Over the friends setting... is it possible to have like a save button so after you re-arrange it it wont get rumbled up every time you check it outside the settings area? just thinking though. cause it gets jumbled up at times..
Dont panic folks, I'm in the middle of some changes to the friends list.
Please be patient, normal operation shall continue shortly.
Thanks for your assistance in testing and debugging this problem Kiki.
Everyones profile should be fixed up now and friends are back in the correct order. The re-shuffle *should* now be resolved, for good!
I don't want my stories emailed.
I don't mind people printing them, but I wouldn't want them emailed out to people.
The read later que is a great idea though.
We could have a more specific voting system or add a more specific one next to the one we already got.
I got the idea from this Poetry site in Swedish, and it's really helpful to see what you might need to work on.
Also, it helps a person not get beaten up by an over all 3 when he/she gets a 5 in one of the categories.
The categories they use are:
Language
Structure
Overall
Expression/emotion
ok while i DO like the idea of changing it to a 1-10 voting system, yeah, having people do more then hit a number isn't going to work here, i fear - i mean, i have had stories with thousands of hits and gotten less then a dozen votes on them, so like Alan says, making it harder isn't really fruitful.
ps - Gav? what about developing a DirtyMartini device of some sort not sure what it is, but sometimes, i feel the need for one... maybe it could ad random bad puns to everyones posts or even stories? *giggles* and yes, i love you too, Alan *blows kisses*
You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.
I think DD's idea about a simple, yet required, choice selection on 3-votes would be good, and helpful to the authors. However, if its all in the effort to deter 3-bombers, I'm afraid that in the long run we'll only make the system clumsier for everyone while never really eliminating somebody's ability to be vindictive and childish with their votes if they're determined to do so.
What if the voting is already too complicated for some people? Why don't we just go to a thumbs up or thumbs down style of voting? Yes, I liked it or no, I didn't. Then if they vote no we can have a dialogue box pop up that asks them if they want to change their vote. That way everyone is encouraged to get amazing votes and no ones feelings get hurt.
Thousands of user submitted stories removed from the site. You are nothing without your users or their freely submitted stories.
One other feedback/suggestion I thought I'd put out there is the idea of having a 10 Top Story Picks for the month and a separate !0 Top Poetry Picks for the month. Most of the time, the top picks for the month are disproportionately taken up by poems (as it is today, 7 out of 10 picks for February are poems). It would be nice to separate them into two different columns so readers can browse the lists according to their preferences. Just an idea... (not something meant to begrudge poetry).
You know what? I'm bothered a lot less by 3-bombing than by the attitude displayed above every time anyone even mentions this subject. We're babies for trying (admittedly in vain) to minimize it? That's fine. Understand that its awfully pompous to assume that only your concerns are worthy of being spared ridicule.
EDIT: and just to be clear, yes I understand that we can't just change the entire vote structure, for the reasons that Dirty Martini laid out. As far as I'm concerned, its almost beside the point.
i will have to tell you about the wine incident one day soon...
You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.