Not wishing to derail this excellent thread but on the subject of critical comments, here's an example.
I can't remember exactly which story it was, but both Kimmi (I think?) and I said we enjoyed the story premise but the author's continual usage of referring to the characters by their initial - H took off her panties, A spanked J then kissed H and stroked J's ass while J purred, etc - meant it was quite difficult to follow. So, for future reference, we mentioned it might help their readership if they tried a different system. Even fake names rather than just initials might work.
If a bunch of readers think the same thing, and I was the author, I would wonder, "aha, how about in the next story I try such and such and see if it works...?" That's what I do if someone leaves me constructive feedback.
Now, I appreciate that this is subjective, and some people may love the fact that the story is sprinkled with capital letters for the names, because it adds to the anonymous feel.
Could I have said nothing? Yes. Should I? The jury is out. If I said nothing, the next story might be the same. And the next. And if it carries on and readership dwindles, will the author be discouraged from writing altogether?
I did enjoy the story - and said so - but the mental gymnastics with the people's codenames slowed me down as a reader. I felt that was important to highlight, in as nice a manner possible, so the author knows how their story is received. That would be more valuable to me, as a writer, than someone simply getting cheesed off with the acronyms and closing the story without reading the rest, or leaving a comment.
I could have sent a PM. But if one person says it, others might chime in on the same subject, which adds credence to the viewpoint and is a signal to the author that they'd be as well to revisit that aspect of storytelling in future, if they want to grow their fan base.
