I am a college professor living in New York City. I am here for fun, intelligently flirtatious chat, and to meet sexually imaginative females. I like to chat and get to know someone and am interested in the truth, not who they pretend to be when online (except for in role-play). Be honest with me and I will return the same respect.I am dominant and interested in learning about others fantasies and talking about female masturbation, getting caught, 3somes, 4somes, bdsm, and teacher/student related role playing. But I am up for talking about almost anything, so try me, you probably can't shock me.
No favourite stories listed.
Today, staying at a resort in Florida. I came back to my hotel room from the beach to get ready to attend another workshop conference, leaving my wife on the beach. I got undressed from my swim suit and before I could slip into my clothes I had an erection.
Wife/girlfriend: of course.Stranger: only if they enjoyed it--not going to impose on anyone.Another guy: probably not unless there were women involved.
Yes. But not recently. Used to slip off to the bathroom when I needed to relieve the tension.
Oh, to be fair, tazznjazz's conclusion that ONLY the National Guard should be allowed to lawfully own weapons is incorrect. The wording only gives the right for the US to arm a military. It does not ban, in any way, the public bearing arms. But, more to her point, it does not guarantee it as a right for all.
Specific referenced in the above post...Section 2 of the US Constitution begins:"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."Section 8 of the US Constitution includes:"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;"and"To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"
While I am not going to argue against the tradition in the U.S. for the public to bear arms, there is a problem with lafayettemister's argument by referencing modern usage of the word militia. You see, there is a strong context for the use of the word militia throughout the Constitution. The militia, as referenced in the US Constitution, is clearly pointing to the governmental run military. Only when looking at the second amendment separate and disconnected from the rest of the constitution does ambiguity exist. This is contrary to the modern definitions that you cited and actually lends support to tazznjazz's argument. Makes for interesting debate.
Pretty kinky!Grats! You're 71% kinky!
Leave her tied up and give her a slow tongue bath.
Pass - because I read his profile and did not have a knee jerk reaction to his avatar. :)
Attach a note to this member, which only you can see.
Please tell us why you think this profile page is inappropriate.
What would you like to do?