Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

Social Experiment: Would you have sex with me?

last reply
12 replies
1.5k views
0 watchers
0 likes


Oops.. can't post two vids at one time.. part 2 is below



When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates
Part 2




When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates
I thought you were asking about having sex with you. I was all, and , and now I'm all,
Ut incepit fidelis, sic permanet.

***
********************************CLICK THE BANNERS TO BUY THESE WILLY-STIFFENING BOOKS!********************************
Quote by Shylass
I thought you were asking about having sex with you. I was all, and , and now I'm all,


Looks like you blew it again LM
Looks like I'm not the only since I double posted.
Pretty funny. But I would have thought one of the BF would have knocked his lights out!! HAHA

I would have figured at least one would have said yes. Guess you learn something new everyday. I never realized that if you were Christian and believed in Jesus you didn't have sex!

Be interesting if they tried the same thing in a club with a bunch of girls who were drinking.
I'd like to see what happens after the guys say yes...like the big reveal.

"What is the quality of your intent?" - Thurgood Marshall


That distribution of repsonses is pretty much what I would have expected.
{allba115-feed-5eed-facedeadbeef}
Quote by Shylass
I thought you were asking about having sex with you. I was all, and , and now I'm all,



What Shylass said. I was all ready to show you my naughty list and everything.

I just know I'm going to be really sorry I said that lol.
This was also posted in The Pub. Here's the reponse I gave :

Nice find. LMFAO in the first video when the guy on the phone said "Yeah mom? I'll just call you back, okay?".

Honestly, I don't think there was much of a difference socially speaking. Both the girl and the guy were good looking and polite, and just appeared as random sexually open persons who wanted to have a quick release. Although it was socially awkward, both were perceived as amusing more than offensive, in most cases.

The difference in the responses was mainly due to the rules of attractions between males and females, in my opinion.

- For a man seeking out a woman, physical appearance plays a primary role. Even myself, being polite and romantic, can't deny that. When the girl asked the question, the mental process was simply : "Good-looking : check. Let's do it.". The only reason they would refuse the bargain was for social restrictions/inhibitions (morally uninclined, already engaged, thinking it was a trick question, etc). Men also have the ability to more rapidly obtain a sexual craving, which was achieved the second the girl finished asking her question, in that case.

- For a woman seeking out a man, a lot more factors come into play. Physical appearance is only a very minor factor down their list (although it can influence the way they perceive the man's personality). Women seeking sexual excitement/release analyze many more factors such as emotional involvement, respectfulness, reciprocity, moral respectability, appearance, personality, overall status, etc. In that case, simply asking the question "Would you have sex with me?" without previous introduction wasn't sufficient to offer them an overall perspective to apprehend the situation. Women also achieve slower and steadier sexual cravings, which reinforces this whole natural "analyzing process" and allows them to be more objective when choosing a mate.
This is quite funny and I say it meaning I've done this before with a couple friends as a dare.. you'd be surprised at the responses some people give
Could you wait until after the CNN News