Less sore from uncircumcised cock? Serious question...

A female friend of mine had sex with an uncircumcised guy (every other man had been circumcised). She told me that they fucked five times throughout the night. She said that she wasn't sore, much to her surprise. She thinks it's because the shaft of his cock didn't move as much inside her, but rather his cock moved in and out of his foreskin. If you've had sex with both cut and uncut men, what has been your experience?

Soreness usually follows sex without enough lubrication. I live with 2 guys and one is circumcised and the other is uncut. The uncut boyfriend is much thicker however, so you'd think there would be more friction, but I never notice any soreness with either of them because I'm extremely wet during sex. I suppose it depends on a lot of things, including the length of thrust of the uncut cock, because the slip of the foreskin only goes so far with each thrust. I can't feel foreskin slipping in my pussy, but I can when he's in my mouth, so I know slippage can be a factor.

Quote by Beffer

Soreness usually follows sex without enough lubrication. I live with 2 guys and one is circumcised and the other is uncut. The uncut boyfriend is much thicker however, so you'd think there would be more friction, but I never notice any soreness with either of them because I'm extremely wet during sex. I suppose it depends on a lot of things, including the length of thrust of the uncut cock, because the slip of the foreskin only goes so far with each thrust. I can't feel foreskin slipping in my pussy, but I can when he's in my mouth, so I know slippage can be a factor.

Thanks! Interesting thoughts. Maybe this guy plenty of "slippage" and/or didn't thrust as hard/deep.