Life in any society involves trade-offs.

Of course it does. But those should be wighted up against each other. As I said earlier. All the security in your country in form of security checks, more police, etc you have didnt helped you to decrease terrorism. Maybe you should start thinking about some other options to fix those problems.




Complete and unfettered freedom does not exist, here in the US as well as in every other developed society. One cannot drive a car without a background check and a renewed registration, for instance. Yes, I suppose if you want to venture into tin-hat conspiracy territory, it's possible that "the government" could execute some sort of power grab, but let's face it, if that happens, they'll do it with or without some sort of legislative foothold. By the way, they won't. If you choose to believe otherwise, then effectively, you've written off the rule of law in general, and all of this becomes moot.

Why need to get personal? I am just offering you examples of what could happen and what are the risks. The government might or might not be corrupt, BUT it can become at any time or place and here it is necessary to think today about the consequences in law. If you give away all your power to the goverment without an backup plan you are literally inviting possible abuse of this power. There needs to be an balance between power the goverment has and power the people have.

And that doesnt have to do anything with tin-hat conspiracy, but with thinking about possible consequences.

So, to sum it up, here's the complete list of those who benefited from yesterday's Senate vote:

1. Gun purchasers who would've failed a background check had it been required.


Outstanding.






Well. Here is the question how far you want to go without cutting too deep into someones personal life and freedom. Sometimes freedom and safety are contradictions.


The problem here is that if you need an basic background check before ordering an gun (mentally and specific criminal records like theft) you completely give away your right to the government.

Lets for example say this would go through and there would be an basic agency opened up where you need to send an small request to when buying an weapon. They check and send you an positive or negative letter back.

So you give away the control to this to the goverment and they could just say inside this agency: "Refuse all requests."
So even if your right would be to order one and the law allows it, you dont get it.

Furthermore documents can easily be faked.



So in theory it sounds completely reasonable and I agree on this, but you would have to think about the practical use as well. And here I see some issues which needs to be overcome before you go through with an law like this.

Well the 100 deaths was updated (as in the title) to Dec 21, 2012

as about a month ago (Mar 22, 2013 8:03 pm EST) we're at 2,244 more people. Shy of 25 per day.

p.s. Would that be a reasonable priority?


Because what you guys are doing is symptome-fighting and not cause-fighting. Guns dont kill people. People who use guns kill people. But they could use knifes, selfmade bombs, etc.

The point is that people - who want to harm other people physicially - will always get their weapon for it. Illegally or selfmade if necessary. So when you ban guns you will only harm the people who have them for self-defence.

As an example about the Batman-Shooting. If there is no one in the cinema where the shooting starts all you can do is run away. If one of the people got an gun for self-defence he could liquidate the shooter before he could do more harm.




Instead of working on the actualy cause linked into society you found your scapegoat, push out some tears and thats it. But scapegoating never solved problems.



Just a few examples:


- Since 9/11 you got more and more police and safeties in your country. Yet the number of terristic acts and gun-rampages is increasing. -> The higher "safety" isnt working, yet you give up freedom because of it

- You have violence in every media. Your people are exposed to violence each day. Think thats healthy? Common Sense tells me its not.

- Your goverment is in constant war and therefor an bad rolemodel. Around 120.000 Civil deaths alone in the Iraq-war since 2003. And thats just direct deaths. Not even involved indirect deaths of the destroy infrastructure.

- Of all the school-rampages it is proven that more than 95% of the shooters were on constant pharmaceutical drugs. No one blames medics though who can later your personality.

- Increasing proverty is forcing desperate people to become criminal.

- Your prison-system is an whole lobby earning money with laws.

- Instead of educating the people to solidarity and cooperation your whole system forces egoism.

- 80-90% of your medias is owned by 6 companies (GE, News-Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner & CBS) and you still think you get neutral news coverage.






Now think about if scapegoating on guns really is the right way to fix things or if you start opening your eyes and search objectively for the cause of the problems and dont get hyper and emotional about the symptoms (terroristic acts)

Focus on about 100 death people and ignore tousands and millions of civil deaths caused from US military in wars. Lets talk about relations.


P.S. Not saying any life is worthless, but there should be some reasonable priorities.

tell him that if he doesnt get me off, im going to tell his wife.


Then I would have to tell you that you will miss the opportunity to get fingered and fucked and used until you pass out from that bliss. You sure you want to miss that opportunity?

I liked fantasizing about 2 of my teachers. Since I am natural dominant though I always fantasized about how I would overtake them and place them below me as MY living sextoy. ,)

Not an message I got, but an short message contact with phone I had a while ago. Its translated, but I try to keep its meaning.



I write her: "I have been thinking about our last encounter"

She: "*blush* I am at work"

I: "Especially I was thinking about the look in your eyes telling me how much you wanted and craved me"

She: "Hmmm. I am really at work"

I: "And I thought about how mit felt when I was entering your pussy. How amazing it felt and how you moaned out loud."

She: "You are bad"

I: "It was incredible seeing how each thrust was making you feel better and better. How your body started squirming and how you moaned my name"

She: "Hmmmm"

I: "But the best was, when all those feeling ended up in this explosion called orgasm, when you were shaking all over. Your hands holding me tightly and giving in completely to me"

She: "Oh Gosh"

I: "I want to repeat that. Today. When are you at home?"

She: "Im up at 6pm"



You should have seen how she jumped at me when I arrived at her place.

The question is. Is that an cause or the symptom?

I wouldnt be surprised, if todays media just inforce this behaviour by objectification of women in combination with big breasts and this study just shows the result of it. Therefor I take such studies always with a grain of salt.

am not a guy but to me this is like your bf asking you to get a boob job

hello it is THE person you love..not the icing

guys who are or are not..they all are wonderful

just like women with big or small breasts

love what ya got


Honestly. Circumcising is even worse than a boob job, because it actually removes something necessary of the human body. Its more like if you were to cut out your nipple or your finger nail.

If she were to do that to me I would instantly leave. I wouldnt want to waste my time with someone as shallow as that.

Biological age is an indication on how much life experience someone has and how much the person matured with it.

But thats it. Its way more important what someone does with his life experiences. I have met 18 years old being more mature than 30 years old.


In the end it all comes down to the individuality of everyone.

It's 200 years from today in a utopian future. Mankind is living in peace and has been for more than 150 years. All diseases have vanished and people are generally happy. Things changed massively after the third world war, way back in 2023. All government and religions amazingly came together to fix the damage we had done. Humanity now lives under huge domes to stay safe from radiation. But...

Added 05 Aug 2012 | Category Novels | Votes 3 | Avg Score 4.67 | Views 1,204 | 1 Comment