Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
Nikki703
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 57
Forum
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by Dancing_Doll
One of my favourite things was when someone sent me this amazing arrangement of orchids potted with stones in a low square glass terrarium. The way it had been done up looked so cool. I had it on my window ledge for years.
I love that. You can keep it alive plus it shows so much more effort and thought went into the gesture as opposed to just calling 1-800-FLOWERS or I guess it would be online now, even less effort, LOL!
Active Ink Slinger
I like getting flowers but under the right circumstances. I have had guys bring me roses on a first date and send me roses after a first date and while I was flattered it was also kind of creepy and made me feel he was going a little to fast. But after a few dates, getting a single rose is nice. And if we are in a relationship, flowers are always appreciated although this may sound weird but I much prefer potted flowers I can plant in my garden instead.
Active Ink Slinger
HAHA! I have honestly never heard of it! I guess its sort of like you cant post a pic in the forum until you made 10 posts!
Is there like a 10 date rule for Anal and maybe 25 dates before you should ask to have a threesome? What ever happened to just letting things happen as they happen?
Is there like a 10 date rule for Anal and maybe 25 dates before you should ask to have a threesome? What ever happened to just letting things happen as they happen?
Active Ink Slinger
I cant speak for the Lesbians but I think the reasons have been pretty well stated already. Most of my Lush friends are women, some Straight, some Bi and some Lesbian. But I also have male friends too. As a matter a fact one of best friends here is a male.
The reason I normally don't add men is that the majority of the men who ask me either have no info in their profile or along with the request they send a not that says something like "you look hot, wanna fuck?" If I receive a request like that from a man, woman, or something in between I am going to reject it.
I clearly stated in my profile that I will not add anyone who has a blank profile unless we have communicated and connected on some other level. Or if they at least send a note explaining why he/she thinks we may connect. If the person can not or will not take the time to read my profile and respect what I am asking, then why the fuck would I want to be his/her friend.
The reason I normally don't add men is that the majority of the men who ask me either have no info in their profile or along with the request they send a not that says something like "you look hot, wanna fuck?" If I receive a request like that from a man, woman, or something in between I am going to reject it.
I clearly stated in my profile that I will not add anyone who has a blank profile unless we have communicated and connected on some other level. Or if they at least send a note explaining why he/she thinks we may connect. If the person can not or will not take the time to read my profile and respect what I am asking, then why the fuck would I want to be his/her friend.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by naughty_uk_guy69
I have a female friend in the USA who wants to send me (in the UK) a pair of her panties. The post office counter staff are asking some awkward questions about the content of her packet and have told her that they can open it to verify the contents. I doubt that this is true although US or UK customs could if they thought the package was suspicious. Have any of you gals sent your panties overseas like this - have you any tips as to what you wrote on the customs slip about what was in your package? Perhaps the panties could be concealed in some other ingenious way say a poster tube or something? Gals, I really need your thoughts, ideas and experiences about how this can be done!
Is it the package they find suspicious or her? If they are properly packed in a box labeled as clothing or even a shipping envelope they should not even be questioned. Unless they are giving off some foul odor in which case they may need a Biohazard label. LOL
Sounds to me like she is having second thoughts. Is this a woman you know IRL or someone you met online? And if its an online friend are you sure it is actually a woman?
Active Ink Slinger
I never really understood the big deal some women make about it. If you suck it why not let him come in your mouth, and then why not swallow it. Im not saying go out and suck every random guys cock and swallow his cum. But if you are in a relationship then really what's the big deal.
Some women say its gross or its to "intimate". Kissing is far more intimate. If you will take his saliva in your mouth why not his cum?
Some women say its gross or its to "intimate". Kissing is far more intimate. If you will take his saliva in your mouth why not his cum?
Active Ink Slinger
I believe you can. I have been In Love with 3 people in my life. I have loved others but was NOT In Love. One was when I was very young and while I sometimes wonder where she is and what she is doing, I am not in love anymore. One was my ex-husband and while I would never wish for harm to come to anybody, no matter how bad the person is, if I heard he got run over by a bus I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. And the 3rd is my current SO.
Maybe I never actually was In Love with the first 2, who really knows. But I do know I DO NOT love them now.
Maybe I never actually was In Love with the first 2, who really knows. But I do know I DO NOT love them now.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by kornslayer1
I'm not saying they aren't worthy, I'm saying there are so many other bands a lot more worthy than them. To me anyway, it just kind of adds insult to injury when you consider that there were so many bands were out touring, and recording so many years before they came out.
Well I agree and disagree. The reason for the OP is that there are so many bands that deserve to be in that aren't. But Nirvana is as worthy as any of them. They are to Alternative Rock in the 90's-present what Black Sabbath was to Heavy Metal. And I love Black Sabbath!
At least we agree that HOF is a JOKE ! HAHA
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by kornslayer1
I know, I know. Beastie boys getting in, LLcoolJ, Madonna? A million others I could name that SHOULDN'T be in there, and vice versa. Top of my list, Iron maiden, and Judas priest. Quite honestly, I just gave up giving a crap. Alice Cooper, and Black Sabbath were on the list to get in many years before they were finally inducted. Nirvana got in the first year they could, and they were part of the grunge era, that almost killed the era of the bands that should be in there, and aren't. It's just bullshit wrapped in more bullshit, and that forced me not to give a shit. If someone else wants to open The Real Rock n Roll Hall Of Fame, where truly deserving bands get in, and get in when they should, I might check that out. Quite honestly, I only live a few hours away from the hall of shame, and I can't ever see myself driving out there. Why do you think that is?
As much as Id love to see Iron Maiden and Judas Priest get inducted, I hope you are NOT saying Nirvana doesn't deserve to be in. There is a definite Anti Heavy Metal bias for sure, but to say Nirvana isn't worthy is just plain wrong. Grunge didn't kill bands like Priest, Maiden, Metallica, etc. Grunge killed bands like Poison, Kix and L.A. Guns, LOL!
Quote by seeker4
True enough.
The other issue would be which lineup. Going on influence and artistic merit, it should be (IMHO) the Fragile-era line up of Anderson, Squire, Bruford, Wakeman, Howe. However, if they go for most commercially successful lineup, then it's the 90125-Big Generator lineup of Anderson, Squire, Kaye, White, Rabin. Given the number of musicians who have passed through the band over the years, maybe just say "we're inducting Yes" and see who shows up
Same would be true for Deep Purple. I agree Yes should be Anderson, Squire, Howe, Wakeman and Bruford and honorable mention to Alan White.
And Deep Purple should be Blackmore, Gillan, Lord, Glover and Paice with honorable mention to Glenn Hughes and David Coverdale.
Maybe that is the excuse the Hall of Shame is using for keeping them out, HAHA
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by HotBttmInBriefs
I agree about the name of the Hall (rock vs. pop) but I just never have wanted to go there as for so many that definition is either a narrow one or wide one as to what is Rock and Roll and what isn't.
Many would want to exclude all the soul artists, while others would want to take out the reggae artists, and then you take out the Rap artists, then some would want artists that were mainly disco out, and all punk and alternative out, and so forth. When you start restricting, it never stops. Many today wouldn't even consider the artists who gave birth to rock and roll in the 50s true rock artists.
With any hall of fame there are always going to be exclusions and folks who don't get in when they should. Politics play way too much into the voting process with any of them. And sadly that is just part of being human.
I agree in principle BUT there is a Pop Music HOF, Latin Music HOF, an R+B HOF already. A true Rock Band is not eligible for induction into any of those. So why should a performer, even one as iconic as Michael Jackson, who is know as the King of POP be eligible for the Rock and Roll HOF? cant have cake and eat it too!
My main point though is if you are inducting performers who to most people aren't considered Rock, how can you not induct such Iconic bands as Deep Purple? Why did it take so long for Rush and Kiss to get inducted? There is more to this.
Quote by seeker4
After the arduous journey to get Rush in there, I think most Canadians are pretty soured on the place. I had not realized Yes wasn't in yet. Getting them together for the induction might be a trick, though. I think Jon's on the outs with the others (again) or at least was last I checked which, admittedly, was a while ago.
Yeah, could be tricky but even Pink Floyd put differences aside to be inducted, although Roger Waters wasn't there in person but was on via satellite, LOL
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by jollylolly
Who decides which bands get inducted?! Sonic Youth, The Pixies, X, Bad Brains, The Cure, The Smiths, The Go-Gos, Devo, The Buzzcocks...
More great choices.
I think there is a committee made up of Music Journalists, Record Company execs, etc who probably listen to stuff like Air Supply and have no clue what is good music.
It even pisses me off that Madonna and Michael Jackson are in and bands like Maiden, Priest and Motorhead may never get in. Its the ROCK AND ROLL Hall of Fame, not the POP MUSIC Hall of Fame!
Quote by HotBttmInBriefs
So glad Kiss and Linda Ronstadt are finally going in.
I am not a Kiss fan but if they were inducted back when they should have been there would be no controversy about them playing at the ceremony. It would have been the original 4 members. Another RARHOF Blunder!
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by CurlyGirly
Nikki, how did the Godz miss being on your list???C'mon! They're rock and roll machines.
In addition to most of yours, a few I would love to see inducted:
The Cure
Barry White
Joe Cocker
Stevie Ray Vaughn
Soundgarden
Pixies
Iron Maiden
Journey (totally nostalgic choice for me)
I know that Nirvana is finally being inducted, but what about Dave Grohl just for being DG?
I agree with all your choices. There are so many more but I just picked ones who have been eligible for a long time. The Godz would burn the hall down.
As for DG, he is just too cool to be included. Besides he is already in MY Hall of Fame and with membership he gets a lot more than his name on a plaque, LOL!