Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

Sig Image Size

last reply
18 replies
2.3k views
0 watchers
0 likes
We need to impose a max sig image size, some people's sigs are getting out of hand again. I don't think this was ever really finalised.

It's bad for site speed, and people on lesser connections suffer. Plus if the member is the prominent poster in a particular thread, it looks like they are totally dominating the whole page.

I think it wouldn't be a bad idea if we could have the option to turn sigs off completely, at a member level, in your settings too.

What would people like the size limit to be?

Poll attached.
I know a number of other forums I frequent the signature size is automatic you can't change it if you go over what you add the forum software won't let you upload it till you get it down to the required size. And yes I noticed a lot of the picture sigs are getting crazy big. Having said that 500x150 seems a good max size to me.
Plus, people access the forum from their phones, too, right?
Yes, about 4% of our surfers do Rocco.

I am wondering if it's possible to do the same for Avatars too?

Most phones have the option to turn off images while surfing, mine does.
Quote by nicola
We need to impose a max sig image size, some people's sigs are getting out of hand again. I don't think this was ever really finalised.

It's bad for site speed, and people on lesser connections suffer. Plus if the member is the prominent poster in a particular thread, it looks like they are totally dominating the whole page.

I think it wouldn't be a bad idea if we could have the option to turn sigs off completely, at a member level, in your settings too.

.

as big as the cats head
It should be fairly easy to restrict the image size in the code, but I know this off-the-shelf software can be hard to work with.
Yes it was me who voted Bigger.... couldn't resist it after what I said in another thread

Quote by SweetBitch
Yes it was me who voted Bigger.... couldn't resist it after what I said in another thread





LOL. That's even more funny because your current sig is actually 983 x 63, the widest on the site
Sweetbitch's sig is wide, but because it's not really deep it doesnt seem all that big. Is there a total size we could go for, so it could stretch out as long as its not too tall? Or are you stuck with little rectangles for programming reasons?
Yes, SB's doesn't look too bad at all.

It's the thickness not the length that matters

There will be some leeway on width, but the 100 height rule will definitely be enforced.
Quote by nicola
Quote by SweetBitch
Yes it was me who voted Bigger.... couldn't resist it after what I said in another thread





LOL. That's even more funny because your current sig is actually 983 x 63, the widest on the site


Nicola, what are you doing to me I think I might have to buy some stocks in Bartter, if I am going to walk around all day with egg on my face
Personally I'd like to see a limit on the width as well. Anything over 800 and I have to scroll horizontally to read the posts on a thread where a wider sig was used even once.
Quote by Jebru
Personally I'd like to see a limit on the width as well. Anything over 800 and I have to scroll horizontally to read the posts on a thread where a wider sig was used even once.


Less than 1% of internet users are still on 800 x 600. The majority use 1024 x 768 or higher.

Considering we have the sidebar and other things in the forum, it's safe to assume 99% of people will not have to scroll sideways if images / sigs are no wider than 600, so yes, we'll impose a max width too.
Quote by nicola
Quote by Jebru
Personally I'd like to see a limit on the width as well. Anything over 800 and I have to scroll horizontally to read the posts on a thread where a wider sig was used even once.


Less than 1% of internet users are still on 800 x 600. The majority use 1024 x 768 or higher.

Considering we have the sidebar and other things in the forum, it's safe to assume 99% of people will not have to scroll sideways if images / sigs are no wider than 600, so yes, we'll impose a max width too.



I'm at 1024x768 myself and sometimes I do have to scroll across the screen. but I can live with it myself lol.
Big sig images are returning - does this need to be bumped?
Warning: The opinions above are those of an anonymous individual on the internet. They are opinions, unless they're facts. They may be ill-informed, out of touch with reality or just plain stupid. They may contain traces of irony. If reading these opinions causes you to be become outraged or you start displaying the symptoms of outrage, stop reading them immediately. If symptoms persist, consult a psychiatrist.

Why not read some stories instead

NEW! Want a quick read for your coffee break? Why not try this... Flash Erotica: Scrubber
Quote by overmykneenow
Big sig images are returning - does this need to be bumped?


Ta!
I came across this thread when I was deciding how big to make my sig images, and went with the majority rule.

Good Will ---|--- Three Alarm <= Both almost famous, give them a read and get them one step closer!

I was once told in a message by Coco: "Signatures are restricted to 10 lines of text to keep the site clean looking and fast loading. Images can be up to 500 x 150 px in dimension. Please keep signature images below 75kb out of courtesy to people on slower connections."

I see sizes larger (and smaller) from every sort of member, but perhaps if the signature manually sized the sig or would not except an image "larger than" that might help - I do not know, but that might make it easier so that no one must police or remove some sigs while others unfairly remain larger (?) Signatures are a priviledge, yet when I was new, I did not know any such things because there was no defining limit or statement on the signature add page.
There are some crazily large sigs just now...
I'm not a fan either...
I think they should be limited to the standard ten lines or equivalent image size...

The two above my post are just about perfect, in my opinion.