Quote by nicola
It makes sense as a site owner, to look at your competitors once in a while, and make sure you are offering surfers / members, what a lot of them want. There's no desperation to it at all. It's common business practice. We went a step further, and decided to throw some new categories into the mix, to make the site more interesting, and draw in a wider audience.
For anyone who is wondering how much credibility "BigGarrett" has, this is the question he posted previously, under his "TabbysTales" username (which was deleted):
You'll need to zoom in to read it - or just go here: https://www.lushstories.com/forum/yaf_postsm2799257_Can-my-story-feature-a-mother-teaching-her-daughter.aspx
Seems to have a bee in his bonnet about the Incest Fantasies section, and our ruling on a story he was proposing.
Yawn.
Let's keep on topic shall we?
Yes, it's a contentious category. Will it stay? Yes.
This wasn't supposed to be open for discussion from the start.
If the category becomes really problematic, we'll readdress, as we always do.
As much as I dislike BigGarett's tone, he is right about one thing: with the introduction of the mind control category lush abandons its stance about consent. If I control your mind, you don't, and if you have no control over your own mind, you cannot consent to anything. That means that having sex with someone whose mind is controlled is essentially . Allowing one form of will make refusing other forms of nonconsensual sex i.e. seem hypocritical. How do you see this?