Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
Emerys
Over 90 days ago
Pan Cis Female, 34
0 miles · New Jersey

Forum

Quote by one_winged_angel


I quite agree with Clum, with just one addition, to my understanding the knot issue is unique to canines so if it can be left out of the story, I would advise not putting that part in. Pun not intended



I always appreciate a good pun! biggrin

Anyway, so tentacles is the only exception? Like, if I were to write a story about a were-octopus (which I totally, totally might now that I'm thinking about it (seriously, wtf is wrong with my brain)) whose lower body was that of an octopus', that would be allowed?

The whole knotting thing is one of the best aspects of werewolf smut, so I'm trying to understand why this in particular isn't allowed. (I was totally one of those annoying kids in class who was constantly asking "why", by the way. Apparently you just don't grow out of some things. Though, I'm pretty sure most of my teachers would be horrified if they knew where my curiosity lead to these days...and I'm digressing =p)
Quote by clum

Stories such as this would probably be dealt with case by case, as they are so rare. It sounds almost passable but I think the moderating team would have to have a look at the actual story (once written). Characters engaging in sexual activity must have human sex organs and human features.


I swear I don't mean to be a hardass, but can I ask why? I mean, I know tentacles are allowed as long as it's not an actual octopus/squid having the sex, so why not, say, excess hair, pointy ears, and a knot on a werewolf?

This is pretty much what I had in mind for the werewolf:

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/z5z0GqD.jpg?1[/IMG]


Not this:

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/j17NDQZ.jpg?1[/IMG]


So would that be okay?


If yes, I'd still like to know why #2 wouldn't be allowed? Particularly if the werewolf could still think rationally and was only stuck in that form for whatever reason, and if the sex between the werewolf and his/her partner was entirely consensual. I mean, it's not exactly , y'know?

Once again, sorry for all the questions. I write a lot of hardcore -ish smut and my interests seem to straddle the IS-NOT-ALLOWED line quite a bit.
Quote by one_winged_angel


The lack of safe word will only be fine if nobody says, stop or no, or tries to put and end to the roleplay at any point. The rest of it sounds ok.



Ok. So if they were to come up with a safe word the sub in that scenario would be able to say "stop" or "no", right? Because I can't imagine any type of fantasy playing out where those words wouldn't be said at least once. So it's probably in my best interest to determine a safe word and just not use it.



Um, I also have a question regarding (I apologize if these questions are bothersome). I realize that it's a huge no-no at lush (understandably considering it's pretty much ), but I'm curious to know if sex between a human and a were-creature (ex: werewolf) would be acceptable? For example, the were-creature would be human-shaped but still have animal parts/features. Mentally, they'd be a mix of the two. Would that be OK?

Or if, say, a shape-shifter shifted into an animal but had the full mind of human and non-penetrative sex (on anyone's part) occurred (example: a human-turned-wolf licking in between a woman's legs, but that's it)-- would that type of story be rejected? I only ask because I'm also considering writing an Alpha/Beta/Omega story and that's something I'd like to include. In my head the wolf will interrupt a woman masturbating, curiously "taste" her, and then shift to human so the actual sex can happen. It'll be entirely consensual and the shape-shifter will, as I mentioned, have the mind of a human, even in (brief) animal form. So: yay or nay?
And since we're discussing this at all, I've also been playing with the idea of writing a story where an established couple acts out a fantasy. The fact that it's a roleplay (and consent has been given) will be clearly emphasized at the beginning of the story, but the sex will be incredibly rough and demeaning to the submissive. Moreover, no safe word will be used-- and this is a mutual decision by both characters-- so the sex will, for all intents and purposes, come across as . It just, y'know, won't be, and at the end the couple will be fine.

Will I be allowed to submit something like that?
Quote by naughtynurse
Abduction and hypnotism are not allowed.

Many of the people here on Lush have strong feelings about this type of behavior.



Ok, so I've been playing with the idea of writing a story where the protagonist is abducted by humanoid aliens for non-sexual reasons, though fully consensual sex will occur later on in the story. Will a story with that kind of scenario be rejected? And if so-- why?
Celtic Woman. Particularly Walking in the Air and The Voice.
Creamed corn.

An awesome shopping spree or a romantic weekend away.
Agreed. Unless you know beforehand that it's alright, it's kind of rude.


Massages can sometimes be better than sex.
Guess we're moving forwards again.


Hard to Explain - The Strokes
Quote by evie_j
Just sounds like a joke to me. Some people should lighten up a little.




This. I'm a little astonished that people are taking this so seriously.
As a joke (because I truly don't think the guy was serious)? I think it's hilarious. I would have laughed if my husband said that to me.
Quote by ThatStoryGuy
It's great to get some feedback on it all.

I asked simply so I could see what the modern day gentleman should adhere to without seeming, as put by dancing doll, as smothering. Gone are the days where a large sword, although arguments can be made it is simply called something else now, and a suit of shiny armor would sway a lady into your arms. Got to say though in the list diamond supplied the biggest thing that confused me was "No.31 Call her babe". There was me thinking it objectified women and made you seem stereotypical macho man.

Then again, at my inexperienced age, what do I know?



I love it when guys use terms of endearment, but babe/baby has never been one I particularly liked. In fact, the last time a guy kept on calling me "baby" I asked him to stop. There's just something about it that rubs me the wrong way.

This guy I used to hang out with used to call me "sweetheart" and it never failed to make me melt into a puddle of goo. I still get butterflies in my stomach when I think about it. heart


EDIT: Be supportive, understanding, considerate, attentive, courteous, affectionate, honest, loyal... the whole shebang. I don't think you need to serenade outside someone's window or punch the guy who whistled at her in the face in order to be a "gentleman". You just need to care for your partner and want to treat her well/with respect WITHOUT making her feel like she's a delicate snowflake who wouldn't last a day in this cruel, cruel world without you.

Seriously, though, it's different for each person. I know some women who love it when guys open doors and pull out chairs for them, and some women who hate it. I myself enjoy such things on special occasions (like if we went to a nice restaurant for an anniversary or something), but regularly? I'd get annoyed, fast.

So it definitely depends on the person.
Quote by Dancing_Doll


It was a great list! smile


I've always liked the general concept of a 'gentleman' and the basic tenets behind it. I think taken to an extreme, it can become more of the white knight 'put the girl on a pedestal and worship/adore her' which could be many a girl's ideal man, but I'm very egalitarian when it comes to the underlying power dynamic in relationships so having a guy go full tilt with being a 'gentleman' would make me feel smothered and possibly like I'd accidentally waded into a Harlequin romance novel.


Agreed. I am a major romantic, but that list goes so far beyond what I'd consider ideal. I actually thought it was a little creepy. There were a lot of really awesome points, but there were probably just as many that were trite and, honestly, kind of ridiculous. I'd personally feel smothered if someone were to constantly fall on me hand and foot and treat me like a delicate little flower who needed to be sheltered and protected and pampered at all costs.

I think a huge part of being a "gentleman" is understanding how to balance one's desire to be a caring and attentive partner while respecting the fact that one's partner is an independent person capable of taking care of/making decisions for themselves.
Quote by crazydiamond
This is massive, I don't think every one needs to be considered, but many should, it may help: The Rules of a Gentleman


OP- This seems more like the criteria of an individual's ideal partner than an actual "gentleman's list". There were a LOT of good points, don't get me wrong, but a lot of them are crap, too. Case in point, #122: when she's tired, carry her, and #126: have those I-love-you-more fights, and #175: calling her "baby" will make her melt every time, and #334: fall for her harder everyday, and #4: learn to play the guitar for her, and #30: give her piggy back rides, etc.

Basically, I think some girl(s) read a few too many harlequin romance novels (or saw Twilight too many times) and came up with a list of how they'd like their ideal boyfriends to be. A lot of the stuff mentioned is in no way "gentlemanly", I don't think. But hey, that's just my opinion, OP.
A gentleman, huh? Do those even exist anymore?

I suppose my definition of a gentleman would be someone who's courteous, attentive, honest, loyal, and sincere. Bonus if he's a romantic at heart (double bonus if he's not, but tries to be anyway). I don't need some guy to open doors for me and pay for every outing we have-- I can do all that by myself, thanks. I just want a guy who knows how to listen and pay attention and who tries to do the right thing (even if he sometimes gets it wrong). Someone who's willing to be open and who genuinely cares about me AND our relationship. A guy who doesn't lie or cheat or manipulate, and who'll always respect me, even if I suggest we try freaky stuff in the bedroom.

That's a real gentleman in my eyes. =p
I would never tell my partner that he couldn't masturbate just because he was with me. Why? Because I'd never allow some guy to tell me I couldn't masturbate while I was with him.


Mutual masturbation would be a real turn on, though, to be honest. And I would totally get off on watching a partner jerk off if he'd let me.

So yeah, I'm all for it.
Quote by Jack_42


I know everything is relative but your definition of an older man which includes someone in their 20's made me smile but please don't be annoyed it's not a sneering smile. smile


Haha, no worries. I'm 21 so I still consider guys who are 28+ years old to be "older men".
I tried to come up with alternatives for the male-equivalent for 'cougar' (that I've heard/seen) but all I could come up with was cradle-robber, dirty old man, , child molester, pervert, sicko, daddy, etc...you get the idea.

To be honest, I think the guys get the short end of the stick in regards to liking younger women (and the names they're called for it). "Cougars", at least, are generally considered to be older, sexy women with a bit of a wild side (at least that's the impression I always got, though correct me if I'm wrong). Guys are just considered perverts. :/ Or "Daddy", which is kind of weird. If I were an older woman I'd be grossed out a younger guy/girl I was interested in tried to call me "Mommy", so I wonder how men who don't have that particular kink must feel about it.
I'm very attracted to older men (generally late 20s to early 50s), but I personally wouldn't be able to date someone older than 35, I don't think. Not unless there was amazing chemistry between us, anyway. As for younger guys...18 (and therefore not jail bait) is definitely the youngest I'd go for, and he'd have to both act and look mature. I wouldn't be interested otherwise.

Other people can date whoever they want, though. As long as the relationship is consensual and both parties are of legal age, I don't think there's a problem. I mean, age so rarely determines one's level of maturity, and to me that's what matters most. I know people who are pushing 40 who still act like they're in high school, so obviously I don't put much weight in the so-called correlation between age and maturity.
Quote by anonymous1526
yes, it would be fun! Be in general i prefer a proper man!



I don't even know what this means. I mean, what's the criteria for being a "proper" man? Or a "proper woman", for that matter? Holy crap, maybe I've been doing it wrong all my life and never even knew. D:


Back to the OP: what do you even mean by "sissy" boyfriends? Are you referring to men who are sensitive? Who aren't emotionally stunted, repressed, and all "macho"? If so, can you tell me where I can get one?