Forum posts made by magical_felix

Topic Must we woman accept?
Posted 11 Jan 2013 12:04

Hi Sisters I am part of the older woman of Lush. Last night I went out to meet a new man. I had spent the day at the SPA and everything was sweet and smooth, new hair do and perfect make up. Sexy but very classy dress. We met an upscale restaurant.

Right after we were seated another couple came in she could have been me 25 years ago and obviously she had done the same as I and the result was simply stunning.

Her date was the same age wearing flip flops, beat up shorts, a well worn tee shirt, unshaven and with a billed cap turn backwards. At her age and with all the effort she had taken to look great, I would have slammed the door in the face of any guy who came to pick me up looking like this guy did.

Why do woman accept this treatment? Which I have seem more than a few times.

Are we that hard up to get a man, that we will accept anything? Maybe I am just out of touch with the world of 2013.

What ever happened to "My Rules I have the Pussy?"

Help me understand, Please

Every girl I am with ALWAYS dresses better than me, looks better and is frankly out of my league BUT...

What ever happened to "My Rules I have the Pussy?"

My dick is the bomb.

Topic gf asking you to circumcise?
Posted 11 Jan 2013 11:50

am not a guy but to me this is like your bf asking you to get a boob job

hello it is THE person you love.. not the icing

guys who are or are not..they all are wonderful

just like women with big or small breasts

love what ya got

When I get a cupcake I only eat the icing on top and through out the rest.

It's because I don't give a fuck.

Topic Club Zafia....
Posted 11 Jan 2013 09:46

http://www.youtube.com/embed/X_PcKdlD1Ys

Topic Story Posters
Posted 11 Jan 2013 09:42

http://upload.lushstories.com/291-kingdomcomeposter.gif

Topic Club Zafia....
Posted 21 Nov 2012 15:27

They borrowed the suits from ronald mcdonald's mexican uncle, I know.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/d1I9W064leU

Cuando me muera, como te agradeceria
que pusieras en mi tumba, dos botellas de mezcal
Porque se que de morirme de una cruda,
sabes bien que es culpa tu ya.
Por no poderte olvidar.

(Chorus 1)
Todas las noches, cuando agarro la botella
yo te miro dentro ella, y me pongo a platicar.
Al rato siento que me abrazas y me aprietas
Cual si fuera cosa sierta. Te allamo y allamo y no es verdad

(Chorus 2)
Cuando al fin vuelvo, de mis locos pensamientos.
Empiezan los sufrimientos. Porque te busco y no estas.
De mis ojos, empieza brotar el llanto porque.
porque yo te quiero tanto y no lo puedo evitar.

Topic would you ever want to see your girl fucked by another man?
Posted 06 Nov 2012 18:03


Big talk for a mangina, especially from someone who never talk to me before, which makes you petty, pathetic, and ignorant

I'm not ignogrant.

I don't need to talk to you, I see what you post. It's not a petty or small character flaw. Alienating half of the population won't get you very far. Not that I care really.

Topic would you ever want to see your girl fucked by another man?
Posted 06 Nov 2012 15:39

I suppose it's a good thing that people here finds my old heartache to be amusing, it's show me each of your true nature

It's not so much your heartache that is amusing. It's your overall weakness in that you blame women for your problems. Pathetic.

Topic Judge orders woman to wear "idiot" sign. Humiliating or not harsh enough?
Posted 06 Nov 2012 15:25

What a cool judge.

Topic Girls wearing tall socks
Posted 04 Nov 2012 22:40

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbqpjvQMFl1rwdfeoo1_500.jpg

Topic Girls wearing tall socks
Posted 04 Nov 2012 22:37

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcyelwaALr1rhklkeo1_500.jpg

Topic Girls wearing tall socks
Posted 04 Nov 2012 22:35

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcmbqdCsjf1qbn0f7o1_500.jpg

Topic Club Zafia....
Posted 04 Nov 2012 22:17

This video looks like an 80's trapper keeper had sex with Saved by the Bell and made this video.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/3yn0PISCGpg

Topic Is it difficult for some guys to cum "quickly" during sex?
Posted 04 Nov 2012 06:44

This would sound like a ridiculous question I guess except that lately my boyfriend has been lasting forever..not always in a great way and I'm kind of worried. He says sometimes it just takes longer for whatever reason and I'm not doing anything wrong so don't worry... but I know he'd worry if I didn't cum during so.. I suppose this is my outlet and I just want other male opinions if possible.



He's probably whacking off too much.

Topic would u prefer a bi or straight gf?
Posted 03 Nov 2012 12:11

As long as she did anal, who cares.

Topic would you ever want to see your girl fucked by another man?
Posted 03 Nov 2012 12:04

I've already seen that years ago when I came and found her ''experimenting'' with her co-workers

Experimenting?

Were they female coworkers? Like they were having a girl orgy? Or was it just wild shit in general with a few dudes or something?

Dude... Your girl, she's awesome. Need more details.

Topic Fuck or Pass???
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:59

FUCK! so he doesn't feel so ignored all the time sad10

Edit: I'd tag team trinket with bane up there.

Topic Would you go private with the person above you
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:58

Only if he promises to be a feisty hairy wolfman grrrrr!

Topic Would you have sex with the avatar below you?
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:53

You cock-blocked kinkygirl big time!

Yeah I'd fuck the person below me. BYOL (bring your own lube) lets party.

Topic Would you have sex with the avatar below you?
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:48

Only if it's kinky girl that posts below me. I'm picky. I would fuck her kinky little brains out.

Topic Kiss, Fuck or Pass
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:45

I would pass my seed

Topic Sloppy seconds , thirds, fourths etc...........
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:37

How many of you guys enjoy fucking a woman after another guy has just shot his load into her? Or after several guys? Is it a turn on to slide into a super wet pussy or a no-go zone?

No.

There are many reasons why I wouldn't like this. Another guy's cum going up my pee-hole leads the pack though.

Topic Can Romney/Ryan get elected?
Posted 03 Nov 2012 09:32




This is to funny now just to be up front I edited a little out of Krugman's rant because it was mildly irrelevant non the less Krugman actualy MAKES THE CASE for Romney/Ryan, to damn funny! Obama's so called (jobs act) sent OUR TAX DOLLORS to Findland to a company called Fiskers that was (supposed) to build a plant in an empty Gm facility but backed out yet (kept) our stimulas money. Then there are these. As President Obama the “outsourcer-in-chief” based on the stimulus spending for foreign projects. “Among them are solar panels built in Mexico, electric delivery trucks assembled in Great Britain and parts used to build U.S. wind-power farms that came from South Korea, Japan and Mexico, not to mention companies in Veitnam, India, Italy, Spain, France and at least a half dozen other countries. Not to mention his (speculating) into (venture capitalisum) which by the way is what Bains Capital does but OBAMA gave (OUR MONEY) to THREE companies to cronies that (contributed large sums to his campain) that went BANCRUOPT with OUR MONEY! Bains money was THEIR MONEY not OURS! A BIG MEGA-DIFFERANCE! That said OBAMA spent over $10,000.00 bucks (EACH) just for SIGNS to put up at any (street) improvement in any city let alone any other project somply saying (American reinvestment act project). MILLIONS for fucking SIGNS! Back to Krugman YES reducing spending LOWERING and ELIMINATING THE DEBT gives the U.S. MORE SPENDING POWER on the social programs that the socialist like Krugman LOVE and Americans have come to (DEPEND ON) DUH! If A TRILLION DOLLORS A YEAR is spent ON INTEREST ALONE (OBVIOUSLY) raising our DEBT and bringing us ever closer to COMPLET and TOTAL DEFAULT (bancruptcy) when we can NO LONGER send out a check for S.S. pay for Medicare, or Retirment benifits for Gov. workers, pay for our soldiers or (working Govt. workers) then HOW THE HELL does SPENDING MORE TAX MONEY (Our MONEY) taking us FARTHER IN DEBT. make ONE DAMN BIT OF SENSE? That is like saying when YOU are in default on your mortgage and out of work then you go out and buy a two hundred dollar pair of shoes a five hundred dollar suite and a fifty dollar tie and saying it is an (investment) to get a job even though you (already) own nine suits, six pairs of shoes and two dozen ties. Krugman simplfies the Republican agenda as (spending cuts) there is MUCH MUCH more to it then that but THAT is a differnt topic then Krugmans artical. Obama wants to (sustain PUBLIC) spending what he is REALLY saying is Obama wants to (sustain) GOVT. JOBS fine then the (question is simple) WERE does the MONEY to (sustain public spending) and those jobs come from? OUR TAX MONEY! Which in turn ADDS TO THE DEBT and is money we have to BORROW from CHINA to pay them! Which ADDS to the INTEREST that brings us even CLOSER TO BANCRUPTCY! So Romney and Ryan say that there are (REDUNDANT) and (IRRISPONSABLE) govt programs with yes (Govt workers) that can be and SHOULD BE eliminated thus bringing (DOWN) our spending and REDUCING the amount we have to (borrow) reducing our (interest) and getting us closer to spending ONLY what the Govt takes in from Tax money. Which then gives US MORE money to pay for the SOCIAL PROGRAMS the LEFT LOVES! Again I say DUH! It is NOT (IMPOSING) anything on Americans! Govt. workers earn TWICE WHAT YOU EARN with BENIFTES FOR LIFE that YOU DO NOT GET that (WE the taxpayer) Can NOT PAY FOR with out BORROWING IT FROM CHINA adding to OUR DEBT! Romney/Ryan say they want YOU to KEEP your EARNINGS FROM YOUR HARD WORK from having to (RAISE YOUR TAXES) to pay for Govt. workers that earn (TWICE) what people in the (same) job that work at in (private companies) then receive TWICE the retirement and health benefits (for life) that are EQUAL to the pay they made when they worked! Which is an oxymoron in the first place in many cases! I have not made this up I have FIVE family members that were ALL Govt. workers (now retired) and I KNOW that all I said above is FACT! Now Krugman talks of the bad news from the world and that the (disproportionate) news is from the countries that are (imposing) austerity measures that Republicans want to (IMPOSE on Americans) Krugman is NOT talking about JOE BLOW and the AVERAGE JOHN the FACTORY WORKER he is talking about (GOVT. JOBS) this is (NOT) an IMPOSITION ON (AVG) AMERICANS it is in fact (absolutely the OPPOSITE)!! But Krugman does not tell you that he LEADS YOU TO BELIEVE that it hurts ALL AMERICANS WHEN IN FACT what hurts (AVG AMERICANS) the (Middle class) is the IMPOSITION on (THEM) to PAY for (PUBLIC SPENDING) with OUR EARNINGS! BECAUSE OF OBAMAS POLICY OF (PUBLIC SPENDING) (FOR HIS CONSTITUANCY.. GOVT WORKERS!!) The austerity measures in countries like GREECE and SPAIN are necessary because the (tax dollars) taken in and the (extreme) benefits given out not only to Govt. workers but EVERY CITIZEN soon was (SO MUCH MORE) then the tax they took in forcing them to BORROW so much that when the (house of cards fell) and became MORE then they could even pay on the (INTEREST) causing default or (bankruptcy) the ONLY thing that kept them from that was GERMANY that keeps lending them money with the (provisions) that they REDUCE their spending to the level of their tax dollars taken in! OH MY GAWD THE HORROR! But Krugman does NOT TELL YOU ANY OF THAT!! And for that the Socialists in Greece and Spain Riot, Burn Buildings, Pillage and act out VIOLANTLY and (ONLY BECAUSE) the Govt. has to do what they NEVER SHOULD HAVE DONE in THE FIRST PLACE is (GIVING MORE then THEY HAVE) then BORROW money to PAY FOR WHAT THEY CAN NOT AFFORD! And THAT my fellow Americans is what the Socialist like Krugman and OBAMA want US to do, SPEND MORE THEN WE HAVE BORROW MONEY TO PAY FOR IT so then what can we expect? That is a question.. the answer of course is BANCRUPTCY and there is NO COUNTRY ON EARTH that can keep us afloat NOT GERMANY NO ONE except maybe China and just EXACTLY WHAT do you think THIER DEMANDS WILL BE? Reduce our Armed forces? CUT S.S. Medicare, Welfare? Then what RIOTS, PILLLAGING, BURNING BUILDINGS, VIOLANCE in (OUR) STREETS!? China would LOVE THAT! Krugman says well they did not (ACTUALY) say that but they said that more economies were (disappointing) BECAUSE of more aggressive (fiscal consolidation plans) in other words YES they cut spending but GERMANY still had to GO BACK LEND MORE and DEMAND MORE WHY? Because they STILL had not CUT ENOUGH! Thereby KEEPING the economies (depressed) and of course (disappointing) For THAT the Socialists in Greece and Spain are calling Germany NAZIS sound familiar in OUR COUNTRY? WHO HAS and IS calling REPUBLICANS NAZIS? The LEFT and the SOCALISTS LIKE KRUGMAN! Krugman notes that the economies that experience the most sever depression are the ones making the deepest CUTS in spending. TRUE however they were ALREADY the countries in the DEEPEST ECONOMIC DEPRESSION! The CUTS they have made has NOT KEPT them depressed as Krugman WANTS YOU TO BELEIVE. It is the mere FACT that they have NOT YET CUT (ENOUGH) to bring them to a point of spending LESS then they TAKE IN! (AUSTERITY) It does not help that the WORKERS in Greece and Spain have STRIKED to get their so called (FREE) benefits SUBSIDIZED BY THE GOVT. of course that means (taxpayers) so striking workers means LESS taxes paid in causing the cycle to start all over again. LESS IN MORE OUT! Again Krugman WILL NOT tell you THESE FACTS! Krugman proclaims that MORE STIMULAS will (gradually) improve employment we did that TWICE and STILL it has not even come CLOSE to what Obama PROMISED! But we HAVE INCREASED OUR DEBT BY FIVE TRILLION DOLLORS more then DOUBLE then EIGHT YEARS year’s under Bush in only four years! So Krugman declares that BORROWING MORE and MORE DEBT which means HIGHER TAXES which means LESS MONEY for JOE BLOW THE FACTORY WORKER TO SPEND to buy that BOAT HE ALWAYS WANTED! And do NOT BE FOOLED taxing (The RICH) even at 100% would ONLY RUN THE GOVT for 30 DAYS! So then what? OBAMA and KRUGMAN WILL NOT TELL YOU that the ONLY MEASURE LEFT is to (TAX THE MIDDLE CLASS) MORE then they do NOW! So the 35 or (actual) closer to 50% with federal energy (gas, elect, fuel) tobacco liquor (medical supplies) etc. etc. is more like 50% Obama would likely not raise (INCOME TAX) but pursue the CLANDESTINE TACTIC of (Raising fed income tax on EVERYTHING ELSE)! The ONLY AMERICANS that would KNOW are those like ME that WATCH EVERYTHING THEY DO! 90% of Americans would uselessly complain that the price of EVERYTHING has gone up! Then what? You have LESS TO SPEND so You can BUY LESS which means Companies MAKE LESS which means MORE people are LAID OFF which, means MORE UNEMPLOYMENT which means MORE WELFARE and then we have to BORROW MORE to PAY MORE and the cycle continues! THAT IS KRUGMAN AND OBAMAS GRAND IDEA! So to get to the conclusion of Krugman’s Rant that the economic doctrine of Republicans that has proved (false) is simply and bluntly a LIE! JFK successfully did what Romney/Ryan are proposing so did Regan and yes G..W BUSH because the TRUTH IS with ALL OF CLINTONS BLUSTER that (HE) balanced the budget is 100% FALSE YES it WAS DONE while he was president with a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS and SENATE (THEY MAKE THE BUDGET!) NOT the President! The President can do (ONLY) ONE OF TWO things he APPROVES IT or VETOS it and if he VETOS it then goes (back) to the SENATE that can only (override) the veto with a TWO THIRD MAJORITY VOTE and THEY HAD THAT so Clinton HAD NO CHOICE but sign it! And then the (DOT COM BUBBLE BROKE) cascading us into a RESSESION by (BEFORE) Clinton LEFT OFFICE and BUSH TOOK OVER! Six months later we had 9/11 THAT DEEPENED the RESSESION THAT Bush (INHERITED) so he did what BOTH JFK and REGAN did that ENDED THE RESSION bringing us down to a 5.2% UNEMPLOYMENT that (virtually) means that EVERYONE that WANTS to work IS WORKING and the ones that can NOT WORK (no fault of their own) are counted as unemployed (regardless) of the FACT (they can NOT WORK). (BTW for the record REGANS RECESSION WAS WORSE THEN OBAMA’S) Then the (Housing bubble burst) that was CAUSED BY legislation from DEMOCRATES and some Republicans that made it possible for ANYONE TO BUY A HOUSE even IF the COULD NOT AFFORD ONE. Cascading us into ressesion AGAIN! I PERSONALY know many that got caught up in this INCLUDING my brother who is (disabled) and gets $1100.00 a month in S.S.D. and was given a loan for a house in value of OVER150K his mortgage was 1k a month leaving him $100 to pay for EVERYTHING ELSE (elect. Gas, groceries) you get the idea. I asked him THEN HOW THE HELL are you going to LIVE? His response like the MILLIONS of people that did the SAME THING was ( I’ll figure it out.) Then within TWO YEARS FORECLOSER! Hell WE bought a house for 98k at the same time still paid on our old house for six months before selling it and WE earned a little over 6k a month and the six months before selling our old house that was worth then about 72K sold it for 70k and still made about 5k in the sell. Even after THAT we had to watch our budget to pay for EVERYTHING ELSE! CONCLUSION WE SPENT LESS THEN WE TOOK IN! My brother SPENT MORE then HE TOOK IN! He lost we still have our home and just refinanced for 3.2% and will pay about $130.00 bucks LESS a month giving us MORE TO SPEND to buy things to KEEP AMERICAN’S WORKING! Under Romney/Ryan they want to Tax the (RICH) by closing loopholes to REDUCE MIDDLE CLASS Taxes giving US MORE OF OUR OWN MONEY to spend to BUY MORE to KEEP AMERICANS WORKING! OBAMAS PLAN and AS KRUGMAN (ADMITTS) is to (SUSTAIN PUBLIC SPENDING) or what he is (REALLY) SAYING is GOVT, JOBS and MORE WELFARE to SPEND MORE. TAKE MORE ,TO SPEND MORE. TO BORROW MORE. TO PAY FOR WHAT WE SPEND ON PEOPLE THAT TAKE MORE, AND GIVE LESS! So the choice is CLEAR! Obama’s plan to BANCRUPT EVERYONE! Or Romney’s to allow us (MIDDLE CLASS) to KEEP MORE so (WE) can SPEND MORE, THE WAY (WE) WANT TO FOR (OUR) OWN FAMILIES and GIVE LESS! Thank you KRUGMAN YOU SOCIALIST PIG for MAKING OUR POINT!!






confused1

Topic Club Zafia....
Posted 02 Nov 2012 17:11

http://www.youtube.com/embed/3F3J7IqqanI

Topic Happy, Happy Birthday ♥ Magical Felix ♥
Posted 02 Nov 2012 16:33

OCTOBER 28 occasion7

Close your eyes
Make a wish
I know what you want,
It's NOT a kiss!

Have you been a good boy,
Followed the rules?
If you have,
Come closer
Let me show you my jewel

YES , it's a Topaz,
Shiney and smart
Pull it out slowly
I'm a lady ...

I DON'T FART.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31x6FOWiykL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

Happy, Happy Birthday Jack Daddy!
Do something Loco Joto!!!
I love you oodles occasion9

http://1.cdn.tapcdn.com/images/thumbs/taps/2012/09/in-birthday-suit-inbirthdaysuit-tumblr-com-submit-yourself-today-38-3eb3fdf3-sz624x924-animate.jpg







This is my third favorite poem of yours. This really caught me of guard and really made me smile. Thanks Trixie!

Was it supposed to turn me on!? :-"

Topic Happy, Happy Birthday ♥ Magical Felix ♥
Posted 02 Nov 2012 16:29

Thanks to everyone that wished me happy birthday!

Topic Shemales: Are they the straight man's 'free zone'?
Posted 23 Oct 2012 06:47

You know I hummed an hahhed whether to put either Puritanical OR Prudish

I think dense or misguided may have worked better.

For example.

My sensibilities aren't offended with the knowledge of fudge packing. I.e., not a prude.

See what he said? That is a very bigoted way of making his point. That is like saying, "I'm not racist, I love spooks." Do you think he describes sex between a man and a woman as fudgepacking even though straight couples have anal sex too? I don't think so.

If you like taking it up the ass or fucking some dude while giving him the "reach around", go for it. We should all be able to fuck whomever we wish. Nor do I think that a gay man or lesbian woman is breaking the laws of nature and are destined to eternity in the fiery pits of hell because of their sex life. And not dragging them naked out of bed and straight to Bible study to save their souls.


See? Dense.

He thinks he is tolerant because he doesn't drag them naked out of bed. What weird imagery. I mean, just a weird place to go in his head.

He thinks that tolerance is belittling them first and crudely describing their sex lives then saying, well I don't think they should burn in hell for it.

Just very bizarre or maybe misguided. It could be he's just trying to be cool lafayette or like bad boy lafayette. Who knows..

Is there a word that combines dense and misguided?

Topic CREATE YOUR OWN GLORY HOLE
Posted 22 Oct 2012 12:13

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5h4w5Qt8q1ql6w5ko1_500.jpg

Topic CREATE YOUR OWN GLORY HOLE
Posted 22 Oct 2012 10:19

http://i.chzbgr.com/completestore/2012/1/30/867823cc-153e-4338-b847-90d043eeebb1.jpg