Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

Nude man barely noticed in London

last reply
8 replies
4.7k views
0 watchers
0 likes
I love visiting London for this kind of thing when I'm over there - English humour is right up my street:

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/arts/article-23396769-details/The%20nude%20that's%20barely%20noticed/article.do



The nude that's barely noticed
17.05.07

Rust in peace: commuters stroll past Antony Gormley's statue on Waterloo Bridge, one of 31 life-size casts placed around London in his latest work

A nude man stands on Waterloo Bridge but the thousands of commuters who pass him every day scarcely bat an eyelid.

The nude is one of 31 life-size casts of sculptor Antony Gormley dotted around London as part of his latest work, Event Horizon. They all look towards the Hayward Gallery on the South Bank, where an exhibition of Gormley's work, Blind Light, opens today.

But if these sculptures were designed to amuse, they are proving a success.

"Anything goes in London," said solicitor Sally Ashford, 39, from Guildford. "From a distance I thought it was really a naked man, but when I realised it was a statue I was more confused."

City insurance broker Mark Courtneidge, 50, from Lee, said: "It's quite good fun and we need more fun in London. As long as drivers aren't distracted."

Italian waiter Marco, 28, from Elephant and Castle, observed: "I wonder if he's lonely. They could pay me to stand beside him."

Fellow Italian Silvia Lombarda, 20, a student at King's College, said: "Our statues are much smaller in Italy. This one is, shall we say, more realistic. But the quality is not up to much. We are used to the work of Michelangelo." She thought the statue on the National Theatre's roof was a suicide attempt.

Stefano Calusini, 48, from Waterloo, was not a fan. "It's bizarre and I think it's total rubbish," he said. "Roman statues are much more sophisticated."

But Mimi Robinson, 44, a PA from Stockwell, disagreed, saying: "It's amazing. At first, I was underwhelmed by this one but it's nice to have the chance to see it close up. My nine-year-old son thought it was great."

That was, at least, a more charitable view than the verdict delivered by one middle-aged woman who refused to give her name: "He's uglier than I thought he would be."
Any great Art Gallery has beautiful carvings of naked men and boys, females and girl children, and no visitors are embarrassed.

What makes this an initial shock us that it is in public ... the everyday environment of everyday life.

I have no problem with it but I wouldn't make a detour to see it.
Quote by SusanEngland
Any great Art Gallery has beautiful carvings of naked men and boys, females and girl children, and no visitors are embarrassed.

What makes this an initial shock us that it is in public ... the everyday environment of everyday life.

I have no problem with it but I wouldn't make a detour to see it.


I wouldn't either, but I always make a point of a allocating a day visiting the galleries - the Tate Modern especially.
Quote by Lush

............... but I always make a point of a allocating a day visiting the galleries - the Tate Modern especially.


ON NOooooooo ... not the bricks and mortar art. Not the fluorescent lighting, shining a light on man's gullibility. No. I do NOT believe it !! You MUST be teasing me.

I am in shock!!!
Time to take the blinkers off Susan!
English humour is disgusting.

It should be banned.
{allba115-feed-5eed-facedeadbeef}
Well, in the London where I live (London, Canada) I can pretty much guarantee it would be noticed. And debated. And be the subject of petitions for its removal (assuming our prissy, controversy-averse city councilors even let it go up in the first place). And be the subject of petitions for its return. And...yeah, you probably get the point. It would be a political hot potato, even though there are so many more important issues to deal with in this city.

Props to the English for approaching it with the right attitude and a sense of humour.
I’m not quite sure where you intended this to go Nicola, although I suspect that you are attempting to show the difference in attitudes to nudity in public art and nudity in public. I am not a great fan of Antony Gormley’s statues which lack the tactililty of a Henry Moore for example. What does interest me is the homoeroticism of so much Renaissance sculpture, most of which was intended for public spaces and cathedrals. This sculpture of St Sebastian in the Duomo in Orvieto, although not completely nude clearly demonstrates the ecstasy of martyrdom, which is barely indistinguishable from sexual ecstasy.

And Donatello’s David in Florence is even more homoerotic, even more so than Michelangelo’s better known sculpture.