Topic Do women dislike or resent the use of the slang "Cunt"?
13 Apr 2013 03:16
All speech is arbitrary and why one word gathers different connotations to another must have some cultural significance. I notice there is no noun except fuck for having a sexual session where you can use the indefinite article. This must be the same sort of thing. We seem to be trying to avoid in some Victorian double morality way saying these words so even grammatically there is no way to say this except in a clinical kind of way (sexual intercourse).
Topic RACK vs SSC
13 Apr 2013 03:01
I don't mind the lifestyles so much as all the acronyms which I find most affected. Is that to keep a sort of restricted club or cult atmosphere or is is related to George Orwell's ideas about language in 1984? How about HMP (hetrosexuall mainstream practices) or WMSENOPL (wank myself stupid every night over pornographic literature), or PTCIMBN (put the custard in my boots now)?
Topic Missionary Sex
09 Apr 2013 15:30
I vacillate between Schweitzer and Livingston.
Topic RIP Margaret Thatcher
09 Apr 2013 15:17
I don't agree with any of the celebrations about her death they are - to quote someone ''tasteless posturing'' and also pointless as celebrating the end of something implies something better is going to happen or something bad has ended like WWII but nothing will change because she's died. The sad part of her death to me is she was part of the age I lived in and it is a reminder of my own frailty. However I abhorred all of her polices the harvest of which we are reaping in endless ways today as the latest idea about taxing bedrooms in council houses is showing which has overtones of the poll tax to it.
Topic Why do guys act this way?
05 Apr 2013 07:40
Why do guys seem to almost always seem like they're very interested in you and then ignore you? For example, one guy and I that I knew spent the night cuddling and kissing and later looked at me and said, "We're definitely going to see each other again." That was three weeks ago. One guy strung me along for 6 months. And guys seem to act in that manner generally. Can you tell me why? xx
I never do this and even when I was younger never did it. These guys sound like they feel they're doing you a favour or something. Whenever a girl expressed an interest it always gave me that happy buzz rather than a power surge. Seems the problem is with them if, as others have expressed, they want to play head games, rather than really meet someone they're just sad pratts trying to boost their flagging egos which they probably doubt in the first place. Kind of berks who consciously flex their muscles and do chest breathing exercises and sing rugby songs in the shower and sneer at skinny little guitar players.
Topic What do you think of my avatar?
02 Apr 2013 12:04
I feel your avatar is ok especially taking into consideration your sexuality but also that if anyone who knows you saw your ''headless shots'' they would recognise you. There are a few small mistakes in your favourite authors where you quote book titles - maybe you meant D.H Lawrence. Not meaning to be picky but you did ask.
Topic Why is girl-girl erotica so hot?!!
02 Apr 2013 09:12
I like anything that portrays realistic passion and romance in whatever gender combination. I have watched some phoney porn of all kinds including girl on girl. I tried watching gay porn but was unable to find any sexy overtones just straight get your dick out stuff which I felt was as off putting as similar hetro or lesbian scenarios. I think part of the appeal of 2 women is the taboo voyeur aspect of watching something that to be realistic isn't yet totally accepted. Also I think women generally (I could be wrong here) are less inhibited and express their feelings visually and vocally better than men and I'm always turned on by that.
01 Apr 2013 04:52
''Very good sir'' - Jeeves understanding Bertie Wooster's inarticulate hungover groans.
Topic Bar joke
01 Apr 2013 04:03
A dog is lying on a bar floor eating from an open bag of crisps (potatoe chips) and then licking its balls. A guy says to his friend ''I wish I could do that.'' The friend replies ''Well give it a crisp and maybe it will let you.''
Topic North Korea
01 Apr 2013 03:24
The reason the Cuban missile crisis ended the way it did was because kennedy made a secret under the table deal the administration never admitted to publicly or they'd look weak. It was a peaceful de-escalation where everyone got what they wanted. It showed the new leaders were willing to play ball, where as Stalin never would have. The ussr would withdraw from Cuba, Kennedy gets to takes credit and say Russia blinked in the stare-down then about 6months later all hush hush we would take our missiles out of turkey. No one has to get lit up atomic style. America and the Ussr could hold their own. we bluffed, they bluffed, we spent on quality, they went quantity. Hence why it's called the cold war. When you setup missile launch sites a hour away from targets things get real regardless.
North Koreas a different situation from the ussr, it's not a multinational league. It's one totalitarian regime, and it's not weakening. They eat fine, the populace suffer. The ussr coup was government vs government. North Korea won't change unless it's the citizens rising up against a million man army which will end in the country destroying itself and being absorbed by south korea; external intervention resulting in the same outcome, or northkorea being dumb enough to poke the world lion with a big fat stick and get malled.
North Korea couldn't fight itself out of a wet torn paperbag against any fully developed nation of the west or east. They boast a big army on land. But that gets you no where when you can't move them, feed them abroad, or support them by sea and air. North koreas completely isolated. An army can't do anything locked in a tiny peninsula. They're ships aren't going anywhere, their planes aren't either. They can't get their missiles straight. They may pose a threat to South Korea or the citizens of North Korea but to NATO it's laughable. So I don't see where your getting this idea that the ussr and north Korea are just yanking our chain. The ussr could have bombed us off the face of the earth and vice versa. North Korea doesn't even have a stable delivery platform or a payload to send. The Entire cold war was a fallacy because no ones dumb enough to launch a nuke and go down that road, it was mostly just the war industry profiteering, but it doesn't change the fact that the threat was real. it doesn't matter if no one pushed the button. It only took a crossed wire or false alert on a radar screen or someone tripping and pushing it by accident (that's not how they're actually launched but that's not the point) Your age is irrelevant because you seem to have a rudimentary understanding of the Cold War-Cuban missile crisis as you wouldn't be comparing it to the completely empty threats of Pyongyang.
Kim Jong Un can talk all he wants but he can't back it up like the soviets could have. I don't know any other countries that try to threaten the strongest military presence in the world while seemingly ignoring the fact they run entirely off foreign aid and can't feed their own people.
We beat North Korea once, were prepared to do it again if we have to. The Korean War wasn't a stalemate because North Korea is some kind of savant military power. They got their asses handed to them and they called their big buddy china to come help just like we stepped in to help South Korea when they got there beating. (pardon the language there) The north doesn't have that option anymore like the south does. They're out of luck.
You can't just lump them together, it was a turning point, It's more likely to end future conflicts than "the war to end all wars" because it was the first time man learned to stop and think before acting and realize this whole business is unacceptable in a civilized society. Kims just a douche.
From what I can gather from all these strategic details you are giving you seem to be proving my point that the cold war was all a con or to use your word bluff and furthermore that there is no reason to worry about North Korea which again I've already said. Looking at my comments I'm not quite sure why you are saying all this, unless you're concerned about the population of North Korea in particular. And I will lump flag waving bully boys together if I want including ''the strongest military presence in the world'' which is not something to be proud of in my opinion. I perfectly understood the rudimentary facts of the cold war and knew they were never going to do it unless of course as you mention it was by accident although I felt my earlier reference to Dr Strangelove said that or didn't you get the joke? My age is relevant in terms of I've seen it all before and could do without all this childish warfare which would just be tiresome if the implications weren't so serious. And young men talking about ''asses kicked'' like it was all some sort of football (sorry soccer) game is equally disheartening.
Topic home wrecker or cheater?
01 Apr 2013 02:51
In my book the onus is always on the cheater and I've been in both situations. I feel the title home wrecker is melodramatic and primitive unless you apply it to the cheater. I also feel that following a come on from a married person is just fair game in fact I am not impressed with marriage as a means of staying faithfull the only important thing unless of course you're religious is the relationship; silly bits of paper and public promises mean nothing the important thing is the relationship and trust between the two people.
Topic Funniest GIF marathon
01 Apr 2013 02:47
I like the dog getting on the sledge everything else on the whole thread seems painfully unfunny.
Topic who is your favourite porn star?
31 Mar 2013 14:23
Can't say i have one, on the whole I don't find porn that appealing, i like to watch sex yes, but porn kinda gets boring. I much rather amateur over pron stars anyday.
I was surprised that people actually remember names. :)
Topic North Korea
31 Mar 2013 13:29
The whole thing was sabre rattling or finger hovering over button bluffing otherwise all the Americans who did so wouldn't have wasted all that money on nuclear fallout shelters and we would not be here. As for the USSR and Gorbachev the details of who was in charge is irrelevant it was crumbling the signs were all there - the wall coming down etc (don't forget I remember when it was built) let's stop enjoying all the drama about Kim Jong I've lost count of how many tyrants are running countries around the world and as for people starving that too is all over the place. And please don't quote the nuclear capability thing - remember I lived with the con of the cold war for all my life so am not impressed. ''Mein Furher I can walk.''
Topic Why do women have such a problem with the age of a one nighter?
31 Mar 2013 08:39
Because when he says he is 78 , you dont know whether he is lieing or not.be the time he takes his blue pill, rubs on the andro, and rogain , you just cant tell any more .
I don't need any godamn blue pills and whatever andro and rogain means (which must be reassuring to those who are on the road to claiming their free bus pass to know it doesn't go away I can still do it every day and on a good day more than once). :)
I must be weird as I don't have any sort of set preferences apart from availability.
Topic North Korea
31 Mar 2013 05:14
Jack, you are correct in the sense that only one country has used nuclear weapons against another country.
But just as the US has recently used it's nuclear capable stealth bombers in test over South Korea as a warning, all too many countries have used nuclear tests as a warning.
Thus, the threat continues to exist, and will only increase as more countries use what little resources they have available to create their own nuclear technology.
Unfortunately I have a long memory and they are not going to do it it's a no win situation and a waste of money. I was a serving member of the forces during the Cuban crisis and that was all sabre rattling. Even the British (my lot) conned the US into thinking we had tested an H bomb so they would allow us to be part of their nuclear thingy when all the time we exploded a very large atom bomb and not an H bomb (I remember the documentary they even told us it was an H bomb). The whole thing will probably crumble internally like the USSR did - all the rest is just hot air and we won't have Charlton Heston on his knees looking at the remains of the statue of Liberty saying ''you finally did it.''