Trump was right..

Quote by Chryses
... chuckling ... Stop whining and correct your failures.
San Francisco on rampant drug use on city streets: “We need to change”
Drugs, famously, only a California problem.
Quote by Chryses
So are the facts of affirmative action. He faked being black to get into medical school.
yawn
Quote by Chryses
Please don’t think I have a particular animus against San Francisco. Oakland, on the other side of the bay, has also attempted suicide.
California sucks... Can you tell us how to improve using sample policies from where you are from?
Quote by Chryses
... chuckling ... Loading who? Heading where?
Remember (if you were ever aware) which justices voted to retain racial discrimination college admissions and which justices did not.
Next we need to get rid of 4-H programs. Do you have any idea how many hogs have been slaughtered as a result?
It's not right.
https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1679829904026730496
Charlie Kirk is a drop-out by the way.
Quote by AngelEthics
The Little Mermaid is a Dutch story and in the original version, she is described as having a "rose-leaf complexion" and blue eyes. Disney decided to go with a white Aerial in the 80's despite setting it in the Caribbean, then changed the ethnicity for the live action version. Do think they did that because they thought they were going to make more money?
Why did Mel Gibson play William Wallace? Because he had box office draw at the time. I would imagine Colin Ferrell and Chris Hemsworth were cast for the same reasons.
So it's only "political" when a black person is in the movie...
Hugh Jackman was a nobody when he was cast as Wolverine... A 5'3'' Canadian character... Why isn't that "political".
And you thinking that Disney isn't in the business to make money is just silly, not sure what to even say to that. It's pure silliness to think Disney would put anything above making a profit.
The Little Mermaid (2023) has made 544 million on a budget of 250 million.
Quote by AngelEthics
This is my reasoning: it's political because the decision wasn't made based on what was going to make them the most money. It was either based on (cynically) making them look like they care about diversity or (non-cynically) that they really want black and brown children see themselves represented in these classic stories. Would those children watch a movie with a white Ariel? They already have. Are they expanding who they are selling tickets to by doing this? I doubt it. That's what makes it political to me.
Do you think I'm wrong to think so?
lol
So whenever there is a black person in a movie it must be some kind of affirmative action thing to make black people feel better about themselves? Because movie studios aren't in the business of making money they are in the business of forcing diversity? How many black people is the max that can be in a movie so it's not "political"?
Doesn't the story take place in the Caribbean anyway? In the original story the mermaid doesn't even have a name..
When they cast and an Irish guy as Alexander the great was that to make Irish people feel included? Or is that different?
What about Thor? The actor is Australian but the character is supposed from Scandinavian mythology.
Quote by AngelEthics
I hope humanity is moving towards having having more people with your mindset and fewer with Kid Rock's.
Political isn't always bad, either. I think that the choice to have the Little Mermaid represented by a black actor was both political and a good choice.
I don't think you understand... Why is it "political" to you that they made the little mermaid black?
Quote by AngelEthics
Too political for the people he was hoping would buy tickets to his movie. He was worried about limiting the success of his own product. There's nothing controversial about hating an Imperialist regime that sprung out of a Republic (at least in 1977) but putting a white Leia and a black Han in a romantic situation was.
Just odd, like I never think "wow this is political" when I see a black person or a woman on screen.
Funny how it's always conservatives actually getting caught though.
Lawyers who had cases before SCOTUS, including the case that ended Affirmative Action, sent payments to aides of Justice Clarance Thomas from 2019-2021. The payments were never disclosed, & they paid via Venmo, b/c of course they did.
