Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
m.lushstories site? Affiliate?
I too found it funky - particularly that friends aren't shared between mobile and desktop, so it makes it seem like they are completely different sites altogether with some similar features.
Why?
Is this just while the mobile site is being developed and code bugs worked out?
I'd love to have a more consistent experience between my desktop and mobile. Currently I go to lushstories.com/chat-rooms/ and login from there to get to the desktop site on mobile and bypass the m.lushstories.com redirect.
Why?
Is this just while the mobile site is being developed and code bugs worked out?
I'd love to have a more consistent experience between my desktop and mobile. Currently I go to lushstories.com/chat-rooms/ and login from there to get to the desktop site on mobile and bypass the m.lushstories.com redirect.
You can always bookmark certain pages.
I have m.lushstories[dot]com bookmarked and have my info saved on Chrome so I don't have to type in my info all the time.
I have m.lushstories[dot]com bookmarked and have my info saved on Chrome so I don't have to type in my info all the time.
I’m well aware of bookmarks. My comments are only partly about the inconvenience of it. They are about the oddness of the choice. As someone that works in IT around the web development space, I’ve never come across a website that uses its mobile platform as an alternate site from the primary one. Ever. It creates confusion like what’s been noted in this thread. So it’s not a standard choice, which makes me curious as to why that decision was made.
What’s the benefit for having two separate sites dependent upon device type and making users jump through hoops to get where they want to go when they are on the other kind of device?
Most (all) mobile sites are about a mobile-optimized experience of a website, not a separate database for the mobile site. Does somebody actually have mobile friends and desktop friends? Maybe we should have chrome friends and safari friends too... ( because you can manage redirects and build site optimizations off of specific browsers as well)
The last sentence is sarcasm.
A
PS - I’m just being direct in these comments. I’m not up in arms and will continue working as I have been. Just airing thoughts because that’s what you do in Internet forums, right?
What’s the benefit for having two separate sites dependent upon device type and making users jump through hoops to get where they want to go when they are on the other kind of device?
Most (all) mobile sites are about a mobile-optimized experience of a website, not a separate database for the mobile site. Does somebody actually have mobile friends and desktop friends? Maybe we should have chrome friends and safari friends too... ( because you can manage redirects and build site optimizations off of specific browsers as well)
The last sentence is sarcasm.
A
PS - I’m just being direct in these comments. I’m not up in arms and will continue working as I have been. Just airing thoughts because that’s what you do in Internet forums, right?
m.lushstories[dot]com can be used to meet people around your area. The site is different from the main one which is pretty obvious. Couples can share an account or it can be used as a dating site.
Jump through hoops? How so? I don't have any issues when logging into lush from any device. Sure, when you login through a new device, especially a phone, the mobile site will pop up but you can easily scroll down and choose
Its an easy fix.
it's as you say, linked. But that link requires pages of scrolling on the mobile device and is therefore not really intuitive to the first time user examining the menus or someone not really knowing what to look for.
But it's okay. I know how to work through it, so it is what it is. My initial point was more that it doesn't behave the way most desktop/mobile site integrations work, which makes it confusing. But that seems to be by design, so that's fine.
A
But it's okay. I know how to work through it, so it is what it is. My initial point was more that it doesn't behave the way most desktop/mobile site integrations work, which makes it confusing. But that seems to be by design, so that's fine.
A
Quote by Anatomy
I’m well aware of bookmarks. My comments are only partly about the inconvenience of it. They are about the oddness of the choice. As someone that works in IT around the web development space, I’ve never come across a website that uses its mobile platform as an alternate site from the primary one. Ever. It creates confusion like what’s been noted in this thread. So it’s not a standard choice, which makes me curious as to why that decision was made.
What’s the benefit for having two separate sites dependent upon device type and making users jump through hoops to get where they want to go when they are on the other kind of device?
Most (all) mobile sites are about a mobile-optimized experience of a website, not a separate database for the mobile site. Does somebody actually have mobile friends and desktop friends? Maybe we should have chrome friends and safari friends too... ( because you can manage redirects and build site optimizations off of specific browsers as well)
The last sentence is sarcasm.
A
PS - I’m just being direct in these comments. I’m not up in arms and will continue working as I have been. Just airing thoughts because that’s what you do in Internet forums, right?
Agreed to the core. I strongly believe that the both need yo be consistent and for feedback/opinion poll can be created for users if some custom features can be added to the site at large, rather than having a separate thingy for either.
Personally I'd love to have a mobile site or even an app that provides the full fledged experience of the site I've thankfully enjoyed since almost 2013.
Gav and Nicola, Please have a look.
Thank you
A.
Site administrator
Quote by Icanteachu2
When I find myself on the mobile site, I scroll down and choose desktop as well. But I'm getting friend requests from the mobile site, which I do not want to deal with....can I be removed from there and only use the desktop version? Thanks!
If you are able to login on the mobile site there is an option to delete your account and this is described in the Support FAQ's in the Help Center. If you are unable to login you can use the Contact Us link on the Login page to raise a support ticket and ask for your account to be removed.
Active Ink Slinger
I haven't seen anything about this site...is it a Lush clone or is Lush expanding into the international market please?
https://avataransk.ru/
https://avataransk.ru/
Scarlet Seductress
Quote by flyer_uk
I haven't seen anything about this site...is it a Lush clone or is Lush expanding into the international market please?
https://avataransk.ru/
It's a clone.
"insensitive prick!" – Danielle Algo
Quote by Anatomy
As someone that works in IT around the web development space, I’ve never come across a website that uses its mobile platform as an alternate site from the primary one. Ever.
It surely was a thing when mobile websites became a thing as smartphones first took off. Responsive web design was not a thing yet and many sites had m.domain.tld versions to deal with smaller screen sizes and lack of features. But these days it's very uncommon indeed.
Quote by flyer_uk
I haven't seen anything about this site...is it a Lush clone or is Lush expanding into the international market please?
https://avataransk.ru/
Looks like someone is in the process of ripping off Lush. I'd suggest not trying to see if your account works over there ;)
=== Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER ===
Active Ink Slinger
As of today, my browsers refuse to go to the mobile site.
Chrome puts up a warning message, "your connection is not private" and "attackers may be trying to steal your info" etc...
With duckduckgo the browser just hangs and won't go there.
Anyone else noticed this? Is there a security issue?
Chrome puts up a warning message, "your connection is not private" and "attackers may be trying to steal your info" etc...
With duckduckgo the browser just hangs and won't go there.
Anyone else noticed this? Is there a security issue?
Site administrator
Quote by NicolasBelvoir
As of today, my browsers refuse to go to the mobile site.
Chrome puts up a warning message, "your connection is not private" and "attackers may be trying to steal your info" etc...
With duckduckgo the browser just hangs and won't go there.
Anyone else noticed this? Is there a security issue?
The problem is known and we are waiting for a solution which I understand to be a renewal of the security certification.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by simplyjohn
The problem is known and we are waiting for a solution which I understand to be a renewal of the security certification.
Thank you team!! ?? I knew your crew will be on it
..your team has got this ?? keep up the awesome job 
'..May the Lord watch between you and me when we are absent from one another..' Gen31:49 😇
Quote by The_Goodwill_Hunter
Agreed to the core. I strongly believe that the both need yo be consistent and for feedback/opinion poll can be created for users if some custom features can be added to the site at large, rather than having a separate thingy for either.
Personally I'd love to have a mobile site or even an app that provides the full fledged experience of the site I've thankfully enjoyed since almost 2013.
Gav and Nicola, Please have a look.
Thank you
A.
I see the issue has been resolved for good. Thank you, team lush.
Plus, A very warm welcome to the mobile site users, from a nobody who just loves lush to the core.
Regards
A.