I watch it live on a stream and it's also on Headline News when in session and not on a break. She admits murdering her part time sex pardner but claims "self defense". She shot him once in the head, stabbed him 29 times and cut his throat from ear to ear. Anyone else keeping up with her trial? Talk about "paying" for pussy, this guy sure did.
Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy.
Live in Phoenix it is always on the news, all she is doing trying not to be put to death............no doubt in my mine that she is crazy. With all she did to the guy I don't think sef defense is going to fly.
She just royaly fucked herself today. The prosecution just shot holes in here story and she broke down in tears on the stand. LOL she said Travis body slammed her while in the process of stepping out of the shower because she dropped his camera. The smug look and smirk on her face hasn't helped her cause, that's for sure.
If you go by the evidence and the witness and expert witness then she is guilty. But so was O.J. and that baby killer in FA. I have worked as a court recorder and I know that lawyers are not interested in people who make good jury members. They look for people who can be easy to control. With todays generation who believe that reality shows are real and that police labs have lots of money and time to work on just one case and that anything a lawyer says in court is true then you have results like O.J. and FA. Lawyers don't have to be trueful as they are not required as everyone else is to swear by their honor to be honest and trueful. If you have power, money or if the jury has a chance to make a buck by interviews then anything can happen. And if you let the so called entertainment reporters sway you as to a person's guilt or not rather than make the choice on your own from what you see and hear going on in the court room then you are just as big a mush head as the O.J. and FA jury. So what the victims have to do is wait and hope that an honest jury is in court and that the law will be upheld and justice done. By the way you will never hear a lawyer or judge or lawmaker use the words justice and law in the same sentence.
We KNOW she did it, she admits all that, the question is was it justified as "self defense". I believe the only thing the defense is trying to do, is get her a less than death sentence verdict. She is one stone cold bitch and I bet there are many former lovers who are taking a deep breath and thanking their lucky stars to be alive.
Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy.
I've become totally hung up on this trial too. I've watched some of the court proceedings on youtube late at night (I used to love doing mock trials in school so even the process is interesting to me). And the concept of it - the psychology of how a human being can get to this level of macabre brutality and then be so casual and flakey about everything is mind-boggling to me. I've seen all the autopsy photos on the net and they are way worse than what you can imagine just by the descriptions and 'censored' pics alone.
The way I see it - this is a girl that met a dynamic, successful, 'popular' and well loved guy and was quickly charmed enough to set her sights on him as being 'the one'. Less than a week after they met, she dumps her older live-in boyfriend, declares an interest in changing to his religion and then sets about eventually moving to the state he lives in. That alone shows an 'over-commitment' to a relationship that seems like it was more of a casual/sexual one all along. Fatal attraction, obsession and pathological stalking never ends well. Her story of self-defence (after all her other stories) just doesn't compute with the forensics, evidence and even general logic. Her version of the events is almost laughable at times. If the jury fucks this one up, I'm going to be even more dumbfounded than when I heard about the Casey Anthony verdict.
The sex aspect of the trial is part of what's so compelling. Playing the phone sex recordings in court, the sexting messages... Gawd. It made me think of my own computer and phone etc and how easily things can be misconstrued. The fantasies and sexual dynamic between them that I think anyone on Lush would see as totally normal and mainstream were painted in such a 'deviant' way by the defence. All I know is that if I ever get killed or kill someone and sex came into play, I would be totally fuckered by my own digital trail alone. lol. This poor guy. First being murdered and then having *everything* thrown out into the public domain. Imagine having your phone sex recording streaming live on HLN and your dick pics, kinky fantasies and sexting-messages being discussed in open televised court. Damn. It does make me think more about how digital the world has gone (even crime) and how absolutely nothing is private anymore once it has a digital footprint.
It's a good cautionary tale to men though - no matter how tempting it might be, don't dip your dick in the crazy.
I haven't followed this trial too closely, but I've just googled some of her images. Most are of her in court, with a few others I've seen. Funny how her out of court pics show a pretty attractive woman. While her court pics show her wearing frumpy clothing and school marm eyeglasses. Trying desperately to downplay her attractiveness so she'll seem less sexual.
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates Before the trial started she said that she would never be convicted. Right now I think her attorneys are just trying to save her from the death penalty.
Word of advice stemming from the Jodi Arias trial to all guys: Never tell a psycho ex-girlfriend that just spent the night having sex with you that you are going on vacation with another girl.
This is just a slam dunk case like John Goodman and George Zimmerman .
Travis Alexander is only guilty of poor decisions. He should have stood firm when he broke up with Jodi Arias and not let her seduce him into sex again. But what guy hasn't made that mistake, sex with a sexually aggressive ex. Unfortunately he paid with his life. It would be only fitting for her to pay the same price for her premeditated murder.
That is a serious matter and i will only say that her stories change. Sounds like a good many men In Lush.
The tv analysts kept speculating that the jury can't even look at her due to disgust with her. If those assumptions about the eye cantact are correct, i think it's a case of the judge ordering the jury not to make direct eye contact with her.
But he's one of 250 people out of what? 14k associates to have a ring? He carries himself like a shady used car salesman.