Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

In honor of the Freinds 25th anniversary who would you rather?

last reply
23 replies
1.4k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Open to all, guys, gals, gays, lesbians. Who would you rather?

My pick is Phoebe

Male: Matthew Perry (Chandler Bing)

Female: Courtney Cox (Monica Geller)

But I must confess that I kind of gave up on the show after the first season or two. Didn't really click with me enough to go the whole run.
Women... IDK i gave it some thought, and I dont really have a preference.
I have a MONTROUS crush on the late 90s Jennifer Aniston. Layla points out (correctly) that I know every episode and every scene where her nipples are clearly visible (which, to be fair, is nearly all of them).
I would choose Jennifer Aniston, though Courtney Cox is more my ideal as far as looks. It may be because I know Courtney's parents on a social level and have met her a couple of times. It would seem kind of weird.
None of the above.
The only attractive sitcom actress I can recall is Gina Bellman in Coupling.
I'd go with Jennifer, but Lisa would be a close second though.
Quote by Verbal
I have a MONTROUS crush on the late 90s Jennifer Aniston. Layla points out (correctly) that I know every episode and every scene where her nipples are clearly visible (which, to be fair, is nearly all of them).


Points well taken
Quote by uhhuh
The only attractive sitcom actress I can recall is Gina Bellman in Coupling.


you're wrong. it's all about Sarah Alexander in coupling. mmmm.

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

Quote by uhhuh
The only attractive sitcom actress I can recall is Gina Bellman in Coupling.


you're wrong. it's all about Sarah Alexander in coupling. mmmm.



also, jennifer aniston is boooooring.

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

Quote by sprite


also, jennifer aniston is boooooring.


TAKE THAT BACK RIGHT NOW!!!

Actually can we include guest stars? Cuz in that case I might choose Sophia Milos as the hottest, who plays a poly character (!!!) for an episode.

Quote by sprite


you're wrong. it's all about Sarah Alexander in coupling. mmmm.



also, jennifer aniston is boooooring.


Hell yes but let's not forget the spectacular guest appearance of Alison King




Two shows I couldn't stand that everyone else seemed to love: Friends and Seinfeld.
Quote by LYFBUZ


Two shows I couldn't stand that everyone else seemed to love: Friends and Seinfeld.


With you on Friends, but I loved Seinfeld.
Quote by LYFBUZ


Hell yes but let's not forget the spectacular guest appearance of Alison King




Two shows I couldn't stand that everyone else seemed to love: Friends and Seinfeld.


THERE IS A GOD!! You are the first person that has agreed with me on that show. Seinfeld was just 30 minutes of constant whining.
Quote by LYFBUZ


Two shows I couldn't stand that everyone else seemed to love: Friends and Seinfeld.




If I might mount a defense for Seinfeld (which I also love): it's sort of the anti-Friends. No one is particularly likable, everyone is self-centered and narrcisistic and petty, and I think it plays more like satire than pure comedy. It's a smart and biting satire of New Yorkers. I think it's brilliant, but there's not much emotion to it. There's not meant to be. It's funny but cold. That's the appeal. They're not nice people. I'm cool with that.

Seinfeld is smarter and more cutting and Friends. Friends works for much simpler reasons - good writing and good acting. It's just a great example of a show where everything clicked. The actors have amazing chemistry with each other, and they are perfect for the material. It's a genuinely funny, well-done show. And it has friendships and relationships and (unlike Seinfeld) actual nice people as characters. It doesn't satirize the characters, but allows you to love them.

I love both shows, but they are polar opposites.

Sorry to have strayed so far from the OP's original question.
Quote by Verbal



If I might mount a defense for Seinfeld (which I also love): it's sort of the anti-Friends. No one is particularly likable, everyone is self-centered and narrcisistic and petty, and I think it plays more like satire than pure comedy. It's a smart and biting satire of New Yorkers. I think it's brilliant, but there's not much emotion to it. There's not meant to be. It's funny but cold. That's the appeal. They're not nice people. I'm cool with that.



Exactly. On topic (sort of), I can't see doing a thread like this for Seinfeld. I can't think of one of those characters that I'd "rather". I mean, Julia Louis-Dreyfus is cute but Elaine was no more appealing sexually than the guys IMHO for the reasons Verbal gives in the quote.
Quote by seeker4


Exactly. On topic (sort of), I can't see doing a thread like this for Seinfeld. I can't think of one of those characters that I'd "rather". I mean, Julia Louis-Dreyfus is cute but Elaine was no more appealing sexually than the guys IMHO for the reasons Verbal gives in the quote.



The "I'd rather" game you'd play with Seinfeld is which one of Jerry's girlfriends would you do.

As for me:

Quote by Verbal


The "I'd rather" game you'd play with Seinfeld is which one of Jerry's girlfriends would you do.

As for me:



Her riding cowgirl with those spectacular tits in my face
Jennifer Anniston...bent over, my cock up her hot MILF ass, a she's eating out Courtney Cox.
Quote by LYFBUZ
Two shows I couldn't stand that everyone else seemed to love: Friends and Seinfeld.


I've not seen Seinfeld, to my knowledge it wasn't that big in NZ. I am not a Friends fan either. I've seen episodes, but it's not for me.
I couldn't really get into this show, but, Phoebe seems like she would be the most fun to have sex with. Jennifer is the sexiest of the girls though.
I'd bet Phoebe is a screamer and Monica is a creamer, and Rachel needs a gangbang.


So, l'd bang Phoebe.