Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

What would you think if your Husband/boyfriend wanted you to be fucked silly while he watched? X Options · View
BelleduJour
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:21:32 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 11/13/2011
Posts: 1,509
Location: Canada
JohnC wrote:

If that is what you both agree to... that is fine.

Me? No way in hell. LOL I would simply not "share" my woman and if she wanted to fuck other guys she should not have been with me. But that is just ME and how I look at it. What others choose to do is up to them. I am sure my woman would agree with me on this one (Belle?). Oh heck, I KNOW she would... she said she would not share me in another thread here on the same topic. LOL

Damn straight! To each their own but in MY relationship there is only room for two of us - me and my man. Period. I'm his partner not some toy he can pass around at a party. Do couples really benefit from this? I think I may be a bit too old fashioned for this place if so dontknow

Guest
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:28:50 PM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 535,127
BelleduJour wrote:

Damn straight! To each their own but in my relationship there is only room for two of us - me and my man. Period. I'm his partner not his chew toy for anyone to play with. Do couples really benefit from this? I think I may be a bit too old fashioned for this place if so :p

Oh I agree baby.... I don't think we are too old fashioned, I just think we draw the line at a different place than some do. And as already posted by others, we are not alone.

I don't think badly of others who DO choose to do it, it just isn't for me... or us. :)
keoloke
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:33:33 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 8/12/2010
Posts: 599
Location: United States
neeshan wrote:
Dude, are you the forum police or something, chill! Did you write your directions on all the other versions of this topic, if you did you should get a badge for upholding the clear and concise directions for getting to a topic which has been asked no more than once! Thanks but no thanks sheriff


Typical online reaction. C’mon.

Just because you’re behind a screen in the vast cyberspace you feel it gives you sanctuary to use a choice of words not appropriate for the comment that you were given?

A) They are there to help
B) Maybe you didn’t know that it was a topic already brought up, with lots of info that may already satisfy you.
C) Your topic was not deleted…. Dude!


Choose n Practice Happiness

Life is simple; we are what we eat and what we read. Talk is superfluous.
Dancing_Doll
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:56:39 PM

Rank: Alpha Blonde

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 6,274
Location: West Coast
Is it an issue of 'monogamy' that some people have the issue with? Technically in this case it's all in the open without deception to either partner and a consensual mutual adventure based on prior agreed upon rules. In essence it's the separation of sex vs love.

I can see why many people aren't into threesomes or swinging or watching or anything along those lines because the impact of visually watching their partner with someone else.

Technically speaking - cheating on one's wife or husband without them knowing is far more of a morality curve-ball than this, in my opinion... yet it seems to be far more common (and acceptable) in society for some reason.


Guest
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:04:32 PM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 535,127
I don't think it is about morals at all. For me it is about not wanting to watch my partner with someone else. Again, morals is not IMO an issue. It is about something else.
Dancing_Doll
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:09:30 PM

Rank: Alpha Blonde

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 6,274
Location: West Coast
JohnC wrote:
I don't think it is about morals at all. For me it is about not wanting to watch my partner with someone else. Again, morals is not IMO an issue. It is about something else.


So it's not about the concept of monogamy within a relationship - but more just the unappealing visual of actually watching it happen.

Yeah, I can understand that.


Guest
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:31:37 PM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 535,127
Yeah, sort of. Not that the other would want to "not see it" so if they didn't it is ok. LOL Most people who go outside their marriage for sex (classic definition of cheating) without their partners approval, don't TELL them they are doing it. So that too is not the same either. It IS about the concept of monogamy withing a relationship..... but hypocrisy exists. For example, a person who is "cheating" on their spouse would probably still not want the spouse to do the same thing... whether they saw it or not.

I think you are making the choice black or white, but the reality is a LOT more gray. ;)
Dancing_Doll
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 4:52:10 PM

Rank: Alpha Blonde

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 6,274
Location: West Coast
JohnC wrote:
Yeah, sort of. Not that the other would want to "not see it" so if they didn't it is ok. LOL Most people who go outside their marriage for sex (classic definition of cheating) without their partners approval, don't TELL them they are doing it. So that too is not the same either. It IS about the concept of monogamy withing a relationship..... but hypocrisy exists. For example, a person who is "cheating" on their spouse would probably still not want the spouse to do the same thing... whether they saw it or not.

I think you are making the choice black or white, but the reality is a LOT more gray. ;)


Oh, I agree it's very gray. Matters of sex and love usually are.

Same as how in the scenario the OP presented, I would find that while it's not technically monogamous, it's also not cheating. The latter is an issue for me, while the former is not. We are a society, often tend to associate them together. I can't speak for all - but I think that's the viewpoint that makes the scenario exciting or appealing to those who are into it and looking to explore the area of non-traditional forms of monogamy.

We, as human beings, are not naturally monogamous creatures. Instead of fighting against it, scenarios like this basically work with our biological tendencies. So - that would be one of the benefits (I think someone questioned this in an earlier post). But as you said - many are not ready for this kind of reality. And if they aren't - it's definitely best to avoid it.


Guest
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:02:21 PM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 535,127
For the most part, I agree with you on what you just posted. Not in disagreement enough on some minor issues to keep going with it though. :) I don't think, however, that it can be boiled down to some not simply wanting to deal with "this kind of reality"; as if they are somehow denying themselves something and living in some not reality based fog. We as humans are set aside from all other creatures because we can control ourselves, and I will leave it at that. ;)

It is quite often best to avoid a LOT of things, for a good many reasons. :)

But like I said, heck, to each their own. As long as all involved are in agreement it is fine. However, many times people THINK they are in agreement, but then after act, they find they really were not...... and that is so unfortunate, and tragic.
Dancing_Doll
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:19:40 PM

Rank: Alpha Blonde

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 6,274
Location: West Coast
JohnC wrote:
We as humans are set aside from all other creatures because we can control ourselves, and I will leave it at that. ;)


Gotta admit - this is pretty funny. clown


Guest
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:26:31 PM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 535,127
Ok.... well some of the time. LOL ;)
brazilandaussie
Posted: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:27:54 PM

Rank: Active Ink Slinger

Joined: 3/24/2010
Posts: 38
Location: perth, Australia
my wife is a slut and loves cock,she loves big cock and loves to be fucked hard,i love nothing more to sit back and watch her fuck 1-2-3 boys its so fucking hot
Guest
Posted: Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:20:19 AM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 535,127
Been reading the various comments and clear its obviously not for all, however I think its not a matter of a woman being passed around like a sex toy. Far from it, its a mutual agreement if it pushes both the husband and wifes buttons. To say the relationship would then be over I dont think is true as Alpha Blonde rightly said, its not a matter of monogamous relationships, its just fucking and getting turned on by it. To say that a woman is simply yours I think cannot be said, as you cant own someone like their property. Its similar to just get turned on by watching porn together. Both parties get aroused by another pair at it! Lol when to people get married, i think sexual desire and fantasy for other people doesn't stop at the push of a button. If you see someone amazing for example in a supermarket lol, you then think 'yea id fuck her/him'. Its then just taking that thought to another level.
Users browsing this topic
Guest 


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.6 (NET v4.0) - 11/14/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.