personally, i think that if they don't go for this:

Colton said he had offered Kaitlyn a plea deal in March in which the charges would be reduced to child abuse, a third degree felony; he would recommend to the judge a sentence of community control and probation; and he would not discourage the judge from wiping her record clean. The offer is good until May 24, after which they will move toward a July 15 trial date, he said

they're being incredibly stupid. the consequences of taking it to court could be far worse.

I heard they offered it as a misdemeanor, 2 years probation, 1 year house arrest.

Edit: nevermind you were right, I wasn't paying attention to the tv.

She's being treated just as any boy would be. A guy would already be in jail lol.

Moon

Jj's an okay director if you have a simple plot that needs alot of lens flare.
He's incredibly overrated otherwise.
the only reason his star trek movie worked was because it was an action packed villain episode.
He would never get away with doing a serious anthology episode that really made star trek popular.

Lost sucked, alias sucked, revolution currently sucks but defiance has taken some of the heat off that, fringe was medicore, alcatraz got canceled.
Super8 was terrible and I need not mention mission impossible.

The only good thing he's done is the star trek reboot and person of interest but minus the season finale that was goin downhill too because they keep making it about the other cast members cliched storylines instead of the main story about the machine which is the interest part of the show and ultimately the saving grace that keeps people coming back.
He needs to drop Carter and lionel fuckso, (I mean fusko oops) and bring the show back to Finch and Reese. They're the stars.
If I wanted to watch the cop supporting cast I'd watch law and order or thunder cats.

So I'm apprehensive about his new star trek sequel as it's not getting the hottest reviews and starwars is dead to me anyway after the three flop remakes, but leaks have pointed to it being a seven samurai remake with lightsabers which makes it a joke.

Not donating clothes is just wrong but I can't help but see their point considering it keeps them high end so they can continue to charge outrageous prices to people dumb enough to shop there.
Rich people are assholes, if they think a 70$ t shirt makes them cooler and superior theyll buy it.
If they see poor people wearing it they won't want it, and then the company makes less money which isn't acceptable. It won't hurt a&f at all. theyll only change if their customers stop buying their product.

if I had the money I'd shop there myself considering its impossible to find anything that fits elsewhere unless I want to shop in a kids section. So they have no reason to change

Another reason gattaca was a great movie.

@Kristind

Where is the 3d ar15?
there's only 2 videos in this thread. I didn't see this weapon in either of them.

I guess the action wasn't in automatic mode. It was single shot. What I wanted to address was that you said a rifle had too many parts and would melt. I wanted to show you that in fact they do have a rifle that shot 30 bullets and the weapon didn't melt down. With technology sailing this far I 'd bet automatic is not far off.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-i-Ek-lzGnrs/UUI7SXUDQJI/AAAAAAAACPo/4TVYQCXICjE/s1600/Ar15_upper.gif

Only one part out of 200 was printed. there are so many things to overcome.
I believe the lower receiver is 67. 63 looks like a pin. the part they printed is the simplest of the gun.
The liberator barrel broke after 1 shot of one of the smallest callibers. It's fractured enough on the second shot that he retired the gun. there's no way your going to get multiple fires out of a larger caliber bullet without melting, warping, or breaking the barrel unless major changes are made. That's only one problem of many. the liberators only 15 pieces and is more of a cannon.
I think it's even muzzle loaded. a rifle would use a magazine and automatically cycle each round in after being fired.

If anything the liberator is safer. I'd rather have a crazy on an airplane with an unreliable gun that fires once or twice.
You can't hijack an airplane with one bullet. there's 200 people that are going to bumrush you the second you fire. Zero terror if you spend more than 30 seconds thinking about the situation.

I'm having browser problems ignore this post

Actually it just seems like groups were singled out for their political views.

Superpacs are just as abundant for either left or right politically. I wouldn't mind that 100% of all superpacs get a special review. But unless that is done equally then it would not be right.

I thought they were picked by having the word tea party or patriot.
Any group in politics related to money needs to be watched, picking a side or picking groups that have nothing to do with politics based on a title is just stupid. Superpacs especially regardless of affiliation.

I'm just curious if they were all political groups singled out or only a few of the 75.
Anyone could use the word patriot.
maybe there's a patriot cupcake shop or something.
Doesnt change anything but I'm just curious if this is only political groups.