Quote by Seeker4
And, frankly, taking advantage of someone who is drugged or drunk is so clearly non-consent that I don't know why discussion is needed
Because Mind Control is also "so clearly non-consent" and yet is allowed. You don't see that contradictory point as needing discussion?
Quote by Seeker4
Never written for the Mind Control category myself but my understanding has been that consent must be given prior to the control, so someone agreeing to be hypnotized or whatever aware of what will happen. Using mind control to force consent is what is not allowed.
And yet there are several stories in that category that don't adhere to this where no consent is given, they just do it.
As I said in my original post, if a website doesn't want certain content, that is it's choice. But the interpretation of this rule just seems absurd.
"Consent is paramount.....except in Mind control. Then, it's fine. And is out because it's icky. But is fine."
Like, come on guys. How is that consistent?
Also, thanks to Chet_Morton for linking those. Was helpful.
