Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
lafayettemister
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male
0 miles · New Orleans

Forum

Quote by Angie57
I really don't see how people can say Dylan. He never really considered himself to be a performer but as far as writing goes I would put him in a tie with Lennon/McCartney as far as leading music in the last 50 years.
Rush? Please those guys are Schooled musicians, you may not like their stuff, but when you start talking about talent they were around before all of the TOYS were being used and would be able to pull off stuff even without their gadgets. Nikki you do know your music girl!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chris Squire one of the best bassists ever along with Entwhistle and everybody forgets John Paul Jones of Zepplin.
This comes down to taste aside from Rap (which I don't consider music, it doesn't have a basic component which is MELODY its chant) The boy bands are all Manufactured there is some talent but not enough.
And I know this isn't a band but would someone please tell Justin Beiber he really isn't good imitation of whoever!!!!!!


I saw Dylan in concert once. Worst concert I've ever been too, and I'm a huge Dylan fan. He walked on stage, and played his guitar and harmonica and sang his songs. Never said hello to the crowd, never interacted with the crowd in any way. It was very boring, and disappointing. I'm still a Dylan fan because he writes so well, but I'd never see him in concert again. His musicality at the concert was fine, still a fine guitar player.

I'm not a big Rush fan, but I can recognize the brilliance of the playing abilities. There's a lot to be said for old school musicians who honed their craft by hours and hours of playing their instrument. The internet, and thousands of instructional books, and autotune have made things way too easy. There's more to being a good musician than learning notes and fingerings. You have to learn about pitch, intonation, tempo, rhythm, dynamics, chord structure.. and then you have to learn to meld what you know with the other musicians and learn balance.

Justin Bieber is a tool. He'll never write anything worthwhile because he's never lived in reality so he can't write about anything real.
Quote by trinket

I can only speak for myself, but the answer to this question for the 1000th time, is no, size does not matter and a big one doesn't make a man more attractive.

As the last 2 paragraphs of the article say...

Before worried chaps starting popping blue pills or purchasing pressure pumps, it’s worth bearing in mind that this was a small study, and women were asked to rate attractiveness at a single point in time.






Hahaha. That was dirty. A study on penis size... a small study. Ouch.
Oh yes. Come on Kinks, let me soap your boobs! You get the soap, it's liquid. Just pump the handle a few times...
Outside of the classics and classic authors I have a couple recommendations. Two books by Wally Lamb. "I Know This Much To Be True" and "The Hour I First Believed". Both are excellent, but of the two "The Hour..." is better. But be forewarned. It is emotionally brutal and will stick with you for a couple days after you're done reading it.
"Red Red Wine" by UB40. I'd rather listen to a duet sung by Justin Beiber and Fergie than listen to "Red Red Wine".
Quote by crazydiamond


(one also should allow for the mental maturity diference of roughly 7-8 years, men are about that much behind , that's no way an insult but a factor)



Are not!!!! Nanny nanny boo boo you big meanie pants.
Quote by trinket


I'm just curious LM, would it be any different if some dude got a woody at the beach and then stood a few feet or even a few meters away from your wife or a sister? Or if he were walking along the beach and struck up a conversation with a female relative of yours? Perhaps he might walk past you with a woody and then you knew he was standing a few meters behind your deck chair.. Be honest, I am really curious as to whether you would have a different opinion.


My opinion wouldn't change. If a guy sees a woman he finds attractive, and she's naked, there's a good chance he'll get hard. However, I'd never go to a nude beach with my sister or any other relative. That would be creepy to me. With my wife, that would be fun. If he started talking to her, she'd just ignore him and walk away from him. Now, if he touched her or after she walked away or told him to leave her alone, if he continued to follow or engage her, then we'd have a problem. But that would be the case whether he was clothed or naked.


I don't like anyone just standing behind me. But if he were, I'd ask him to move if he were directly behind me. It would annoy me for him to be behind me clothed or unclothed, hard or flaccid. The nakedness or hardness wouldn't change my reaction. Being naked in a nudity allowed atmosphere doesn't bother me. Being aroused in a nudity allowed atmosphere wouldn't bother me. I'd pretty much expect it. It's what is done or the behavior of the aroused person that would give me reason to be annoyed.