Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Circumcision: Pediatricians say advantages outweigh risks Options · View
lafayettemister
Posted: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:42:47 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 10/4/2010
Posts: 6,343
Location: Alabama, United States
Circumcision has health advantages

CHICAGO (AP) — The nation's most influential pediatricians group says the health benefits of circumcision in newborn boys outweigh any risks and insurance companies should pay for it.

In its latest policy statement on circumcision, a procedure that has been declining nationwide, the American Academy of Pediatrics moves closer to an endorsement but says the decision should be up to parents.

"It's not a verdict from on high," said policy co-author Dr. Andrew Freedman. "There's not a one-size-fits-all-answer." But from a medical standpoint, circumcision's benefits in reducing risk of disease outweigh its small risks, said Freedman, a pediatric urologist in Los Angeles.

Recent research bolstering evidence that circumcision reduces chances of infection with HIV and other sexually spread diseases, urinary tract infections and penis cancer influenced the academy to update their 13-year-old policy.

Their old stance said potential medical benefits were not sufficient to warrant recommending routinely circumcising newborn boys. The new one says, "The benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for those families who choose it." The academy also says pain relief stronger than a sugar-coated pacifier is essential, usually an injection to numb the area.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Convention has estimated circumcision costs range from about $200 to $600 nationwide. Coverage varies among insurers and several states have stopped Medicaid funding for circumcisions.

The new policy was published online Monday in Pediatrics. It comes amid ongoing debate over whether circumcision is medically necessary or a cosmetic procedure that critics say amounts to genital mutilation. Activists favoring a circumcision ban made headway in putting it to a vote last year in San Francisco but a judge later knocked the measure off the city ballot, ruling that regulating medical procedures is up to the state, not city officials.

In Germany, Jewish and Muslim leaders have protested a regional court ruling in June that said circumcision amounts to bodily harm.

Meantime, a recent study projected that declining U.S. circumcision rates could add more than $4 billion in health care costs in coming years because of increased illness and infections.

Circumcision involves removing foreskin at the tip of the penis. The procedure can reduce germs that can grow underneath the foreskin, and complications, including bleeding and infection, are rare, the academy says.

Despite the U.S. decline, about half of baby boys nationwide still undergo circumcision, or roughly 1 million each year. The country's overall rate is much higher than in other developed nations, but U.S. rates vary by region and are higher in areas where it is a cultural or religious tradition, including among Jews and Muslims.

Psychologist Ronald Goldman, director of an anti-circumcision group, the Circumcision Resource Center, said studies show circumcision causes loss of sexual satisfaction — a claim the academy said is not supported by the research it reviewed — and can be psychologically harming. Goldman contends medical studies showing benefits are flawed and that the academy's new position is "out of step" with medical groups in other developed countries.

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists took part in the research review that led to the new policy and has endorsed it. Circumcisions in hospitals are typically performed by obstetricians or pediatricians.

The CDC also participated in the review, and will consider the academy's updated policy in preparing its own recommendations, a CDC spokesman said. The agency has a fact sheet summarizing circumcision's potential health benefits and risks but no formal guidelines.

The American Medical Association and American Academy of Family Physicians have neutral policies similar to the pediatrics academy's previous position.

Philadelphia social worker Shannon Coyne examined medical research on circumcision before her son was born last September and had a tough time making a decision. She learned that a relative's boy needed reconstructive surgery after a botched circumcision, and that another's son who wasn't circumcised developed urinary infections.

Coyne said she and her husband ultimately decided against circumcision, because she didn't want her baby to have what she considers cosmetic surgery without being able to consent.

Her advice to other parents is "just make an informed decision. Do your research, be open-minded."

Some 18 states have eliminated Medicaid coverage for circumcision, a trend that could contribute to rising health care costs to treat infections if circumcision rates continue to decline, according to a study published Aug. 20 in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

Dr. Aaron Tobian, a Johns Hopkins University assistant professor who co-authored the study, said the academy's updated policy "is a very good step."

============================

Personally, I am cut. My son is cut. Our decision wasn't based on any religious concept. Just is what's done. What do you think? Unnecessary ritual? No harm no foul? No way Jose? Now that it's considered "healthy(ier)" does it change your view on it?





When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates
blazestcyr
Posted: Monday, August 27, 2012 2:34:47 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 10/19/2011
Posts: 737
Location: where bugs die
wow this is a good 1!

i struggled so hard with this when my son was born

i wanted him to be like all the other boys in gym class...circumsized.. as we all knew ..it was thought.. that being uncircumsized was considered unhealthy in the US..for years

however, his father was from eastern europe & he OBJECTED highly

so i decided w/o research to bow to his wishes...& seeing what they did to those other poor wee newborns...barbaric...babies DO feel pain there!!!!

i am glad ...i have heard that decreases pleasure & there truly is no medical prooof that it is better....

has my son gotten crap from it...or teased.. yes...

but ignorance is ALIVE & well here in the south

me i have no preference....it doesnt affect me during sex if you are or not

(but u have to teach your boy to move the skin back & forth so that it doesnt attach to the shaft &..that..is hard)

ps his dad did that!!!!ouch
Buz
Posted: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:27:34 PM

Rank: The Linebacker

Joined: 3/2/2011
Posts: 5,185
Location: Atlanta, United States
I've lived in the south my entire life and never seen or heard of anyone being teased about not being circumcised. There were several guys on my sports teams that were not circumcised and we all had to shower in one big group shower room, no one cared or even mentioned it.

If I have a son and we decide to circumcise him (I think we will), I will make sure that it is done manually. No machine! I do know of 2 instances that the machine messed up and destroyed the baby's genitals.

I have written a new poem. It is called 'Long Twisty Woman.'
You can read it at: http://www.lushstories.com/stories/erotic-poems/long-twisty-woman.aspxx
Also, if you wish, check out my co-authored a story with the wonderful DanielleX. It is called 'Focus on Sex.'
You can read it at: http://www.lushstories.com/stories/quickie-sex/focused-on-sex-1.aspx

naughtynurse
Posted: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:12:53 PM

Rank: Head Nurse

Joined: 4/15/2011
Posts: 6,505
Location: Soaking up the sun, United States
I have had to have patients circumcised as an older adult(I mostly work with geriatrics) due to health problems.


An Editor's Pick

My latest Recomended Read: Something Borrowed
JesseS
Posted: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:28:03 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 1/1/2010
Posts: 117
Location: United States
According to an article I read on the subject, circumcision is a $4B a year business. Call me jaded, but the idea of putting an infant through this severe trauma, plus the endangerment of the procedure, which goes wrong more times than they care to admit and causing future loss of sexual enjoyment, all based on the possibility that the person, whose decision it should be, might let their penis get dirty, is obscene.
kmac88
Posted: Monday, August 27, 2012 6:00:56 PM

Rank: Advanced Wordsmith

Joined: 8/16/2012
Posts: 50
Location: United Kingdom
i had mine done when i was young due to my foreskin being to tight cant really it remember it hurting when i had it done tho
Users browsing this topic
Guest 


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.6 (NET v4.0) - 11/14/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.