I would say bi-curious until you've actually experienced it - especially if you're just fantasizing at this stage and have mixed feelings about it (eg. wanting a blindfold etc.).
You might also have a sexually submissive side that you want to explore too (the blindfold and taking advantage bit). If your current sexual experiences have you in the traditionally dominant role with women, maybe you're more interested in experiencing a sub role. Like would a woman wearing a strap-on while you were blindfolded be a turn on, or is it specifically a guy's cock that excites you in that scenario. The first would be desire to be in a sub role and the latter would be bi-curious leanings. Or, it might be a bit of both.
I also agree that sexuality is fluid and can change to a certain degree with time and experience.
It's kind of like being a 'furry' but without dressing up (necessarily), right? Like your inner animal persona etc. I notice there is a distinct culture around it. I assume a lot of cat owners and people who like being collared are drawn to it too, so I can see the BDSM influence in a way.
If it makes people happy, it's all good.
Has anyone ever been romantically (or sexually) involved with someone who was anti-kitty? Like they didn't get it or were weirded out by it or your needs? How do you handle it? Can you closet your inner-kitty for the sake of a relationship or is it so integral to you that it would be impossible to do this?
Interesting thread!
Note: Calling the OP a 'waste of space' because he's from a certain country without knowing anything about that person is flat out wrong, sorry. People are not countries or stats or religions. The 'don't jump down others throats before posting' statement applies in this case too. If we can all remember our forum respect and drop the generalizations, the thread can continue.
As for the question - domestic violence is an issue in most parts of the world. In some cases, religion and culture may defend the perpetrators to a certain degree. Women do not like it, under any circumstances - but in many cases they lack the self-esteem or financial abilities to leave a situation. If there are kids involved, it complicates things even further. In some cases, escaping such a situation may trigger an escalation of violence, so there's that too. Staying in an abusive relationship doesn't mean they are content with the situation - merely that they are trapped.
It's varied slightly but they all share the commonality of being fit guys. Within the fitness realm, it's ranged from lean yoga-body type to typical swimmer/surfer build to a shredded muscular build. Nothing excessively bulky though as that tends to be a turn-off for me in the same way that a skinny guy would be. Slightly softer (ie. less defined) bodies aren't necessarily a turn-off to me but there would have to be some general level of health and fitness. Heights have ranged - anything from 5'9 and up past 6".
You need to get some hobbies - that's really the only way to meet people naturally.
Or why not try a Contiki Tour through Europe, South America or Oz (Australia that is, not related to the Wizard). You'll be with a group that don't know anyone else anyway - and it'll form a bond as you travel/party etc. I think you just need to shake things up and explore life and who you are. It'll be good for you. Some world travel on the cheap, backpackers, some adventure. You'll make new friends and have some fun.
Technically all three people are at fault in this hypothetical.
1. The 'buddy' for talking shit about a mutual (supposed) friend to the degree that the person doesn't want to get called out on it (ie. it's kind of two-faced and lacks loyalty if it's someone they consider a friend).
2. The 'female friend' for blabbing a private conversation to someone else, thereby betraying a confidence - although unfortunately this particular confidence sounds like it was shady anyway, so loyalties seem kind of weak with this whole group as it is.
3. The 'new girlfriend' for issuing an ultimatum in a friendship that shouldn't involve her, thereby acting like a total control freak.
But... based on the final question - I would say no - I'm against ultimatums. People should make up their own minds. A relationship isn't ownership (well.. unless they're into BDSM, I guess).
No issues with me, as long as they're not the super grungy "I don't give a fuck about my life" kind.
I actually think they look good on a lot of people though for downtime. Casual, sporty etc. Nobody is dressed to impress 24/7.
I guess trying them on in the shop since there's more selection to pick from and you can try on things you probably would never end up buying or maybe don't want to spend the money on. It's more fun (for me) if someone else is there like a BF or a GF. My (platonic) female friends and I go shopping all the time and have ended up trying on things like lingerie, bikinis, sexy stuff in the changerooms and getting advice or opinions from each other (or even from a female salesperson). I don't really see changing or getting naked in front of another girl as a sexual thing unless that vibe is there already.
It would suck to go through life getting a woody every time you see women's underwear and bras. Walking through the mall or a department store must be challenging.
If someone has a 'fetish' that intense about just the visual of a garment of clothing hanging on a line, then it's important to remember that not everyone is aware of this or is provoking it on purpose. It's like a guy with a shoe fetish thinking a woman is flirting with her neighbour because she left her sandals on the back porch one night in plain view of his window.
A guy might be titillated by knowing what kind of panties his neighbour wears but it's important not to assign meaning to it beyond that. She's not doing it on purpose. It's her private residence and property - she can hang up her laundry wearing a string bikini - that, in and of itself, doesn't mean anything.
I believe the basic definition is when a wife/GF fucks another guy(s) while her man is forced to watch or hear about it later and is, in a way, helpless to control or influence the situation. It's kind of like cheating but in front of your maybe reluctant s.o. - even though technically to be in this kind of situation, there is mutual consent between the couple and the husband/BF is usually aroused as well, watching his wife/GF satisfy herself with these other guys, all the while not directly participating in the action himself.
From there - it can take on more extreme elements like BDSM, humiliation, feminization, impregnation etc. but they aren't core to the basic definition.
That's always been my interpretation of it anyway.
As for a separate category - sure, if there's demand for it - why not.
Fact - I sometimes end up with nipples that will poke through a thinner sweater, or t-shirt. This is because I actually prefer unpadded (sheer) bras. If/when it does happen - it has zero to do with the situation or me being turned on or trying to get a guy's attention. It just happens. It's not a signal nor something I'm trying to do on purpose.
As Trinket said, unless this woman is really old-school she's probably just hanging her laundry and not thinking much about it. I wouldn't really assume someone is going to get a hard on by seeing fabric blowing in the breeze or something resting on top of a basket of laundry at a public laundromat. It's just not something that would cross my mind as something I need to 'hide' or be overly discreet about - especially when the woman is hanging them in her own private backyard.
