Forum posts made by magical_felix

Topic Halloween Costumes, Girly-Girl Culture, Over-Sexualization and Outside vs. Inside.
Posted 07 Oct 2015 09:46

Halloween and October in general is one of my favorite times of the year but it gets me thinking about our culture in general and why we are the way we are. I went to one of those temporary halloween stores with a friend and her daughter and I won't say I was shocked but I was a little surprised with how literally every costume for girls is either sexualized if it's for teens or comes with a skirt if it's for pre-teen girls now. Literally everything. Batman with a skirt, clown with a skirt, cowgirl with a skirt, astronaut with a skirt... a fucking astronaut.

Is this one of the reasons sexism still exists in our culture? Not just the halloween costumes but the girlification and sexualization of young girls from a very young age.

Do we send the constant message to young girls that it is their looks that are the most important thing about them? That it's what's outside that counts?

Should little girls be girly and little boys be... boy-y? (not sure what the word is supposed to be for boys) Is there really any harm in teaching girls to be pretty?

Is it good to have such specific gender roles? Is it just traditional that girls don't play rough and wear skirts and like pink?

Is it possible to teach both to young girls (and boys)? How?


We should raise boys like we do girls. Does that statement sound ridiculous to you? Why or why not?

We should raise girls like we do boys. Does that statement sound ridiculous to you? Why or why not?

Of those two statements which one sounds the least ridiculous to you? If you had to chose one way to raise all children, which one would you chose?


I saw this ad (Verizon) floating around the internet and to be honest, it does not seem exaggerated at all.


Is this all just politically correct nonsense and girls are girls and boys are boys or is there something deeper going on here?

Topic Butts in Motion
Posted 06 Oct 2015 15:38

Topic Butts in Motion
Posted 06 Oct 2015 15:35

Topic Butts in Motion
Posted 06 Oct 2015 15:34

**Image removed by moderator. Too explicit for this section of the forum.**

Topic Butts in Motion
Posted 06 Oct 2015 15:34

Only butts in motion. Wiggling, jiggling, bouncing, shaking, clapping etc.

**Image removed by moderator. Too explicit for this section of the forum.**

Topic Cybering..
Posted 05 Oct 2015 13:40

new low for us fellows to ponder - Teh cyber pity fuck. Think

And that's coming from someone who has experienced a lot of lows.


Topic Stalkers. Don't forget stalkers. Lol.
Posted 05 Oct 2015 12:04

I DIDN'T say THEY DID validate ANYTHING... (If you ARE CLEVER ENOUGH to look carefully, you'll notice both are ANTI-NAZI jokes!!!)

Don't EVEN ATTEMPT to TROLL me... (Which I NOTICE you DO!!!)


xx SF

If they weren't intended to validate your opinion that anything can be funny then what was the point of posting them? You told the jokes and then said "you can laugh about anything".

I'm not trolling you... If I wanted to troll you I would say that smart people don't usually need to remind you that they are smart.

Topic Stalkers. Don't forget stalkers. Lol.
Posted 05 Oct 2015 11:38

Allow me to be QUITE CLEAR...

In RESEARCHING a NOVEL which needed JOKES from the NAZI era I found what I needed... (AS to the thread, well, I AM stalking BDSMBARBIEDOLL... I actually go through her bins...)

xx SF

Not sure how actual jokes told by Nazis validate anything... It's like using jokes a rapist says about their victims to say you can make jokes about anything... But ok Steph.

Topic Stalkers. Don't forget stalkers. Lol.
Posted 05 Oct 2015 10:19

Humour will ONLY work if it's not VENAL and POISONOUS...

Actually... Humor will only work if it's funny.

The two Nazi jokes and this thread are just not funny. I get the Nazi jokes but they just didn't make me laugh. This thread is just nothing though. There is no joke, no wit, nothing. It just comes off like a crazy person thinking everyone is stalking her.

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 04 Oct 2015 15:43

Further, it will no doubt be pointed out that the sex industry is inherently dangerous. It is.

So is crab fishing, and I think it self-evident that we need sex more than we need crab legs. more, One could argue that appearing in porn is fishing for crabs.

Topic Why do guys like sex in morning so much?
Posted 04 Oct 2015 13:09

Because we like fuckin' all the time.

Fuckin' in the mornin', fuckin' in the evenin', fuckin' at supper time.


Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 04 Oct 2015 09:36

Then that is your opinion. Now please stop acting like you're so smart and having to prove it by being such a jerk. Your post just shows how obsessed you are with me (because you didn't go after HotWife4U or Dani) and how desperate you must be to show everyone you smart you think you are. I've never said you weren't smart... but it's clear you do have issues.

Since you also edited my original post it also proves my earlier point about how when someone quotes you, it can be altered or edited.

As to why you included all this so called information of which you gave NO reference to back your so-called findings with says you went searching for what you WANTED to find. Not much different from this study's findings. Your bias is clearly showing here.

To close by returning to the topic at hand... I'd be interested in other studies done by other researchers on this topic or perhaps on the positive or negative effects on porn. HotWife4U had raised this point up rather eloquently and Dani's counterpoint had merit.

This was one study, one snapshot. By no means is it the definitive end-all on this topic. Will I search for more on this topic... probably not. HS shared it to allow people to SHARE THEIR OPINIONS! Even Dani said that's what this was about... people sharing their opinions on this particular topic.

Wow... Your "point" about people quoting things they are responding to had nothing to do with anything that anyone was talking about. It's just another example of your poor reading comprehension skills. I won't bother explaining it again because it would be like trying to teach math to a donkey.

It's funny you mention the whole obsessed with you thing too. All your posts, especially the ones that were deleted, were directed at me or what I had said. You probably wouldn't have even posted in this thread if i hadn't posted first. You assume I'm stupid and everyone else too when you direct things at me then play innocent because you didn't directly quote me. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

I didn't have anything to say to Dani or Hotwife because they both make valid points about porn addiction. Porn addiction was a point I first mentioned by the way. It stimulated further discussion unlike anything you have said. You asked a question about the source of the data and I answered it.

You further make yourself look foolish by suggesting the information I posted has no source or is just information to prove my bias. If you had bothered to read the actual study that this thread is about (instead of focusing on what a meanie I am boohoo) you would see that the information I posted is directly copied and pasted from the study. Studies will have a section called data source where they state where and how they collected their data. You would think someone like you would know that but I guess not. The data source information is complete and as is in the study.

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 03 Oct 2015 20:22

I think that we need more information about the study to see what the control group was, what the variables were, and the types of porn clips that were used. I say this because if they used ones that portrayed women in a more positive light it would influence the way the viewers perceived women.


Obviously the study wasn't conducted by guys in white coats showing test subjects porn clips and then asking them if they think the porn stars are whores... oh my god haha.

It took about 2 minutes to find the information, Nymph... With very basic researching skills.

Data Source.
The data for this study were drawn from the GSS (Smith et al., 2011), a large-scale, random-probability, personal interview survey that has been conducted in the United States every one to two years since 1973. Since 1975, each residence in the United States has had an equal probability of being sampled, with adults within each household also having an equal probability of being interviewed. The interviews were typically conducted face-to-face, though phone interviews were employed when participants were unable to meet in person. In an effort to reduce participant fatigue while still including a large number of questions, the GSS has contained a set of core questions that were asked of everyone surveyed, but has also contained other questions that were asked of only a portion of parti-cipants or were asked only in certain years. Since 1973, the GSS has had a reasonable response rate, ranging from 82% in 1993 to 70% in 2000. The data used in this study were collected between 1975 and 2010.

Across all of the survey years used in the current study, 10,946 American males and 14,101 American females responded to questions concerning pornography use in addition to questions concerning at least one of the following sets of measures: feminist identification; attitudes toward women in positions of power; attitudes toward women working outside the home; attitudes toward abortion; and attitudes toward the traditional family. Of the total available participants, most were married (53.94%; n¼13,511), White (82.58%; n¼ 20,683), female (56.30%; n¼14,101), politically moder-ate (38.90%;n¼9,001), Protestant (60.58%;n¼15,124), and had a mean age of 45.37 (SD¼17.59) years. Further demographic information can be found in Table 1. The actual number of participants used in each analysis differed for each dependent variable that was examined, as noted in the following section.

Pornography Use.
Pornography use was assessed by asking participants if they had viewed an X-rated film in the preceding year. Response categories were dichot-omous (Yes=No). Across the entire sample of available participants, 22.82% (n¼5,715) of participants indi-cated that they had viewed a pornographic movie within the past year. Recently published research using these data suggests that the prevalence of pornography use has increased slightly since in the 1970s, and individual-level analyses have indicated that pornography use within this data set is correlated with being younger, less religious, non-White, and holding more liberal attitudes toward sexuality within both men and women (Wright, 2013; Wright, Bae, & Funk, 2013). In recent years, the GSS has included a frequency measure of online pornography use over the past 30 days. Unfortunately, this item has not been asked of participants who responded to items about nonegalitar-ian beliefs and attitudes, precluding its use in the current study. Surveys conducted in 2000 and 2002 asked a subset of participants to respond to both metrics of pornography use. Of the participants who indicated that they hadnot viewed an X-rated film in the previous year, only 6.89% (n¼21) in 2000, and 7.14% (n¼10) in 2002, indicated that they had accessed a pornographic Web site in the previous 30 days.

Feminist identification.
Feminist identification was assessed with a single item that asked participants, ‘‘Do you think of yourself as a feminist or not?’’ Response options included Yes, a feminist; Don’t know; and No, not a feminist. To clarify the interpretation, Don’t know responses were dropped from the analysis presented in this section, as only 46 participants selected this option.3 Data were available only for survey year 1996

Women holding positions of power.
Attitudes toward women holding positions of political power were assessed with three items: ‘‘Do you agree or disagree with this statement: Women should take care of running their homes and leave running the country up to men’’; ‘‘If your party nominated a woman for president, would you vote for her if she were qualified for the job?’’; and ‘‘Tell me if you agree or disagree with this statement: Most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.’’ All items had three response options, eitherAgree=Not sure=Disagree orYes=Don’t know=No. Responses to these scales were averaged, with reverse-coding where appropriate, to form an aggregate variable that could range from 1 (indicating a positive view toward women in politics) to 3 (indicating a negative view toward women in politics) (M¼1.49; SD¼0.65; Cronbach’s a¼.70). Analyses concerning attitudes toward women holding positions of power were restricted to the survey years 1975, 1978, 1983, 1986, and 1988 through 1998

Working outside the home.
Attitudes toward women working outside the home were assessed with seven items using 5-point Likert scales that ranged from 1(Strongly agree)to5(Strongly disagree). Example items included: ‘‘All in all, family life suffers when the woman has a full-time job’’; ‘‘A woman and her family will all be happier if she goes out to work’’; and ‘‘Both the husband and the wife should contribute to the household income.’’ Responses to these seven items were reverse-coded where appropriate, and averaged to create an aggregate variable that could range from 1 (indicating a positive attitude toward women working outside the home) to 5 (indicating a negative attitude toward women working outside the home) (M¼2.85; SD¼0.70; Cronbach’s a¼.70). Analyses concerning attitudes toward women working outside thehomewererestrictedtothesurveyyears1988, 1994, and 2002

Attitudes toward abortion were assessed with three items. These items asked participants if they thought that it should be possible for a woman to obtain a legal abortion under different circumstances, including pregnancy as a result of rape, pregnancy when the woman is unmarried and does not want to marry, and abortion if the woman wants one for any reason. Response options included Yes, I don’t know, and No. Responses to these scales were averaged to create an aggregate variable that could range from 1 (indicating strong support for abortion) to 3 (indicating no support for abortion) (M¼1.90;SD¼0.76; Cronbach’sa¼.78). Analyses concerning attitudes toward abortion were restricted to the survey years 1978, 1980, 1983, 1984, and 1987 through 2010

Traditional family.
Attitudes toward the traditional family were investigated with 10 items that assessed the extent to which participants believed the institution of the traditional family either benefited or hindered its members. To this end, participants were first provided with the following definition of the traditional family: ‘‘In many married couples, women take the main responsibility for the care of the home and children, while men take the main responsibility for supporting the family financially.’’ Participants were first asked whether men, women, children, everyone, or no one benefited from this arrangement. They were then subse-quently asked if the same five groups were hurt by this arrangement. Response options to these 10 items included Yes, I don’t know,andNo. Responses to these 10 items were averaged, using reverse-coding where appropriate, to create an aggregate variable that could range from 1 (indicating a negative attitude toward the traditional family) to 3 (indicating a positive attitude toward the traditional family) (M¼2.3; SD¼0.45; Cronbach’sa¼.71). Analyses concerning attitudes toward the traditional family were restricted to the survey year 1996

This makes me feel like this study is pretty bogus... Would you like me to find the Data Analysis method used for you too?

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 03 Oct 2015 12:27

I think porn degrades women, plus it sets a standard most women can't meet. These plastic porn stars that are grinning from ear to ear while being pounded with cocks the size of baseball bats is not real. Treat a woman as a porn actress and don't expect a relationship.

I think porn is a healthy thing for many reasons... But like you, when I think of the negative aspects of it, I think of the way it warps the minds of the inexperienced. There are young women now who are scared of sex and young men who would rather watch porn than have actual sex. The expectations it creates are ridiculous. To people who didn't grow up with the Internet the way modern day teens did it may be hard to understand. Teens are exposed to some of the most ridiculous sex acts ever now. A lot of them are totally desensitized. They are watching this shit everyday from very early ages. Preteen ages. When a lot of us were growing up we'd look at a magazine we found somewhere or an old tape in our dad's closet or something like that. It would spark curiosity but it was nothing like the endless porn kids watch today. I've read things written by prostitues and heard it on interviews with them who talk about young clients who have a hard time finishing or even getting started. Young clients who need porn playing in the background. Young clients who just can't cum unless they jerk themselves off. Porn addiction will actually change the chemistry of the brain in a similar way that drugs and alcohol does.

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 02 Oct 2015 12:40

I didn't change it? And why are you suggesting I'm crying? I can't figure out if you're joking or you're actually this enraged. If so you got problems man...

You did change it... You changed it after your got some replies. I know you did and you know you did. Calling out your ineptitude doesn't mean I'm "enraged". But if you want to believe that, fine. Just trying to educate you, son.

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 02 Oct 2015 09:25

Haha Jesus fucking Christ, sensitive much?

Okay not in the most explicit way but I did raise the point about a lot of people seemingly jumping to conclusions about porn damaging boys' perceptions of girls without any real basis other than assumptions. "It can be sexually aggressive so it's bound to be detrimental."

I took leaving a link and a brief comment to be a "do you agree? Discuss?" Thought some sex research would be an interesting prompt for discussion in its own in this place.

Nobody's crying but it sure seems like someone's about to have an aneurysm. Chill the fuck out, man. No need to be personally insulting.

Oh boohoo someone insulted you on the Internet. What I find the most funny is that you went back to change what you originally posted to be more like what Buz, Dani, and I said. You changed it to make it seem like you too question the accuracy of the findings which makes me wonder what the point of posting the article was if you think it's bogus...unless you just changed your mind after you got a few replies.

Your attempt at intellectualism is a joke.

Your thread is a joke.

And you're a joke.

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 01 Oct 2015 14:53

Maybe wrong place to post an article where a reputable researcher is talking in a perfectly scientific way about their perfectly reasonable study and acknowledging their own biases and highlighting them as interesting points for future discussion and as potential flaws in their own study... I mean if people are just going to say what the researcher themself said in the damned article...

Well then maybe you should learn how to create a proper discussion thread instead of acting like a bitch when you don't get the replies you were looking for. Instead of pouting, grabbing your toys and going home you can summarize the article more clearly, to the point of not needing the article as anything more than a source for your thread. You can ask some questions of the thread readers to stimulate conversation as well. It goes, summary then points of interests then some further questions. You will find that threads you create will have many more responses when done properly instead of just posting a link with some vague commentary after it. If you still think the thread needs further intellectual stimulation you can quote people and ask further questions or just post more questions of your own. It's your own fault that your thread sucks. Anybody can start a thread like you did... Anybody can cry about it when it doesn't turn into a stimulating discussion. Don't be a bitch about it. That's it.

Topic "Porn watchers think more highly of women"
Posted 01 Oct 2015 12:37

I'm neither agreeing or disagreeing with the study but I would imagine that 99% of men with access to a computer watch porn. What I am getting at is, how did they get their data? If it's a survey or done at a college I would also imagine that those who participated are more enlightened than the common man. I mean just to be willing to participate in a study like this would make me feel the participants felt like they had nothing to hide or maybe even something to prove. Not sure if that makes sense but I think a study like this has way too many variables to be accurate.

Topic Picture with words.
Posted 30 Sep 2015 15:53

Topic Burger King Whopper Wine?
Posted 30 Sep 2015 07:01

Just when you think America does some of the stupidest shit on the planet, Europe goes and does something like this.

Topic Romance stories...
Posted 29 Sep 2015 14:29

No, it won't. As long as you convey some real emotion between the characters before, during and after the sex it will stay very much romantic. I wrote a story where the male character initiates the sex by choking the female character before continuing to rough anal sex. The comments I received for this story were variations of, "this was unexpectedly romantic"... "I had an awww moment" ... "They longed for each other" etc. As long as the hardcore action makes sense between your characters and the world you create it shouldn't diminish the romantic aspects at all. It might even elevate the romance.

Topic Guys - do you have any problem with her getting rough and physical with you - such as smacking your
Posted 28 Sep 2015 17:27

FUCK OFF preferably yourself!

That's what I thought. Quiet down now.

Topic Guys - do you have any problem with her getting rough and physical with you - such as smacking your
Posted 28 Sep 2015 17:19

Who in the fuck asked you? Don't like my opinions? Then USE 'EM FOR SUPPOSITORIES you sorry anally enchanted nimrod. Those women you speak of in WW II were doing NON COMBAT jobs to free up men to do the fighting. Your WEAK ATTEMPT at logic and reason is once again a FAIL! Now try for once to focus your tiny attention span on the ACTUAL OP rather than finding yet one more reason to be a pain in my ass. I don't CARE HOW MUCH you WANT IT you'll NEVER get it! SUFFER BITCH!

Do you think I care if you asked me or not? Assume that whenever you post your idiotic sexist opinions, that you are asking me because I will remind you how stupid you are every time. Every single time weavindreams.

Factory work was not traditionally something women did. What world are you living in? Because those women were given the chance to step up and step into roles that were not traditionally filled by women we were able to win the war. It was our industrialism that won that war because our tanks weren't as strong as the german tanks and our planes weren't as fast as the japanese ones. But unlike them we were able to keep producing ours. British intelligence, soldiers, and our industrialism won that war... And guess what? Two out of those three things the Axis didn't have.

On a side note... The assumption that I want your ass is a very gay thought you are having.. Just strange that your mind goes there.

Topic Announcing the Winners of our "Historical Erotica" Competition
Posted 28 Sep 2015 17:00

Congratulations Lupus, Saucy and Milik.

Both Legion and Scarlet were a pleasure to read. Both effortlessly conveyed their time periods to the readers without overdoing the details, excellent writing. There was genuine emotion from the characters to go along with the sex as well. Amazing imagery and pacing. Very well done guys.

Topic Guys - do you have any problem with her getting rough and physical with you - such as smacking your
Posted 28 Sep 2015 16:54

(NO, I'm NOT even slightly concerned with the feminist ergo PC train of thought on this. Mankind has developed as a species and certain traits have been predominantly distributed along gender lines. That fact among many others has contributed to not only our survival but our thriving as a species.)

Feminism is not some politically correct notion. Yeah, mankind has developed (evolved) as a species. Back in your times, men would bonk women over the head and claim them like property. As centuries went by we evolved out of that. In several hundred more years thinking like yours, might even be nonexistent. To choose an example your narrow minded military fellating brain might understand... WW2 historians credit american women for being one of the essential factors for us being on the winning side of that war. Those women were certainly not sticking to "traits that have been distributed along gender lines". The countries that treat their women the most equal to men are the countries that have the best quality of life in the world.

Step away from your computer and go put your head back up your filthy ass.

Topic Favorite Pizza?
Posted 27 Sep 2015 10:18

triple peperoni , with pineapple …… side of anchovies …… 22oz Bud.
I know a special place….

No bull shit or lies , just good friends that tell the truth…...

I had no idea that there are pizza parlors full of lies and bullshit.


Topic Sexy Girls in Nature
Posted 24 Sep 2015 16:40

Topic Club Zafia....
Posted 24 Sep 2015 16:30

Topic Who should be the next US president?
Posted 24 Sep 2015 15:24

I'm still going with Frank Underwood. A democrat with balls (i.e. who isn't Hillary?) and a guy who will take bold action. Oh and he could win the Nobel Peace Prize for a genuine reason when he moves in troops and creates the two state solution. Yup it's Frank for me. What? Who said he's a fictional character? What are you talking about? I mean I saw him on TV just last night.

I wouldn't mind Claire in her tight power outfits running around the country either.

Topic What would you?
Posted 24 Sep 2015 10:39

Another girl butting in here! Sorry! Couldn't his motives just be that he's a talker and strikes up a conversation with the first person he sees, even in the shower room, without a thought about sexual implications? I'm noticing a pattern here, where all the guys are territorial and defensive, while the girls see no suspicious intent. When I was in college, I lived in an older dorm that had open showers, and girls just line up next to each other and start talking! I'm not straight, but even straight girls did this without worrying about whether the girl next to her was bi or lesbian. The other thing I noticed, is how guys seem to be so averse to the prospect of being hit on by other guys. We girls have to deal with getting hit on all the time by people we have absolutely no interest in! We're used to it! If I'm on a lounge chair at the beach, and there are 50 other empty lounge chairs, half the time the first guy to come along is going to grab the chair next to me, and start flirting. More than half the time it'll be some ugly jerk I don't want bugging me, but until he gets obnoxious, I try to be nice anyway. Why are guys so afraid of the prospect of the guy next to him being gay? Get USED to being treated as a sexual object, so you know how WE feel!

Lol please... It's annoying when women do it too. You think men can't handle rejection? You should see how women act when they flirt with a guy who isn't in the mood or not attracted to them. Sorry but not every guy will fuck anything that moves. Women get defensive and call men gay more than other men do.