Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
SereneProdigy
Over 90 days ago
Male

Forum

Quote by Magical_felix
I like how it looked before... I think the stretched out look and the look with the gaps both look worse. Stretched out/warped pics are bad design.


I actually agree with Magical_felix: I much preferred the way it looked before. Out of the 15 friends shown on my profile, 9 of them now have distorted avatars; it especially looks weird when you look at them as a bunch and the great majority of them are warped with bizarre proportions. It almost makes me feel sick actually, and I'm very serious here.

My personal order of preference is: 1) the way it was before, 2) keep aspect ratio and fill horizontal space, 3) stretch to fill the entire space
I only come here to supervise Magical_felix's rehabilitation from severe mental trauma...


Quote by Sabroan

Sure they exist online, but in real life there are only two reasons why they might work:
1: You are unattractive
2: She is unattractive
or 3rd and very unlikely, the genjutsu has been cast on you



...or 4: We're both attractive but can get over it as we both have plenty of other attractive partners in our respective lives to fuck with.
Quote by Sabroan
You are referring to male-female friendship? Those things don't exist.



I personally must be subject to heavy hallucinations then.
Quote by Buz
I think there should be a an organized movement to popularize the word fornicate. Maybe street demonstrations with signs that say "Give FORNICATE some love".

We could organize the Fornicate Party. Come to be known as Fornicators.

Who wants to be a fornicator?


I fully agree Buz, we need more Fornicators among us.


Quote by SereneProdigy
Fake Cum Recipe

- 8oz / 1 cup / 250mL of water
- 1/4 to 1/2 teaspoon of xanthan gum
- 1 teaspoon of milk/cream

1. Pour the water in a container of your choice
2. Gradually add the xanthan gum while mixing thoroughly
3. Add some milk/cream until you obtain the desired color



For the curious, here's what that recipe looks like. Some bubbles are still trapped in the mixture because it was freshly mixed, but you get the idea. I like to make a considerable amount myself, around 250mL which is roughly equivalent to 50 average cumshots (ie. an enormous bukkake).

I rarely use it all right away though, I often like to play with the same batch during an entire weekend:


Quote by YandelIdbell
then what do you recommend best simulator for long sitting.



The OP closed his account, but he mentioned the Vibro Play in his review:


Quote by Guest
Only drawback - and it's minor - is using in for a long time while sitting - it does need a little adjusting every now and then - my Vibro Play toy is still the best for a long sitting edging session (it's not curved and only has one vibe speed but it just sits there and does it thing) - pic of that is below the pic of the Dr. Joel. The Vibro Play one is only $20 - so if this is your first time getting a toy like this - maybe try that one first. It's also good because it gets a bit wider from the tip to the base - which feels nice smile

Quote by uber_cougar
But I don't want to know how to spot a fake profile, I want to know how one would determine a genuine profile with genuine pictures of the actual person behind that particular profile.



My own personal advice on that? This is the internet, you can never be 100% sure of anything.

As to the rest of your post, I entirely agree with you. You're actually pretty aware/cautious for a newcomer, so kudos for that.
Quote by uber_cougar
I've not been a member here long, so do forgive me if this is a daft question.

After reading through this thread, I'm intrigued to know, how do you people know when a person is using fake profile pics?

There is absolutely no way of knowing if a person's pictures are genuine or not. Anybody can visit a amateur porn website and download a set of nude amateur snaps and then upload them to their Lush profile. So how do know which photos are genuine?



There are quite a few ways to know when someone is using fake pictures, although in some cases you can't be 100% sure:


1- You can perform a reverse image search with Google: if the search returns numerous results, it's extremely likely that the picture was extracted from a random source

2- Some people are stupid enough to use pictures of recognizable pornstars

3- Many other porn pictures aren't easily recognizable, but the way they look so professional/polished just screams 'mainstream porn'

4- Some people are stupid enough to use pictures of different people who don't look alike at all (eg. bellybuttons that look entirely different from a picture to another)

5- Some [s]women[/s] guys are stupid enough to mention that their breasts is a 38C, when even a guy like me knows that they're much closer to a 32F

6- Many profiles just scream 'insincere' and 'fake' in general (eg. "Hi I'm Lucy and I'm currently studying at Iowa State University! I'm still a virgin and here are a few dozens pictures of me, revealing my face and plenty of other compromising details! Please come stalk me!")

7- In some cases you can't be certain of anything, but your gut instincts can still tell you more or less clearly that it's likely to be a fake profile


There are certainly a few others that I'm forgetting, but you get the overall idea. I hope this helped.
Quote by Just_A_Guy_You_Know
Ha. 'Glorious' is out, unless your pole is golden and shining with heavenly light while cherubs dance around it singing in a celestial chorus.


Seems like 'glorious' is appropriate after all then, in my own specific case.

Seriously, I just verified and 'glorious' is indeed a rather rare/fanciful term in the English language. English isn't my first language, and in my own language the term 'glorious' (which is spelled almost exactly the same) is actually a pretty common term, just like 'great' or 'fantastic'. My bad.
Here's my diet, for the curious:





This is my basic 'maintenance' diet (ie. no weight gain/loss), but right now I'm eating an additional 400 kCal daily to provoke a slow-bulk.

I don't always follow this diet precisely 100% of the time, but I'd say that I'm 90% consistent with it. The thing that I'm most likely to change are my dinner carbs (ie. sweet potatoes): from time to time, I like to switch them for couscous, rice, noodles, beans, etc. I also currently add coconut milk to my post-workout meal (125 kCal), to add a bit more saturated fat to my diet. I also eat salad at noon with my salmon, but don't even calculate it as the caloric content is very negligible (less than 25 kCal).


A few explanations:

- All the quantities are expressed in grams, except for my Whey Protein which is just 1 scoop, and my banana which is 1 average banana. The weight of chicken is 'cooked', but the weight of my sweet potatoes is 'uncooked' (sweet potatoes lose almost half their weight after being cooked).

- The grayed lines labeled 'Aft. Snack' is my post-workout meal. I only eat it on the days that I actually workout, hence why there are two different totals at the bottom of the table: 'on days' and 'off days'.

- You'll notice that my fats are repartitioned almost equally between mono-unsaturated, poly-unsaturated and saturated fats: this is ideal for health.

- The columns 'Sodium' and 'Pot' are important to observe together, as your sodium/potassium ratio is a lot more important than your salt intake considered alone. Most Americans eat a ratio of 2:1, while a ratio of 1:2 is recommended for your health. My own ratio is around 1:3.


Quote by ]Recent data from the observational studies reviewed provide additional support for the sodium-to-potassium ratio as a superior metric to either sodium or potassium alone in the evaluation of blood pressure outcomes and incident hypertension.


- The column 'pH' refers to the acidity of foods: foods with a positive value acidify your blood, while those with a negative value have an opposite effect. Ideally your total 'pH' should have a negative value. An acid buildup can have many health consequences and can also hinder your athletic performances: here's an [url=http://www.medindia.net/patients/lifestyleandwellness/acid-base-dietary-balance-health-and-wellbeing-effects.htm]article about it
.

- The columns 'O6' and 'O3' refer to the content of Omega-6 and Omega-3. Again, this is a matter of ratio: ideally you should have a ratio of no more than 4:1. I personally ingest a few additional capsules of Omega-3 (2g) to obtain a hefty 5g daily; my ratio is therefore 3:1 (15g:5g).


Quote by [url=http://www.gbhealthwatch.com/Science-Omega3-Omega6.php
GB HealthWatch[/url]]Due to the opposing effects of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, a healthy diet should contain a balanced omega-6surprisedmega-3 ratio. Human beings evolved eating a diet with a omega-6:omega-3 ratio of about 1:1. Modern Western diets exhibit omega-6:omega-3 ratios ranging between 15:1 to 17:1. Epidemiology and dietary intervention studies have concluded that while an exceptionally high omega-6:omega-3 ratio promotes the development of many chronic diseases, a reduced omega-6:omega-3 ratio can prevent or reverse these diseases. For example, a ratio of 4:1 was associated with a 70% reduction in mortality in secondary coronary heart disease prevention and a ratio of 2.5:1 reduced rectal cell proliferation in patients with colorectal cancer. A lower omega-6:omega-3 ratio in women was associated with decreased risk for breast cancer. A ratio of 2:1–3:1 suppressed inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and a ratio of 5:1 had a beneficial effect on patients with asthma, whereas a ratio of 10:1 had adverse consequences.



I know, I'm quite anal about it all, but I love that stuff and I love my diet; everything is absolutely delicious and I'm never hungry. And no worries, I also allow myself a few moderate cheat meals during the weekend.
Haha, this made me laugh out loud.

I agree with most of the things you expressed here. I'd also add that fanciful terms like 'heat-seeking love-missile of masculine pleasure' personally turn me off even when they're expressed in the narrative, especially when they're constantly used and feel forced (which they often do). People don't talk this way, but they don't think or perceive things this way either.

An occasional "I was eagerly waiting for her to ride my glorious pole" is perfectly fine for the sake of variety, but it definitely shouldn't be overdone.
Quote by SereneProdigy


Yep, planks are great to work the core. I actually add a slight movement myself when I'm performing planks, and also perform them with 40 lbs attached to a belt.

I stand between two benches and move my hips up and down (pretty much like a fucking motion actually), and I perform 40 reps in total (though with the added weight I can only perform 12-14 reps consecutively). It looks like this:

Quote by Dirty_D
planks.... isometric training that I loathe... yet still incorporate it into my stadiums regularly.


Yep, planks are great to work the core. I actually add a slight movement myself when I'm performing planks, and also perform them with 40 lbs attached to a belt.

I stand between two benches and move my hips up and down (pretty much like a fucking motion actually), and I perform 40 reps in total (though with the added weight I can only perform 12-14 reps consecutively). It looks like this:




Another great exercise for the abs are stomach vacuums. These work the transverse abdominal muscle (ie. deep abs), which helps you maintain a flat belly:





If you should only perform one exercise for your abs, it's this one. I personally perform them while lying on my bench, 6 x 30 sec in total:


A lot of women actually have a hard time stimulating their g-spot when stimulating their g-spot...

I highly doubt that stimulating their bellybutton will do any good, especially since it's nearly 1-foot away from the g-spot.
Quote by SereneProdigy
Note 1: I perform isometric contractions to train my thighs as I currently have a knee condition. An isometric contraction is when you keep a resistance against your muscle without actually moving the joint. I might explain these in a later post.



As promised, I feel like explaining what isometric contractions are...

A lot of people assume that to stimulate muscles efficiently and to make them bigger/stronger, one must absolutely be moving weights. If you're holding a weight without any movement, you're still actually contracting your muscles to a significant extent. I'm sure that everyone will concur: just try to hold an appreciable weight or to keep a strenuous position, and you'll soon feel your muscles burning/aching, just like it is with any bodybuilding movement.

If you use a significant weight, it's still very possible to contract your muscles and to stimulate them without any movement:





That's what an isometric contraction is. The downside of it however, is that you'll mostly be gaining strength at the specific angle that you'll be practicing, as opposed to a complete motion which will develop your strength on the entire movement. This is not ideal for athletes who need functional strength, though isometrics contractions are still frequently used for rehabilitation after an injury.

However, in terms of bodybuilding (ie. gaining volume without much importance given to functional strength), isometric contractions can be just as effective as proper movements. The optimal 'time per set' for hypertrophy is usually around 45-60 seconds: to gain volume, you should choose a load that allows you to move the weight for 45-60 seconds before feeling exhausted (usually this means 8-12 repetitions per set). If you hold an isometric contraction for 45-60 seconds and feel greatly exhausted after that time, it will actually have a much similar impact for hypertrophy than performing a regular set in the same time has.

Because I suffer from a knee condition since around 2 years ago (ie. chondromalacia patella), I've been incorporating isometric contractions to train my legs. This is a lot friendlier for my joints, as 'no movement' also means that my cartilage won't be subject to the 'wear and tear' that's usually encountered with regular movements.

Mostly, I keep this position to train my quadriceps. I try to find an angle that's challenging enough, and perform 4 sets of 45-60 seconds (for each leg). I feel greatly exhausted after that, sometimes even more so than when I was squatting with heavy weights. And my progress is also very appreciable so far:


Quote by Magical_felix
They know better. They know I don't like getting ugly...but I will if I must.



Quote by Paman
Those who find size difficult to judge should carry a tape measure or ruler, and then enjoy the measuring experience.

The basic problem is that for years men have been telling ladies that this:
!----------------------------! is between six and eight inches long.



Technically, women do carry a rather accurate measuring tool: their hands. I mentioned this a few times already on these forums, but a woman's hand is 3 inches wide on average; if she's holding a dick with both of her hands, that would be a measurement of approximately 6 inches.

It's possible to guesstimate the size of dicks fairly accurately with this method:




Quote by clum
I think it's a wonder men are still using imperial units to measure their dicks. Doesn't 18 centimetres sound more impressive than 7 inches?


My own dick is 152,400,000 nanometers long... and God knows that every nanometer counts.