Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
darkroot50
2 hours ago
Straight Male, 67
0 miles · Stafford

Forum

Quote by activegrandpa

All of you who say, “Sure, why not”—what would you say if your mother-in-law were her?

Not even if I was dead

Quote by Just_A_Guy_You_Know

I am a foreigner, and have been told on several occasions to go fuck myself, so, yes.

Great reply. 🤣🤣🤣

Sure, I'd gave tea or coffee with her. She could give me some nature photography ideas. What do you prefer Kistin? I'm buying.

I'm seeing a younger woman right now. She's 16 years younger, although we both fit the "mature" definition.

Not much since we had a big breakfast and big lunch. Probably soup.

One of the biggest issues with the way Supreme Court justices are selected is their ability to avoid answering questions. Every nominee for the last 30+ years was asked about their position on Roe. Most, if not all, declined to provide an answer. Instead, they relied on the concept that they can't talk about possible cases that might come before SCOTUS. If you can't talk about your views on possible cases, what the hell is the point of having them appear for hearings in the Senate. And God forbid they are asked about their religious views - that is forbidden. We might not have the Court we do today if the Senate knew about the 3 justices with "a misguided variant of Christianity." I think almost anything is fair play before selecting a person to serve in a lifetime role that can decide the fate of the entire nation.

Quote by Jocelyn00

Sure thing, sports bra and nike pro shorts. It's comfy and practical.

I'm pretty sure I'd jog off the curb and break my neck if I saw you jogging towards me in a sports bra and Nike shorts. 😈

Quote by Seeker4

Well, no, they are imposing a conservative/fundamentalist Christian interpretation of the Old Testament Jewish laws. Sharia is Muslim and comes with it's own set of values and baggage. Every Muslim will tell you they follow Sharia, but there are many diverse interpretations and understandings of what that means from the fundamentalists in Iran and Saudi Arabia to more liberal ones like many North American Muslims. And Christians and Jews are very much the same with the Old Testament laws. So you can't say they are imposing "Sharia" or "Biblical" laws. It's much more specifically a fundamentalist understanding of those laws. IOW, please don't judge a religion's value system and religious practice based on the most extreme interpretation of it. In the end, this is on the Supreme Court justices for choosing to bring their religious values into a secular courtroom, not any religion.

Bravo!!! Excellent description of the intersection of law and religion.