Forum posts made by magical_felix

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 06 Jul 2014 09:14

As my enjoyment of the site has decreased greatly due to a few individuals; I've spent less time here recently SO; time for another "RANT" I have several posters to respond to:

Ajax- Anyone can make ANY claim at any time. I COULD claim to be Sprite's BF ( I'm not her BF NOR am I making the claim, just a point). If she were asked directly ABOUT that claim and did not answer it, and THEN proceeded to spend every waking moment from the time she got up in the morning until she went to bed at night in CONSTANT private communication with you for weeks...would YOU believe MY claim? DUUUHHH!!!

Dani- First make note of the little stats chart that Felix posted. See the heading "gun related"? The pop tart gun and the picture of a gun on a tee shirt and a LOT of other nonsensical CRAP that did NOT actually involve a gun fall into this "category" and are included IN these "stats" as Felix well KNOWS! This entire chart is Mike Bloomberg at his "finest". Inflated GARBAGE, and these are the "factual stats" Felix CLAIMS to be posting. Felix ALSO KNOWS (as do I) that the "no gun zone policy" is ZERO TOLERANCE so the pop tart gun and the pic of a gun got those kids expelled; not some "last straw" BS. Did EITHER save any lives? Was either DANGEROUS, as both Bloomberg and Felix would have you believe? NO! The entire "no gun zone policy" has been WORSE than an abject failure as it has not only FAILED to save ANY lives it has also INVITED shooters who KNOW that there will be NO possibility of ANY armed resistance that could interfere with their shooting spree. My point being that pop tart guns are the ONLY THING it "prevents"! Fact, crime rates DO increase in areas with restrictive gun laws and DROP in places that EASE those restrictions (Chicago is a case in point).

Do I WANT every dumbass and their dog to be allowed to carry a firearm? NOT NO, BUT HELL NO! I DO NOT want convicts, or those with dangerous mental problems (LIKE Adam Lanza) to be able to TOUCH a firearm without going to prison for it! NOR do I want ANY fool who hasn't had the proper training to be allowed to carry one. The requirements are set forth in EVERY concealed carry law on the books and include: knowledge of the LAW concerning the LEGAL use of BOTH force and deadly force (I've had that training three times in my life), proper threat identification, firearm SAFETY (both in handling the gun AND firing it! More training I've had repeatedly) AND, marksmanship training (I DO NOT want idiots "spraying" rounds in the DIRECTION of a criminal I want them to able to HIT what they aim at!)

Is "return fire" the solution to mass shootings? NO, BUT the POSSIBILTY DOES serve as a deterrent. The TOTAL ABSCENCE of such a possibility serves as? AN OPEN INVITATION! In short, the "gun free zone" idiocy NEEDS TO BE ENDED! Lastly, crime rates decrease when criminals are NOT ASSURED BY LAW that NO ONE else WILL have a gun. They are COWARDS who pick on what they believe to be the weak, helpless and DEFENSELESS (with the exception of the occasional utter moron like the two cop shooters in Vegas) When the LAW assures them that EVERYONE is defenseless there is NO deterrent factor in play and THAT is when violent crime rates RADICALLY increase (as has been PROVEN in BOTH Chicago and Australia). The other thing I DO NOT WANT is for Mikie Bloomerbug and Felix to turn the entire NATION into a "gun free zone" (which IS their intent!) To lump, properly trained, LAW ABIDING citizens who chose to carry a firearm for their protection and the protection of their family into the same "class" as criminals is no different than saying EVERY female is a whore.

Felix- Are ya just kidding me? Even YOU can't be THAT stupid! How the Hell am I supposed to quote stats that CANNOT exist due to the FACT that the moronic law you've championed has rendered any such occurrence an utter impossibility?! Moreover, you REALLY NEED stats to PROVE that some people ARE willing to put their own lives at risk for others? SERIOUSLY? Hell, the teachers at Sandy Hook did so and committed suicide in the process (as did the concealed carry guy who was killed in the Vegas Walmart trying to stop the cop killers!)

Ladies, if you have children make note of his remarks and DO NOT let HIM anywhere near your kids! IF he considers a kid chewing a pop tart into the shape of a gun as "a last straw" ...

You want STATS? Here ya go, according to the CDC (which reports on all manner of things and as far as I know has NO "dog in this fight" one way or the other...
From 2010-2011 we ranked third in the world in murder rate out of 216 nations. There were OVER 11,000 murders ...of those ONLY 2,200 were NOT gang related shootings... in a nation of over 300 million people. That same year? 45,000 died in automobile accidents (hmm, those cars and trucks are more deadly than fire arms! Time to look into the liscencing requirements? Or maybe consider a BAN on those man killers? SARCASM folks!) Another factoid or two from that same report, IF you subtract the killings in: CHICAGO; WASHINGTON, DC; Detroit and New Orleans (ALL of which have HIGH levels of gang activity) We end up WHERE on that SAME list? #214! AND, two of them (Chicago and DC) had? The MOST restrictive gun laws in the nation! So much for the SO CALLED "effectiveness" of gun bans.

I hope you ALL (even you Felix) had a nice 4th of July as we US citizens celebrated our FREEDOM, the LIBERTIES it is SUPPOSED TO guarantee us, AND the sacrifices that have been made over the course of our history to PROVIDE it!

You're a...crazy person.

Topic Does she like me?
Posted 03 Jul 2014 23:33

Imbecilic remark

I came out to have a good time and I'm honestly feeling so attacked right now.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 03 Jul 2014 11:04

And your source is? Oh let me guess, Mikie Bloomerbug's NOTORIOUS stats padding liars. Of course, coming from someone who wouldn't recognize truth or honesty if they jumped four feet in the air and drop kicked him across the room... While you may not have anything more to do than research stats or run to Bloomerbug for more of them, I DO. Stats can and often DO lie! Which is WHY liars tend to make profuse use of padded and often phony stats. So tell me, did those "gun related" incidents include the gang bangers? AND, the kid with the chewed pop tart?

News stories aren't stats... how dumb are you... I am asking you to back up your claims that law abiding citizens with guns prevent school and mass shootings. Surely these instances would make the news. Why can't you provide any?

And even if gangbangers shoot people too... Are you saying that those shootings don't count? You can provide a news story where a vigilante fantasy having nutcase like yourself took down a gangbanger before the gangbanger shot someone at school too if you wish.

By the way, one kid who was sent home after chewing a pop tart into a gun isn't more tragic than dead children. Plus, since you don't provide any source for this incident then we don't know any background. We don't know if that was the straw that broke the camel's back that got him in trouble or anything.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 03 Jul 2014 07:01

Congratulations, we ARE in agreement (it's called emphasis and I don't personally give a damn who likes my style and who doesn't). As to the kids at Sandy Hook, remember to THANK the anti gun crowd for insuring the shooter maximum time to wreak maximum carnage and making ANY possibility of a RESPONSIBLE and law abiding citizen coming to their defense an utter impossibility.

Still waiting for you to link us to all the stories of gun carrying citizens taking down mad gunmen in non gun free zones.

There have been over 70 gun related incidents where a gun is fired (including mass shootings) in schools since Sandy Hook. Were all these in gun free zones? How many of these gun men were stopped by a "RESPONSIBLE and law abiding citizen" and their gun?

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 02 Jul 2014 21:48

Oh, Guy, we GO BACK!

(It was the realization that the words 'rape' and 'culture' can be combined in an ACCEPTED phrase that turned my stomach! I despair sometimes, ya know!)

But darling YOU DIDN'T INVENT THE TERM! (And I know that...) I don't ALWAYS agree with you but I always respect your views and your often sharply pointed arguments. You make me THINK and sometimes reconsider. No Higher Compliment.

xx Stephen

The fact that we need to have a term like rape culture upsets me too dude.

And thanks, that is really cool to read Steph.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 02 Jul 2014 13:50

Magical Felix, we have inter-acted more than once without ever a cross word! I meant NO OFFENSE to you in any way!

LOL I know... I didn't take it that way. I was just wondering what your views were.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 02 Jul 2014 13:15

The USE of the term "RAPE CULTURE" in this topic/header has ACTUALLY AND IN FACT made me throw up.

x SF

Why is that? Do you feel it is not relevant to this case or do you believe it does not exist or what?

Rape culture is a concept that links rape and sexual violence to the culture of a society, and in which prevalent attitudes and practices normalize, excuse, tolerate, and even condone rape.

Examples of behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include victim blaming, sexual objectification, trivializing rape, denial of widespread rape, or refusing to acknowledge the harm of certain forms of sexual violence that do not conform to certain stereotypes of stranger or violent rape. Rape culture has been used to model behavior within social groups, including prison rape and conflict areas where war rape is used as psychological warfare. Entire countries have also been alleged to be rape cultures.

Although the concept of rape culture is used in feminist academia, there is disagreement over what defines a rape culture and to what degree a given society meets the criteria to be considered a rape culture.

Rape culture has been observed to correlate with other social factors and behaviors. Research identifies correlation between rape myths, victim blaming and trivialization of rape with increased incidence of racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, religious intolerance, and other forms of discrimination.

Topic Does a girl having big breast matter?
Posted 02 Jul 2014 12:44

Hopefully she has two, then all is good!


So you are going to discriminate against those who have had a mastectomy? Shame....

Nope, I just fear the dreaded "uni- boob"


That's not even remotely funny.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 02 Jul 2014 12:33

Sprite- Rant? The fact that you never saw the news stories about those children being expelled from school for those "infractions" of the "gun free zone policy" doesn't make my comments rants. EACH of those idiotic things WERE done by school officials! Including the kid who WAS expelled for doing something as "dangerous" as chewing his pop tart into the shape of a gun! That is NOT a joke although it SHOULD BE! At no point did I say you SHOULD do anything, what you CHOSE to do is up to you. FOR NOW! However, the FUTURE is another matter and people like Mike Bloomberg, Felix and Elicia are determined to turn "Everytown" into another Chicago with sky high violent crime rates due to the simple fact that there will be NO deterent factor. Those from Australia (where this idiocy HAS been tried) have also ATTEMPTED to tell you the same thing. BUT, feel free to listen to the nonsense that arrogant wonder your own risk. Better enforcement of the currently extent gun laws would have prevented MOST of what has been discussed here... even Mark Glaze the former President of one of Bloomberg's anti gun campaigns who recently resigned BECAUSE he saw that what they want is WRONG has said as much. Lastly, even Felix is bright enough to be able to stuff a rag into a bottle filled with gasoline. And, being mentally unbalanced is NOT the same thing as being too stupid to follow the directions they can locate on the internet for building any sort of bomb OR a flame thrower if they so desire. It's all there to be found.

Felix, listen closely sweetpea, you drag utter BS into this and then CLAIM that I'm "fixated upon it". Not ONCE have you argued ANY point honestly and your motives seem to be massive insecurity coupled with CLEARLY mistaken thinking. Still, you cling to your presumption of intellectual superiority. One of us needs to get a grip, but it's YOU, not me. How does it feel to KNOW that I have two little dogs in this house and that either of them is both brighter and braver than you have ever been? Either learns from painful experience, you DON'T! Either, while they would run first, if cornered would fight to the death for those they hold dear. You've already told us you REFUSE to do so. As to your "theory" garbage, I asked you a question dimwit; THAT does NOT constitute theorizing, I was merely hopeful that you at least had a better motive than what appears to be the case. Although given the track record you AND Bloomberg's campaign have, any expectation of an honest answer from you WAS a mistake on my part. Lastly , good catch; you FINALLY got the point. "Gun free" is moronic as the ONLY people who will obey the laws abiding citizens... who then become sitting ducks for the butchers... DUUUHHH!!! Do you own a fire extinguisher? A first aid kit? An automobile insurance policy? A home owners insurance policy? A health insurance policy? Oh my, what fearful and dangerous thinking... by the same standard you apply. Gun owners don't buy weapons hoping TO shoot anyone, we HOPE we NEVER need to, just as we HOPE we never NEED any of those other things. It's called prudence, look it up some time.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 02 Jul 2014 03:09

Tell that last part to Xuani SHE was the one who ASKED! (THIS is what he thinks of YOUR intellect apparently. As to my education, it's none of your business you arrogant, egomaniacal twerp.

As for being "a disgrace to the male gender" you're a fine one to talk; turn YOURS in MISSY they are wasted on you. I WAS going to be nice about this, BUT as you've once again CHOSEN the low road; my remarks concerned YOUR unending insults, and clearly you're too stupid to make the connection. (Well, MAYBE you WERE right after all! LOL You DO seem to qualify!)

Now PLEASE tell us you're on the payroll of Mikie Bloomerbug's $50 Million dollar anti gun campaign, because as little as I think of you; even I don't REALLY want to think you've been THIS utterly despicable for nothing more than the hope of a little cyber assist with a few jerk jobs. As deplorable a sample of humanity as you are I REALLY don't want to think you are actually THAT pathetic!

Now you self anointed genius; as I said before; even an animal is bright enough to learn from it's mistakes but arrogant know it all's like you aren't that intelligent. SO, the next time there is a mass shooting in a "gun free zone" that this FOOL equates with a CRIME free zone, remember to thank him for helping to provide the butchers with plenty of time. Remember that HE insists that LAW ABIDING citizens MUST be helpless, defenseless targets because he hasn't yet figured out that CRIMINALS DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE LAW! Oh, but look at all the GOOD it's doing, because after all, children have been expelled for doing such dangerous things as :chewing a pop tart into the SHAPE OF A GUN! OMG! Or, Wearing a shirt with a PICTURE of A GUN on it! OMG! Or, stating that they had a CAP GUN AT HOME that looked exactly like the PICTURE of a gun in the Wild West magazine another kid brought with him! OMG! Such utterly heinous behavior.

NOW, go educate yourself as to THE FACTS, because YES, the crime rate did drop by those numbers in Chicago BEFORE the first concealed carry permit was even issued!

Because it's resulting in dead fellow citizens and the BS is being spread here. Oh and Sprite so do gas and diesel fuel bombs; but hey why listen to reason when it's so much easier to be flippant and refuse to learn from the slaughter and instead just sit back and watch the bodies mount while you HOPE you're not one of them? And, oh my yes, those deadly pop tart guns MUST go...

Look, I usually refrain from answering such stupidity. But because I strongly believe that young people read these threads and this website as I once did myself when I was young I will answer you in hopes that maybe just one young person can see how dangerous and stupid it is to think like you do.

You give gunmen maniacs credit enough to be intelligent enough to create bombs. The two guys at columbine tried to create bombs but they didn't work. Their guns did though. The boston bombers and tim mcveigh were the only ones who could be considered domestic bombers that I can think off. Both were military trained. Just because bombs can be created doesn't mean they will be by morons with guns. You gun nuts like to scream about how maniacs and terrorists will find a way to kill... But the fact is that guns are still the weapon of choice in this country. Why? because it is the easiest weapon to use and then ultimately kill yourself with. If these gunman were smart enough to make bombs then they probably would, but they aren't because that information is not easily available. It's not easily available here but guns are. If that information was as available as guns are then there would be more bombings. Its that simple.

You talk about gun free zones and the two mass killings there... For starters, obviously those zones weren't as gun free since the gunman were armed to the teeth, right? And two, what about the dozens and dozens of other killing sprees that didn't happen in gun free zones, genius? Now this is a serious question. Can you produce sources on news stories about armed citizens preventing public shootings with their lawfully acquired guns in these non gun free zones? I imagine that would be newsworthy. Of course I know you won't come up with anything.. I asked you to produce some background and sources for your other claims but you have none. The good thing is that you look stupid, misogynist and generally crazy and I feel that young people who happen to read this will see that and in future generations people like you will be weeded out and hopefully go extinct.

I won't comment on your tin hat conspiracy theories on me being on bloombergs payroll? What...

You talk about facts but you don't give any. Get a life, stop mixing your internet "love/heartbreak" with this thread (so weird) stop listening to radio and TV that panders to morons, stop fixating on me getting some kind of internet special treatment... You need to seriously just stop and take a breath. You sound very disturbed.

Topic Elliot Rodger kills 6, injures 13 others. Is it rape culture, guns or something else?
Posted 01 Jul 2014 17:34

Partially right, he SHOULDN'T have had ANY guns...AND IF the laws HAD BEEN ENFORCED...HE WOULDN'T HAVE! Which is WHY I've been screaming that we need MORE enforcement NOT more laws. Oh, and interestingly enough, Mark Glaze; who recently resigned as the head of on of Mikie Bloomerbug's anti gun organizations...SAID THE EXACT SAME THING! He ALSO SAID that they (the anti gun lobby) have NO answers for situations like Sandy Hook!

Interesting FACT, Chicago with it's anti gun laws, has had the highest crime rate in the nation. When it's gun stores were allowed (by the Supreme Court) to reopen their doors...IT DROPPED by 18% When that SAME Supreme Court FORCED the state of Illinois to allow concealed carry... it dropped by ANOTHER 26%

Xuani this thread has BEEN about gun laws from the start. Hence it has also been about politicians and legislation.

Felix, while I'm sure that Albert Moultin, the Sheriff of York, Maine in 1972 who wrote the letter of commendation he sent to my CO at Portsmouth USNDC AND the little old lady whose life my actions that day probably saved, at the risk of my own, would agree that there IS a "vomit bag" posting on this thread; I'm equally sure it wouldn't be ME they would point to! (The junked up, drunked up two legged animal I took on was roughly twice my size and attacking her in her car. I had NO way of knowing whether or not he was armed.)

Margot, you and Elicia keep cheering on the internet hero and shit hurling rabble rouser as it's ME he's throwing the shit at, IF you are (and seem to be) THAT small, I'm sorry you were ever on MY FL in the first place.

It's amazing to me though, how this site operates. Somehow I DOUBT that ANYONE would be allowed to call ANY female on this site a lowlife, two bit, disease laden skank, yet when the internet hero hurls one insult after another at me in the course of this shit hurling fest CALLED "a discussion"'s ignored. But, why do I think that everyone of you HOPES that should you ever NEED ONE, there WILL BE some "crazy, dangerous, vomit bag" like yours truly on hand to come to your rescue? Oh and a dating hint, internet heros don't just "shudder to think" they shudder at a great deal; including the terrifying specter of their own shadow! So, IF you date one... wear track shoes! The only way you'll get any help from HIM with any thugs is IF you can OUT RUN HIM!

The idiotic notion that a "no gun zone" equates to a no crime zone has already been disproven at places like Columbine and Sandy Hook, yet Felix has the audacity to speak of "those of lesser intellectual capacity". Even ANIMALS have the intellectual capacity to learn from their mistakes. One small nugget of truth about me has been told here. I AM 64 years old. Much older, and in some ways wiser than the impetuous young combat Marine freshly back from a combat zone and still filled with the feelings of invulernability and immortality that are a nessicity for a combat trooper. So, IF you let the likes of Felix, Elicia and Mike Bloomerbug talk you into removing my "equalizer" from my hands and further increase the odds that ANY attempt to come to your rescue should you need it will merely be a pointless suicide mission that will only add my name to the death toll, don't be surprised IF I'm unwilling to do so! Protecting the defenseless has been who I am for many long years but ...

Lastly, as to the individual chomping at the bit to prove their hypocrisy by posting some emails... YES, I made the mistake of falling in love with someone on the internet and it turned out to be the WRONG person. Shame on me (Sound like the gal who let some guy take naked pics? hmmm) I don't know or care what "the mods have read". I am SURE that NONE of them did what I wouldn't do either and that is to read ALL of the literally THOUSANDS of BB's that went back and forth over the course of nearly two and a half months of 16-20 hour days spent in nonstop private conversations. But, they don't need to. Just read the very last one she sent to me, it tells you EXACTLY what this BS has all been about. So, Xuani, THAT is my one condition. As long as the FIRST thing she posts IS that last BB she sent me, she can then post ALL of the hand picked emails she pleases! BUT, I want this site to SEE THE REAL person not the fascade.

You may now resume your shit hurling under the capable guidance of your rabble rouser, I'll go back to playing golf. Best of luck to one and the world THEY want us to live're going to NEED ALL the luck you can get!

Ideas are bulletproof, dumbass.

It's obvious intellectual superiority makes you and others of your ilk make you tighten your grip on your guns because, like you say, it's your equalizer. Unfortunatly for you, ideas and intelligence is what makes our society evolve. Not your fear.

As for what you said about your feelings about women getting preferential treatment on this site, you couldn't be more wrong and just further brings to light your obvious mysogonistic tendencies. Again you state that its women's fault for making themselves victims rather than the fact that men shouldn't create victims out of them. You're a disgrace to the male gender.

Your interesting facts on crime rates have no sources or background. Obviously when you start with one of the highest crime rates in the country no law will change the rate either way in such a short time. Your nearsighted uneducated nature is a huge problem in this country because there are many of you. Fortunately, the times they are a changin'.

As far as your claim that this thread was about guns, well yes, it was. It's clearly stated in the thread topic. What's next, newton? You gonna let us all how the sky is blue too?

Topic Which improvements or features would you like to see added?
Posted 01 Jul 2014 10:33

Just picking up the thought. I'm not sure if fractional scores between four and five would work and how those could be implemented so they are intuitive to use for readers.

What I've got in mind would be a more detailed scoring system with individual scores for different aspects of the story. Just making up an example from the top of my head:

1. Character development

1 - Huh, there were characters?
2 - Yeah, there were characters, I remember now.
3 - Interesting characters! I even remember all their names!
4 - Your characters were lovely distinctive, gimme more of that!
5 - Wow, I felt as if I was your characters' heads!

2. Plot

1 - What plot?
2 - Something happened, but nothing important.
3 - Cool, this story had an interesting plot!
4 - This wasn't just plot, this was storytelling. Very good!
5 - Outstanding! Kept me guessing what would happen from the first second right until the end!

3. Writing level

1 - It was okay to read
2 - There was a certain flow in the story, at least mostly
3 - This story flowed well and was fun to read
4 - Well-written and imaginative language
5 - Brilliant! This story wasn't just written, it was painted with language!

4. Dialogue

1 - A bit plain
2 - I could see that you tried to make the dialogue work
3 - Your dialogue worked well for your situations
4 - Loved the dialogue, each character even had a distinctive voice!
5 - Absolutely brilliant! Witty, imaginative and absolutely believable!

5. Suspense

1 - Sorry, there wasn't much to look forward to
2 - I almost fell for the hints, but they were a bit obvious
3 - Yep, you kept me guessing!
4 - I couldn't sit still for even a moment! Well done!
5 - I kept biting my lip and chewing my nails. God, I almost died from suspense!

6. Eroticism

1 - The sexy parts need shaping out.
2 - There were some sexy moments.
3 - This one was sexy and had moments I loved!
4 - Wow, absolutely hot!
5 - Sizzling! I've got blisters on my skin!

If all of these were weighted equally, we as authors would perhaps get more detailed feedback about which parts could be improved and which work well while the combined scores we get through these would be better balanced. If readers could filter for certain aspects that are important to them, they could get some value as well.

Finally, what's not included in the scoring above is the explicitness level. This might also be an interesting information for readers - it might also be something the author sets when submitting the story. I do know that some of my regular readers are a bit out of their comfort zone when I submit heavier stuff.

How explicit would you rate the language of the story?
Tame ..... Romantic ..... Sexy ..... Dirty ..... No holds barred

I'm quite aware that my suggestion couldn't replace the existing scoring system and mixing scores between both would be rather pointless, so it would need a separate display and a catchy name to take off.

All this would do is have people that tend to ask for votes from their friends and vote-trade with other authors to recieve six votes of 5 rather than one vote of 5.

Topic have you guys teased a lady while shes asleep and is it a turn on?
Posted 01 Jul 2014 10:08

Are any of you that finger women while they are asleep currently on any sex offender registries?

Just curious.

Topic Announcing the Winners of our "Supernatural / Sci-Fi" Stories Competition
Posted 01 Jul 2014 08:42

Nice going again Liz!

Topic 24 horrible truths about sex we wish someone had taught us in sex education
Posted 01 Jul 2014 08:30

8. Fanny farts are a thing. End of.

That's the best part. Make that pussy go pfrtfrtfrtfrtfrt.

Topic Today in Pictures (post a picture representing your mood)
Posted 30 Jun 2014 02:33

Someone sent me a PM saying I'm a "peace" of shit. A PEACE of shit. sign3 LOL


Topic Is something wrong?
Posted 29 Jun 2014 22:48

Totally agree

Though I must add that what Master Jonathan said was very informative. To master anything in life, a person should do research, apply what they learned from it and practice the skill(s). The simplest thing to have done was just ask what he meant by "study." But I guess that would have been too easy for MF.

I did ask... I very clearly asked where he studied for years to be a master. He could have elaborated or set me straight.

I know you don't have any answers either Banes1.

Still curious as to where it is all this master studying happens.

Oh and how was regurgitated master nonsense that really says nothing, informative? I'm asking seriously. Tell me exactly which parts are informative. I see what is posted but I don't see any substance realistically relating to anything.

Topic Is something wrong?
Posted 29 Jun 2014 12:27

I understand that these are legitimate concerns. Perhaps they would be better addressed in another thread entirely. Feel free to start another thread with this as a topic.

I look forward to the replies.

Let's keep things on topic going forward.

Did you read the OP's topic starter? He mentions he's a Dom with some confusion about the treatment and motivation of people who act submissive for him. "Master" Jonathan came in to say very little with many words and he said he studied for years (lol) to be a master. Obviously a "master" would know what was up with the submissive so that would indicate the OP isn't one nor does the OP claim to be one. I would imagine "master" Jonathan hasn't forgotten where he did all his studying on the subject and I would also imagine that that information would be useful to the OP.

The OP pretty much needs information on how to be a better master. I asked "master" Jonathan to share some information.

Not sure how exactly my inquiry is off topic.

Of course I know that the master's knowledge tends shrink when me or anyone asks for any kind of explanation so there is a mocking tone to my post. But I was right, they never respond, they never answer anything.

Topic Is something wrong?
Posted 28 Jun 2014 15:56

Can anyone tell me where someone goes to study - for years - to be a master? Seriously, where and what does someone study for that long to officially call themselves a master?

Topic Is something wrong?
Posted 28 Jun 2014 03:00

I have been a Dom most of my life. It was only after years of study and learning all I could on the subject that I became a Master.

LOL what... did you go to master college, **Content removed by moderator. No name calling please.** ?

Can someone please explain to me why someone needs to study like a huge nerd - for years - to learn something that should be an inherent trait because we are talking about sex here right?

I mean this dude studied - for years - to be a master...?


Like studied what? Are there master textbooks n shit??? Like is there a master study group with quizzes n shit? Like is that an elective or can you minor in masterdom or what the hell? Can someone study - for years - to be a master and like fail? like, is there a head master to govern the study of masters and then they give out grades or what in the fuck? Can you get a BA in being a master or is it a BS as in bullshit of masterdom? Or do you like master in being a master. Like WHAT DO YOU STUDY TO BE A MASTER AND WHERE??????? Are some masters in student loan debt after studying - for years - to become a master? WHAT THE FUCK???


I'm sorry but this is just like one of the funniest things I have ever read.

Topic Club Zafia....
Posted 25 Jun 2014 22:08


Ooh ay hey

What would I do if I didn't affect you?
Mary goin' round and round and round
Tell me the truth, I know that you're leaving.
Tell me the truth, I know it's you.

Strange it didn't affect me.
Strange it didn't affect me.

Ooh, stay.
Assuming to your heart, we got nothing at all.

What should I do?
It completely destroyed you.
Swimming around, around and drown. Oh.
Tell me the truth love.
I know that you need me.
Tell me the truth, I know it's you.

Strange it didn't affect me.
Strange it didn't affect me.

I came to say goodbye, cause you're feeling nothing.
Assuming to your heart, we got nothing at all.
Cause even if you wanna try to see if there's something.
I drove into your heart, we got nothing at all.

Ooh, I...
I came to say goodbye, cause you're feeling nothing.
Assuming to your heart, we got nothing at all.
Cause even if you wanna try to see if there's something.
I drove into your heart, we got nothing at all.

And I don't care to say goodbye, cause you're feeling nothing.
I dug into your heart, we got nothing at all.

Topic Cum shot accuracy
Posted 25 Jun 2014 21:38

I'll knock an apple off a slapper's head. I swear on me mum.

Topic Escorts
Posted 25 Jun 2014 21:33

I listen to how thick the accent on the other end of the line is.

Topic Why Women Don't "Earn Less" Than Men...
Posted 25 Jun 2014 21:25

I don't know if its a cultural thing or what or if this is even a relevant comment in this thread (I don't care if it is really) but I was always taught that it is more expensive to be a woman because of the societal pressure they have about keeping up their appearance. Like go to a hair salon and look at a men's haircut price compared to a woman's cut. Woman's wardrobes tend to HAVE to be larger than men's, they're body products cost more, men don't use makeup etc. So even if they make even money they still have less disposable income.

Topic The Gun Control Debate Thread.
Posted 13 Jun 2014 00:47

For the record, and if you search thru my posts, they will uphold this. i have NEVER advocated for taking away guns. if you are a responsible gun user, and you have weapons that are reasonable to own (pistols, rifles, a shot gun) and if you treat them as what they are, tools that can kill another human being, then i'm okay with it. my issue is, that no one actually needs guns that are military grade, can fire of multiple shots in a matter of seconds, can piece the vests of police officers. the guys in the picture at chipotle (btw, i can come up with several dozen of those kind of pictures taken over the past few months, and at a variety of places and of a variety of different people) are NOT responsible gun owners. they're idiots - even the pro gun people agree with that - thing is, they feel entitled to being idiots and their choice of idiocy puts my life and the lives of others in danger.

what ever happened to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? does it only apply to the guy with the biggest gun? my "feelings" have EVERYthing to do with how i would react if someone walked into a place where i was enjoying dinner with my family when my FEELINGS are that they are one step away from doing something to get us killed. change the fucking law to comply with my feelings and i'll be a happy camper.

Can you imagine sitting at Chipotle eating a fucking burrito bowl and you see some dude walk up with a semi automatic rifle hanging off his neck like those two guys in that picture? My first thought would be "holy shit, these guys are the next klebold and harris, I'm gonna be one of these poor saps in a news story". Why wouldn't anyone think this upon seeing a gunman? Why would we all just ignore the guy holding a fucking assault rifle in a chipotle restaurant? What if another guy with a special in his waistband thinks this? What if he pulls it in fear of these guys with the assault rifles pulling a columbine as they enter? Now we have two morons shooting at each other and me or you or your children or anyone is now in the corner of this restaurant hoping they don't get hit by one of these "patriots" with their guns they don't need. it's totally absurd.

Topic The Gun Control Debate Thread.
Posted 13 Jun 2014 00:30

Since we don't, people should be tested up the asshole psychologically before being allowed to own a weapon that makes killing so much easier.

They think guns don't kill people - that people kill people. That is the "thought" you are confronted with when you try to think with your brain about the role guns play in the current state of american violence. They think that someone with a knife will have the balls to go on a killing spree then kill themselves with that same knife. Anyone with half a brain can ponder about how much easier it is to kill themselves with a gun as opposed to a knife. Obviously the guns are a catalyst. They are what give these people the balls to carry out a heinous act and when the shit hits the fan, they can just blow their own brains out with the squeeze of a trigger and not face any consequences for what they have done. Not so easy with a knife.

Topic The Gun Control Debate Thread.
Posted 13 Jun 2014 00:14

This quote just goes to show how very little you know about firearms, Felix. Having multiple handguns does not mean one is planning on going on the "offensive"; personally, I own four different handguns, each for a separate purpose. Pepper spray, "stun gun", and Tasers are all methods that can and will bring you into close contact with an intruder, and that have been shown to be useless against someone who is delusional, high, drunk, or all of the above, even when used by professionals. With a shotty, you only have two chances to hit your target before having to reload.

Oh, and it's not a "clip", it's a "magazine". At least make the effort to have your terminology correct.

Two chances with a shotgun??? And you're telling me I don't know anything? lol

You're gonna leave your house with more than one handgun on you? Really? You live in such fear that you think it is necessary to carry around more than one handgun at a time? The odds of you going out with two guns and using them for self defense is many times smaller than someone going out with two guns and using them to go on the offensive. Look at the news... Tell me the last time someone that wasn't law enforcement stopped someone going on a rampage with their two hand guns. I would imagine that conservative news would just love to report on all the stories of people with their handguns using them for self defense, since pandering to their base is all they really do. I would imagine these stories wouldn't be hard to find, many stories that outnumber the amount of death in all the other stories where gun nuts with all their guns decide one day to shoot a bunch of people. Go ahead and find them. I don't expect you will by the way.

Where did I say pepper spray is what you use a against a home invasion? I was listing weapons that are for self defense in general.

I said clip, who the hell cares, You obviously knew what I meant. You can probably fill a library with things that I know that you don't. I don't jerk off to guns. You said "shotty" but I knew you meant shotgun. You think ignoring everything else I said, which you have no answer for, and focusing on semantics makes you look intelligent? No, It makes you looks stupid as fuck.

Topic The Gun Control Debate Thread.
Posted 12 Jun 2014 09:23

No, hunting isnt. But protecting me, and mine, from those that come on the farm is. I consider putting down those that are rabid, or predatory self defense.

And there is no other option for dealing with those animals? no one you can call at all? No one at all? Last I checked rabid animals can't open doors. We don't live in Jurassic Park. Plus that is out in rural areas, you know damn well what I mean. If you live in an area where rabid animals are an ongoing problem then fine, getting a special permit for a rifle, some classes and a register for it like they do in Australia shouldn't be a big deal.

Topic The Gun Control Debate Thread.
Posted 12 Jun 2014 09:16

Add rifles to the list of self defense please. Id just as soon not get that close to some of the things Ive had to shoot.

We also hunt, and eat that which we kill. While I have hunted with a crossbow, and a friend rabbit hunts with a recurve, Id rather not.

Hunting isn't self defense. Sorry, but if someone breaks into my neighbors home I don't want the round from a high powered rifle coming through the walls and hitting me in my spine as I'm sleeping.

Topic The Gun Control Debate Thread.
Posted 12 Jun 2014 08:49

Those guys are total douchenozzles, but what they're doing is legal. Laws are based on actions, not feels. Until you get a law passed making their actions unlawful, I couldn't give a rats ass how you feel.

Only someone that is incredibly simple minded would need the law to tell them what is right and wrong. At one point in our history slavery was legal, at another point alcohol was illegal as well. You're so simple that you would be fine with that just because of their legal standing?

At one time Americans "felt" that slavery was wrong and those laws needed changing and they were changed. Not quite sure what you mean when you say laws are based on actions and not "feels". More shooting from the hip by you I suppose.

Add for the rest, yes pepper spray can be an effective tool, but it's just another tool in the toolbox. So are situational awareness, and a study pair of running shoes. I'm not advocating trying to run away 100% of the time, nor am I advocating shooting 100% of the time. Every situation is different, and will probably require a different response. Different tools for different things.

Yeah no shit...

1 handgun, pepper spray, stun gun, tasers, 1 shotgun in the home <-- All tools for self defense.

Semi auto assault rifles, extended clips, multiple hand guns <-- All tools for going on the offensive.

Those two geniuses in the picture above can't even make a proper decision on what clothes to wear... I hate that we have to trust them with making a proper decision with those weapons they are carrying into public dining establishments simply because legally they can. Only an idiot would contend the fact that if all these morons started taking their guns everywhere there would be more shootings and more killings.