Regardless whether it was all Gav or if he really was channeling Alan, that list was absolutely hilarious!
I think there should be a 'fuck me' button instead of poke or have both. When someone receives the notice it should say 'fuck back'
I often wonder why it's so common for every complaint anyone has anymore to be met with, essentially, "Fuck it! There's nothing you can do about it. Lay down and let the assholes win. Don't bother coming up with a solution. Don't let it bother you even though someone is repeatedly spoiling your fun."
I don't know if it comes across the same way to others, but that's the way that it always sounds to me.
The reviews are in. Here's what people are saying about FicklePickleTickle:
"BestCukeOnTheVine" - LusciousLola.
"Pickle juice rocks!" - curiousbutterfly.
"Pickles is really a jalapeño" - sw33tang3l
"Will someone make that guy sit down, my kids can't see the movie?!?" - Some guy in at the theater.
"Shouldn't he be wearing clothes if he's going to be in the wedding?" - Your mom.
"If FTP Eats A Pickle, Is That Cannibalism? " Nikki703
"FTP makes me wet. . ." - imhapless.
"Always thought he was dill but he's actually a sweet pickle." - kinkygirl.
My last story I wrote was three bombed like 20 minutes after I hit the top author list. Was it annoying? Yes. Did I see that I had 8 5s then 2 3s and wonder to myself what the intention of those 3s were? Yeah I did. It was someone that didn't like me or someone that validates their existence by being on the top author list...
Do I want to be that person? Fuck no.
I actually start thinking about how sad a person like that must be. Do I say let them give me a 3. I got better shit to worry about. Less pathetic things to do.
I'm not calling anyone a baby for not just taking the 3s. Hell I do deserve a 3 if my mistakes distracted you too much or the story didn't make sense. But on the last one the timing was so obvious and just a little sad. I think whoever did it gets happier doing that than I get annoyed by it. Let them have their win nothing victory.
It’s frustrating seeing good authors receive low scores just to take them off the top spot. It’d be different if the people giving those scores included a reason for their vote. Their feedback could turn out to be valuable to a writer who takes pride in their work.
I don’t think there’s a solution here though. Any kind of competition just brings out the worst in some people. You could extend the voting range to a ten point system but that just gives those who sabotage stories more power. If the Top Authors list was removed it would still leave the “most popular” and “most viewed” tabs in each category. Unfortunately it’s all a part of competition. The majority of people involved are good sports, but there’s a small number who aren’t. I hope none of you let those people discourage you. At least you can be happy knowing they'll never be able to manipulate the Editor’s Pick category. That's based on story quality rather than the author's popularity.
Purveyor of Poetry & Porn
Hate to go back into this voting thingy, because believe me I've heard it all before in the last two years...yes, I've been doing this before I started here on Lush...and thanks for acknowledging LadyX that I try to give a reason behind my madness...just want to add a few final thoughts...
Just to show that I have a bit of experience on the subject...I know Nic doesn't like mention of other sites, and btw Lush really is the nicest site, but here are my score tallies from the site I started on in April 2009...that site gives you the total votes...
Overall
Score:
4.232
out of 5
based on
1096 votes
130 19 64 137 746 1096
Your adjusted score is 4.369 out of 5. what is this?
I know it's not totally clear, because the graphics don't copy...but I have 130 "1" votes, 19 "2" votes, 64 "3" votes, 137 "4's" and 746 "5" votes out of 1096 total...
Here's the thing...is it clear to me that the 1 votes are simply malicious to knock me off the lists when I have more 1 votes than 2 and 3 votes combined? I think that's a fair conclusion, and I think most would agree...
Here is the thing...and I think we're all adult enough here to realize this...voting is not always an objective rational act based solely on the quality of your story...
It does not take a rocket surgeon to figure out that someone with a lot of "friends" and "fans" will tend to get more and higher votes...the opposite also holds true...
People who get involved in some "drama" on the site, whether it is in the forum or chat rooms are also targets of low votes...people use low votes as "weapons" against authors...
The worst, most deplorable act I've seen in my time on Lush happened in early 2010. At the time, the scores that someone gave a story were still visible on a members profile page, that changed shortly after this incident btw...
Another member apparently had a grudge against Bunny12 for some reason or another, and this "person" (I use that term loosely) decided to take out their anger by attacking Bunny's stories with 2 votes across the board...I noticed it because the attacker happened to be on my friends list at the time, and the votes showed up on my friend's activity screen...
I went to the attacker's profile page and used a screen capture program to record the activity...I sent a copy to Bunny and about 20 other authors I knew on the site I thought should be aware...
That "person" is long gone...Thank God...
The point is, votes are caste for a variety of reasons...the people who vote are not always paid professionals with high moral standards...
If you want a more objective rating for your stories, post on a site where you have no "friends" or forum posts...and there are sites with no voting or Top Author lists...
But, I can tell you, it's less fun...it does feel good to get up on the list...even if only for a few days...
Ok, for the voting issue - how about this for a solution:
1. Have a range of votes (1 to 5) (0 - 10) whatever
2. Each vote number has an example (possibly as a tooltip) of what would consitute a story fitting that number.
e.g 5 = One of the best examples of it's genre, 1 = One of the worst examples of it's genre etc
3. Only the middle vote can be cast without a comment (all other votes must be accompanied by a comment)
4. The comments must be valid (i.e. not just gibberish) and repeat offenders can have their right to vote revoked.
This way, authors get their much sought-after constructive (hopefully) feedback and we normalise scores again with only the very best getting the 5s
Did I start that...
Think I'll head back and hide over here in my corner.
Purveyor of Poetry & Porn
Hey...just looking at the new "Popular Tags" list on the right of the home page...
Seems to me that they are all just categories listed on the left, at least as they stand at this moment...isn't it a bit of a redundancy?
One merely has to look over to the left side of the page...
Also, " " is shown prominently as one of the most popular searches. Given that it's prohibited content, maybe its not such a swell idea to show it as a popular search.
The searches and tags are in beta testing. Those boxes have now been removed as the live testing pointed out a few issues. It will be live in April.
There will be a word exclusion list built into both the tags and top searches.
There will be randomness built in to prevent the same words appearing day in day out.
The top searches and tags will have their own full pages, with filtering based on chosen categories or some other means.
Seems to be a bit of a couple glitches when searching for various stories. As a test do the following.
Select the category of Lesbian and you'll see there are 37 pages of stories under that category.
So you'd think you'd get the same or more with a search based on if it had a category or tag of Lesbian. You don't. You only get 12 pages of stories. Further, if you click next you are taken to a blank results page.
Maybe all of this was already known, but I figured I'd point it out just in case.
Thanks Katland, we're working on a few things with regards to our search.
Would not a search and a tag provide different stories? Let's say that lesbian stories are written and the author does not put a lesbian tag on it. A search would pull it up because it contains lesbian but a tag would not as there is no lesbian tag on the story. Or a lesbian tag is put on a story that contains no lesbianism. It would not be pulled up in a search but display itself under a lesbian tag. Or do I have it wrong?
Thousands of user submitted stories removed from the site. You are nothing without your users or their freely submitted stories.