Xzibit

No, usually Maga goes for the same set of convoluted logic you are employing here. Ignoring logic, common sense, or basic physical evidence.
It really makes you look just as foolish as a MAGA Karen.
There is so much to criticize Trump about and so many overt things he’s said and done. You actually lower the cause against him by attaching to these raving theories.
Here, today he said he wanted to make it so people will never have to vote again. Go talk about that. That’s a legitimate statement to pick apart.
Quote by noll
Newsom can't be running mate to Harris as they're from the same state.
Wording on that rule is confusing. Snopes has a good breakdown of it. The rule is about how electorates are cast.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/president-vp-different-states/
That being said because of the sheer amount of electorates from CA this could be an issue to avoid. It might skew some weird split ticket scenario because of these ancient rules.
Good catch though, completely forgot about that rule.
Quote by DanielleX
I've not checked the news all day, has something happened?
Biden dropped out and endorsed Harris. All the Democrats immediately released statements backing her pretty much ensuring she'll coast to the nomination as was pretty much expected.
VP will still be up in the air. My guess is they'll probably tap Gavin Newsom which is a bonus for me because he'll vacate the Governor position here. But that's probably going to be a fierce but quick competition. They'll likely have this wrapped up in a week or two on who that is.
Quote by Magical_felix
You sound upset..
Anyway, I’m still confused since you said you wanted the democrats to lose. Not sure why you say this is good for dems if you want them to lose or are you now changing your mind on that?
Also who is the nominee of the third party you are voting for (if you’re still doing that, sorry you have a very confusing stance)
Why would I be upset? Honestly, this has proven exactly what I was saying for weeks. Watching you flounder is just a bonus.
I'm not speaking as to what I want or not. I'm speaking for the Democrats chances of winning. My ideal scenario would be split power (congress is Dem, President is Republican) because it creates a blockade of bad policies from either side going through.
Democrats are more than willing to back war, oil companies, and the billionaire class so long as they control the presidency. They will performatively fight many of these policies when a Republican is calling the shots. When Dems control congress and executive they create as much destruction as the Republicans.
The way things were going, Biden was pulling down all chances for Democrats to have control of the House of Senate.
I haven't changed my current choice of Cornell West, but California ballots are still not finalized. I'll see who I've got when that happens.
Quote by Magical_felix
You’re chronically online.. that’s why you’re brainwashed into thinking that a third party will rise out of the ashes after a trump presidency lol
most people are going to be like “wait what… we voted for Biden but now the nominee is going to be someone we didn’t vote for? It’s going to be Kamala???” Most people have heard her speak a couple times in 2020 and that’s it.
Look at who’s the most happy about this, and you’ll see who were the ones who really wanted the democrats to shoot themselves in the foot.
Democrats are happy. The revolt has quelled instantly, and they all are happy to coalesce behind Harris. Harris (with no vast campaign for months backing her as president) polls better than BIden against Trump by 5% with likely voters. That's absolutely huge.
The Republicans are furious and still attacking Biden instead of Harris. They had an easy win. Some of them are trying to call the swap illegal and saying that Biden has to run from fringe, unhinged legal theories. Their #1 campaign issue and tons of their already paid-for advertising attacks Joe's age. It's literally money down the drain at this point. This is actually their worst-case scenario.
Harris is actually a really strong debater as well. She's performed well in the past, so much so that the Vance camp released a statement 3 days ago that he refused to debate her.
Quote by Magical_felix
But this is good remember? You said you wanted Trump to win so that things get so bad that people will vote for the Green Party… that’s what you said.
The democrats panicked because the conservatives and leftists podcasters criticized Biden for fucking up the debate and not like you know, Trump and his dictatorship plans.
But like you say, maybe it will get so bad we’ll have have to live through ruin for 30 years and then the Green Party will win and legalize weed or something.
I would say they more fucked it up by sponsoring a sundowning old geezer unopposed through a primary process when he had terrible polling numbers. But I guess I'm not tapped into the self-insert BIden fanfic crowd like you are. I'm sure it's angered the octogenarian-lovers like yourself.
So what you're saying is Biden voters will not vote for Harris?