Quote by Seeker4
And how do you propose to do that equitably and fairly on a site with a BDSM forum and that publishes BDSM stories? An author who is dominant and writes stories from that perspective, for instance, should be able to use a name that reflects that without attracting extra scrutiny. That lifestyle faces discrimination from some quarters as it is. This site should not be contributing to that discrimination but provide a space where they can express their sexuality like we all can. So no to this. Report th spammers and scammers and do not target people just based on their choice of username.
Not easy, I understand. Also probably easy to avoid for abusers. However, the name itself can be “monitored” without affecting the actual user, by the message profile. Simple having the name “XXXDominatrix” (my apologies if that is an actual user name) can alert an algorithm without the user ever seeing an affect, as long as the next step in the algorithm is to monitor number of unsolicited outgoing messages, especially to new users.
Perhaps the solution goes back to the broad brush of everyone being limited to number of outgoing unsolicited messages. A normal user limited to 20, 30, or 50 unsolicited outgoing messages per month (for example) would probably never notice or reach that threshold, whereas a bot or other predator, might be discouraged if the have to pay for numerous accounts to reach the wide range of potential victims they can currently.
Next question might be: Why should LS care? Shouldn’t it be the user’s responsibility to protect themself?
My answer is that the user must ALSO protect themself, but getting this type of harassment gives the user the feel of walking through a seedy, downtown back alley. I have not paid for a silver or gold membership yet because I am still feeling out the site. I have written on other sites and dropped several for how I perceived both the readers and other contributors. I had hoped by making my profile blatantly clear, I could be spared the annoyance. That didn’t work. That’s a bad sign.
I don’t begrudge anyone their (within legal limits) lifestyle and don’t want the BDSM lifestyle singled out for writings by any means. But it seems blatantly obvious that a user attracted to the sub side of that style could use more added protection than the rest of us.