Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

are human beings natural monogamist or just a social imposition? Options · View
latinfoxy
Posted: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 8:55:03 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 4/5/2011
Posts: 819
Location: Here
Im torn on this subject, i would like to believe that yes humans are monogamous and me for most of my relationships have been, but the truth is that if you spend 40 years married with the same person, i think its only logical that along all those years you will find someone that you connect with other than your partner.

So what do you think? are we designed to be monogamous or is it just because thats the rule of society?
LadyX
Posted: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 11:10:05 PM

Rank: Artistic Tart
Moderator

Joined: 9/25/2009
Posts: 4,804
Rules of society. Rules that governments and religions gave us so that we could be reliable, stable, and productive.

I think we're meant to procreate. Not only do I not think we're meant to be monogamous, but I think our nature is to seek different partners throughout our lives.
loud_bkr
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 2:34:08 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 2/24/2011
Posts: 5,807
Location: Fuct if I know
I think it's a social imposition. We all grow at different speeds and our desires change over time.
I think Polyamory may be better suited for Humans.

MMonroe
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 5:04:06 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 4/10/2009
Posts: 1,897
Location: United Kingdom
loud_bkr wrote:

I think Polyamory may be better suited for Humans.


You say that but what sets us apart from animals is that we have more complicated emotions. In this day and age, to say that monogamy is out and we can all sleep with whoever when want because its 'natural' would become a big problem.

I can see how polygamy is seen as natural behaviour but for me, its more natural to want to settle down with just one person you're in love with
loud_bkr
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 5:50:13 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 2/24/2011
Posts: 5,807
Location: Fuct if I know
I see where you are coming from MMonroe and agree with you that when “we can all sleep with whoever when want because its 'natural' would become a big problem” , but I suppose the definition of Polyamory can be misunderstood.
For me polyamory does NOT = polygamy or promiscuity, but for me polyamory means a committed relationship with more than one person, not necessarily sexually.
Polyamory acknowledges the possibility of more than one soulmate and that one can be in love with both at the same time in different ways.
I suppose one has to ask oneself if you think that in a relationship with several persons each connection can never be as deep as when you are in a relationship with only one person...?


latinfoxy
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 8:33:37 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 4/5/2011
Posts: 819
Location: Here
Yes i agree with
loud_bkr wrote:
We all grow at different speeds and our desires change over time.
but most humans are to possessive to let a person they love to just go out and say ok have fun and then come back to me, after all one of the first words we learn to say is "mine".

I agree i don't think humans are made to be monogamous, BUT i know i couldn't just say to my boyfriend or husband ok go ahead fuck who ever you want and then come back, unless im involve in the act.

So maybe it is a social imposition that runs so deep on us that its best to just be smart and dont get caught? dontknow
CellarDoor
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 10:07:39 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 1/11/2011
Posts: 126
Location: Realityville
In my opinion I think that monogamy is a means of functioning as "normal" in today's society. Most of us were brought up with the notion that eventually, one day, we'll find a nice person who shares similar interests, values and beliefs and after time we will commit ourselves to them and build a strong foundation with a house, a car, a dog, and 2.4 kids.

As a married woman with a child - yes, I do believe that monogamy, especially to sustain a healthy marriage, is very important. Marriage is about commitment - so if that's not what you're looking for, don't get married! It seems simple enough to me!
If you have other ideas on how it's supposed to go in your relationship, I would hope you and your mate are on the same page about your expectations and boundaries. I find the most important thing is to just communicate and always talk about how you feel. The worst thing is to feel you are on different levels within your relationship - thus making you feel "boxed in" to a certain stereotype. If you're a closet dominatrix, You can only play a Stepford wife for so long!

On the other hand, as much as i'd love to hold on to my fairytale notion of soulmates and destiny, I honestly believe that there is more than one person we are meant to be with. We all think we know what we want, but who can honestly say that they want the same qualities in a partner that they wanted 10 years ago?

As we grow and evolve and mature as individuals, we usually change how we perceive others and change our views on what makes the ideal parter for us.

It's really inevitable that times change. And with that, our environment, society and our frame of mind changes with it - we have to go with the flow or eventually we get left behind. Because of that, a lot of the time couples simply drift apart from those they once considered their "soulmate."

I really do believe that it's possible to love more than one person at a time for different reasons. It really makes me laugh to think that people are monogamous by nature...when really it's just seems that way to most people because it's "the norm" today.

I've learned that no matter how much we mask or deny certain feelings and urges in our minds, we cannot ignore our bodies physical reactions. People can always try to brainwash you to make you believe that a certain idea or formula is ideal, but no one can take away or change the physical, natural and animalistic reactions we have to other human beings. And I was ALWAYS told to listen to my body.

For now, I'm in a committed, monogamous marriage - but that doesn't mean it will always be that way. I think we just need to find someone that makes us happy and feel good inside. As long as you make your intentions clear from the start, you can't really go wrong. And even if you do, we're humans, we make mistakes all the time. It's about learning from those mistakes and applying what you're learned.





Dancing_Doll
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 11:20:33 AM

Rank: Alpha Blonde
Moderator

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 7,183
Location: Your dirty fantasy
I believe in emotional monogamy and then structured physical non-monogamy. This means, you love/connect with one person but may indulge in sex with other people provided it's not done in a sneaking around way and the other person is comfortable with it. I don't think that we are a naturally monogamous species (very few species are). We have innate drives and urges that yes, we can (and should) have some kind of control over, but that doesn't mean that playtime has to be off limits. Obviously sex does not always equal love. I also think it keeps the sex between the primary couple fresh and exciting if they are open to certain kinds of extra-curricular playtime (either together or solo). I just think there always needs to be rules about what is allowed and what each person is comfortable with.

As far as emotional monogamy... I believe in it. I have always operated this way myself. You need the love/emotional bond to justify being together. When that is not there, it's time to dissolve the partnership. I could not function in a marriage/relationship with one person and have emotional affairs on the side and still consider myself happy. Physical connections are very different.

As far as society goes, I think the image of a 'healthy marriage' needs to become more realistic and in tune with human nature and the times we live in. Involving other people in an 'open' way involves communication. And I still think that communication flaws and unrealistic expectations are the main issues behind the divorce rate.


rxtales
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 5:51:19 PM

Rank: Advanced Wordsmith

Joined: 11/28/2008
Posts: 2,589
Location: Newcastle, United Kingdom
This is a topic I have been thinking about a lot recently. Personally I don´t think monogamous relationships are what I want. I have mostly been in monogamous relationships, with only a few open ones.

Quote:
As far as emotional monogamy... I believe in it. I have always operated this way myself. You need the love/emotional bond to justify being together. When that is not there, it's time to dissolve the partnership. I could not function in a marriage/relationship with one person and have emotional affairs on the side and still consider myself happy. Physical connections are very different.


I truly believe people can love more than one person. I think that´s more natural, than only loving one person for the rest of your life. Just because you meet someone who isn´t your spouse/bf, doesn´t necesarilly mean you will love them any less.

I am reading an interesting book right now called "Ethical Slut." If you´re interested in reading materials, I have a few PDFs - PM me.
Dancing_Doll
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 6:12:36 PM

Rank: Alpha Blonde
Moderator

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 7,183
Location: Your dirty fantasy
rxtales wrote:
This is a topic I have been thinking about a lot recently. Personally I don´t think monogamous relationships are what I want. I have mostly been in monogamous relationships, with only a few open ones.

Quote:
As far as emotional monogamy... I believe in it. I have always operated this way myself. You need the love/emotional bond to justify being together. When that is not there, it's time to dissolve the partnership. I could not function in a marriage/relationship with one person and have emotional affairs on the side and still consider myself happy. Physical connections are very different.


I truly believe people can love more than one person. I think that´s more natural, than only loving one person for the rest of your life. Just because you meet someone who isn´t your spouse/bf, doesn´t necesarilly mean you will love them any less.

I am reading an interesting book right now called "Ethical Slut." If you´re interested in reading materials, I have a few PDFs - PM me.


I love the title of that book, so I just sent you a PM. Thanks! icon_smile

Re loving more than one person. I agree that this can happen, however in these cases, I don't really see the necessity of being in a formal relationship with anyone in particular. I think it's all up to the individual person or couple on what works for them, but if I loved or had deep emotional feelings for both Guy-A and Guy-B, then I'd rather just stay single and explore both. I think there's a bigger issue at work with this topic, which is why does everyone feel compelled to couple up and get married at all if it doesn't feel natural for them? I've always seen the point of that kind of committed relationship as being an emotional connection/bond combined with sexual chemistry. I agree that sexual chemistry with other people doesn't have to threaten the emotional connection with a partner, but I wouldn't want to commit to a guy that was in love with both me and another girl. I just wouldn't see the point of the commitment. I might enjoy the connection for what it was worth, but in that case I'd rather just stay formally "single" and explore other options as well. Sometimes staying single and not labelling connections that they have with people is what works best for people.

Then there is the whole polyamory thing, which obviously works for some family arrangements. Personally, I couldn't do it though.


latinfoxy
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 7:16:23 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 4/5/2011
Posts: 819
Location: Here
Im with DD that books sounds very interesting, send you a PM as well.

Dancing_Doll wrote:
I believe in emotional monogamy and then structured physical non-monogamy. This means, you love/connect with one person but may indulge in sex with other people provided it's not done in a sneaking around way and the other person is comfortable with it. I don't think that we are a naturally monogamous species (very few species are). We have innate drives and urges that yes, we can (and should) have some kind of control over, but that doesn't mean that playtime has to be off limits. Obviously sex does not always equal love. I also think it keeps the sex between the primary couple fresh and exciting if they are open to certain kinds of extra-curricular playtime (either together or solo). I just think there always needs to be rules about what is allowed and what each person is comfortable with.


About the topic, i think its very easy to say that you have emotional monogamy, but not physical monogamy. Im not saying that sex is vinculated only with feelings, but i do believe that if you have sex repeatedly with the same person eventually you do end up having feelings for that person. I also think that for more open minded you can be there's always a little jealousy thinking he/she is with someone else.

I dont believe we are monogamous by nature, but i do think that its better to just b the smarter you can be and dont get caught.
Dancing_Doll
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 7:38:57 PM

Rank: Alpha Blonde
Moderator

Joined: 2/17/2010
Posts: 7,183
Location: Your dirty fantasy
latinfoxy wrote:

, but i do believe that if you have sex repeatedly with the same person eventually you do end up having feelings for that person. I also think that for more open minded you can be there's always a little jealousy thinking he/she is with someone else.

I dont believe we are monogamous by nature, but i do think that its better to just b the smarter you can be and dont get caught.


Agreed. And that's why it's important not to have any 'repeat performers' when it comes to partners on the side in an 'open-relationship' (in my opinion). icon_smile

I also think it's better when the couple involves another together or when it's planned together. I would always need rules, personally. I like more of the idea of 'structured monogamy', not just an open free for all. I don't think I'm psychologically made to handle that... LOL. I'm fundamentally against the deception element though (unless it's in a sex story!). My feeling has always been that if it makes your partner uncomfortable, then don't do it. I think that's why it's important to know what one is getting into before committing. Everyone has a different threshold for what they can handle/tolerate.




mare24
Posted: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 11:39:03 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 4/6/2009
Posts: 146
Location: Second star to the right, straight on til morning.
loud_bkr wrote:

For me polyamory does NOT = polygamy or promiscuity, but for me polyamory means a committed relationship with more than one person, not necessarily sexually.
Polyamory acknowledges the possibility of more than one soulmate and that one can be in love with both at the same time in different ways.
I suppose one has to ask oneself if you think that in a relationship with several persons each connection can never be as deep as when you are in a relationship with only one person...?


I completely agree that monogamy is a useless social imposition. Who says you can't have more than one relationship in your lifetime, either singularly or simultaneously? Who is to say the person you were 10yrs ago when you married is the same person today and that your mate will fulfill your evolving needs and desires. Or who is to say the person you are with today is your match in another 10yrs.

I think love and relationships are filled with many dimensions. I, personally, am involved in two relationships right now. Each person fulfills a need that the other cannot. I love each one deeply and differently. Does that make me a horrible person? I think not because I am happier because of it, and I think I give more into each relationship as a result.

I can honestly say that I am a much much happier and whole person than I ever have been in my entire life.
MinaMiranda
Posted: Thursday, April 7, 2011 1:38:11 AM

Rank: Advanced Wordsmith

Joined: 3/29/2011
Posts: 71
I'm loving this thread, the answers here are so thought-provoking.

I agree with Dancing Doll, I'm a believer in emotional monogamy. But I feel physically we are not designed to receive all our needs from just one person, and it's a choice we must make for ourselves as to which path we choose.

For myself, I could not split my soul into parts and share them amongst partners, I would need to give 100% each time. So serial monogamy is my thing. And there is one person in the world for whom my feelings have never, ever, changed, but sadly he can't be with me.

I believe polyamory can work, but the people involved need to be very secure in themselves, and not possessive. Possessiveness and territorial issues are just as natural as polyamory if we are going to compare ourselves to other species, so saying polyamory is natural rather highlights the flaws in nature.






Stock answer to most forum questions:
Some do, Some don't

Love blindsides us all.
loud_bkr
Posted: Thursday, April 7, 2011 6:53:09 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 2/24/2011
Posts: 5,807
Location: Fuct if I know
You are right, possessiveness will come into play a lot, as well as jealousy, however if all partners are open and honest then a non-monogamous e.g. Polyamory) relationship can work.

Most of us go through our lives with the brakes on. Our souls call for growth and expansion, but we ignore and repress those longings, because they go against the "rules" we have agreed to. It's a lot of work to drop our judgments, but they only serve to limit our freedom and our growth.

My view on humanity is that if we are living from the love that we truly are, we will do no harm to others. People can still hurt themselves using our behaviour as an excuse, but that's their baby, not ours.

But those who have grown to the place of realising that everything in this physical plane is temporary, and no one is really "yours" to claim, you can drop the attachments that create jealousy and hurt.


mercianknight
Posted: Thursday, April 7, 2011 7:20:18 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 8/11/2009
Posts: 2,027
Location: whispering conspiratorially in your ear, Bermuda
LadyX wrote:
Rules of society. Rules that governments and religions gave us so that we could be reliable, stable, and productive.

I think we're meant to procreate. Not only do I not think we're meant to be monogamous, but I think our nature is to seek different partners throughout our lives.


Eloquently and concisely put - totally agree. Add to the above the discussion re 'emotional monogamy' and you have it all.

"Whoa, lady, I only speak two languages, English and bad English." - Korben Dallas, from The Fifth Element

"If history repeats itself, and the unexpected always happens, how incapable must man be of learning from experience?" - George Bernard Shaw
Squirthero
Posted: Thursday, April 7, 2011 10:10:35 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 4/5/2011
Posts: 373
Not sure what a social imposition is latinfoxy?, but if you mean a social construct, then for sure. Agree with allot of what is said here too. boringly its both isnt it.

I think

There are instictive drivers that influence us to offer loyalty in order to receive it back, thereby increasing the chances of genetic procreation for men, and having our children provided for for the women (from a darwinian perspective of course)

But there are instinctive drivers that can lead us to break these constructs, chiefly among them being the zenophilic nature of sex drive. The intrigue and allure of the different. Thats why men ogly at any girls, and women read trashy novels.

When the later is stronger than the perception of risk of the former being compromised, infidelity can occur.

XX



Squirt is in the eye of the beholder
myself
Posted: Thursday, April 7, 2011 10:48:59 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 3/17/2010
Posts: 966
Location: .showyourdick.org/
I have always been a monogamist. Sure that I was born this way. Even as a girl, multiple partners didn't feel the way having just a single person felt. Throughout my life, this has always been the same.

Torture the data long enough and they will confess to anything.
cokeheadbarbie
Posted: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47:04 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 11/4/2010
Posts: 169
Location: In the DJ Booth , United Kingdom
I am not a believer in monotony.. oops, I mean monogamy. Giggles.

Yes it is a social imposition. I don't think that anyone follows it though even the ones that claim they do. Everyone will cheat it's just a matter of time and opportunity. That is a guarantee!

xx B.
WellMadeMale
Posted: Saturday, November 24, 2012 4:24:22 AM

Rank: Constant Gardener

Joined: 9/30/2009
Posts: 10,799
Location: Cakeland, United States
cokeheadbarbie wrote:
I am not a believer in monotony.. oops, I mean monogamy. Giggles.


6



Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.
Guest
Posted: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:14:15 AM

Rank: Lurker

Joined: 12/1/2006
Posts: 784,449
According to scientists we are so close to our primate cousins in every way. So, we are naturally rampant not monogamists. It is the social conditioning that makes it so. We now live in an age (as we have for centuries) where our emotional attachments to our partners compels us to be monogamous. As extra relation sexual activity evokes guilt.
sprite
Posted: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:16:50 AM

Rank: Her Royal Spriteness
Moderator

Joined: 6/18/2010
Posts: 21,138
Location: My Tower, United States
Dancing_Doll wrote:
I believe in emotional monogamy and then structured physical non-monogamy. This means, you love/connect with one person but may indulge in sex with other people provided it's not done in a sneaking around way and the other person is comfortable with it. I don't think that we are a naturally monogamous species (very few species are). We have innate drives and urges that yes, we can (and should) have some kind of control over, but that doesn't mean that playtime has to be off limits. Obviously sex does not always equal love. I also think it keeps the sex between the primary couple fresh and exciting if they are open to certain kinds of extra-curricular playtime (either together or solo). I just think there always needs to be rules about what is allowed and what each person is comfortable with.

As far as emotional monogamy... I believe in it. I have always operated this way myself. You need the love/emotional bond to justify being together. When that is not there, it's time to dissolve the partnership. I could not function in a marriage/relationship with one person and have emotional affairs on the side and still consider myself happy. Physical connections are very different.

As far as society goes, I think the image of a 'healthy marriage' needs to become more realistic and in tune with human nature and the times we live in. Involving other people in an 'open' way involves communication. And I still think that communication flaws and unrealistic expectations are the main issues behind the divorce rate.


what i love about Doll is, we share a brain, and whenever she posts, it save me the trouble of trying to say the same thing, only less perfectly :)


oh, and she's hot.

and she's an amazing writer.

and she's nice.

and smart.

and interesting.

did i mention she's hot already?

and yes, i'm emotionally monogamous, my partner/girlfriend/owner/wife-to-be/best friend/soulmate is the only one i need/want/wish/plan to be with - but we both fool around sexually - openly and honestly, often together and it strengthens our relationship rather than hurts it, imo.



Love not hate.
deadlogger
Posted: Monday, November 26, 2012 11:38:35 AM

Rank: Active Ink Slinger

Joined: 11/2/2012
Posts: 18
Location: United Kingdom
latinfoxy wrote:
Im torn on this subject, i would like to believe that yes humans are monogamous and me for most of my relationships have been, but the truth is that if you spend 40 years married with the same person, i think its only logical that along all those years you will find someone that you connect with other than your partner.

So what do you think? are we designed to be monogamous or is it just because thats the rule of society?


Don't like the word designed, perhaps you slipped it in unconciously. We behave in such a way as to give our genes the greatest chance of immortality. Marriage and civilisatation are at odds with this natural aim but they never quite suceed in stamping out the beast in man.
Buz
Posted: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:46:03 PM

Rank: The Linebacker
Moderator

Joined: 3/2/2011
Posts: 10,494
Location: Atlanta, United States
Do you think that Viking men used to swear to their wives that they didn't have their way with foreign women on their summer journeys of pillaging and looting?

"Of course dear I never even looked at another woman but I did behead 25 monks, 11 knights & a Duke and look at all these wonderful gold bracelets I plundered in England. You can have some of them."
— Hagar the Berserker




yonilove
Posted: Sunday, September 25, 2016 12:18:07 PM

Rank: Active Ink Slinger

Joined: 7/5/2016
Posts: 14
Monogamy is imposed through religion and patriarchy. However, we are wired towards being monogamous at least for 3 seconds to 3 years as it is how long the passion and chemical processes involved in it could last. This could expand depending on the direction of the lives of those involved and how they match together. Sometimes passion is not what a person needs/wants in life and prefers the company of their partner over other people's connections or sexual interactions.

I believe monogamy is solely imposed to women as it was a men's attempt to control women not because of the protection of their DNA through their heirs. That was not important in the big communities before the Industrial Revolution unless the heirs were Royal. Royalty has always believed they were special with special blood. But that's another subject for another post. Men wanted to control women because they couldn't control their supremacy within the group by their own merits. It was the only sense of control they had at times. The thing that made them feel a man when he lacked all other traits that would allow him to be privileged within that group/community. Women being more vulnerable when gestating and more susceptible to control.

This said, monogamy or polyamory are a question of needs/wants. If a man/woman needs constant sexual interaction to reaffirm their identity or control over their lives/short term and shallow connections, then polyamory would be a more honest and suitable lifestyle. If a man/woman needs company, deep connections and solid foundations, then monogamy would be a more suitable option.

The thing is either option are right for different needs/wants of the person at a certain time. This might change or not. Polyamory is less socially accepted due to long term religion's influence, but as long as it a honest choice and communicated from the beginning with those who the polyamorous subject interacts is a valid option like any other. Also, the polyamorous subject must express whether they accept their partner to be polyamorous or not from the beginning.

To your question, the answer is yes monogamy has an imposed factor, but it is based on a real need/want at a certain time of people lives. This moment might last all their lives or part of it.
apacheman
Posted: Sunday, September 25, 2016 10:15:52 PM

Rank: Active Ink Slinger

Joined: 9/18/2016
Posts: 16
Location: San Diego area, United States
Given that most sperm have the role of blocking other sperm from reaching the egg, and given the shape of the penis. i.e., the presence of the coronal ridge, and given the difference in male/female responses to orgasm, it is my belief that females are evolutionarily wired for multiple partners in one session.

The coronal ridge speaks to scooping away other sperm, and the differences in penile length speaks to competitive pressures to get the sperm closer to the egg. Many other physical responses point in the same direction.

When a man has an orgasm, it tends to makes him more docile and less aggressive, sleepier sometimes. When a woman has an orgasm it tends to make her want more, and energizes her. One of the most frequent female complaints/frustrations is that the man comes too soon. The man becomes less likely to be ready to go again quickly while the woman is just getting started.

If we look at it, however, as one man just being one of a group, then this response disparity makes sense.

I know on the occasions when I've shared a woman with several other men, the woman reached what I refer to as an orgasmic plateau, where her orgasms become nonstop and can go on for a quite long time.

Basically, it seems that women are designed by nature to be gangbanged, to put it crudely.

So from an evolution point of view, monogamy isn't what we are cut out for.

Now don't get me wrong here, I'm not saying that women should be promiscuous, I'm just describing what the physical features of our equipment and our physical sexual responses seem to point to. Emotional/social responses are a completely different ball of wax.

I think monogamy as a social construct evolved more out of a need to ensure property transfer and male insecurity than out of the physical wiring of sexual response.

I do know that from a personal point of view, I've found that sharing my partner has always been fun (nothing quite like watching your partner lose herself in orgasmic bliss) and seldom threatened my relationships because those relationships were built on more than sex alone. In many ways sharing your partner with multiple men is far less emotionally threatening than sharing her with one.

Everyone is different, with different physical and emotional needs, and the choice of monogamy or not should be based on those.

But if you are a woman with a high sex drive and a straying eye, at least you can understand why you're like that and needn't feel ashamed of your impulses: Nature wired you that way. Mind, that doesn't mean that it is the sole form of sex or relationship one should seek or have, or that every impulse should be surrendered to. It's just a part of the spectrum of human sexual response that society has chosen to stigmatize and repress. It's healthier, I think, to acknowledge and understand and make choices from that viewpoint.
CharlotteRusse1
Posted: Sunday, September 25, 2016 10:34:30 PM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 1/9/2011
Posts: 265
Location: United States
Monogamy is not natural, especially not for women. Read up on it. The tendency is for women to stop being sexually attracted to their partners in monogamy even before the attraction wears out on the other side. Monogamy is a choice. It requires a lot of effort to make monogamy successful.

Writer of amateur erotica since 2011..See the latest at:

[url=http://www.lushstories.com/stories/reluctance/the-chaise-lounge.aspx]
TheAngryishLover
Posted: Monday, September 26, 2016 5:06:54 AM

Rank: Forum Guru

Joined: 12/31/2015
Posts: 1,266
Location: United Kingdom
I do wish people would stop saying monogamy is something that is socially imposed, as it's quite insulting to those who are/were/want to naturally be in one

Can't we also agree that with more than seven billion of us on the planet, that some people are going to be different to others? Not a great stretch of the imagination I'm sure.

My gf would have been distraught had I had sex, or had 'play time', with someone that wasn't her. I would have been equally upset the other way around. Neither of us had, however, any inclination to do so. We would both look at others and recognise beauty/sexiness when we saw it, but without even a thought of wanting to do anything with that person. Even 18 months on and I'm still in a monogamous relationship with her- and it's not due to a lack of opportunities either.

Reading this thread, it would insultingly be suggested that my feelings for her where part of some kind of brainwashing.

If you want to talk about natural desires, how about you talk about how we raise our young. We aren't a species of animal where the man impregnates the woman and the child, or child and mother, is left to fend for itself. Our young are born with a physical and mental development (compared to adulthood) that is way behind all other creatures, and the reasons for which are fantastically interesting (for the geeks amongst us who find that type of stuff interesting). Women do, naturally, look for a father. They look for someone who can bring up their child, and that's why we 'fall in love'. That is not a social imposition, but a chemical reaction that scientists have actually witnessed and measured going on in the brains.

Anyone who thinks monogamy isn't natural clearly hasn't done any research on the subject. But then again, it isn't natural for everyone.

So I go back to my original point- can't we just agree that we can be different to each other?
Users browsing this topic
Guest 


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.6 (NET v4.0) - 11/14/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.