Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
Ruthie
Over 90 days ago
Heteroflexible Female
Forum
Empress of the Moon
This has been a great thread for me. Now I know where to post my brother-in-law story. I would never have sex with a brother-in-law in real life either, but this is a fiction site. Things that I would never consider actually doing in real life are excellent to fantasize about.
Empress of the Moon
For some people being collared means a 24/7 relationship of total submission. I love being totally submissive, but not as an all the time thing. I only wear collars as a part of costuming either at home or in clubs. Mostly I wear chokers in fact, rather than a true collar. People make assumptions about women in collars at BDSM clubs, and I suppose men in collars too. Men don't hit on me as much when I'm wearing a choker or collar, or women either as far as that goes. They tend to assume that my boyfriend is my master, which is only true to the extent that he's the boss in the bedroom.
I only know a couple of truly collared subs. I don't know any (women) subs who have masters that are not their husbands or their live in lover. I have met a lot of boys at clubs with their mistresses and it is not unusual for a mistress to have a string of male subs. There seem to be more male subs than mistresses most of the time anyway. A lot of them wear collars, but I don't know what commitment they have beyond the evening.
The club I go to most often with my boyfriend has rules about interfering in scenes or relationships, but even if they didn't I don't think most people would, beyond the usual self centered assholes of course. I think most people in the community respect collared relationships and it is always surprising when you find out someone hasn't.
Everyone's life has so many aspects that singling out sex as a definition of your lifestyle seems silly to me anyway. I could never be permanently collared, but that's just me. I respect those who do, just like I respect married people who keep their vows. I would never try to seduce either type. Here's my ideal collar set:
I only know a couple of truly collared subs. I don't know any (women) subs who have masters that are not their husbands or their live in lover. I have met a lot of boys at clubs with their mistresses and it is not unusual for a mistress to have a string of male subs. There seem to be more male subs than mistresses most of the time anyway. A lot of them wear collars, but I don't know what commitment they have beyond the evening.
The club I go to most often with my boyfriend has rules about interfering in scenes or relationships, but even if they didn't I don't think most people would, beyond the usual self centered assholes of course. I think most people in the community respect collared relationships and it is always surprising when you find out someone hasn't.
Everyone's life has so many aspects that singling out sex as a definition of your lifestyle seems silly to me anyway. I could never be permanently collared, but that's just me. I respect those who do, just like I respect married people who keep their vows. I would never try to seduce either type. Here's my ideal collar set:
Empress of the Moon
How much money does the father make? Shouldn't a father or mother support a child in the best manner that they can afford? Should the mother be stuck with all the work of raising a child, and the father only give the kid what he wants? Yatzee is right; these people aren't like us. Rich people live much better than those of us who struggle from paycheck to paycheck, but the amount of money doesn't matter. If a man has a child by a woman he should pay child support. If he has children by three different women he should pay enough child support to all three so that they can live in the circumstances that he can afford for himself.
If this father has children by another woman and actually raises them in his home, should the child he doesn't raise be less fortunate than the ones he does?
Lafayettemister, if the father of the child devotes equal time to raising and caring for the child, getting it to bed, feeding it, changing it's diaper etc, the Linda Evangelista should also chip in 46K. Otherwise, screw him.
If this father has children by another woman and actually raises them in his home, should the child he doesn't raise be less fortunate than the ones he does?
Lafayettemister, if the father of the child devotes equal time to raising and caring for the child, getting it to bed, feeding it, changing it's diaper etc, the Linda Evangelista should also chip in 46K. Otherwise, screw him.
Empress of the Moon
Most of the images on my profile are from the Internet. They are things that I found funny or amusing. A few things are jokes for myself. I have changed icons about twenty times and only one of the pictures was of me. Most are generic icons that can be found by looking for icons under the listing right here on Lush. Crazy people read things on the Internet. I had a picture of my face at one time, but I took it down because it looked exactly like me and if anyone I knew or worked with saw it they'd know who CoopsRuthie was immediately. Only a couple of people in real life know about my Lush identity and I would prefer to keep it that way.
I have nineteen images on my image file, but they are not all viewable on my profile page. Some of the ones that are, and aren't are icons that I used at one time or another. If I were going to post pictures of a nude woman and claim she was me I'd use a woman with big breasts because. why not? That picture wouldn't be an accurate representation of my actual physical self, but it would perfectly represent the me that was meant to be. The large breasted me. The way the pictures of cocks on men's profile pages represents the real them, the big dicked version of themselves.
A lot of guys have pictures of naked women on their profile pages too. I find them more appealing than the cock shots that might or might not belong to the page's owner. I am as fond of cock as the next girl, but photos of dicks in isolation aren't really attractive. However, I don't go to guy's profile pages and complain or accuse them of using someone else's cock picture as their own, or even question them as to whether it is really theirs or not. I take it as an article of faith that all the men on Lush are massively endowed.
The can of Heinz Spotted Dick on my profile page is a genuine canned spotted dick. You may help yourself.
I have nineteen images on my image file, but they are not all viewable on my profile page. Some of the ones that are, and aren't are icons that I used at one time or another. If I were going to post pictures of a nude woman and claim she was me I'd use a woman with big breasts because. why not? That picture wouldn't be an accurate representation of my actual physical self, but it would perfectly represent the me that was meant to be. The large breasted me. The way the pictures of cocks on men's profile pages represents the real them, the big dicked version of themselves.
A lot of guys have pictures of naked women on their profile pages too. I find them more appealing than the cock shots that might or might not belong to the page's owner. I am as fond of cock as the next girl, but photos of dicks in isolation aren't really attractive. However, I don't go to guy's profile pages and complain or accuse them of using someone else's cock picture as their own, or even question them as to whether it is really theirs or not. I take it as an article of faith that all the men on Lush are massively endowed.
The can of Heinz Spotted Dick on my profile page is a genuine canned spotted dick. You may help yourself.
