Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
MorganHawke
1 month ago
Bisexual Female, 62
United States

Forum

----- Original Message -----
...There's a Short Fiction Contest going on. I already thought of my theme and I have a complete first draft. But, I'm confused. One of the rules says "The story must have an ending." I don't know what that means. You see, usually I like to end my stories with a feeling that the characters go on with their lives even after the plot is solved. Thing is, I don't know if that could be considered an "open ending" or "inconclusive ending" or whatsoever, or not even an ending at all!
-- Anxious Contestant

It means that your story must be more than just a ramble of words. In order for a Story to BE a a Story, it must Say something, Show something, or Prove something. A story must make a POINT.

Think: What are you trying to SAY with your story?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Love Conquers All
Greed makes one Greedier
Love = Insanity
Love doesn't always mean Happiness
Love isn't always Nice
You Reap what you Sow
No good deed goes Unpunished.
You can't escape Yourself
A Snake will always be a Snake
Sometimes, Love means Letting Go
Sometimes, Love means Giving In
Appetites will find a way to be Filled
Revenge only brings Misery

A story ends when you prove your point. Seriously. It has nothing to do with whether your characters live on or die at the end.

What matters is that:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Monsters are faced.
Emotional hang-ups are dealt with.
Problems end up solved.
What was begun - finishes.

Enjoy!

DISCLAIMER: As a multi-published author, I have been taught some fairly rigid rules on what is publishable and what is not. If my rather straight-laced (and occasionally snotty,) advice does not suit your creative style, by all means, IGNORE IT.
Quote by nicola
You really know your movies!


There are a LOT of movies I don't know. However, I have this knee-jerk habit of analyzing everything I do see, (and read.)
Quote by TracyAmes
Creative people, published or not, have to stick together or we'll find ourselves stuffed in cubicles. *cringe*


Been there. Was NOT a happy place.
Building the DUAL-NATURED Character

Let’s start this lecture with a HUGE secret:
-- There are Three Essential Characters in every story:

> Adversary – The one causing all the trouble.
> Proponent – The one trying to keep things the way they are.
> Ally – The close companion of one or the other caught in the middle.

In other words, you can tell any story with ONLY these Three Characters; perhaps not with any real detail, but you could still do the entire basic plotline.

And each essential character is governed by one of three SPECIFIC aspects, or Drives:

> MOTIVE - Driven by a REASON to Make something happen, such as Revenge.
> ACTION - Driven by the need to ACT, normally because if they don't they die, but an incentive such as a Reward or Prize works too.
> EMOTION - Driven by emotional impulse to REACT; out of love, out of honor, out of guilt...

There may be any number of side characters, but in traditional Adventures and Romances of every stripe (erotic or not,) the main conflict is always a triangle of these complimentary opposite drives. Just to make things Truly confusing, the Hero, the Heroine, and the Villain can be any one of them!

In ‘Leon – the Professional’, Leon is a very Action-driven professional assassin Ally who is pestered into taking in his Motive-driven and Adversarial Heroine who was looking for a safe haven from a very Emotionally-driven and impulsive Proponent Villain cop.

In ‘Tomb Raider’ Lara Croft is an Action-driven Proponent Heroine with Emotionally-driven impulsive Allies and Adversarial paramours that are usually, if not always, Motive-driven.

In ‘Robin Hood Prince of Thieves’, the Sheriff of Nottingham plays the impulsive Emotionally-Driven Proponent Villain to Robin Hood’s Motive-driven Adversarial Hero. Maid Marian is an Action-driven Ally Heroine.

In ‘The Crow’, Eric Draven is the very Adversarial and Motive-driven Hero who goes after the Action-driven Proponent Villain trying to keep his little kingdom of crime under control. The little girl Nell, is Eric’s impulsive Emotionally-driven Ally Heroine, who gets caught in the cross-fire, like any other side-kick.

Why does a character's 'Drive' matter?
Because a Dual-Natured character possesses TWO DRIVES - one for each side of their nature.


Man against Himself

When a character is at war against his inner-nature, you treat both his likable nature, and his unlikable nature, as separate drives (Motive / Action / Emotion,) separate URGES that are darn near separate entities.

Example:
> Outer Man – Emotionally Driven to Protect
> Inner Beast – Motive Driven to Destroy

Additionally, the other two main characters should Frame, or bring attention to this drive and/or personality split.

> Hero = Divided character
> Ally / Lover = Represents everything the character DESIRES, (and likes about themselves.)
> Villain = Represents everything the character HATES, (and despises about themselves.)

Duality = Main Conflict

In a story where a character’s opposing nature (inner-man verses inner-beast,) is heavily pronounced, the character and his battle with his inner nature overpowers the story, and in fact BECOMES the story.

There's nothing you can do about it either because regardless of what you may have intended to write, once you split your main character's nature in Two, your character’s “duality” becomes the story’s Core Issue = the PREMISE. Resolving that “duality,” that division in their nature becomes the story’s main conflict.

If you don't, if you leave your character hanging, your readers will LOATHE you.

Hint: The Character assumes the third drive (Action / Motive / Emotion -- the one they Don't have,) to resolve their split! The idea behind it is: Balance.

The CURE -- or not?
-----Original Message-----
What about a fight to find a "cure", for the duel-natured character, like for a werewolf?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The BIG Secret!
-- A “Dual Nature” in Fiction is symbolic of a Psychological issue – not a Physical issue.

Every monster you can think of is in actuality, a symbol of a human Issue from the dark side of the psyche.

> Ghosts = Memories that ‘haunt’
> Vampires = Manipulative Male Sexuality
> Witches =Manipulative Female Sexuality
> Sorcerers & Scientists = Control – either loss of, or overwhelming
> Werewolves = Passions that Consume
> Faeries = Inability to fit in with the society. This is why Urban Faeries tend to have a ‘punk’ look to them.
> Monsters in general = Destruction

(What? So, I read a lot of Carl Jung, Wilhelm Riche, Robert Anton Wilson and Timothy Leary…)

One does Not CURE a Psychological Issue.
One learns to ADJUST to it.

It is a Proven Fact: There is No Medical Cure for Psychological Issues. Drugs do NOT make psychological issues go away, they merely SUPPRESS their symptoms -- and only temporarily. After enough time, no matter how powerful, ALL Drugs wear off.

There is only ONE satisfactory Answer to a split in Nature / Personality: Acceptance and INTEGRATION.
The only other option is madness and death.

In FICTION, the search for a Cure for a dual-natured character (such as a werewolf,) is a symbolic delay tactic; something the character does to Run Away from his ISSUE rather than face it.

A character’s “Dual Nature” should be written as two Necessary halves, that need to come together to defeat the bad guy. In fact the two halves of a personality split MUST integrate if you are to have a happy and satisfying ending.

A CURE should be used precisely in the same fashion as a drugs are used for psychological issues: as a Delay Tactic to Avoid the Issue by Suppressing the Issue. In fact, the application of a Cure should be used as symbolic proof of the character's FAILURE to face and deal with their personal Issue.


Failure and the CURE: Van Helsing

In the movie “Van Helsing” the Premise: “Man vs. Monster” demanded that the answer be “self control”.

Gabriel was changed into a werewolf, psychological symbol of a complete lack of control over one’s temper, (and everything Gabriel suppressed within himself.) He went from Action-Driven hero (paid to do what he does) to Emotion-Driven monster (I am so pissed off...!) which gave him the strength and determination necessary to defeat the Motive-Driven vampire.

Logically, (plot-wise,) Gabriel should have gained self-control over his second nature (becoming Motive-driven to control himself -- attaining he third drive) and thus remained a werewolf, albeit able to transform at will; gaining the prize of Controlled Fury -- and the girl.

However, after his battle, he was unable to come to terms with his “emotional” nature. He failed to gain self-control of his Temper, and Killed his Heroine, symbol of everything he Could have had – unconditional acceptance and love. She forgave him, (as a ghost) but that did not change the fact that he had Failed to accept himself.

The movie’s writers had no intention of killing off his character, so a remorseful suicidal cliff-dive was right out. Instead, Gabriel was cured. However, this “cure” is a blatant flag that Gabriel will have to face this same issue again, in a later story.

Just to keep things rounded...

Man against Nature

The Old man & the Sea

A “man against nature” tale, is in fact a “man against himself” story. The Nature elements, that the character is in opposition with, are (or Should Be) symbolic representations of the Opposing Drives within the character.

In ‘The Old Man and the Sea’ by Hemingway...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Proponent -- Old Man, Motive driven to fish. (He needs the money.)
> Adversary -- Ocean / Weather, Unpredictable and dangerous. This is the symbol of the man’s opposing drive of Action. Fishing takes inaction and patience -- something in old man doesn't possess a lot of.
> Ally -- Shark, this is the Symbol of the old man’s impulsive Emotional drive to Survive. This is the drive he must adopt to survive the story.

Man against Man

Ravenous

When you have only two characters: Proponent, and Adversary, you give each character an opposing Primary Drive and additionally, opposite aspects of the SAME second drive as a Sub-drive.

The first one to adopt the Third Drive (the one they DON'T have,) Wins!

In the movie “Ravenous”...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Proponent – Captain Boyd
> Main drive: Emotion Driven "Why is this Happening to me?"
> Sub-drive: Action Driven in the aspect of Refusal to Act.

Adversary – Calhoun
> Main drive: Motive Driven "I will Make something Happen."
> Sub-drive: Action Driven in the aspect of Determined to Act.

Circumstances force the “Boyd” to adopt the Third drive of MOTIVE, while the "Villain” resists his change in drives and remains Motive-driven.
The Villain's Inability to Change is why the Villain LOSES to the Hero.


Does this sound a little too planned out?
-- It should because it's Supposed to be. Another name for it is: PLOTTING. smile

Never forget:
Reality may be full of Random events – but
Fiction MUST make Sense.


Enjoy!

DISCLAIMER: As with all advice, take what you can use and throw out the rest. As a multi-published author, I have been taught some fairly rigid rules on what is publishable and what is not. If my rather straight-laced (and occasionally snotty,) advice does not suit your creative style, by all means, IGNORE IT.
Quote by DirtyMartini
...And Morgan...if I'm only two or three days behind, I consider that pretty good...


I prefer to be two or three days ahead, myself. smile
Quote by TracyAmes
...It's difficult to ignore facts.


Which is why a writer's best protection is a personal Author site with a Full List of their stories. This way all you need is a single link to make your point.
Quote by nicola
Quote by DirtyMartini
You did start a thread about plots though I noticed. Somehow the moderators let that slip by...don't worry, I won't say anything...


You're a little behind the pace there Alan.


Only two or three days behind. smile
Quote by Mistress_of_words
That was kind of my point about audience and the Lush zero tolerance policy. Even if you intend something to be viewed as horrific or painful, and use it as part of a story to add depth to a character, in an environment such as this you know there are people who will read it in an entirely different way.


That's true of ANY story in ANY genre because people automatically read Subjectively -- they put themselves in the place of the characters, UNLESS you draw a strong clear line between them, which is NOT an easy thing to do.

Quote by Mistress_of_words
So for example, if I wrote a story that started out with a woman being , but she was rescued by someone and went on to form a relationship with them. The would not be intended to be arousing, it would be intended to be scary and horrific, but it still wouldn't be accepted.


Yep, that's the rules for LUSH.
-- I couldn't even use the word ' ' in my story. I had to pull it out.

On other sites though, I've discovered that the best way to handle something potentially explosive with the readers is by Telling it. I DON'T describe what happened, I state it:

"Back when she was fresh out of college, her apartment was broken into. She never quite recovered from it."
Quote by Dancing_Doll
I submitted a a rather scathing review on one of the stories yesterday (about how it was stolen) to see if it would get approved on Amazon. It's up today! I'm going to add it to the other stories as well. I wonder if Elizabeth Summers reads these. smile


It doesn't matter if the plagiarist reads them. What matters is the Site Authorities and Potentials Buyers who Will.
Quote by sprite
i was wondering, since Amazon has a place for reviews that go with the storie, if it would help for one of Damon's fans to write a review there stating it's been stolen?


YES.
Quote by TracyAmes
Devoted bloggers and rabid fans are the best defense. They kick ass!


Abso-flogging-lutely!
-- However, one needs a place those fans can point to to prove that something has been stolen from their favorite author -- which is why Every Author needs a Personal Website, even if they only write drabbles.
Quote by DamonX
...I just found out, that several of my stories have been stolen by some supposed "author" named Elizabeth Summers, and are on sale on Amazon in Kindle form for 6.99 a pop. ... Now I'm not sure what to do about this. Does anyone have any ideas?


First -- contact Amazon and report the stolen material. Be aware that you're going to need Proof that the stories are actually yours. Unfortunately, I don't know what they'll ask for because my publisher usually goes after them for me -- along with the company Lawyer.

The best way to keep a story from being stolen is to make it EXTREMELY PUBLIC who that story belongs to. For online stories, an author website -- where you keep the full collection of your free posted stories -- is your best insurance for this. Having an online site will Brand those stories as yours far more effectively than you think.

Never underestimate just how rabid your Fans can be!

Believe it or not, my Fans have proven extremely effective in not only spotting poached stories, but providing a storm of hate mail to the offender. (Keeping my nose clean.) This is in addition to notifying the site hosting the stolen stories (and bitching them out) in droves. smile

And all this is Before my publisher gets a hold of them. (evil grin)

All of you authors that Don't have a personal Author site:
GET ONE NAOW...! even it's just a free Word Press or Blogspot site.


Sometimes a link to a story on an author site is all the proof you need to say a story is YOURS.
Quote by Mistress_of_words
...I understand why Lush has to have a zero tolerance policy though, it's all about the audience.


Exactly!
-- The audience for those stories does exist, just not here.
Quote by GallagherWitt
I have plenty of BDSM sex scenes, but not in this book. lol The water-boarding was detailed, written in first-POV from the victim's perspective, plus there's a chapter or two after that with him dealing with what amounts to PTSD from it. But it was necessary for the story. It's an erotic suspense, so there's plenty of sex in the book...just not THAT scene. lol


Very sensible.
-- I've discovered that as long as you draw a solid line between what's supposed to be pleasurable and what's Not, you can cross some erotic romance publishers' 'no-go' lines. SOME...
Quote by GallagherWitt
I actually have a scene of water-boarding in one of my upcoming books, but it is NOT part of a sex scene or anything of the sort. lol It's used as a method of serious torture. (And was rather skin-crawly to write, if I'm honest...)


I've done one torture session, but I didn't go into any real detail. I mostly stuck to what was going on in the victim's mind rather than go into gruesome detail as to what was happening physically.

I squick the readers enough with some of my borderline BDSM Sex scenes. I don't need to send them gibbering into corners too.
Quote by TracyAmes
We can talk until we're blue in the face. I guess the fundamentals reek of tyranny. They certainly improved my life!...sans water-board. smile


The fundamentals only reek of tyranny when one doesn't know them -- and it Shows.
Ahem...
It's when someone's Arrogance slams head-first into their Ignorance, and they cry out, "I meant to do that!"
Quote by GallagherWitt
Quote by MorganHawke
Quote by TracyAmes
...The [fundamentals] aren't meant to fence us in...they're a springboard.


Exactly!
-- Now how do I get the 'creative' writers to believe this?


I'm told water-boarding is an effective means of-- *looks around* What???


That does have possibilities...for entertainment value if nothing else.
Quote by mercianknight
....and there I was, worried that I may not learn anything new for today when, Lo the wise Morgan came to my rescue. Nice tip. Many thanks.


You're very welcome.
-- I answer questions too!
Quote by TracyAmes
...The [fundamentals] aren't meant to fence us in...they're a springboard.


Exactly!
-- Now how do I get the 'creative' writers to believe this?
Quote by Mistress_of_words
Without ever knowing why I was doing it or what it was called, but somehow instinctively knowing it needed to be there, I have a "habits" section in my character profile sheets. Now I'm going to be stuck thinking about this all day, trying to work it through in my head.

Food for thought -- Literally!

Quote by Mistress_of_words
...just throw your ingredients in the pan and add what you like? If the result tastes good, that's what's important, right? Only you'll never make a soufflé that way.

= TALENT --> When you get it right by Accident.

Quote by Mistress_of_words
...Cooks follow recipes. Eventually you get to be a chef, and you understand the food so well you can adapt the recipe with skill to produce something exquisite and unique.

= CRAFT --> When you get it right On Purpose.
Quote by DirtyMartini
I'm confused again...

That's okay. We're used to you being confused. smile
Quote by sprite
...so, anyways, I decide to name my characters static traits, and funny thing is? Once I have a name for them? Once I know? It becomes so easy to write a scene, using the knowledge of what drives them each time and wow, it’s amazing how I can just reference that in dialogue, in actions, in pushing the scene forward… and it's consistent as well!

Anyways, my way of saying thank you *hugs*


Ha-ha! You've just taken the step from 'talented' writer to become a 'skilled' writer. Congrats!

Talent is when you get it right Accidentally.
Skill is when you do it On Purpose.
Quote by TracyAmes
So I see! Well, I'm in good company. Love both of your work. smile

Thank you so much!
-- And yes, you're in Very good company.
Quote by magnificent1rascal
"Erotic Word Slinger & Smarty Pants"

I love it!

And I think I've found a kindred spirit. ;-)


You've got to be a smarty-pants to hang with This crowd! smile
Quote by TracyAmes
Excellent post, Morgan. I LOVE Byronic heroes but often I find myself shouting, "Oy, here we go again." *Throws book at wall*


What do you expect? the original Lord Byron himself was seriously neurotic. (But for some reason, the women of his era thought that was Sexy. Fan-girls never change...)

I'm glad you liked the post!
Quote by magnificent1rascal
Like Jack Nicholson in Prizzi's Honor. Even without speaking and with his back to the camera, you can sense the inner struggle his character, Charley Partanna, is having when the Don tells him "it's just business." Now that's what I call acting!


That's it Exactly!
-- Another excellent example of acting without speaking (explaining anything) is Silent Bob, of the Jay and Silent Bob movies such as Dogma.

One of my favorite exercises is having people write a one page conversation between the two of them: Jay & Silent Bob -- WITHOUT using internal narration for either character. If you can write that, you can write ANYTHING.
Quote by nicola
...I didn't know they had a particular name either Magnificent. I thought they were merely character traits, but since it has been spelled out to me, I can see how the technique is so commonly used in films now.


Truthfully, I believe it's also one of the tricks of Method Acting that allows an actor to not only identify with a character, but also illustrate their inner character to their audience without saying a word.
Quote by GallagherWitt
...No one's saying you have to use it. But calling it contrived B.S.? That's just rude. Morgan's taking the time to post these articles to help writers. If you don't want to use it, don't. If the advice doesn't click with you, by all means, try something else.

If you want to stand off to the side and polish your nails on your lapel as if your methods are somehow superior, I can introduce you to some film school graduates you might get along with.


You're so cute when you're fierce! ~smooch
Emotional Conflict & PLOT!
PLOT ARC - The events that happen while the characters make other plans.
CHARACTER ARC - The emotional roller-coaster that the character suffers while dealing with the Plot.



NO CONFLICT = No Character Depth

I’m sure, most of you have noticed by now that far too many movie characters, and many book characters, are One-Dimensional. The characters DO stuff, but they don’t face any real personal issues: a hang-up, a fear, paranoia, a moral code, a love interest, a strong dislike… Without hang-ups to deal with, and face down, those characters are not PEOPLE. They’re pretty card-board cutouts moving around on a pretty stage. They're EMPTY. Or worse, they DO have issues, but those issue are never faced in the story.

The rule of Mystery Fiction states:
-- “If the gun is shown in Chapter One, it better go off by Chapter Three -- and there had better be a damned good reason for that gun to be there.”

The Rule of Erotic Fiction:
-- “If the Kiss is shown in Chapter One, the Sex better happen by chapter three -- and there had better be a damned good reason for that Kiss to be there.”

These rules should apply in ANYTHING you put in a story, no matter what it is: a situation, an object, a person... If you have it in the story, you better have a use for it, and that use had better Show Something, Do Something or Make Something Happen. If your Character has a Hobby, a Pet, a Family, a JOB -- you need to show that character involved with those things, and those things effecting the plot in some way shape or form. If you DON’T, you’ve just made a PLOT HOLE, and I guarantee that someone will not only See it, they’ll call you on it. It could be a fan who writes you a concerned letter, “Whatever happened with…?” or worse, a Reviewer read by thousands.

That includes a character's PERSONAL Issues.

Adding CONFLICT to your story.
The best way to give your characters greater dimension is to put them in conflict – with EACH OTHER.

Let’s start this lecture with a HUGE secret:
--> There are Three Essential Characters in Every Story.

Adversary – The one trying to change things.
Proponent – The one trying to keep things the way they are.
Ally – The one caught in the middle.

Traditionally known as: Hero, Villain, Victim, and/or Antagonist, Protagonist, Ally.

Seriously, you can tell any story with ONLY these Three Characters; perhaps not with any real detail, but you could still do the entire basic plotline from Star Wars to Gone with the Wind.

Why does this matter?
-- To really make your Proponent shine, the Adversary and the Ally should have Physical and Mental traits that go AGAINST the Proponent’s traits.

In a medieval-style RPG, role-playing game, you will often see a hulking Paladin Knight (an ACTION-driven character,) paired with a slender but highly dexterous Elvish bowman, or knife-throwing Thief, (an EMOTION-Driven character,) and a physically weak but highly intelligent and powerful Mage, (a MOTIVE-Driven character). Each of the three characters possesses traits that overlap to cover most monstrous encounters, and their strong differences in temperament make for very lively chit-chat in between.

By the way, RPG books on Character Creation are a great way to dig up mental and physical traits for characters!

How this works:
-- If you have a tough-guy, kick-ass Proponent, like Riddick in Pitch Black, you give also your kick-ass Proponent has a handicap your other characters can take advantage of, such the inability to see in ordinary light. Make the Plot work AGAINST him by putting him in situations where his handicap can be used against him, (at least twice,) rendering him helpless and in physical danger each time.

Most importantly, expose his emotional soft spot; a hang-up, a fear, a paranoia, a moral code, a love interest, a strong dislike... at the same time and then force him to face them to succeed.

Use the PLOT against them!
-- To really torque your Characters, make your Events CONFLICT with one of your characters' physical and / or mental hang-up at least TWICE - each!

A well-placed REVERSAL (where everything that Can go wrong DOES,) throws your characters right into Looming Danger, forcing them off the straight-line path to the goal they’ve chosen and onto a path to a different goal. This is more commonly known as the Plot-Twist.

Making EMOTIONAL Issues HAPPEN in a Story

My Issue/Plot Template
A Cheat-Sheet for adding Emotional Conflict to the Plot


In the movie: Secretary

Adversary: He is trying to make things Change for her; to make her a more emotionally stable person, someone that doesn't need to hurt herself.
Proponent: She fights to continue his 'punishments,' to keep things the way they are after he suddenly decides to stop.
Ally: Everyone else in the story are caught between them. This is particularly evident in the final act.

The Mirrored Issue: (Opposing reflections of the same issue.) Dealing with Emotional Pain
Her Issue: She uses Physical Pain, she hurts herself, to relieve her Emotional Pain.
His Issue: He uses Physical Pain as a disciplinary tool to relieve his Emotional Pain.

His Mental Handicap: Confrontation Issues
Her Mental Handicap: Abandonment Issues

The PREMISE: LOVE

Introduction
0 – Alarm - Encounter: Boy meets Girl – Mirrored Issues trigger Emotional Conflict
-- A wonderful typist, but otherwise clueless, girl becomes a secretary for a dominating, but soft-hearted, lawyer.

Inciting Event
1 - Denial - Situation: Response to Emotional Conflict exposes Issues.
-- Her desire to please her boss drives her to cut her clothing, and later wound herself, as punishment for not pleasing him. Horrified by her “self-punishment” he demands that she stop her self-destructive behavior. An emotional bond develops between them.

Defiance
2 - Antagonism - Dilemma: Issues instigate a Dilemma prompting a Fight/Flight response
-- She goes on a date and is seen by her Lawyer. The lawyer’s emotional conflict (his growing feelings for her,) drives him to begin disciplining her at work, beginning with a spanking for a typing mistake.

The secretary discovers that his spanking brings her an emotional release and a deeper emotional connection to her lawyer. She begins to encourage his discipline by making more mistakes.

Reversal
3 - Bargaining – Crisis: (Worst Case Senario) Conditional compliance to resolve Dilemma
-- Despite the fact that his secretary is blooming right before his eyes, the lawyer sees his disciplinary behavior as being destructive. He decides that his behavior is wrong and stops.

Declaration
4 – Despair - Panic: Disaster strikes bringing Emotional Consequences - Issues Surface
-- Desperate to get her lawyer to discipline her, and give her the emotional connection she craves, she makes mistake after mistake until finally, she mails him a worm, (he truly hates bugs,) literally mailing him a demand to be punished.

The lawyer cannot resist her demand, she's pushed one button too many to ignore, and discovers that he cannot stop disciplining her, (she won’t let him,) and fires her.

Ordeal
5 - Sacrifice – Breaking Point: Desperation forces confrontation of Issues & Emotional Conflict
-- Her boyfriend proposes marriage. Out of guilt over HIS feelings for her, and pain at losing her lawyer, she agrees. In her wedding dress, she realizes that she does not love her boyfriend, she loves her lawyer.

Confrontation
6 - Acceptance - Resignation: Acceptance of Issues presents solution to Crisis.
-- In her wedding dress, she confronts her lawyer. She demands that he love her. He insists that what he’s doing is wrong. She insists that it’s not, that it’s just a different kind of love. They belong together.

He demands that she sit at his desk – with her hands flat on the surface -- until he comes for her. It’s a test. He doesn’t believe that she could possibly love him and figures she'll give up before it goes too far.

Resolution
0 – Resolution - Conclusion: Emotional Conflict resolved - Relationship secured
-- She doesn't give up. He's far too important to her. She sits at his desk for days, dealing with family and friends about her personal choices concerning who she loves, and why.

The lawyer has been monitoring her progress the entire time and realizes that she does love him, just as he is and for what he is. He comes for her. Happily ever after – for them.

WHY Issues???

In my opinion, good fiction, no matter the genre, presents us with characters dealing with a basic human issue. This 'Issue' permeates a story and is the story's heart. Every character should face this ONE issue and either succeed or fails when they get there - presenting different results to the core argument (issue) that is the Premise.

A story's Premise = the human ISSUE being addressed

Once upon a time in ancient Greece, the plays of Greek theatre were used as Therapy. The stories were all lessons dealing with the basic drives of human nature - love, hate, jealousy, greed, abandonment... (Ahem - ISSUES.) The old Greek plays were gut-wrenching for a reason, they were trying to make the viewer FEEL what was happening enough to laugh out loud, scream with rage, or burst into tears, experiencing a therapeutic cathartic release. This is where the word 'Catharsis' comes from: Greek Theatre.

In modern fiction, when a story's core issue is addressed we feel a release, laughter, anger or tears. If the story does not wrap up the core 'issue', negatively or positively, we feel instinctively cheated because that sense of relief or release is Missing.

In Conclusion...
-- Don't cheat your readers! Make sure to give your story plenty of conflict by giving your characters ISSUES to solve -- a PREMISE.

Enjoy!

DISCLAIMER: As with all advice, take what you can use and throw out the rest. As a multi-published author, I have been taught some fairly rigid rules on what is publishable and what is not. If my rather straight-laced (and occasionally snotty,) advice does not suit your creative style, by all means, IGNORE IT.
Quote by sprite
Quote by Bunny12
To me this is all a bunch of contrived B.S. all my writing comes from personal experience, straight from the heart driven by pure inspiration. But that's just me lol


All the heart felt inspiration and personal experiences in the world won't make a good story, if you don't know how to translate it onto the written page.


Absolutely true.
-- I look at it this way, these tips are merely Tools in your fiction-writer's toolbox. You can choose to use them or not use them, depending on what you need to accomplish.