Quote by nicola
All donated
Brilliant.

Quote by RejectReality
Well, now with No-script updated for Quantum, I can say I'm still not a fan.
While no-script solved the biggest part of the issues on ad-heavy pages, it still froze up in both of the long sessions on such pages since adding no-script. At least it didn't completely freeze up my system this time. Firefox was dead in the water for at least a minute and a half both times, though.
Ended up closing it and going with Opera for the remainder of both sessions once it defrosted, because Chrome rolls over and dies within 5 minutes on pages choked with ads.
Still opens slow as hell and takes forever for the processes to end once you close it. Zero speed improvement over previous versions on typical pages. Zero speed improvements over Chrome on typical pages.
The latest update to Firefox for Android, on the other hand, has marked improvement in speed and reliability. Things that used to crash Firefox every time on my hardly-top-of-the-line older Samsung tablet work just fine now.
I'm sure they'll break it with the next release in a few days. That seems to be what Firefox and Chrome have both been consistently good about since going to this constant update scheme. Every other update is a memory-leaking dumpster fire.
New York attorney general says the FCC won’t help investigate fake net neutrality comments.
The FCC is about to announce a vote to slash net neutrality rules, allowing ISPs like Verizon to block apps, slow websites, and charge fees to control what you see & do online. Once they announce the vote, it's hard to stop.
Quote by noll
My experiences with Firefox Quantum so far are a bit mixed. It seems to crash quite often on Google Maps for instance. And some sites seem a bit slow even, though that may be due to server issues of course. I didn't do a side-by-side comparison. Other than that I'm quite content. Not a real fan of the the dark skin, but that's probably just something to get used to.
Quote by JakeD68
My comments are not the issue. The issue is you allowing that happen in the first place. Don't give me the misunderstanding stance. Each mod should have been prepped accordingly before the category was reinstated. There is no excuse for a 'mistske' like that. It's not good business for 1 and 2 it's an insult to the average persons intelligence.
Quote by JakeD68
Mods, if the 'inc fantasies' are only 'fantasy' why is there a 'true' tag on 1 of the stories? I noticed it due to my big fingers getting in the way. I wasn't logged in yet. Does that make a difference? I did as folks suggested, hid that category. I'm fairly certain the subject in that category is illegal. To promote 'true' stories on the guise of fantasy seems awfully underhanded. Considering this site promotes itself as a high caliber site.![]()
Quote by nicola
A word of warning. I just tried to use FireFTP to transfer some files to a server. It no longer works with Firefox Quantum.
As a browser, it seems excellent.
Quote by Raza
There needs to be an advert for stories on the homepage. When I visit Lush, the first thing I see is a big banner advertising breast cancer. That's gotta go. That's not erotic. That's gonna put people off straight away.
Quote by Raza
The point is, Liz, this is an adult site. If people are that sensitive that they can't even look at the word " " without being offended, then adult sites are not the best places to be.
I find it disheartening that Nicola is trying to push things forward, trying to evolve the site and encourage more people to use it, thus ensuring the site's future, yet people are trying to put a negative spin on it.
I see things that offend me all the time, but I tolerate it, don't whine about it, because I'm an adult and can tolerate things I don't like. Fictitious stories don't hurt anybody; that's the point I'm making.
Quote by browncoffee
Some words I love to say and some I can't bear to.
Quote by BigGarrett
Would it be possible for the mods to reject my pending story, Family Camping? I wrote it as a story under the impression that the site refused . Now I've found the category, I would like to re-upload it as an story.

Quote by VirgoGo
I don't believe that many have thought it through. The question of privacy and data security doesn't seem to be present in these debates. If Lush is so hand to mouth that it had to reintroduce , what is it doing to protect its members from hacks and other breaches in privacy? It just became a bigger target for hackers who want to make mischief under the guise of doing good.
Quote by IAMLOVE
It's not so much values as is a direct personal effect for some of us. Those of us who've been abused in horrible ways, it's not a matter of "Puritan values". It's because of real life and how comfortable or not someone is by staying. And for whatever reason people want to go, they shouldn't be shamed if they do.![]()
Quote by ChuckEPoo
Just my![]()