Quote by Chet_Morton
making minor edits... I have read posts and/or PMs cautioning authors to not copy/paste the entire revision because then the mod has to review the entire story.
That's true.
To augment what AvidlyCurious said, we do have a story differences feature, which sometimes works depending on how big the original story is, how many changes have been made, how long ago it was submitted, and which way the wind is blowing. Stories from before the switchover to lush v2 for example—and some newer ones that contain formatting styles brought in from some word processors—sometimes send it into an infinite loop, meaning we have to read the whole story again.
If you give an indication in your mod note of the rough number/extent of changes you've made, it may mean a moderator who is pressed for time could know to grab your story and whip through it. Assuming the diff feature works, of course. That's not to say anyone should make false claims in the hope of being looked at faster! We're pretty good at spotting people gaming the system.
Please bear in mind that if you are resubmitting frequently and hogging precious moderator time, we may sideline your story for a short while to give people further down the queue a look-in. We're trying to balance fairness with speed, while maintaining quality standards and it takes time. It may also be that the moderator grabs a story with every intention of reading it, and they get sidelined in real life and can't get back to it for a day or so. Any number of factors can influence the time it takes.
Rest assured, as AC says, it will be processed in due course.
Edit: and coincidentally re-approved while I was typing this.