Forum posts made by jack_42

LOL Indeed "hocking a loogie" is NOT cool. But I don't think that is what we were talking about here. ;) If a woman lets her saliva gently flow from her parsed lips, and it falls on the cock to make a blowjob or handjob better.... she just spit. ;)

I did say sloppy is ok but I have actually seen shots of people doing what I described into or onto people's genitals as well as on the turf (nobody is explaining that one - as usual).

He is hardly fair game if he is married.

Oh yes he is the trust does not involve the neighbour (unless she's married then she is breaking trust with her spouse.) But my main question was avoided or was the implication not clear enough as to who should be punched if anybody?

Sloppy sounds ok but actually doing a spitting action like some disgusting football/soccer player (why do they do that nobody ever explains why?) is a turn off especially the sound.

Maybe I'm missing something but going by the prices quoted for driving on US roads compared to UK road tax etc it seems that US drivers have it easy. Though I'm quite happy to be corrected.

Pardon my ignorance but what is a cougar (other than the large feline indigenous to the USA) and are there any tigers, jaguars (not the nifty British car) leopards or cheetahs?

I'd punch her in the throat... I don't share well...

Why her? Everyone is fair game the point is who breaks the trust surely?

The thing about pitbulls is that they are much more easily trained to becoming a killer dog than any other type of breed. They are highly capable of learning, and you don't need much skill to teach them how to kill on command. Some animals, like the German Shepard, can be considered vicious, but that's just because they're very protective of their owner and their owner's property. Unlike the pitbull it will only attack if it considers itself or it's owner(s) to be threatened, while a pitbull can be trained to be a virtual attack dog.


MM This sounds familiar - strange how they've successfully banned the former references you made but not your latter.

I fail on the athletic bit (though I'm not overweight maybe under):) but pass on cooking and travel. Could my third thing be jumping about with a guitar?

I said on an earlier post that men are obsessed with the size of their dicks not women - this seems to be proving it . To add something - this attitude could be viewed as unconsciously sexist as the implication is that women must have huge vagina's which of course isn't the case but merely flexible, (I hastily add). :).

From what I've seen on other threads guys are obsessed with the size of their dicks more than anything else. To answer the question though I find all women have a variety of attractions; they're all a one off for me rather than I have some idealized preference.

My vote is on illegal immigrant dogs. They're working as seeing eye dogs and are also guilty of tax fraud and being payed in bacon under the table.

Or they could be undercover agents for the government plotting against the hoi polloi.

It depends on what you mean. Usually ''where are you from'' means your place of origin - where you were born but location means where I am. So not meaning to be pedantic but I am from the UK but live in CZ. As for heritage it's so complicated I can't be bothered detailing it.

Well, I'm not trying to brag (seriously, and this is true), but none of the guys I've had it off with has had a penis under 8 and 1/2 inches.

So if a guy asks you out you get out your tape measure before you make a decision?

Might want to add some more info on this, because as of this moment you're giving fuck all info other than they're killing dogs...

Maybe they're dogs carrying AK47's.

I have been trying my best not to jump in and add my thoughts to this hot button topic, but I fear I can no longer do so. I have read many of the comments made on all the forums on this topic. In reading these comments, on both side of the issue, I feel many of you are failing to grasp the brass ring.

I wish not to belittle anyone here, but facts are facts so let me point out a few of them.

First. The United States of America stands along in the world, for one reason. We are, the only Constitutional Republic, in the world. We are not (As many believe) a Democracy or a Constitutional Democracy.

For those who wish to disagree with me on that statement, I will ask you to do 2 things.
1: Say the Pledge of a Legions.
2: Study the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and the Constitutions of all 50 states.

Nowhere in any of these documents, dose the word Democracy appear. Why? Because, we are not a Democracy. A Democracy is nothing more then a Mob Rule type of Government. And this is why our founders chose to form our country as a Constitutional Republic. So the People and the Government would be subject to the Rule of Law.

But our Founder understood, that the powers to be, within the Government, could and would change the constitution to benefit them, if there was not a CHECK to their control over the constitution and the people. This is why, they wrote the 2nd Amendment.

Many people only use part of the 2nd Amendment. “The right to bear arms.” But I ask to read the whole amendment below.

Article II
Right to keep and bear arms
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Three points here. The people have the right to form a militia. The Government has the right to regulate the militia and the people have right to bear arms in that militia.

This simple little article allows the PEOPLE to be free from their own Government and allows them to band together in one voice, when all other options fail under the law.

Now with respect to the Governments right to regulate in the 2nd amendment, they can pass laws banning some weapons and some weapons should be regulated. But however the ban they are talking about would be useless and will not save one single life.

To prove that statement here is a FACT! From 1994 to 2004 we had the assault weapons ban in place along with a ban on any magazines holding over 10 rounds.

In 1999, in a place called Columbine 2 mentally disturbed, young boys killed 13 people and injured 21 people. That is an ugly fact. And I am truly sad about that and my heart goes out to all those families.

But back to the point, that LAW didn’t save those poor young people. The fact is, no Law can regulate anyone’s behavior. We have laws on drunk driving, but yet people are still taken to soon and people still drive drunk.

Let’s face it. People have been killing each other since we have walked up right. Kane killed Able and did not use a firearm to do it. So until people learn to respect life, which will never happen in our lifetime, death will happen by any means.

What is the answer to this hot button topic? There is none. You can ban very weapon on earth, and people will still find ways to kill one another. I know. I have seen it many times, all over the world. But to take the people's right or attempt to take that right, is not the right answer. For it will only lead to more death and allow those in power to rule over the people without any fear.






You know to the rest of the world this sounds absolutely insane.

It is amazing how we are always near to each other on this thread.

Call my current one ''You dangerous red head.''

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kT_YS8KhXYM

To me it sounds as if your own sexuality needs awakening. you don;t seem to have had very considerate lovers - maybe I'm misinterpreting here.

His comment about the guy above him made me think of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpJ0cyXbMbI

What strikes me about this is when describing penis size nobody used metric.

My first ever sexual experience was masturbation and I sort of passed out with the intensity of the orgasm and this continued for some time. However my first encounter with another person was not very satisfactor;y in retrospect I realise my partner was not as aroused as me. I was very young and inexperienced and unfortunately there was not a lot of information around about it. For example oral sex was considered rather grotty and as for anal that was only for perverts. I hasten to add that we all became a lot more liberated and in fact my generation probably did more for changing this and other social themes than any previous generation coining the phrase ''Make love not war'' which I still think despite my antiquated attitude is a good idea.

The meat has to be tender but the fat crisp. You get this by continually moving the bacon around in the pan.

Both solo and accompanied.

''I've heard about you.'
What have you heard Shane?
''That you're a low down Yankee liar.
Prove it!''

Bad news Mr Stallion you are 1 inch above the accepted circumference but we have this special lathe.

We could jam together.

As technology advances we may have to rethink our attitude to relationships both real and virtual. I have written a poem/song about this and published it on Lush.

In my opinion by definition a relationship is a specific interaction between people therefore each has its own uniqueness and a generalisation can't be applied. All of the problems and scenarios mentioned so far can all be negotiated and compromises reached. This does make me wonder why non-religious people get married as a public declaration of intent to me always sounds phoney the important thing is not the public promise but the private reality.

You already know how you feel nobody else does everything is now your decision.