1st try 50%, second try 100%.
Thanks very much to everyone for all your thoughtful replies!
I've found a wealth of information in your responses, and I truly appreciate all the help you have provided.
Emily.
I'd rather worry about man-made contamination than natural contamination. Most food these days is so devoid of any natural ingredients and so highly processed that it's very unlikely you could catch anything from touching it. Swallowing the food on the other hand could be a danger. But, considering the alternative of starvation, I guess we just have to live with what we've got.
No need to get on the defensive, Jebru.
I was asking a poignant question, regardless of the origins of the game and political views about the US.
The question remains.
Emily.
.
It depends on the maturity level of the woman and man in question.
Any guy or any girl in a beneficial relationship will recognize the qualities and faults of their partner, assess them and question them accordingly.
Seems like rather an immature question to me, but who am I to judge?
Emily.
No, no, no, and absolutely no! I've often wondered why American football has never gained any appreciation outside of the USA, except for perhaps within a few developing countries.
Wow, that's a pretty good laundry list of topics!
What I would write about:
: Yes, if it is fantasy and both parties are turned on by it, and it's non-violent. I hate violence in any form.
Kids: A definite no-no if it involves underage children. Yes if it's a an adult-adult interaction with one acting/dressed like a child (although I have no interest whatsoever in adult-babies. That's just too weird for me, borderline psycho). I'm thinking more along the lines of schoolgirl fantasy here.
Animals: Absolute no. Animals are the most innocent beings and have no control whatsover over what happens to them. Leave them alone in sexual fantasies, please.
Scat: No, because I don't like the look or smell of poo. Besides, I'm guessing the readership must be very limited (perhaps I'm naïve?).
Pee: As a guy, it can be fun and a turn-on to watch a girl taking a pee, or feeling the warmth of the flow in one's hands, especially if the flow is through her panties (but, that's just because I'm a panty perv :-). Not sure about swallowing it, because I never tried. In any case, this would happen outside of a toilet area, because IMHO toilets are there for practical purposes, carry germs, and generally turn me off.
Puke: That's totally sick :-) Let's not even go there.
Snuff: You gotta be kidding. Again, .0000001% of readership.
Felching & rainbow eaters: I forget what they mean even though I looked them up on Google. I guess they were so remote that they didn't even register.
Emily.
One of the issues I often find when writing stories is how much should be left to the imagination. I'm particularly thinking about character descriptions, but the same principle could apply to a lot of different aspects of the story. For example, "she was 23 and had a hot body" may appeal to some readers because it leaves the them to imagine the physical qualities of that 23 year-old girl. Other readers may be less-imaginative and rather disappointed that the physical characteristics of the girl weren't described in detail. And yet other readers may be thrilled or disappointed that the detailed description of the girl either met or did not meet their expectations. Of course, the example uses a girl, but the same can equally apply to the description of a guy.
How important is it to you, the reader, to be told what to imagine rather than filling in the blanks?
To the authors, have you thought about this issue, and how do you deal with it?
Emily.
I'm naked because I got abducted by aliens. They're busy probing my body right now... Ouch!!!
He'd tried oyster flavored popcorn. According to the site he'd purchased it from, it would increase his libido.
But instead...