|
|
Rank: Active Ink Slinger
Joined: 9/14/2012
Posts: 23
Location: London, United Kingdom
|
What do you all think of the french publishing topless shots of Kate?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Wordsmith
Joined: 8/18/2012
Posts: 54
Location: United Kingdom
|
i have two thoughts. Disgusted at the photographer and sad for kate.
But i can't help thinking she shouldn't have taken her top off in the first place. While she should have every right to do so when in private grounds, as one of the most famous people on the planet, she unfortunately loses this right to privacy and i feel she was a bit naiive to take her top off when outside.
|
|
Rank: Rookie Scribe
Joined: 11/4/2011
Posts: 9
|
I simply don't understand why she should lose her right to privacy. Naive she may be but naivety is no sin whereas the taking of pictures and then publishing them is just plain graceless. The public should refuse to buy the rags that carry such pictures but, as we all know, far too many people will want to see them. Now, I like a nude woman as much as the next lesbian does (lol) but I prefer my pictures to be of volunteers rather than victims.
|
|
 
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 9/6/2011
Posts: 781
Location: the land of enchantment, United States
|
monica3 wrote:I simply don't understand why she should lose her right to privacy. Naive she may be but naivety is no sin whereas the taking of pictures and then publishing them is just plain graceless. The public should refuse to buy the rags that carry such pictures but, as we all know, far too many people will want to see them. Now, I like a nude woman as much as the next lesbian does (lol) but I prefer my pictures to be of volunteers rather than victims. THATS why she loses her right to privacy.
littlemissbitch ~ professional face ripper offer, at your service..
|
|
Rank: Internet Philosopher
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 1,997
Location: somewhere deep under the Earth, United States
|
I admit it. I do want to see them...
“It is a great thing to know your vices.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
. Kelly is beautiful, sexy and willing to do anything... For a price! Kelly's PassionLushstories, the site your Mommy warned you about.
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 2/24/2010
Posts: 2,667
Location: Ohio
|
Milik_The_Red wrote:I admit it. I do want to see them... LOL, me too Milik
|
|
Rank: Internet Philosopher
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 1,997
Location: somewhere deep under the Earth, United States
|
scooter wrote:
LOL, me too Milik
Well they are Royal tits! I mean how often does a guy get a look at really nice tits on a real honest to god princess! Yeah I know. I'm an American, what did you expect?
“It is a great thing to know your vices.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
. Kelly is beautiful, sexy and willing to do anything... For a price! Kelly's PassionLushstories, the site your Mommy warned you about.
|
|
Rank: Story Verifier
Joined: 1/2/2011
Posts: 582
Location: Sarasota County, United States
|
Googe Images - search 'kate middleton topless', poor res, but they are there. Personally, I'd rather see her sister Pippa naked than Kate (yeah, there are a few shots of her if you search, too.).
|
|
Rank: Internet Philosopher
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 1,997
Location: somewhere deep under the Earth, United States
|
TheGulfCoaster wrote:Googe Images - search 'kate middleton topless', poor res, but they are there. Personally, I'd rather see her sister Pippa naked than Kate (yeah, there are a few shots of her if you search, too.). I will later. Tits arn't what I'm thinking of right now
“It is a great thing to know your vices.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
. Kelly is beautiful, sexy and willing to do anything... For a price! Kelly's PassionLushstories, the site your Mommy warned you about.
|
|
Rank: Senior Story Moderator
Joined: 8/23/2011
Posts: 1,915
|
Oldfaithful wrote:i have two thoughts. Disgusted at the photographer and sad for kate.
But i can't help thinking she shouldn't have taken her top off in the first place. While she should have every right to do so when in private grounds, as one of the most famous people on the planet, she unfortunately loses this right to privacy and i feel she was a bit naiive to take her top off when outside. I agree. She was naive to think that this could not happen, especially with the history of the paparazzi with Diana. She would have to concede that relinquishing the privacy of an unknown citizen was part of the deal in marrying into the royal family. A hard way to learn this lesson. Perhaps she was not thinking about it at the time, being in France, where women going topless to sunbathe is common.
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 5/27/2010
Posts: 905
|
It's inevitable that sooner or later, some sort of 'undesirable' pics of such a high profile couple will appear in the press somewhere in the world. In two or three days anyone who is so inclined will have looked at the pictures, and moved on. In my opinion the most naive thing is to sue the publication in question. This will only gain even more press interest, thus pro-longing the whole episode. Typical and ongoing stupidity of the royal press advisors in this country.
|
|
Rank: Active Ink Slinger
Joined: 9/14/2012
Posts: 23
Location: London, United Kingdom
|
She has nice nipples
|
|
Rank: Constant Gardener
Joined: 9/30/2009
Posts: 9,518
Location: Cakeland, United States
|
Who is this woman again, and why are her exposed breasts and nipples of great concern?
 The best thing you can do for your fellow,
next to rousing his conscience, is - not to give him things
to think about, but to wake things up that are in him...
to make him think things for himself - George MacDonald
|
|
Rank: Active Ink Slinger
Joined: 9/14/2012
Posts: 23
Location: London, United Kingdom
|
my tits are bigger
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 8/7/2009
Posts: 10,591
Location: The Other Side Of The Mirror
|
Well at least it will take the heat off of Harry!! HAHA
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 7/19/2012
Posts: 410
Location: A Cave, United States
|
What I don't get, is why everybody cares. In my life, I've never understood the obsession with celebrities. Just because I don't think a rich, famous, noble and/or royal individual should get paid as much as they do, does not mean they should lose their rights to privacy. Many rich people (and nobility/royalty) have committed a lot of crimes in order to get that rich, and maybe they should lose some of their rights and freedoms because of that, but in general, I think the right to privacy should be much more resilient.
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 4/16/2011
Posts: 841
Location: The Sprawl, United States
|
They aren't flattering pictures. it's more ..eh than WOW.
And I thought prince Phillips.. "prince Phillip" took the heat off Harry. Now Phillips off the hook.
Expect the queen next lol
|
|
Rank: Internet Philosopher
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 1,997
Location: somewhere deep under the Earth, United States
|
juicyjaneuk wrote:my tits are bigger And to be fair, I'd like to see yours as well 
“It is a great thing to know your vices.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
. Kelly is beautiful, sexy and willing to do anything... For a price! Kelly's PassionLushstories, the site your Mommy warned you about.
|
|
Rank: Active Ink Slinger
Joined: 9/14/2012
Posts: 23
Location: London, United Kingdom
|
no probs lol
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 5/27/2010
Posts: 905
|
Garza wrote:They aren't flattering pictures. it's more ..eh than WOW.
And I thought prince Phillips.. "prince Phillip" took the heat off Harry. Now Phillips off the hook.
Expect the queen next lol I would challenge anyone to find a pic of the exposed breasts of 'Her Majesty' anywhere! She's a pro!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Wordsmith
Joined: 5/16/2012
Posts: 72
Location: PrairieVillage, United States
|
I guess it time for me to wade in on this "hot" topic
yes she should have privacy that said more caution please
and last I agree with Milik
JuicyJane please honor us with a picture
Blue Eyed Lion
|
|
Rank: Active Ink Slinger
Joined: 9/14/2012
Posts: 23
Location: London, United Kingdom
|
These royals like taking their kit off don't they 
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 8/12/2010
Posts: 397
Location: United States
|
principessa wrote:
I agree. She was naive to think that this could not happen, especially with the history of the paparazzi with Diana. She would have to concede that relinquishing the privacy of an unknown citizen was part of the deal in marrying into the royal family. A hard way to learn this lesson. Perhaps she was not thinking about it at the time, being in France, where women going topless to sunbathe is common.
Agree, well said. I don't mean to stir bad blood here... Just my humble opinion, my apology if I offend someone's thoughts or beliefs. Boobs pics... Who cares! I have not seen the pics. I'm assuming and hope she was not naked. She's a lovely woman with such a natural and classic beauty, but... They want it all and yes, how naive. It's not a big price to pay for what she now has. I personally don't find this event as bad as their wedding. I believe, if they would have said that their wedding was going to be scaled down a bit in lieu of the recent economic situations. They would have been the most loved couple ever. I don't know if a lawsuit will be brought up, but it would only give more exposure. These magazines include lawsuits in their budget. In this case a fine of @ 35000 Euros, and probably some jail time. Not in touch with the reality at all. A gargantuan wedding while peoples are loosing their jobs, homes and families and topless in the open when everything can be recorded. Rule number one for famous peoples: if is questionable... Do not call, write or be present if you do not want to answer.
Practice what you know, and it will help to make clear what now you do not know. — RembrandtThere is poetry as soon as we realize that we possess nothing. — John Cage
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 6/24/2012
Posts: 160
Location: United States
|
Kate Middleton has boobs? Good for her.
|
|
Rank: Story Verifier
Joined: 7/8/2012
Posts: 321
Location: The naughty little world inside my head, United Ki
|
My thoughts - it's a reflection on us as a society (perhaps as a species) that we want to see Kate's body. We're interested in what other people look like naked - particularly young, attractive women. In a world of long-lenses and demand, the only way to prevent pictures like this is to keep your clothes on. It's too late now, the Royals should just let it go. Kate's done nothing wrong, and she's certainly not got anything to be ashamed about. I found myself in a similar situation once. I was on a walk out in the countryside with my BF. It was a sunny day and I was wearing a pair of shorts and little top - so had a fair bit of skin on show. I'd noticed that there was a guy taking pictures but I hadn't realised what of... BF had. It was near a trig-point and BF marched up to the guy and said "Excuse me mate, why are you taking pictures of my girlfriend?" The guy looked like he was going to shit himself - and I wasn't surprised. I'd never seen BF like that - it was like he had inflated with barely-contained rage. I really thought BF was going to attack him. "Show me the pictures." The guy showed them to BF. I didn't see them, but BF said the last 15 pictures were of me. The guy tried to stand-up for himself saying that it was public access land and I wasn't underage. BF ignored him. "I think it'd be in both our interests if you just deleted them." The guy obviously agreed - not just delete, BF made him do a full format and then fill the memory card with fresh pictures... just to be sure. "What would you have done if he hadn't deleted the pictures?" I asked, as we watched the guy leave. "I would have taken them off him." I've never swooned in my life - but came pretty close then....
 
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 2/10/2012
Posts: 1,925
Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
juicyjaneuk wrote:my tits are bigger Quite obviously ... I think Kate is a size 0.
a story that is lots of fun .... Ben's fun!! Good Morning, My CumSlut (oral sex)
* * * * * *
"The supreme accomplishment is to blur the line between work and play." - Arnold J. Toynbee
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 1/4/2012
Posts: 673
Location: New Zealand
|
Milik_The_Red wrote:I admit it. I do want to see them... Me too 
|
|
Rank: Forum Guru
Joined: 2/17/2011
Posts: 333
Location: United States
|
monica3 wrote:I simply don't understand why she should lose her right to privacy. The answer, quite simply, is the almighty dollar. Lots of people would pay good money to see the beautiful young duchess topless and for that very reason, lots of photographers will do whatever they have to do to get the pics
|
|
Rank: Active Ink Slinger
Joined: 9/9/2012
Posts: 39
|
juicyjaneuk wrote:my tits are bigger you are damn right...and i think much more beautiful than her tits....
|
|
Rank: Story Verifier
Joined: 1/2/2011
Posts: 582
Location: Sarasota County, United States
|
swollen wrote:It's inevitable that sooner or later, some sort of 'undesirable' pics of such a high profile couple will appear in the press somewhere in the world. In two or three days anyone who is so inclined will have looked at the pictures, and moved on. In my opinion the most naive thing is to sue the publication in question. This will only gain even more press interest, thus pro-longing the whole episode. Typical and ongoing stupidity of the royal press advisors in this country.
I believe the royal family is suing to prevent them from being published further - if they happen to win the suit, the magazines that publish that sort of thing will think twice about doing it again. If there is a financial penalty that is heavy enough, it might prevent them from ever publishing shots like that again. With the internet and search engines like Google images, I can't see how those magazines can even survive in this day and age.
|
|
|
Guest |