Quote by Tantaleyes

Racism is bad. End of story.

Shit, debate over.

Quote by Ironic

My criticism of the policies is that they are racially discriminatory. I think racial discrimination is bad. Chryses told you that it doesn't square with the equal protection clause, so maybe the policy can be challenged way.

Either morally or legally, I think we'll all be better off dismantling racial preferences and discrimination where we can.

OK you think racism against white people is bad. How would you go about fixing this major problem of America being racist against white people?

Quote by Tantaleyes

It's bad. Don't listen to anybody who tells you it isn't.

Why is it bad, explain.

Like, who is the policy racist against and how long has the policy been around?

Quote by Ironic

Nice try again.

Good lord, fragile, Fine then...

How long has the policy been around? Who is the policy racist against?

Quote by Ironic

It was off this thread's topic, and felix knew it when he tried changing the subject, even though you want to criticize me for pointing it out.

OK, what is your solution to reduce racism toward white people?

Quote by Ironic

More brilliance!

Just explaining it to you... Your fragility is making metaphors go over your head.

Quote by Ironic

You think I'm racist because you think I'm a chinless freak? When you don't know what I look like? Great style there! Brilliant!

Metaphorical... Having no chin means you're fragile.

Quote by Ironic

Nice try. Start a thread about it.

Oh so now you don't want to debate.... See, fragile.

Quote by Ironic

Not at all. Racism's a problem, and discussing the pros and cons of how it can be reduced is a reasonable way of working to reduce it,

The fact that other people disagree with the perpetuation of racist policies is very reasonable.

OK, what is your solution to reduce racism toward white people?

Quote by Ironic

And that's what you do instead of debating racially discriminating policies.

Debate? All you do is repeat the same dumb thing over and over again.

Ironic: 2+2=5

Anyone else: Um, it's 4 actually.

Ironic: No it's 5

Anyone else: when you take 2 units and add them to 2 other units it comes out to 4, that's just simple math.

Ironic: You're discriminating against the number 5

Anyone else: You're an idiot.

Ironic: You insult me because you can't debate.

lol

Quote by Ironic

You call me a racist because I don't agree with racial discrimination. Sure felix.

I call you a racist because you're a chinless freak who says racist things.

Like, I don't get upset if a woman gets to tee off from a closer distance to the hole during a round of golf because I am stronger. If I were to ruin the round of golf by focusing on that it would make me appear weak, stupid and sexist.

Quote by Ironic

It took you a while, but I'm glad you agree that institutionalizing racist policies in the government perpetuates racism.

The thing is, people, including normal white people, know racists like you exist. You whine and cry and that's fine because society carries on. We all just learn to avoid you and make fun of you behind your back or confront you when you get a little too aggressive with your misplaced hatred.

Quote by Ironic

I don't agree that institutionalizing racist policies helps get rid of racism. Doing so perpetuates racism.

We're not talking about you. What's fragile about commenting on what's posted here?

You're right Ironic, it perpetuates racism because when white people like you see anyone who isn't white benefiting in some way it makes you hate them more and act more racist.

Fox news is trying to gaslight us into thinking Trump isn't hot.

Quote by Chryses

Wheels within wheels, m'lady, as well you know!

I don't even know what that means. You're like the Zodiac, writing cryptic letters to the newspaper. But instead of murders you just pull some racist Mrs. Doubtfire shit.

Quote by Chryses

I suspected that conspiracy theory would be trotted out.

You brought it up... You want people to know you like to do that. Very weird. Especially when you make female ones.

Quote by Chryses

It may be a vast right-wing conspiracy!

You weirdos do do that though.

So apparently this guy voted against this but now trying to take credit. This is very common, republicans voting against the interest of people in the rural areas they govern. This is what republicans do across the board.

Quote by noll

We all know you're Dani, Jack.

I wouldn't dumb it down that much, makes it too obvious.

Quote by Chryses

Methinks the lady doth protest too much!

Oh really? Who are my other accounts? I know one of yours was Penny-Candy.

Quote by Chryses

... chuckling ... "coup coup"? You sound like someone else!

What do you mean? You're the one who makes multiple accounts. You remind me of the guy from Split, except all your personalities are dumbasses.

Quote by Chryses

I found it encouraging that the Senators were not partisan and criticized the FBI and DHS for failing to weigh the social media communications. The riot would probably have been handled better had the agencies treated the information seriously enough.

Also like, if the conservatives weren't coup coup for coco puffs, 1/6 would not be a shameful date in the history books.

Quote by ElCoco

I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree on this issue.

You've embarrassed yourself again.

Quote by ElCocko

I think you need to be reminded they’re different because you’ve spent the last few posts associating them as if they mean the same.

.

I don’t think a thread about racially discriminatory policy has anything to do with reparations because “policy” doesn’t have the same meaning as “reparations.”

.

Yes, that’s right. When I looked at the posts in this thread, none of them gave me any impression that providing resources to people who have been denied resources is racism. I also don’t think anybody’s said or suggested the agency’s racist. Have you found any posts that make you think the poster believes providing resources to people who have been denied resources is racism?

.

Yes, you’ve said several times now you think a policy that discriminates based on race isn’t racially discriminatory.

.

How to fix the inequality you and I are aware of is a different question, and like reparations, it might be a good thread topic, but it definitely isn’t the topic of this thread. Before you ask, I’ll tell you I think racial discrimination isn’t the right way to go.

So you don't have a point besides a semantical one about the word "racism" itself... Profound.

Quote by Chryses

I suspected this was true. FBI failed 'at fundamental level' before Capitol riot, Senate report claims

The FBI and other US government agencies failed "at a fundamental level" to assess the potential for violence ahead of the Capitol riot on 6 January 2021, a new report claims.

Democrats on a Senate panel found the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "downplayed" the risks and so did not properly prepare.

Translation: the Capitol wore a too short of a skirt to the wrong frat party.

Quote by ElCocko

No, I don't think I'm being purposely obtuse.

oh...

It's by accident

damn

The right wingers are fighting to prove who is the bigger nazi or something. Both sides were wearing masks btw

https://twitter.com/TheKevinDalton/status/1672981248598499330

Quote by Chryses

See my response above.

I won, tenderfoot.

Quote by Chryses

If attacking me and defending racist policies is what floats your boat, by all means have at it! Keep in mind that because the policies are racist, they fail the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

I have cornered you with logic once again.

I accept your surrender.

Quote by Chryses

Methinks 'tis a gallant gesture of yours to offer those prized items of yours to me as tokens of your surrender.

Who is the policy racist against? And how long has the policy been around?

The reason Chryses, with his below average mouse sized testicles, is scared to answer my questions is as follows.

Who is the policy racist against?

Answer: White people.

And how long has the policy been around?

Answer: Decades.

Now this proves the policy being "racist" doesn't matter because if we were to crunch some numbers... White people have no trouble starting businesses. In fact, most business owners, CEOs and most positions of power really, are held by white people.

Penny-Chryses knows this. That's why he can't bring himself to answer those two simple questions because it completely negates the whole point of his thread... That the policy is designed to be racist to white people which would put them at a disadvantage.

But in reality, racism against white people in America isn't a thing. Not a thing enough to actually economically or socially put them at a disadvantage.

The real point of Chryses' thread is to just actually be racist against minorities by attempting to get white people angry about "anti-white racism", that in reality, doesn't actually exist when it comes to this policy.

It's just right wing culture war poison think. An attempt to create more racism.

"Hey white people, your enemy is minorities! Not corporations, rich people and politicians." <-- That is what conservatives are desperate to make people think.