*All day* is quite a long time. Unless you're replacing batteries or stopping to charge up a vibrator every few hours, the 'all day vibrator' thing isn't possible.
A butt plug or kegal balls would work. Personally I haven't done it for more than a few hours at a time though.
The porn industry is a like a roller coaster that is starting to go off the rails. The beginning of the ride is fine. I've watched vintage porn before and it's mostly just standard sex and cheesy music. Probably the kind of thing that would put most of us to sleep at this point because we've seen all that before. The whole "show us something new" attitude has expanded pornography in both positive and negative ways. The positive is that it's given license to some dirtier fantasies that many women crave and a kind of 'sexual liberation' to some. Rough sex, dp, gangbangs. Would these fantasies have existed without the influence of porn? Maybe, maybe not.
We're certainly over the whole 'lay on your side with a blank expression as you tilt your head to the ceiling and do contrived moans while XYZ guy methodically does the In-N-Out on your burger' scenes. People want more. Performers are expected *to do* more. And hence we've entered an era of 'shock porn' that is forming the new baseline for teenagers because that's what they're immediately exposed to. Now you can see anal prolapse porn, three-dicks in one hole porn, gaping orifices that look like gyno surgery more than sex, toilet dunking porn, guys beating girls up and slapping them around gratuitously and then fucking them. I have, on a few occasions, wondered what the more extreme shock porn does to the senses of young impressionable people - because this is what they're growing up with. This is their new norm. Are they expecting their 18 yr old girlfriend to comply with some of this stuff?
Recently, I saw reference to a porn by Nacho Vidal and Kara Price on a thread in an adult dvd forum where people were questioning how this video could have been made and that it looked like legit abuse. People - even the ones that feed off the hardcore stuff - were disturbed by it. They thought the porn starlet had gotten in beyond her control and how it felt almost like sexual-snuff and shouldn't be out on the market - all this coming from exactly that video's target audience base. Then the camera-man showed up to explain that it was Kara who had requested the video and been behind the direction of it. Safe words were employed and in the end, despite being 'wrecked on film' with obvious injuries - she had originally wanted it to be even rougher than what ended up happening but was overall happy with how it went down. Now, I haven't watched this vid - it's really not my thing - but it did make me think about what it's doing to the minds of the people that seek this kind of shock-porn out. To say that it doesn't leave a lasting influence or warp the sexual mind is being naive. A guy that gets off to that kind of stuff on a regular basis may lose his ability to even get it up for your average cute college girl wanting plain old doggy style. It also makes me question whether the female porn stars are doing this strictly for the cash or to try to outdo what's already on the market or whether their own minds have been warped along the way and now this is how they get their own kinks met too.
I even think about my own sexual interests with consensual rough sex. While it is nowhere near the realm of the fucked up stuff that's out on the scene right now, maybe someone who enjoys standard vanilla sex would think my preferences were too extreme. It's like a slippery slope and you're not entirely sure how far down the slide you've gone, depending on perspective. You don't want to deny someone their own pursuit of pleasure, if that's indeed how they get off - but you also worry about the girl that needs a pay-cheque and has to sacrifice the health of her body in order to work in the adult industry. The surgeries that are required to repair things that have been wrecked (which is apparently standard in the industry and what leads many of the more popular stars to leave). I also worry about the young girlfriend that maybe gets pressured by the guy that's grown up exclusively watching this kind of stuff.
Now, I am all for female empowerment when it comes to sex and even when it comes to porn. I know there are extreme fetishists out there and so - why should I judge, right? If a woman enjoys prolapsing her anus, shouldn't that be her prerogative? My only concern is - where does it end? Does the industry just continue on the "show me what I haven't seen before" trend until performers are pressured to their breaking point? Some of what's out there is, without a doubt, causing physical and sometimes irrepairable harm to the human body. As some people normalize to this kind of thing, like a drug, the natural next step is to search out the bigger and better high. The demand gets placed on the industry and fulfilled by whoever is willing to step up to the plate and cash in. In porn, the low-end risk to the performer is not wearing condoms and the high end risk is potentially unfathomable.
I'm not anti-porn, obviously. I enjoy it. Some of it. I think it's a totally healthy thing as long as you maintain a bit of perspective. But it's definitely given me pause for thought on occasion as well. While I am against sexual censorship, my only concern is that money supercedes pleasure and this is just the more extreme version of the 'blank stares and fake moans' of vintage pornography - except with potentially more far-reaching consequences.
I think she looks fantastic post-baby. She can pull off the curves - even the epic booty.
She got soooo much negative attention about her pregnancy weight gain. It was on par with the Jessica Simpson slam-fest. People can be really cruel. I can't fault her for wanting to show off her efforts to get back into shape. I think she looks great.
I go to Pride almost every year - mostly because it's a brilliant party and I like these kinds of festivals in general. I love the crazy fun and warm attitude and yes, even the spectacle of it all. My accountant dances on one of those floats in silver holographic briefs but in regular life, he's in a suit. It's just part of the fun. I don't go trying to understand what gay people are like because I know enough of them in my personal and professional life to know that they are just like straight people, except they prefer the same sex when it comes to dating and sex. It's no different than going to Mardi Gras and assuming that all women will flash their tits for a string of cheap plastic beads when really it's just part of the festival culture.
I don't think of gay men or lesbians in terms of stereotypes, although I *do* know some gay men that fit that stereotype by no fault of their own. They're not conforming to anything - they just like fashion and clubbing and having fun. I adore them! But I don't assume they are representative of the entire gay culture. Because this small segment is the most different from what guys and preconceived masculinity are assumed to be like, they probably just stand out more and that's how the stereotypes generate and gain momentum, thus totally negating the rest of the gay population because they're not as visible and just blend in with the rest of the crowd that forms what we see as typical examples of the 'male gender' or 'female gender'. If people live sheltered lives or live in areas where coming out is still not the norm, then they will probably look for the most obvious examples, which will always be stereotypes.
Sort of, although I wouldn't classify it as being on a fetish level. I don't pick up used laundry and sniff it or hide it under my pillow or anything, but it's kind of a turn on to lick or suck through the fabric of a pair of boxer briefs as a prelude to sucking cock, especially after a guy's got that clean sweat going on, fresh from a work-out. Especially being 'made to do it' as part of a rough sex session, also while being pinned down, or having them pushed into my mouth later while getting fucked hard from behind. I had a fuckbuddy do that with me over a year ago and it was actually really hot. So, I'd say yeah - it's definitely become a bit of a turn on for me since then - but not to the point that I'm fixated on underwear or interested in them outside of the actual sexual encounter.
There are clues with some guys - a lot of times it's a certain physicality, the way he moves, even a certain attitude. I can usually get a feel for the level of intensity, but freak-level can really vary. Some guys are all talk but end up being milkduds in bed. With others I've thought it would basically just be basic hard jock-type sex and they've surprised me with how creative and kinky they are right away.
I'd say the best predictor would be the kind of porn he watches - but you don't typically know those preferences upfront.
Of the three you posted, I like #2 the best. I strongly dislike the one on the far right.
I generally prefer shorter hair - anything from buzzed to medium-short with a little longer up top to style waved, a little spiked, messy or casually tousled.
I have the occasional weakness for a longer-haired surfer dude type look, but it has to be the right kind of looking guy to carry that off.
I hate 'feathered', longer flip-layered, side-swept bangs (or any bangs) on a guy, emo hair, Bieber-hair, pouffy hair, hair that's over-styled, over-gelled or has too much product in in. I think as far as hairstyles go - the longer *it looks* like a guy spent fixing and fussing over his hair, the less attractive I find it.
I absolutely love watching when I'm having sex - it's definitely a turn-on. I've done it once or twice with masturbation but don't really bother - guess it's not my thing.
I *usually* check, but if the person has sent a nice message and/or I'm in a rush, sometimes I'll just accept the friend add without looking. If I'm doing the adding, I will definitely look through the profile and have a reason for sending the friend-request.
I'm not that social behind the scenes here and I'm always 'invisible' anyway, so for me - my friend list is pretty diverse and isn't limited to people I talk to. The vast majority are probably just people that like my stories or forum posts or maybe they're trying to broaden their friend list. Maybe they're new to the site and have no friends at all, and are tentatively trying to dive into the Lush experience. It doesn't really matter to me - I have zero snobbery when it comes to my friend list - honestly, I'll accept almost anyone.
I could have just taken the approach of having a condensed friend list of only people that I chat with regularly or have had some kind of genuine interaction with, but it just defeats the purpose of the 'social networking' component of the site for me. Plus I like the friendly spirit of much of the Lush community and don't like to feel like I'm unfairly snubbing someone. I think Lush is a different kind of animal to everyone who plays here though. That will probably be a major influence on whether you keep your list trimmed, cliquey or more open and inclusive.
Unless I'm having Coronas, it's always wine or hard liquor for me. Usually I'll go with vodka soda (or vodka water) with a twist of some citrus (lemon, lime or orange). That's pretty much my staple. I also like using rose water or lychee liquor/juice. I'll have a proper dirty martini when I'm really in the mood to drink. Spiced rum is fun around the holidays or coconut rum in the summer, but in general I prefer vodka - it's a lot cleaner and has less hangover potential.
