Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
Dancing_Doll
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female

Forum

Quote by FicklePickleTickle
Paris Hilton 95% of the time looks like a dude to me. I don't find her to be hot at all. There are plenty of non-celebrities who I think are much much hotter than she can ever hope to be.

Sorry, not everyone sees things the same way that others do.


Wow... a girl that looks like Paris would score less than a 5 out of 10 in your books? There must be some smoking hot girls in your town!
I've never done any research for an erotica story. In terms of sex acts, I only write what I have done or experienced personally with the exception of my gangbang story. I have not had a gangbang in real life, but I have had a DP threesome, so I just drew on that experience. I figured it was close enough, minus a few additional male props. All of my settings and locations in my stories are real, and I have been there before. I find it's easier to write what you know, and have the visual of a specific bar, hotel, or vacation spot in mind when creating scenes for a story.

I am considering writing an erotica story in a first person male perspective and that will definitely be a stretch for me. I don't think there is necessarily any research I plan to do for that one though, other than to channel my 'inner guy', and hope I can fool a few people...

I have done research for a dramatic fiction novel I'm working on outside of Lush... specifically an exotic location (the Seychelles) that is necessary as a plot device, but a place that I've never been to myself. I've used youtube, travel videos, wiki, and tourist websites. I've also researched various seaside properties there to get an understanding of the real estate.
Quote by LittleBambi

'There is obviously a hierarchy among the Hollywood set, but they are usually "better looking" than the average person of their age.'

Perhaps I have misunderstood your phrasing of the above, but to me that looks like you're considering that a fact...you made a statement. Well, that sort of thing can surely never be a fact since it is a matter of opinion...to present it as a fact is to assume the opinions of everybody ....which is madness.



What I meant was within Hollywood, there is a beauty hierarchy. Girls like Angelina Jolie, Megan Fox and Charlize Theron are going to be seen as way better looking than Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian. And likewise compared to the average non-celeb girl, Paris and Kim may be seen as better looking. Yes, beauty is subjective, and varies according to opinion to a certain degree, however models and actors are judged as being "good looking" in general. If they weren't, then they would not be in the industry in the capacity that they are. I'm also aware that there are many 'character actors' and people who diverge from the "norm of beauty", but they still make up the minority, compared to the typical hollywood set.

Also... Just to be clear, again... I am not saying that Paris Hilton (herself) is the hottest ticket, because I know that her persona rubs some people the wrong way. I am saying that if a girl named Jenny who had the same physical attributes as Paris Hilton was to be judged against the average girl her age (on a purely physical level), she would be considered attractive by the vast majority of people. I'm basing it strictly on looks here, not on personality, image, or intelligence... The original question in this thread was asking if Paris wasn't a celebrity but just a random girl that you saw on the beach, would she warrant a second glance. And that is what I've been talking about.

Think about it this way: If this girl was standing across from you at the bar, and her name was Jenny Smith, and from what you knew, she spent her spare time volunteering at an orphanage, finishing her degree in aerospace engineering, and baking cupcakes for the local hospital... would you give her a second glance or would you deem her as below average in terms of looks?




Quote by LittleBambi
'but compared to the average woman of her age, she is hot'

....well, that all depends on opinion doesn't it? Although I do appreciate you said 'just my opinion though' further along your post.

As someone said above, some people aren't into blondes...some people aren't into the 'look' that Paris has...I personally am not in to blondes male or female, it's not a rule as such but they rarely get a first look from me, let alone a second look. Not saying the rugged, blonde guy that gets on my bus every morning isn't hot though. silly But either way, I'm not into her 'look' at all....barbie fakeness? Not for me... give me a naturally gorgeous girl any day. Give her some decent curves too!

There's nothing wrong with being into the barbie kind of look...it's just personal taste...so to call 'bullshit' on it seems a bit odd to me, perhaps the people above were actually just speaking their personal opinions and preferences as opposed to simply saying it because, perhaps, it makes them feel better or some other reason. But, only the posters will know that.

At the end of the day....it's down to one's own opinion and personal tastes.


There are lots of people in Hollywood whose "look I am not into"... but I can still appreciate that they are very attractive people. For example, I'm not into redheads personally, but I think Isla Fisher and Julianne Moore are beautiful. I don't see beauty in terms of my personal preferences or who I would sleep with, I try to see it on a more unbiased aesthetic scale. If I wasn't attracted to blondes, I still would not carry the opinion that there is no such thing as an 'attractive blonde'. I would simply say "that person is good looking, but not really my type"...

Chances are that if the paparazzi is stalking them, and they are getting endorsement deals and time on TV or the big screen, they are approximating a standard of beauty that the 'majority' find appealing.

I just find it hard to believe that if Paris Hilton (even if she wasn't Paris Hilton) was in a bar and flirting with a heterosexual man and she suggested that they go back to her hotel room, that a guy would say "Ugh, sorry no, I'm not into the barbie look."

To me, it's all about a leading question... when a girl asks a guy "look at her, she's so skinny and annoying...do you even find her hot?", the guy will answer "No". Same as when a girl asks "do I look fat in these jeans?", the guy will also answer "No". These are simple "man-swers" that every guy learns to pre-program into his mind in order to avoid pissing off the woman asking the question.

Hollywood is the land of superficiality. If someone is consistently on the Hollywood radar, then they are "attractive" to the majority. There is obviously a hierarchy among the Hollywood set, but they are usually "better looking" than the average person of their age.
To prevent the effort required to keep pulling up your t-shirt to reveal your abs, such as what is happening in this photo....




Someone had the ingenious idea to come up with the official douchebag tank-top which allows for maximal exposure...








OK, I'll admit that I have partied with some serious douchebags in my time. It's really just part of "the scene"... If you go to any house music festival on the planet, you're going to see tons of these guys. I've been to plenty of clubs and afterhours parties where guys take their shirts off and keep their sunglasses on. The cheeseball level is high, but smart girls know that you're not supposed to date these guys... you just indulge them and let them hang on your shoulders for photo ops when their friend pulls out the cellphone camera and then run for cover when they're not looking or busy fixing their hair!
Quote by SouthernerEroticer
Quote by Dancing_Doll
OK... I call bullshit...

So, if Paris Hilton was named "Jenny" and had a profile on Lush with nude or scantily clad pics, none of you guys would be bothering to friend her, right?

Come on people... She's a hot girl. There's no crime in saying it. If you're comparing her to other Hollywood beauties, then fine, I concede that she's basically just average, but overall (and in the real world), I'm 100% sure she would be getting a second look from most guys (provided you are into the typical examples of sexy).

This reminds me of those lame conversations that couples have, where the wife or girlfriend looks at a girl on TV or in a magazine and asks "Do you really even think she's hot?" .... To which the guy is obliged to say "oh, she's nothing to look at sweetie, you are way hotter than her."

There's nothing wrong with acknowledging a pretty girl.

As for her 'celebrity status'... I'm not a huge fan of Paris, but I will give her credit for parlaying her "image" into a money maker. People thinks that she's living off her family wealth, but she's actually making her own fortune through her quasi-crappy line of products based on her own image (ie. reality shows, perfume, clothes, music, books, endorsements, sextapes, movies etc.). So she works the whole "dumb blonde" celebutante image. So has an endless assortment of other "celebs" in Hollywood. You may not like what they are doing, but someone out there does, because they are paying for her products and wanting to see more of her in magazines. So that makes her a success in my eyes.

But listening to people saying that you can't imagine how anyone could be attracted to her or that nobody would even notice her on the beach, makes me laugh.

I'd love to see the beaches everyone frequents if this girl wouldn't get a passing glance or a semi-boner. And again, for the record - I am not a Paris Hilton, fan... just a girl that likes to keep it real...








I don't think I, or any other posters up to this point said she wasn't 'good looking' or was 'unsexy'.

I think what I, and a few others were saying, was, as a celebrity, she is way below a lot of much better looking celebrities looks wise and even further lower when it comes to personality.

To say looks wise alone we wouldn't add as a friend is missing the point somewhat.


Actually, the original question was not about comparing her to other celebrities... but was comparing her to other average non-celeb women of her age range... And it was a question posted about looks alone, not personality.

Quote by amber

If you saw her with a group of women of the same age in the same mode of dress or undress (say at a beach) and without a group of photographers hovering, would paris hilton get a second look? Hell, would she even rate a first look?


As I said earlier in the same post (agreeing with your statement), compared to other celebs she doesn't stand out, but compared to the average woman of her age, she is hot.

Re adding her based on looks alone... Many people here add friends based largely on looks. And if it was Paris Hilton herself with her own Lush profile, I'm sure people would be willing to overlook her 'personality flaws' in order to have her on their friends list. Just my opinion though. Perhaps you hold yourself to higher standards than that.
Quote by sprite
Quote by Jillicious
wyoming does have some cold weather. maybe that explains why they are taking up the rear.


ROFL - i read that as 'taking it UP the rear' the first time!


So did I!!
Quote by Piquet
We tried this type of survey once here in Australia but it was found the figures were grossly over inflated.


This one totally surprised me, given the stats typically reported on Lush! Maybe the top 1% of penis sizes in America belong to men that hang out online. Perhaps they will find that computer radiation has caused their dicks to grow at alarming and unnatural rates. Or more likely, scientists will discover that it was just a bad viral case of Photoshopitis...

"Penis Sizes Chart Almost a Perfect Bell Curve: 25% of the Male Population is Under 5" in Length, 50% are Between 5" and 6" in Length and 25% are Longer than 6" in Length"
Since this is such a hotly discussed topic... I thought this might be interesting to some...

"WHO DAT" WITH THE LARGEST PENISES IN AMERICA?

NEW ORLEANS, D.C., & NEW HAMPSHIRE TOP THE CHARTS FOR PENIS SIZE

CONDOMANIA ANNOUNCES THE LARGEST DATABASE OF PENIS SIZES ON THE PLANET: 27,000 MEN, 76 PENIS SIZES


So just how does Condomania know these intimate details? In 2004, the company launched TheyFit Condoms, the world's first line of tailored-fit prophylactics, in 76 sizes. Since then they have sold custom-fit condoms to over 27,000 men in 70 countries, and now have just begun to analyze this incredible cache of data.

"These fitted condoms range in length from 3 to 10 inches and from super slim to extra roomy." says Chris Filkins, Condomania’s Directory of Technology. "After gathering detailed information on over 27,000 penises, we now have the most comprehensive database of penis sizes on the planet!

Previously, the largest formal survey of penis sizes was conducted in 1948 by the famous Kinsey researchers, when 2,500 men recorded their erect penis sizes on pre-stamped cards.

Condomania's ten-times larger database is compiled from the unique "FitKit" measuring system for TheyFit condoms, where the user measures the length and girth of his erect penis to the millimeter and then matches those results to one of 76 possible sizes that comprise different length and girth combinations. In this system, the 76 sizes are comprised of non-sequential letters and numbers, so that the smallest is no more obvious than the largest.

"Unlike other studies in which participants were measuring their penis size solely for the sake of recording a measurement, and were perhaps more likely to exaggerate," says Filkins, "our database is comprised of men looking for the best fit condom for safety and comfort, and thus, we believe, apt to be more accurate." Filkins continues, "The customer satisfaction surveys we received overwhelmingly indicated that men of all sizes, but particularly those on either end of the size spectrum, benefited immensely from a properly fitting condom."







Here are some highlights from Condomania's penis database:

Top Ranking State by Average Penis Size: New Hampshire
Lowest Ranking State by Average Penis Size: Wyoming
Top Ranking U.S. City by Average Penis Size: New Orleans
Second Highest Ranking City (just behind N.O.): Washington, D.C.
Lowest Ranking City by Average Penis Size: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Blue States vs Red States: Blue States' Average Penis Size is Bigger!
Penises Come in a Wide Range of Sizes: The Smallest Penises are Less Than 3" in Length and the Largest Penises are Longer Than 10" in Length
Penis Sizes Chart Almost a Perfect Bell Curve: 25% of the Male Population is Under 5" in Length, 50% are Between 5" and 6" in Length and 25% are Longer than 6" in Length

50 States Ordered by Penis Size (largest to smallest)

1. New Hampshire
2. Oregon
3. New York
4. Indiana
5. Arizona
6. Hawaii
7. Louisiana
8. Massachusetts
9. Alabama
10. Washington
11. New Mexico
12. California
13. Arkansas
14. Nevada
15. Virginia
16. Tennessee
17. Illinois
18. Oklahoma
19. South Dakota
20. Georgia
21. Pennsylvania
22. Mississippi
23. Michigan
24. Florida
25. Rhode Island
26. Kansas
27. Maryland
28. Minnesota
29. Vermont
30. Connecticut
31. Wisconsin
32. New Jersey
33. North Dakota
34. Idaho
35. Texas
36. Missouri
37. Montana
38. Ohio
39. Nebraska
40. Colorado
41. Maine
42. North Carolina
43. Delaware
44. South Carolina
45. Kentucky
46. West Virginia
47. Alaska
48. Iowa
49. Utah
50. Wyoming

http://secure.condomania.com/rankings/
Here are some great examples (both young and old!). Or you can just look to the entire cast of Jersey Shore...







Personally I've always been in the camp that enemas, shaving, and other cleansing and beautification practices are a solitary endeavour.

I have no desire to have another person involved in any of them.

But, as Sprite said, if it turns you on to share with a partner, then to each his own.

However... I can't imagine 'shoving it in hard and deep' would be a good thing with an enema.
People who write erotica for online publication are fortunate because they can choose what they write and cater the stories to their own tastes.

But how about this hypothetical question....

Think of the category of erotica that you detest the most, or offends your sensibilities (maybe it's , BDSM, scat, humiliation/domination or love stories).

Now let's say that a publisher approaches you because they like your writing style and offers to pay you enough that you'd be able to eke out a decent living writing erotica, but they would all have to be stories in that genre that you hate.

Would you take the offer (and the cash!), be able to put aside your feelings about those kind of sexual practices and somehow find a way to write the stories?

Or would you say 'no' on the basis that you refuse to sell out and only want to write what you like, even if you'll never be paid for it.




Quote by DirtyMartini
Quote by Dancing_Doll


And let the record state that I am very willing to take Paris Hilton's place, provided that the trust fund comes with it, and the menagerie of purse-dogs does not.

... I just had to say that cause ya never know when the Hollywood types might be perusing Lush and looking for a replacement. If I can negotiate getting her wardrobe and shoe collection in the deal, then I'll even release a sex tape!



Btw Doll...I'll see what I can do for you...

I'll have my people talk to her people and see what can be done...
You know I'd do that for you...


Aww, thanks Alan! Tell them that I look really good in oversized sunglasses too.

My first project will be a reality TV show based on Lushstories... Let's get ourselves on the Hollywood map, Nicola! The Drama Llama approves.
Quote by milospunk
hahahha lmfao that's me. you are right i am just curious cuz some of the stories are so out there. I am kinda skeptic cuz on other sites the ones who would hit me up and were so sexual right of the bat were guys posing as girls. I would be on a chat room and would start talking to me all nasty. I would get their phone numbers and they were dudes hahahhaaha


I wouldn't base this on how "out there" a story is. Women write erotica to play with their darkest and dirtiest fantasies and/or realities. I'm sure there are some male writers that are posing as women, but there are a lot of female authors on this site that go into some pretty filthy terrain in their writing (myself included). It doesn't mean that they are a dude.

As for the chat rooms or horny cybersluts... I'm more inclined to believe you have good intuition there. I'm "sure" there are plenty of 19 year old supermodels that post their naked pics online and then troll the internet in the hopes of finding some random guy to have cybersex with, but if you know the difference between 'fantasy' and 'reality', you should have no trouble seeing the holes in that kind of logic.

Nasty cybersluts and dirty writers are two very different things though...
Quote by amber
Actually, the last question was if she were with a group of women of the same age and in the same mode of dress.

I also went a lot further with what I thought makes a woman hot and sexy than any internet pictures could.

There are many many petite women who are hot and sexy. The fact that paris hilton can afford the absolute best of best clothes, for instance, doesn't make her hot and sexy. It just means she can easily dress to make herself look as good as possible. But, for example, the way she acts and carries herself, takes narcisism and vacuousness to new levels. That total package just does not even come close to making me think "hot and sexy".

The last question is reasonable because with a group of women the same age and dressed the same way, and asking if she gets a second look, would at least let me know if there is something that stands out about her that guys may find sexy or hot.

There is a thread devoted to small breasts with many many contributions, guys who like short women, hairy women, large women, etc etc. I don't think anyone can argue that there will be guys that can be found to find any particular quality attractive.

But, the last question was for, since within a GROUP of women of same age and dress/undress, it was supposed to make one think... is there something about her that would make her get the second look? For instance, Remington said "If I were to see her on a beach and not know who she was, of course I'd give her a second glance. Hell, I may even go up and talk to her". That really had not answered the question. If she was with a GROUP, would SHE get the second look? Would she be the one he went up to talk to or would it be others first?

It was also asked because I find myself after being here for while, getting more and more ready to try being with another girl and trying to figure out what I would find sexy and hot. I have looked at internet pictures and posted to the picture catagory to see if there was anything in looks that I find particularly attractive. But, that in itself can be sexy or hot, but that is a picture. Not, the whole woman.

An example of the validity..jennifer anniston .If she were with a group of women the same age on the beach, I can see her getting much attention. By me, too. Yet, once I got to know her, I would not find the total woman sexy.

When I answer questions here, I do so with complete frankness and honesty. When I ask questions it is because I want to learn and see what others have learned and experience. Calling it bullshit seemed a little harsh, but if you want. it doesn't bother me. I may not have asked it the best way possible, or explained myself very well but, maybe this is an example of things I don't yet understand well enough to. I am sure I will have many more questions over the coming time. Coming to realize what seems to be an emerging bisexuality is pretty new to me.


I think women are often pickier about other women than men are (for the most part).

But it's been my experience that both sexes will "look at" a woman that approximates the standard of beauty that society qualifies as ideal. If you look at Hollywood women, they are all somewhat similar looking (in the sense that they are typically size 0-6, shiny hair, clear skin, good bone structure etc). Those are all traits that I think Paris has (as well as Jennifer Aniston), so I believe that both would warrant a second look. Of course there are men who find certain other types more attractive (ie. hairy women, plus-sized women, bodybuilder women etc.) but those are smaller groups by far than the average guy whose head will be turned by a fit, young, cute girl. Looking at the pic collections on Lush, or any magazine or movie, this is the standard that is favoured by the majority. Bonus if she is famous or rich!

In terms of bisexuality and what you find attractive... I guess it depends on what you're basing it on. Personality obviously comes into play at some point. But since you were comparing these women to the "average" non-celeb of that similar age... I still believe with great confidence that both Paris and Jenn Aniston will be seen as universally attractive at first glance... and probably second glance as well, depending on what you're interested in.

Comparing them physically to other women of their specific age, and wearing similar clothes, I think they are both head-turners.

And I didn't mean the BS comment towards you... I meant it towards the men that were starting to answer that she was unattractive. Just because I know that men will often answer in a politically correct way when asked by a woman, but they will be the same ones buying her drinks and hitting on the girl at the bar an hour later.

Having said that... ask away. We're all giving our opinions.
Quote by Ursatysfaction
I don't know DD. I agree physically she would turn heads, but even then she's nothing special. DD is way hotter than Paris Hilton is, and what turns me off so much is her lack of a brain. She would be like fucking a blow-up toy or something (not that there is anything wrong with that). For me, intelligence and wit are a huge factor, that she doesn't have. DD should just take her place


Thanks Ursatysfaction!

And let the record state that I am very willing to take Paris Hilton's place, provided that the trust fund comes with it, and the menagerie of purse-dogs does not.

... I just had to say that cause ya never know when the Hollywood types might be perusing Lush and looking for a replacement. If I can negotiate getting her wardrobe and shoe collection in the deal, then I'll even release a sex tape!
OK... I call bullshit...

So, if Paris Hilton was named "Jenny" and had a profile on Lush with nude or scantily clad pics, none of you guys would be bothering to friend her, right?

Come on people... She's a hot girl. There's no crime in saying it. If you're comparing her to other Hollywood beauties, then fine, I concede that she's basically just average, but overall (and in the real world), I'm 100% sure she would be getting a second look from most guys (provided you are into the typical examples of sexy).

This reminds me of those lame conversations that couples have, where the wife or girlfriend looks at a girl on TV or in a magazine and asks "Do you really even think she's hot?" .... To which the guy is obliged to say "oh, she's nothing to look at sweetie, you are way hotter than her."

There's nothing wrong with acknowledging a pretty girl.

As for her 'celebrity status'... I'm not a huge fan of Paris, but I will give her credit for parlaying her "image" into a money maker. People thinks that she's living off her family wealth, but she's actually making her own fortune through her quasi-crappy line of products based on her own image (ie. reality shows, perfume, clothes, music, books, endorsements, sextapes, movies etc.). So she works the whole "dumb blonde" celebutante image. So has an endless assortment of other "celebs" in Hollywood. You may not like what they are doing, but someone out there does, because they are paying for her products and wanting to see more of her in magazines. So that makes her a success in my eyes.

But listening to people saying that you can't imagine how anyone could be attracted to her or that nobody would even notice her on the beach, makes me laugh.

I'd love to see the beaches everyone frequents if this girl wouldn't get a passing glance or a semi-boner. And again, for the record - I am not a Paris Hilton, fan... just a girl that likes to keep it real...






Quote by gav
Quote by Woman
Quote by gav
No Woman, there is not facility to bulk delete your friends comments.

Are they really that terrible



But of course!!! None of them send me salt n' vinegar chips!!!!

It is really not an issue, I like getting the ones I get. Only when I go to my phone to check out recent activities and to see if there is anything that I can mock... it just...well... the pictures you see... For I go to my profile and just use my recent activity down on the left hand side of the screen.

Ummm... Can there be a way to bulk delete things? There's no harm in asking right??? *crosses fingers and winces


I'm actually going to break out the activity section into a new page. Those of you with lots of friends or in D_D's case habitual "fuckers", its going to be much easier to see what your friends have been up to. So for Woman, you can go directly to this feed page and bypass all those crazy animated images.



Great addition! Thanks Gav... you are awesome!

And yeah, it seems like I have a lot of fuckers on my friends list...
When I was younger (and uhm, probably still to some degree now), I get a sexual thrill during times of stress. Don't ask me why... I have no idea. But in school, the idea of being late for class, or being unable to complete a test during the allotted time used to send me into a rolling orgasm (without touching myself obviously.. just with kegal muscle contractions).

Sooo... for me, I've had many, many orgasms throughout my schooling life (through highschool and university) right in the classroom while writing a test. I especially got turned on while trying to finish essay questions, as I tend to be rather wordy (surprise, surprise) so was always racing against the clock. As I would rush to finish writing that long open ended question, when the teacher would say "10 minutes until pencils down", I would get this crazy throbbing and tingling and as the minutes ticked by I would end up in an intense full-on orgasm. Needless to say, my penmanship suffered tremendously as I struggled to continue writing throughout the throes of the orgasm until the very last second. Because other people were often distracted while trying to finish as well, I was able to hide everything quite well. At the most, an outside stranger might just think I was "flustered" while trying to finish the exam. Then I'd hand in my test sporting a nice healthy flush and glow to my skin...

And yes, I know... I am seriously bizarre. I'm not sure if I'm the only one like this, or if there are others out there, but so far I think I might be one of a kind.
Quote by RockhardRides
Ladies of lush please help...
What's a bigger turn on. When a man cooks a nice dinner at home with candles and flowers or a night out at a fancy restaurant being waited on hand and foot???


When a man cooks me a nice dinner at home with candles and flowers (and lube and dildos)... yeah, far preferable to fancy dining. Besides, who says I can't be waited on hand and foot at home?
I was always drawn towards sex scenes or dirty parts in books when I was really young, so I just sought out more and more. I admit, I was more into surfing porn than reading erotica online growing up... However, from as early as I can remember I would write my own dirty stories on scraps of paper and turn myself on that way. I liked being able to cater it to my own kinks. I often wrote dirty stories in the backs of notebooks while bored in class sometimes as well.

I only started reading online erotica about a year ago when I first found Lush... it spiralled from there.
Quote by gav
Quote by Dancing_Doll
Quote by lafayettemister
Quote by Dancing_Doll
Nothing critical or urgent, but just a general thought....

It would be awesome if we could turn off the status updates showing up in our profile feeds from the forum games section. For some people who post in there every 30 seconds for hours on end, it can quickly clog all their friend's status feeds.

As much as I like to stay "in the know" about who would fuck whom, and all the things they would say and do to the avatar above them... I think that those posts tend to be fairly repetitive and probably don't need to be included in status updates.



That would be me DD.. I've often worried that I annoyed my friends with that. My apologies! Sincerely.


Aw, don't worry, you're not the only one... hehe

It's not that big of a deal, but if it's easy to correct, then why not. Continue posting though... I don't want to slow the train down.


D_D actually this is probably a useful feature to add as a default for all. What if we aggregated up all the posts for the same user in the same thread within the hour? This would apply to all topics not just the who's fucking who one.

Thoughts?




That would work great for the forum games section, but sometimes there is a hot argument (errr... I mean debate) that I'm following closely in other parts of the forum (ie. the Tank), and I like seeing when someone makes a new post. Often there can be a flurry of posts within the same hour by the same 3-4 people. Not a big deal though. If I'm in the thick of it, I'll likely be watching that section of the forum anyway and not waiting to be alerted to it in my status feed. Although to be fair, I'm sure that I have my share of 'friends' that get annoyed seeing my string of "Doll posted in the Gun Thread" 10 times within the same hour.

Hmm... aggregate away! Maybe that's the better option after all.

Great thinking! Thanks Gav!
Quote by Magical_felix
Quote by Dancing_Doll
Quote by Magical_felix
[

This isn't cuddling... It's attempted murder.


Isn't this a kind of sexual fetish or something? I think it's called squashing.
Looks like a bone crusher to me though... (as well as a boner crusher, actually)


It is called squashing!

From urban dictionary:

1. A sexual act that involves a large person jumping or falling onto the partner, therefore crushing that person with their immensity.

Some huge kinky girl was squashing me with her big giant self.. it was amazing.



And doll please... I don't think there was ever a boner involved in this enormous equation.


Yeah I think I saw it on one of those late night sex show documentaries. It was interesting because some women made it a business (like being a dominatrix) where male clients would pay them to be squashed, but there would be no sex involved. I found this interesting. Stay home (and fat) and charge men to sit and jump on them. I guess there is a fetish to please everyone...
Quote by Magical_felix
[

This isn't cuddling... It's attempted murder.


Isn't this a kind of sexual fetish or something? I think it's called squashing.
Looks like a bone crusher to me though... (as well as a boner crusher, actually)