Ooh, I've had an idea for something about this for a while. That's exciting.

Quote by KimmiBeGood
I would love to see what you’d do with a cuckqueen! I think there aren’t many of those because female writers won’t go there—we’re emotional, jealous beings who’d cut a man’s dick off for being with another woman, whereas men get excited with a hot wife.
That inspired me to start working on one, but it's been relegated to the folder "AWFUL POWER FANTASIES" I might be writing porn, but that kind of thing just gives me bad vibes.
Quote by CarltonStJames
At the risk of sounding stupid, do you mean if the guy is cucking his girlfriend/wife or being a hot husband?
With women being cucked, I believe it's called being a cuckquean or something along those lines. Not sure what it's officially called if dude's a hot husband.
Yes, that's what I mean. Coming to realize what I wrote makes not a whole lot of sense. I should edit it. Also, didn't know those terms were a thing.
Something I'm curious about is that I've noticed that cuckold, cheating wives and wife lovers appears to be a pretty popular genre. It got me wondering if the gendered-reverse has any popularity, or an established genre name. As in, wife watches husband have sex, or comparable.
Are these genres popular or any interest in them?
EDIT: Apparently the term is cuckqueen and hot-husband. I did not know that.
Quote by Jen
We want to read stories which start with some sort of crime, or the immediate aftermath of a crime and go on to reveal over the course of the story, just who did it. Who done it. Fine, whodunnit (and that will be the one and only time Lush will encourage the use of bad grammar).
Point of clarification, the mystery of whodunnit is critical, so something like the bank robbers celebrating after a successful robbery is a no-go?

Picture the scene. City cops secure the murder scene as cameras flash and fingerprint dust drifts in the summer heat... A car screeches to a halt in front of a bank as two people rush out, faces masked, guns waving... Gasps echo around the gallery, the gathered art lovers in disbelief as the unveiling reveals the centrepiece painting has been stolen...
I'm a bit frustrated that the day after I submitted my entry, I came up with a much more fun idea. Yeah heartbreak and melancholy are all well and good, but I figured out a way to get weird with it, which I always find so much more fulfilling.
Anyway here's my entry, I like to think it's a pretty unique take, dealing with melancholy, heartbreak, bravado, trust and pain. Feelings!
I'm working on a story that makes fun of people banning books at libraries and whatnot, when the crazy people read passages that they find objectionable, and am soliciting titles for fake banned books the weirdos can reference.
Side note, if you want to contribute, in any way what the book might be about or a sentence or two to be read out, feel free.
Quote by AvidlyCurious
Variety is the spice of life!
Just as long as it's not too much out of character, that is, like a virgin going straight into an orgy and performing like a seasoned porn star.
I don't mind chapters without sex. You could still include some sexiness or erotism without actual getting on it.
Funny you should say "variety is the spice of life" because they opening line of the first part of the story is "They say variety is the spice of life, but I've never had a taste for spice on anything" Line is subject to change.
As the subject suggests, if you're reading/invested in a multipart story, do you prefer having the same genre in each section, or some variety. I could imagine both, in that if there's variety and the subject veers into a deal-breaker or turn off, then you lose out on some of the narrative, on the other hand, the same genre could get boring or repetitive.
Beyond that, how do you feel if some sections of a multipart story don't feature sex, just character or narrative development and set up?
I'm sketching out something that I'm having a ton of fun with, it's pretty early going and I need to make the decision.
I haven't gotten to it yet, but I loved Divinity: Original Sin 1 and 2 from the same developers (Larian Studio) and turn-based CRPGs. Though, I'm a bit apprehensive about it, since my favorite parts of D&D can't be translated to a game like rule of cool, novel uses of spells and other weirdness.
Quote by Just_A_Guy_You_Know
The problem is that it draws attention away from the story and to the author themself - sort of like shouting 'hey look at me, aren't I clever?' The same problem can be found with authors who are too precious with their language and put their sense of style ahead of their plot. Before you get fancy or 'experimental' with your literary devices, focus on just telling a good, straightforward story.
By the way, I'm also guilty of not taking my own advice, so...
This makes a tremendous amount of sense.
A story I'm working on has something not dissimilar from fourth wall breaks. Specifically, the narration (not a character) provides explanations directly to the audience. Example below:
"a fairly derivative medieval fantasy land; you’ll have to forgive my not going into much depth. The limited word count for this competition and the generic nature of the world don’t warrant it. "
I'm just wondering how readers feel about that kind of thing.
This proposal is lunacy. First and most notable point, on page 21 of an FBI report on active shooters pretty clearly says "good guy with a gun" resolved active shooters less than 4% of the time.
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-study-2000-2013-1.pdf/view
Second, consider how many school shooters end up turning the gun on themselves. That report says 40% end up killing themselves. Numerous people smarter than me have argued that in these cases, the shooting is secondary to the suicide. Should that be accurate (which I have no doubt in some cases it is) having an armed security guard makes it easier for the shooter to get the ultimate goal of suicide.
See also
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/as-study-quick-reference-guide-updated1.pdf
https://www.wired.com/2012/12/why-spree-killers-kill-themselves/
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/suicide-prevention-could-prevent-mass-shootings/
Best case scenario? Shooter is stopped. Worst case scenario? New target, shooter can retrieve additional weapon and ammunition, response is delayed because shooter uses radio to call in an all clear, and other responses are delayed because on site police 'have it covered.'
Utter lunacy.