUT the results from this study really do cry out for more research to be done on the matter.

2) The NRA and their buddie's way of censoring research that might not go their way. One thing is if they go out and say that this research might not be good or actually use civilised methods, but using their channels to choke funding, slander the scientists that wanted to do the research and in some cases even threatening their families. I hear the extremists call out that by gun control will be a first step towards a dictatorish government, but the way I see it you already have several organisations causing a communist/nazi like censorship of anything they don't agree with and might hurt their cause.

Topic Why no woman US president yet?
Posted 17 Jan 2013 09:07



Grog hit woman over head.... Grog drag back to cave....Grog real man....

reliable, I can rely on them to vote themself a raise as our country is in economic distress.
consistent, Consistantly grid locked never making any useful changes
truthful, Their politicians, if there lips move their lieing. The one you trust is just the better liar.
calm, Have you ever watched a session of congress.

Now Grog go teach Phoenix about sarcasm and irony. Grog realise this might be tough. Grog relentless. Grog make big effort for tribe....

Topic Can we dispense with the labels "MILF" and "Cougar"?
Posted 17 Jan 2013 07:00




I don't consider it derogatory at all, but then again, I don't fit into that category.

Matriarch ILF :-"

As for the term MILF I don't really see a problem with it. I hear countless women talking about how they're afraid of losing their figure after giving birth and being unattractive and all that. Surely being told that yes, your stomach blew out like a baloon and you squeezed a kid out of your vag and you may still have stretchmarks or whatever, but I still wanna fuck you, is a compliment? How many women have complained about being called a MILF?

As for Silverback, I think it's fucking awesome as a term. If it wasn't for the fact that I'm 26 I'd ask to be called a Silverback, simply because it would be one of the more inventive nicknames I've had during my time munky2

Topic Why no woman US president yet?
Posted 15 Jan 2013 09:03

They're delaying Hillary so they know she's done with menopause. Imagine a PMSing angry woman with a nuke button. I say let men rule. We have shown through history that we're reliable, consistent, truthful and calm....

Topic Sperm donor may have to pay child support to couple he helped.
Posted 14 Jan 2013 16:17

Ludicrous. As long as they had a written contract it doesn't matter if it was written on paper made from safran or a napkin from the local pub. As long as it's a written agreement where both parties sign it's valid. That goes for oral agreements as well. If there are witnesses that can say that "Yes, these two were sane and agreed on this" it's valid. It is a typical situation where ideology plays in.

As for the economic part; I dunno how child welfare works in Kansas. Over here it's as long as you have a kid you get some money no matter your financial situation. And what's wrong with using Craigslist? Who knows how much the clinics charge for you getting a kid. Some spend thousands of bucks to get it done, and that's just too big of an expense in short time. It really shouldn't matter in what way they got the kid. They both agreed that he shouldn't have any responsibility on the matter. End of.

Although what always makes me shake my head when it comes to the US; jump across the border and have it done in a shady motel in a different state and it's perfectly ok, while do it in your home it becomes a problem. THAT is what is most ludicrous in this case.

Topic Possibility of war between India and Pakistan
Posted 12 Jan 2013 17:20

Doubt nukes will be used. As mental as the Pakistani government is, they're fully aware of that deploying nukes will lead to not only India answering with Nukes, but the rest of the world realising that they have a nuclear power who's unstable enough to nuke it. Result; mass scale international invasion where the only object is to remove nuclear technology from Pakistan. And using the nukes will make China really nervous. Who would want an unstable neighbour with nukes? You could really end up with a UN invasion led by China, Russia and the US. Would make for a really interesting scene though.

Topic Connecticut town gathering, destroying violent games
Posted 02 Jan 2013 18:23

Can violent videogames make people more aggressive? Certainly at the moment while you're playing it and getting killed at the same spot time and time again, surely the frustration level rises. I know. Will it make you more aggressive over time? That's a difficult question to answer, as it's difficult to say who is attracted to violent games. More aggressive people are more likely to have an outlet through violent games, so I think the studies will be difficult to conclude with a certain answer.

But the question isn't the level of aggression in my book. The question is does violent video games make you more prone to commit acts of violence. That's the issue. Not how aggressive people are. People can still be angry and aggressive without actually doing anything. There's a reason we have the phrase "all talk and no walk".

Besides, if people were actually doing their jobs as parents there wouldn't be a need for a study asking how GTA and COD and Assassin's Creed affect 13yo's. It states clearly on the box, even if it in many countries isn't mandatory, that these games should not be played by people younger than 18. I'm not saying that parents put the guns in the hands of the kids, but if you're so worried that you're kid's gonna be affected by it why the hell don't you have a look at what he's gaming instead of just lashing out. The computer isn't a babysitter, and it's your responsibility to make sure that your 13yo isn't playing GTA or watching porn. And stop having grandma buying games that she doesn't know a thing about.

On another note, when denying kids the game one argument will of course be "But everyone else has it" while another will be "But it's just a game! Of course I know it's wrong to kill people".

And what's a violent CD?

Topic Guys - do you have any problem with her getting rough and physical with you - such as smacking your
Posted 02 Jan 2013 07:51

There are a few guys who actually dont have pain receptors in the groin area, resulting in kicks and punches to the groin results in a hard on, but it's rare. The rest of us flinches in pain just from the thought of having them squeezed.

As for spanking and scratch marks, go for it. I love nails. Tying up is good too.
'

Topic 2nd amendment vs. the Patriot Act
Posted 28 Dec 2012 08:10

The only reason you're not seeing them is because you probably don't frequent any of the multitude of firearms-oriented websites like ar15 dot com and The Firing Line. Many millions of words have been posted in criticism of the subject. The "Tin Foil Hat Brigade" is prominently represented, but trust me, there are thousands of regular people that are now saying, "See? This is precisely WHY we need our 2nd Amendment rights!"

I don't see the NRA or the congressmen advocating the need for guns using that line of argument. Maybe because they know that it has nothing to do with "protecting" yourself against the vicious and mean federal government.

In the US it's almost impossible to get a full dictatorial government or getting right wing fascist governments, simply due to your two party political system. Add to the fact that republican party needs to become more liberal if they're to get minority voters then you have successfully removed any chance for a Hitler type to run your country.

Topic Do you object to your partner being nude?
Posted 27 Dec 2012 06:00

I think I might have agreed to it, but a minimum demand is that I get the drawing I think is the best for my own keeping so I can perv on it later. It also depends where this is. If it's the local college then I think I would oppose it. Call me weird.

Topic Self Fuck
Posted 27 Dec 2012 05:54

Don't think it would be at all possible unless it's semi hard, but like Nudiepants said; where's the fun in that? I would only at best be able to reach the rim and if I got aroused I would get harder and then it wouldn't be possible. Don't think it's anatomically possible.

Topic Scammers Cashing in on Newtown School Massacre
Posted 27 Dec 2012 03:36



You do realize that one of the first things the Nazis did when they were elected was pass a law that took the guns out of the hands of their intended victims...

And you have so little faith in your own government that you think that gun control will be a move to either be able to exterminate black people or create a tyrannic dictatorship?

Hell, with the ways things are progressing it would be more "effective" in the way of reducing the number of ethnic people in the US by making sure gangs get a lot of weapons so they can kill each other and the civilians off. Besides, white people are quicker to shout racism than coloured people. We're not stuck in the 60's anymore

Topic Scammers Cashing in on Newtown School Massacre
Posted 24 Dec 2012 19:06

As far as cashing in goes in the way this is done, it's really no surprise. Sadly. One person's death is another person's living. People will do all kinds of things, like selling "memorial stuff" to "honour the victims". They just don't say that one of the victims is their wallet that needs to be honoured with cash. The world is getting more and more cynical. Thanks to internet we can perform crimes without actually having to meet the person that suffers in real life. easier and you don't have to be that skilled or gutsy to do it. There will always be people trying to profit off of misery and death. It's human nature. Some see sorrow, others see opportunities.

Topic Does it happen to you?
Posted 24 Dec 2012 04:35

Don't think I've sat on them, but definetely sat down and found them squeezed somehow in a very uncomfy position.

It's an evolutionary mistake along with a couple of others we have. Most animals has the ballsack fimrly protected inside their body, but we humans HAD to do it else. Fucking pain...