Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
Jam_Wil_Mac
Over 90 days ago
Heteroflexible Cis Male, 37
0 miles · Lerwick

Forum

Quote by PrincessC
Definitely giving oral, it's pretty powerful giving pleasure.


biggrin ;)
I am winning the Champions League in Football Manager '15 with Bristol City.
I am straight, but would be interested in experiencing variety. I have had minor gay/bisexual experiences in the past. I would like most to try giving head, but would probably be most comfortable giving head to a transgirl.
A friend and I were drinking and laughing one night. We got cosier and cosier and more less-sober. We started playful touching and poking each other. Eventually she unzipped me as part of the play which was quickly followed by her taking my helmet in her mouth. As she tenderly and sexily sucked, she took more and more of me into her mouth. Finally as she deep throated me slowly and massaged my balls softly I exploded in her mouth.
When I was 19 and dating a 31 year old, she really enjoyed fucking my bottom.
I have quite a hairy chest and abdomen and very hairy legs. I would thoroughly enjoy you rubbing your pussy against my legs and very much encourage you, or any woman so enclined, to do so.
Quote by dpw

I'm digging out my wig! I make nice tea as well. You better be wearing your kilt.


My spidey senses must have been tingling (amongst other things) how did I know you'd jump on that?? Haha!
I find it quite surprising how many lady's first sexual experience was performing oral sex. I would have been on it being giving, receiving or mutual masturbation.

Can anyone hazard a guess as to why so many women endulge in fellatio as their first sexual act?
I never have, but would be keen to try. Would reallyprefer to suck on a t-girls cock.
Quote by GirlyWorld
For me, bringing a woman to an orgasmic state is the ultimate reward in a sexual context. I have always focused on pleasuring my female partners, and I've spent many hours pampering them to this end. The more I make them scream, squeal, squirt and beg, the better. Fact is, the more she enjoys the experience sexually, the more I am satisfied mentally.


Agree 100% with you. A woman in orgasm is the sexiest and most sexual thing in the world for me. The noise, the view, the smell, the feel turns me on more than anything else.

For me, there is nothing better than feeling a woman have a big, wet, screaming orgasm when my face is between her labias.

I suppose there is also an ego thing in here, too, in the I feel good about myself knowing that another person feels good directly because of me. But I get turned on by a woman's orgasm, provided by me or not.
I shave my cock clean but do leave a short trim of hair around the base, on my pubis and on my balls. Started when I was 18 after hearing about the 'optical inch'. Prior to that, I had quite the lion's mane.
For me it is a combination of things. Firstly, I lost my mother at a young age, so I think there is a desire to feel a mature, maternal love. But also, older women bring experience, a sense of security, patience and an appreciation of sex and sexuality. They are, often, more adventurous.
So hot. Such an ego boost for me and also the juxtaposition of a woman ejaculating. Turns me on so much.
Love Love Love it. I can happily spend 45 mins to an hour licking a girl's pussy and clit. My record is 18 orgasms.
Pregnant women are beautiful and some women even look sexy as fuck while pregnant. But I couldn't have sex... I know it is not possible, but I would be far too scared of poking little foetus in the face with my penis.
Quote by LittleLuce




No I don't think it's as easy as that. For the finals in Brazil, a few of the players who got us there were unavailable through injury anyway. At the moment we are not exactly blessed with an array of dazzling talent as club football has taken over financially in the importance stakes just as it has in Scotland with their premier League teams.

Walker is a wing back and I'm not in favour of wing backs - they make substandard wingers and substandard defenders. Our game is too fast for the wing-back system and the players tire too quickly to defend properly against the fresher legs of the oppositions forwards. I'm a Spurs fan and having watched Walker last season I have to say he was poor at times.

I would have preferred Defoe and Crouch up front - Crouch is almost impossible to defend against and Defoe will shoot whenever he can. We scored one goal at these finals - a very poor show from a team that consisted of inexperienced players and one or two that were past their best.

As José Mourinho said a few years back when asked about the amount of foreign players coming to English clubs, he said "You can have the best Premier league in the world or you can have the best international team in the world - but you can't have both".


I think that's a pretty valid point. However, in this system you are not relying on wingbacks playing as out and out wingers or defenders. I totally get where your lack of faith in them comes from, but when played as genuine wingbacks, as they would be in this sytem, I think they could be genuinely effective.

Crouch and Defoe compliment each other and are (or were) very good, but I don't think they are international standard anymore. If you want a player in Crouchy's mould, why not Andy Carroll? He's had a poor run, but he is consistent and difficult to mark and always a serious aerial threat, as well as a reliable outball from defence.

Mourinho, I believe is probably right.